Impeach Bush, Great Meme During War!

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Annie, Feb 26, 2007.

  1. Annie
    Offline

    Annie Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2003
    Messages:
    50,847
    Thanks Received:
    4,644
    Trophy Points:
    1,790
    Ratings:
    +4,770
    http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2007/02/the_impeachment.html

     
  2. gabosaurus
    Offline

    gabosaurus Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2007
    Messages:
    95
    Thanks Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Location:
    San Francisco
    Ratings:
    +5
    If a president creates a war, shouldn't he be held liable for doing so?
    Hitler also started a war. Look what happened to him.
     
  3. Little-Acorn
    Offline

    Little-Acorn Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2006
    Messages:
    8,321
    Thanks Received:
    2,016
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    Ratings:
    +5,818
    Impeachment and the war are unrelated. Democrats were circulating the first impeachment petitions the day after the November 2000 election, before Bush had even taken office, much less changed the government's course on Islamic terrorists.

    When we were attacked on Sept. 11, 2001, they simply seized on Bush's subsequent actions as new excuses to continue their impeachment efforts.

    Their efforts had no more basis in reality after 9/11, than before. An irrelevance which continues to this day.
     
  4. Avatar4321
    Offline

    Avatar4321 Diamond Member Gold Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2004
    Messages:
    70,537
    Thanks Received:
    8,161
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Ratings:
    +12,153
    Contrary to the opinion of the fast left wackos, President Bush didn't cause 9/11.

    We didn't start the war. we are just making sure it ends with us as the winners.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  5. trobinett
    Offline

    trobinett Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2004
    Messages:
    1,832
    Thanks Received:
    162
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Arkansas, The Ozarks
    Ratings:
    +162
    Wonder how MANY times the left has to be reminded of that simple FACT?
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  6. Merlin
    Offline

    Merlin Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2004
    Messages:
    405
    Thanks Received:
    61
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    Ponchatoula, La.
    Ratings:
    +61
    Yes, if a President starts a war he should be held responsible. But thanks to our forefathers that wrote the constitution, it is an impossibility for a United States President to start a war. Congress starts wars, the President calls the shot after it is started. Hitler wasn't a President, he was a dictator.
     
  7. gabosaurus
    Offline

    gabosaurus Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2007
    Messages:
    95
    Thanks Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Location:
    San Francisco
    Ratings:
    +5
    What if the president gains authority to start a war through blatant lies and misinformation? This is what happened in Iraq. Bush misled Congress, for his own personal gain.

    Contrary to the opinion of the fast left wackos, President Bush didn't cause 9/11.
    He certainly did nothing to stop it from happening. Mostly because Sept. 11 benefitted the Bush agenda, which was to avenge his daddy by taking out Saddam Hussein. It also gave rise to his alleged "war on terror," which has been his primary operating plan since. Sept. 11 was the greatest day of the Bush presidency.

    We didn't start the war. we are just making sure it ends with us as the winners.

    How do you figure that? Who invaded who here? The United States invaded and occupied a sovereign nation that did not attack us, had no plans to attack us and offered no threat to us.
     
  8. Merlin
    Offline

    Merlin Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2004
    Messages:
    405
    Thanks Received:
    61
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    Ponchatoula, La.
    Ratings:
    +61
    For argument sake only, if the United States did in fact invade Iraq, why don't you just change Congressmen that encouraged the invasion, and tell the next ones to get the CIA to get the facts straight before they invade another country? Bush listened to the Representatives for a year and a half, which by the way included as many Democrats as Republicans, before they talked him into going into Iraq. Kerry and Hilbillery both encouraged him to go.
     
  9. gabosaurus
    Offline

    gabosaurus Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2007
    Messages:
    95
    Thanks Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Location:
    San Francisco
    Ratings:
    +5
    How can you say that the U.S. did not invade Iraq? That is like say that the moon landing or the Holocaust never happened. We invaded a sovereign country without a valid reason. Other than to avenge what Saddam said about Bush's daddy.
    Now let's talk about WHY Congress encouraged the invasion. It is because Bush outright LIED to them. Lied about WMD, lied about implied threats, lied about Iraq's alleged involvement in Sept. 11. Bush is a habitual liar who sold the Congress a bill of goods.
    Bush had the invasion planned from the first day of his presidency. Which is why, in the time period after Sept. 11, he sent 10,000 troops to Afghanistan and 120,000 to Iraq. More lies and deception.
     
  10. roadhouse158
    Offline

    roadhouse158 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2006
    Messages:
    122
    Thanks Received:
    30
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +30
    Hmmm..I thought that before 9/11 North Korea was the big news item of the day. There is only ONE item of misinformation that Bush told Congress, who in turn learned it from Intelligence. That is Saddam was trying to get uranium from Niger. It wasn't a lie, or MISLEADING....Congress has every right to investigate all matters too. This rumor wasn't started by our intelligence in the first place. It was started by either Russia or France. And don't confuse WMD's with Nukes solely. They also mean chemical and biological weapons, which Saddam clearly had, and used in the past. Post 9/11 was not a time to screw with America. Saddam was told what SEVERAL COUNTRIES thought he had, and he in turn wouldn't let weapons Inspectors in....Matter of fact, he kicked them out. He looked guilty as hell. That's why I have no problems with the invasion. None whatsoever. You don't toy with the strongest nation in the world right after it was attacked. Very stupid. Yes they never found any weapons. Hell....They never found O.J. guilty either. It wasn't news we were invading. He had months to move them, IF he had them. Again IF is WAYYYYYY besides the point now. Impeaching Bush is a FARCE. Ridiculous. Now we can't leave because then Iraq is up for grabs. I know a lot of Bush haters truly hope Iraq is taken over by a terrorist regime. They truly do. This way they can say he was a grave failure....Guess what ignorant.....If Bush looses....So do you....Your still Americans.....Na....Your Democrats. I forgot...Somewhere along the lines, you receded from the Union:eusa_snooty:
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1

Share This Page