Immigration....Who To Invite In?

.
Immigration....Who To Invite In?

Well, we can no longer trust the French, Italians, Spanish, English or Germans.
We don't like or want the Mexicans, Haitians, PRs, Syrians, Muslims or Canadians.
All that leaves left to invite in are the Israelis, Indians, Japanese and Australians and most of them are content where they are.

I say leave the status quo, 320 million is about 100 million more than we need anyway. Close the borders and fuck 'em all, except anyone from that last list.
 
.
Immigration....Who To Invite In?

Well, we can no longer trust the French, Italians, Spanish, English or Germans.
We don't like or want the Mexicans, Haitians, PRs, Syrians, Muslims or Canadians.
All that leaves left to invite in are the Israelis, Indians, Japanese and Australians and most of them are content where they are.

I say leave the status quo, 320 million is about 100 million more than we need anyway. Close the borders and fuck 'em all, except anyone from that last list.

It's at least 400 million, counting the illegal aliens the Democrats have enticed/allowed in.


But the number is not the problem.
 
.
Immigration....Who To Invite In?

Well, we can no longer trust the French, Italians, Spanish, English or Germans.
We don't like or want the Mexicans, Haitians, PRs, Syrians, Muslims or Canadians.
All that leaves left to invite in are the Israelis, Indians, Japanese and Australians and most of them are content where they are.

I say leave the status quo, 320 million is about 100 million more than we need anyway. Close the borders and fuck 'em all, except anyone from that last list.

It's at least 400 million, counting the illegal aliens the Democrats have enticed/allowed in.


But the number is not the problem.
only lousy capitalists lose money on border policy. all foreign nationals in the US should have a federal id. the law of large numbers is good for revenue purposes.
 
.....and why?


“In all, nearly 60 percent of immigrants—legal and illegal—are on government assistance, compared with 39 percent of native households. Why would any country voluntarily bring in people who have to be supported by the taxpayer?”
Ann Coulter, ¡Adios, America!: The Left's Plan to Turn Our Country into a Third World Hellhole



1. Here's the answer: the reason that the Democrats/Liberals encourage illegal immigration is for one reason and one reason only: illegals vote for the Democrats.

There is no other benefit to this nation.
None.
Illegals keep wages low, and unemployment of Americans high; it costs billions in welfare services and police costs high.
It is only through the actions of Democrats and illegal aliens that the Left is able to claim a popular vote victory in the last election.
After all, Obama told illegal aliens to get out and vote.


2. Continuing on the theme, one of education for the deluded Democrat voters....

“The New York State Department of Corrections has collected information about the top ten nationalities in its prisons for years—.... Foreign inmates were 70 percent more likely to have committed a violent crime than American criminals. They were also twice as likely to have committed a class A felony, such as aggravated murder, kidnapping, and terrorism."
Data here: http://www.doccs.ny.gov/Research/Reports/2008/Impact_of_Foreign-Born_Inmates_2008.pdf

But....what the heck.....they vote Democrat.



3. In 2010, the top ten countries of the foreign-born inmates in NY were:

Dominican Republic: 1,314

Jamaica: 849

Mexico: 523

Guyana: 289

El Salvador: 245

Cuba: 242

Trinidad and Tobago: 237

Haiti: 201

Ecuador: 189

Colombia: 168


BTW....between 1985 and 1999, the native-born in the prison population increased 99%.
During that time, the foreign-born in the prison population increased 251%.
http://www.doccs.ny.gov/Research/Reports/2010/ForeignBorn_IRP_Report_2009.pdf

Gee.....it's almost as if they were invited in......


4. Of course this is not the slant one gets from the house organ of the Democrat Party, the NYTimes.

"Most readers are agog at the number of Dominicans in New York prisons, having spent years reading New York Times articles about Dominicans’ “entrepreneurial zeal,”21 and “traditional immigrant virtues.” Even in an article about the Dominicans’ domination of the crack cocaine business, the Times praised their “savvy,” which had allowed them to become “highly successful” drug dealers, then hailed their drug-infested neighborhoods as the “embodiment of the American Dream—a vibrant, energetic urban melting pot.”
Ann Coulter, ¡Adios, America!: The Left's Plan to Turn Our Country into a Third World Hellhole


Hence, the importance of re-education camps for Liberal simpletons: balance the truth about what Democrat policies have done, and who they have invited to a neighborhood near you.



There is an answer.....I'll get to it.
60% of immigrants are not on government assistance. This number has been widely circulated for some time and is no more true today than it was when first released. What is true is that a study found 60% of immigrant families have had at least one person on government assistance at one time or another, typically either and free and reduce lunch programs or SNAP. Thus if one person, say a child is on a free and reduced lunch program, the entire family is considered to be on government support.

A much more unbiased recent study has been released by the CATO institute, a libertarian, conservative think tank which found immigrants had a lower usage than native born Americans when considerably all government support. Even when the study looked at strictly welfare benefits, there was only a slightly higher use by immigrants.

The study found that immigrants consume 39 percent fewer federal benefits relative to all natives, largely because they are less likely to receive Social Security retirement benefits and Medicare. Immigrants consume 27 percent fewer benefits relative to natives with similar incomes and ages. Only when you look at SNAP and free and reduced lunch programs do we see significantly higher usage. However, since those programs reports usage by family and not individuals, the actually per person usage may be much less.

https://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/irpb6.pdf
Key findings about U.S. immigrants
about-u-s-immigrants/

Do we need to do a better job of selecting immigrants. You bet we do. The selection process today is based on national origin or race, a section process that would be illegal and unconstitutional for native Americans. Most of the selection process is done by computer, checking nationality, terrorist and criminal databases, profession, and educational level. However, for most countries nationality is the most important criteria which out weights almost everything else. In the 20 minute immigration interview which focuses on checking documents clarifying application data, checking fee payments, and health certifications there is is essential no part of the immigration process that focuses on the personnel accomplishments of the individual. It is a bureaucratic process that completely ignores the traits that have made America great.
 
Last edited:
.....and why?


“In all, nearly 60 percent of immigrants—legal and illegal—are on government assistance, compared with 39 percent of native households. Why would any country voluntarily bring in people who have to be supported by the taxpayer?”
Ann Coulter, ¡Adios, America!: The Left's Plan to Turn Our Country into a Third World Hellhole



1. Here's the answer: the reason that the Democrats/Liberals encourage illegal immigration is for one reason and one reason only: illegals vote for the Democrats.

There is no other benefit to this nation.
None.
Illegals keep wages low, and unemployment of Americans high; it costs billions in welfare services and police costs high.
It is only through the actions of Democrats and illegal aliens that the Left is able to claim a popular vote victory in the last election.
After all, Obama told illegal aliens to get out and vote.


2. Continuing on the theme, one of education for the deluded Democrat voters....

“The New York State Department of Corrections has collected information about the top ten nationalities in its prisons for years—.... Foreign inmates were 70 percent more likely to have committed a violent crime than American criminals. They were also twice as likely to have committed a class A felony, such as aggravated murder, kidnapping, and terrorism."
Data here: http://www.doccs.ny.gov/Research/Reports/2008/Impact_of_Foreign-Born_Inmates_2008.pdf

But....what the heck.....they vote Democrat.



3. In 2010, the top ten countries of the foreign-born inmates in NY were:

Dominican Republic: 1,314

Jamaica: 849

Mexico: 523

Guyana: 289

El Salvador: 245

Cuba: 242

Trinidad and Tobago: 237

Haiti: 201

Ecuador: 189

Colombia: 168


BTW....between 1985 and 1999, the native-born in the prison population increased 99%.
During that time, the foreign-born in the prison population increased 251%.
http://www.doccs.ny.gov/Research/Reports/2010/ForeignBorn_IRP_Report_2009.pdf

Gee.....it's almost as if they were invited in......


4. Of course this is not the slant one gets from the house organ of the Democrat Party, the NYTimes.

"Most readers are agog at the number of Dominicans in New York prisons, having spent years reading New York Times articles about Dominicans’ “entrepreneurial zeal,”21 and “traditional immigrant virtues.” Even in an article about the Dominicans’ domination of the crack cocaine business, the Times praised their “savvy,” which had allowed them to become “highly successful” drug dealers, then hailed their drug-infested neighborhoods as the “embodiment of the American Dream—a vibrant, energetic urban melting pot.”
Ann Coulter, ¡Adios, America!: The Left's Plan to Turn Our Country into a Third World Hellhole


Hence, the importance of re-education camps for Liberal simpletons: balance the truth about what Democrat policies have done, and who they have invited to a neighborhood near you.



There is an answer.....I'll get to it.
60% of immigrants are not on government assistance. This number has been widely circulated for some time and is no more true today than it was when first released. What is true is that a study found 60% of immigrant families have had at least one person on government assistance at one time or another, typically either and free and reduce lunch programs or SNAP. Thus if one person, say a child is on a free and reduced lunch program, the entire family is considered to be on government support.

A much more unbiased recent study has been released by the CATO institute, a libertarian, conservative think tank which found immigrants had a lower usage than native born Americans when considerably all government support. Even when the study looked at strictly welfare benefits, there was only a slightly higher use by immigrants.

The study found that immigrants consume 39 percent fewer federal benefits relative to all natives, largely because they are less likely to receive Social Security retirement benefits and Medicare. Immigrants consume 27 percent fewer benefits relative to natives with similar incomes and ages. Only when you look at SNAP and free and reduced lunch programs do we see significantly higher usage. However, since those programs reports usage by family and not individuals, so the actually per person usage may be much less.

https://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/irpb6.pdf
Key findings about U.S. immigrants
about-u-s-immigrants/

Do we need to do a better job of selecting immigrants. You bet we do. The selection process today is based on national origin or race, a section process that would be illegal and unconstitutional for native Americans. Most of the selection process is done by computer, checking nationality, terrorist and criminal databases, profession, and educational level. However, for most countries nationality is the most important criteria which out weights almost everything else. In the 20 minute immigration interview which focuses on checking documents and clarifying application data, there is is essential no part of the immigration process that focuses on the personnel accomplishments of the individual. It is a bureaucratic process that completely ignores the traits that have made America great.


"60% of immigrants are not on government assistance. This number has been widely circulated for some time and is no more true today than it was when first released. What is true is that a study found 60% of immigrant families have had at least one person on government assistance at one time or another, typically either and free and reduce lunch programs or SNAP. Thus if one person, say a child is on a free and reduced lunch program, the entire family is considered to be on government support."


How about you pay for them, rather than stealing from the public fisc to support your party?





"...immigrants consume 39 percent fewer federal benefits relative to all natives, ..."
Why must you Liberals lie, and conflate immigrants with illegal immigrants????

“The conservative Heritage Foundation estimated unlawful immigrant households paid $39.2 billion in 2010, but received $93.7 billion in government services.” -- Oliver Darcy

[So much for that fable.]

15 Stats That Destroy Liberal Narratives



And, the money taken from working Americans is sent to Mexico by these Mexican citizens....more money than the

"Remittances totaled more than oil income

Money sent from abroad came to $24.8 billion last year, up 4.75%

Mexico News Daily | Tuesday, February 2, 2016

Remittances sent home by Mexicans working outside the country surpassed [Mexican] petroleum revenues in 2015 for the first time.

There was a 4.75% increase in money sent from abroad, most of which comes from the U.S., to total US $24.8 billion last year, up from $23.6 billion in 2014, said the Bank of México.


The bank said it was the first time remittances had totaled more than petroleum revenues since it began tracking them in 1995.


Oil revenues last year totaled $23.4 billion."

Remittances totaled more than Mexico's oil income








"Do we need to do a better job of selecting immigrants. You bet we do. "

Here I am.....now, what are your other two wishes?



 
.....and why?

My post was about legal immigrants.
“In all, nearly 60 percent of immigrants—legal and illegal—are on government assistance, compared with 39 percent of native households. Why would any country voluntarily bring in people who have to be supported by the taxpayer?”
Ann Coulter, ¡Adios, America!: The Left's Plan to Turn Our Country into a Third World Hellhole



1. Here's the answer: the reason that the Democrats/Liberals encourage illegal immigration is for one reason and one reason only: illegals vote for the Democrats.

There is no other benefit to this nation.
None.
Illegals keep wages low, and unemployment of Americans high; it costs billions in welfare services and police costs high.
It is only through the actions of Democrats and illegal aliens that the Left is able to claim a popular vote victory in the last election.
After all, Obama told illegal aliens to get out and vote.


2. Continuing on the theme, one of education for the deluded Democrat voters....

“The New York State Department of Corrections has collected information about the top ten nationalities in its prisons for years—.... Foreign inmates were 70 percent more likely to have committed a violent crime than American criminals. They were also twice as likely to have committed a class A felony, such as aggravated murder, kidnapping, and terrorism."
Data here: http://www.doccs.ny.gov/Research/Reports/2008/Impact_of_Foreign-Born_Inmates_2008.pdf

But....what the heck.....they vote Democrat.



3. In 2010, the top ten countries of the foreign-born inmates in NY were:

Dominican Republic: 1,314

Jamaica: 849

Mexico: 523

Guyana: 289

El Salvador: 245

Cuba: 242

Trinidad and Tobago: 237

Haiti: 201

Ecuador: 189

Colombia: 168


BTW....between 1985 and 1999, the native-born in the prison population increased 99%.
During that time, the foreign-born in the prison population increased 251%.
http://www.doccs.ny.gov/Research/Reports/2010/ForeignBorn_IRP_Report_2009.pdf

Gee.....it's almost as if they were invited in......


4. Of course this is not the slant one gets from the house organ of the Democrat Party, the NYTimes.

"Most readers are agog at the number of Dominicans in New York prisons, having spent years reading New York Times articles about Dominicans’ “entrepreneurial zeal,”21 and “traditional immigrant virtues.” Even in an article about the Dominicans’ domination of the crack cocaine business, the Times praised their “savvy,” which had allowed them to become “highly successful” drug dealers, then hailed their drug-infested neighborhoods as the “embodiment of the American Dream—a vibrant, energetic urban melting pot.”
Ann Coulter, ¡Adios, America!: The Left's Plan to Turn Our Country into a Third World Hellhole


Hence, the importance of re-education camps for Liberal simpletons: balance the truth about what Democrat policies have done, and who they have invited to a neighborhood near you.



There is an answer.....I'll get to it.
60% of immigrants are not on government assistance. This number has been widely circulated for some time and is no more true today than it was when first released. What is true is that a study found 60% of immigrant families have had at least one person on government assistance at one time or another, typically either and free and reduce lunch programs or SNAP. Thus if one person, say a child is on a free and reduced lunch program, the entire family is considered to be on government support.

A much more unbiased recent study has been released by the CATO institute, a libertarian, conservative think tank which found immigrants had a lower usage than native born Americans when considerably all government support. Even when the study looked at strictly welfare benefits, there was only a slightly higher use by immigrants.

The study found that immigrants consume 39 percent fewer federal benefits relative to all natives, largely because they are less likely to receive Social Security retirement benefits and Medicare. Immigrants consume 27 percent fewer benefits relative to natives with similar incomes and ages. Only when you look at SNAP and free and reduced lunch programs do we see significantly higher usage. However, since those programs reports usage by family and not individuals, so the actually per person usage may be much less.

https://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/irpb6.pdf
Key findings about U.S. immigrants
about-u-s-immigrants/

Do we need to do a better job of selecting immigrants. You bet we do. The selection process today is based on national origin or race, a section process that would be illegal and unconstitutional for native Americans. Most of the selection process is done by computer, checking nationality, terrorist and criminal databases, profession, and educational level. However, for most countries nationality is the most important criteria which out weights almost everything else. In the 20 minute immigration interview which focuses on checking documents and clarifying application data, there is is essential no part of the immigration process that focuses on the personnel accomplishments of the individual. It is a bureaucratic process that completely ignores the traits that have made America great.


"60% of immigrants are not on government assistance. This number has been widely circulated for some time and is no more true today than it was when first released. What is true is that a study found 60% of immigrant families have had at least one person on government assistance at one time or another, typically either and free and reduce lunch programs or SNAP. Thus if one person, say a child is on a free and reduced lunch program, the entire family is considered to be on government support."


How about you pay for them, rather than stealing from the public fisc to support your party?





"...immigrants consume 39 percent fewer federal benefits relative to all natives, ..."
Why must you Liberals lie, and conflate immigrants with illegal immigrants????

“The conservative Heritage Foundation estimated unlawful immigrant households paid $39.2 billion in 2010, but received $93.7 billion in government services.” -- Oliver Darcy

[So much for that fable.]

15 Stats That Destroy Liberal Narratives



And, the money taken from working Americans is sent to Mexico by these Mexican citizens....more money than the

"Remittances totaled more than oil income

Money sent from abroad came to $24.8 billion last year, up 4.75%

Mexico News Daily | Tuesday, February 2, 2016

Remittances sent home by Mexicans working outside the country surpassed [Mexican] petroleum revenues in 2015 for the first time.

There was a 4.75% increase in money sent from abroad, most of which comes from the U.S., to total US $24.8 billion last year, up from $23.6 billion in 2014, said the Bank of México.


The bank said it was the first time remittances had totaled more than petroleum revenues since it began tracking them in 1995.


Oil revenues last year totaled $23.4 billion."

Remittances totaled more than Mexico's oil income








"Do we need to do a better job of selecting immigrants. You bet we do. "

Here I am.....now, what are your other two wishes?


My post is about legal immigrants. Most of the data on illegal immigrants are estimates based on census data and surveys. There is no way to know whether remittances sent out of the country come from illegal immigrants, legal immigrants, or US citizens. It is an estimate based how the money was transferred or surveys.
 
Last edited:
.....and why?


“In all, nearly 60 percent of immigrants—legal and illegal—are on government assistance, compared with 39 percent of native households. Why would any country voluntarily bring in people who have to be supported by the taxpayer?”
Ann Coulter, ¡Adios, America!: The Left's Plan to Turn Our Country into a Third World Hellhole



1. Here's the answer: the reason that the Democrats/Liberals encourage illegal immigration is for one reason and one reason only: illegals vote for the Democrats.

There is no other benefit to this nation.
None.
Illegals keep wages low, and unemployment of Americans high; it costs billions in welfare services and police costs high.
It is only through the actions of Democrats and illegal aliens that the Left is able to claim a popular vote victory in the last election.
After all, Obama told illegal aliens to get out and vote.


2. Continuing on the theme, one of education for the deluded Democrat voters....

“The New York State Department of Corrections has collected information about the top ten nationalities in its prisons for years—.... Foreign inmates were 70 percent more likely to have committed a violent crime than American criminals. They were also twice as likely to have committed a class A felony, such as aggravated murder, kidnapping, and terrorism."
Data here: http://www.doccs.ny.gov/Research/Reports/2008/Impact_of_Foreign-Born_Inmates_2008.pdf

But....what the heck.....they vote Democrat.



3. In 2010, the top ten countries of the foreign-born inmates in NY were:

Dominican Republic: 1,314

Jamaica: 849

Mexico: 523

Guyana: 289

El Salvador: 245

Cuba: 242

Trinidad and Tobago: 237

Haiti: 201

Ecuador: 189

Colombia: 168


BTW....between 1985 and 1999, the native-born in the prison population increased 99%.
During that time, the foreign-born in the prison population increased 251%.
http://www.doccs.ny.gov/Research/Reports/2010/ForeignBorn_IRP_Report_2009.pdf

Gee.....it's almost as if they were invited in......


4. Of course this is not the slant one gets from the house organ of the Democrat Party, the NYTimes.

"Most readers are agog at the number of Dominicans in New York prisons, having spent years reading New York Times articles about Dominicans’ “entrepreneurial zeal,”21 and “traditional immigrant virtues.” Even in an article about the Dominicans’ domination of the crack cocaine business, the Times praised their “savvy,” which had allowed them to become “highly successful” drug dealers, then hailed their drug-infested neighborhoods as the “embodiment of the American Dream—a vibrant, energetic urban melting pot.”
Ann Coulter, ¡Adios, America!: The Left's Plan to Turn Our Country into a Third World Hellhole


Hence, the importance of re-education camps for Liberal simpletons: balance the truth about what Democrat policies have done, and who they have invited to a neighborhood near you.



There is an answer.....I'll get to it.
I voted today, and called my Democrat Senator Jones. This illegal entry to the Nation is got to stop. Stopping it will help solve the drug problem and crime problems and save money on welfare. At the end of this year we will be better then before or starting to be a third world country as Soros wants.

Soros himself made the statement many times he needs this country to fail from within.


A current tool of deconstruction is the immigration chaos caused by 20 million illegal aliens residing in the United States. Add to this the proposed U.S. Senate immigration legislation supported by Soros-funded special interest groups. Open-society advocates realize that open borders can only mean a devaluation of citizenship, of voting, of patriotism, and love of country. Open borders mean equal opportunity for dismantling the United States.
 
.....and why?


“In all, nearly 60 percent of immigrants—legal and illegal—are on government assistance, compared with 39 percent of native households. Why would any country voluntarily bring in people who have to be supported by the taxpayer?”
Ann Coulter, ¡Adios, America!: The Left's Plan to Turn Our Country into a Third World Hellhole



1. Here's the answer: the reason that the Democrats/Liberals encourage illegal immigration is for one reason and one reason only: illegals vote for the Democrats.

There is no other benefit to this nation.
None.
Illegals keep wages low, and unemployment of Americans high; it costs billions in welfare services and police costs high.
It is only through the actions of Democrats and illegal aliens that the Left is able to claim a popular vote victory in the last election.
After all, Obama told illegal aliens to get out and vote.


2. Continuing on the theme, one of education for the deluded Democrat voters....

“The New York State Department of Corrections has collected information about the top ten nationalities in its prisons for years—.... Foreign inmates were 70 percent more likely to have committed a violent crime than American criminals. They were also twice as likely to have committed a class A felony, such as aggravated murder, kidnapping, and terrorism."
Data here: http://www.doccs.ny.gov/Research/Reports/2008/Impact_of_Foreign-Born_Inmates_2008.pdf

But....what the heck.....they vote Democrat.



3. In 2010, the top ten countries of the foreign-born inmates in NY were:

Dominican Republic: 1,314

Jamaica: 849

Mexico: 523

Guyana: 289

El Salvador: 245

Cuba: 242

Trinidad and Tobago: 237

Haiti: 201

Ecuador: 189

Colombia: 168


BTW....between 1985 and 1999, the native-born in the prison population increased 99%.
During that time, the foreign-born in the prison population increased 251%.
http://www.doccs.ny.gov/Research/Reports/2010/ForeignBorn_IRP_Report_2009.pdf

Gee.....it's almost as if they were invited in......


4. Of course this is not the slant one gets from the house organ of the Democrat Party, the NYTimes.

"Most readers are agog at the number of Dominicans in New York prisons, having spent years reading New York Times articles about Dominicans’ “entrepreneurial zeal,”21 and “traditional immigrant virtues.” Even in an article about the Dominicans’ domination of the crack cocaine business, the Times praised their “savvy,” which had allowed them to become “highly successful” drug dealers, then hailed their drug-infested neighborhoods as the “embodiment of the American Dream—a vibrant, energetic urban melting pot.”
Ann Coulter, ¡Adios, America!: The Left's Plan to Turn Our Country into a Third World Hellhole


Hence, the importance of re-education camps for Liberal simpletons: balance the truth about what Democrat policies have done, and who they have invited to a neighborhood near you.



There is an answer.....I'll get to it.
I voted today, and called my Democrat Senator Jones. This illegal entry to the Nation is got to stop. Stopping it will help solve the drug problem and crime problems and save money on welfare. At the end of this year we will be better then before or starting to be a third world country as Soros wants.

Soros himself made the statement many times he needs this country to fail from within.


A current tool of deconstruction is the immigration chaos caused by 20 million illegal aliens residing in the United States. Add to this the proposed U.S. Senate immigration legislation supported by Soros-funded special interest groups. Open-society advocates realize that open borders can only mean a devaluation of citizenship, of voting, of patriotism, and love of country. Open borders mean equal opportunity for dismantling the United States.
.....and why?


“In all, nearly 60 percent of immigrants—legal and illegal—are on government assistance, compared with 39 percent of native households. Why would any country voluntarily bring in people who have to be supported by the taxpayer?”
Ann Coulter, ¡Adios, America!: The Left's Plan to Turn Our Country into a Third World Hellhole



1. Here's the answer: the reason that the Democrats/Liberals encourage illegal immigration is for one reason and one reason only: illegals vote for the Democrats.

There is no other benefit to this nation.
None.
Illegals keep wages low, and unemployment of Americans high; it costs billions in welfare services and police costs high.
It is only through the actions of Democrats and illegal aliens that the Left is able to claim a popular vote victory in the last election.
After all, Obama told illegal aliens to get out and vote.


2. Continuing on the theme, one of education for the deluded Democrat voters....

“The New York State Department of Corrections has collected information about the top ten nationalities in its prisons for years—.... Foreign inmates were 70 percent more likely to have committed a violent crime than American criminals. They were also twice as likely to have committed a class A felony, such as aggravated murder, kidnapping, and terrorism."
Data here: http://www.doccs.ny.gov/Research/Reports/2008/Impact_of_Foreign-Born_Inmates_2008.pdf

But....what the heck.....they vote Democrat.



3. In 2010, the top ten countries of the foreign-born inmates in NY were:

Dominican Republic: 1,314

Jamaica: 849

Mexico: 523

Guyana: 289

El Salvador: 245

Cuba: 242

Trinidad and Tobago: 237

Haiti: 201

Ecuador: 189

Colombia: 168


BTW....between 1985 and 1999, the native-born in the prison population increased 99%.
During that time, the foreign-born in the prison population increased 251%.
http://www.doccs.ny.gov/Research/Reports/2010/ForeignBorn_IRP_Report_2009.pdf

Gee.....it's almost as if they were invited in......


4. Of course this is not the slant one gets from the house organ of the Democrat Party, the NYTimes.

"Most readers are agog at the number of Dominicans in New York prisons, having spent years reading New York Times articles about Dominicans’ “entrepreneurial zeal,”21 and “traditional immigrant virtues.” Even in an article about the Dominicans’ domination of the crack cocaine business, the Times praised their “savvy,” which had allowed them to become “highly successful” drug dealers, then hailed their drug-infested neighborhoods as the “embodiment of the American Dream—a vibrant, energetic urban melting pot.”
Ann Coulter, ¡Adios, America!: The Left's Plan to Turn Our Country into a Third World Hellhole


Hence, the importance of re-education camps for Liberal simpletons: balance the truth about what Democrat policies have done, and who they have invited to a neighborhood near you.



There is an answer.....I'll get to it.
I voted today, and called my Democrat Senator Jones. This illegal entry to the Nation is got to stop. Stopping it will help solve the drug problem and crime problems and save money on welfare. At the end of this year we will be better then before or starting to be a third world country as Soros wants.

Soros himself made the statement many times he needs this country to fail from within.


A current tool of deconstruction is the immigration chaos caused by 20 million illegal aliens residing in the United States. Add to this the proposed U.S. Senate immigration legislation supported by Soros-funded special interest groups. Open-society advocates realize that open borders can only mean a devaluation of citizenship, of voting, of patriotism, and love of country. Open borders mean equal opportunity for dismantling the United States.
I agree open boarders would be a disaster but I really think there is little chance of that happening regardless of which side is in charge. Open boarders only make sense when there is little difference between nations, both economically and socially. I suspect we are at least a hundred years from reaching that point.

A recent study by the Center for Migration Studies indicates a sharp decline in the U.S. undocumented population over a six-year period. Although illegal immigrants are still entering the US, the number leaving has increased substantially over the last few years. The bottom line is that illegal immigrants in the US are slowly declining. Better border security and an improving economy in Mexico has reduced border crossings.

Solving the crisis in Central America would reduce illegal immigration in the US substantially. Trump's threat to cut off foreign aid to Honduras is a good first step since this aid is only making life worst for Hondurans.
 
mrz102718dAPR20181027044506.jpg
 
Don 't let anyone in.Not one person. We should have zero immigration levels for at least the next 10 years.We are full up--hang out the "no vacancy" sign.
 
Don 't let anyone in.Not one person. We should have zero immigration levels for at least the next 10 years.We are full up--hang out the "no vacancy" sign.


Not going to happen. Next infantile fantasy?
 
Don 't let anyone in.Not one person. We should have zero immigration levels for at least the next 10 years.We are full up--hang out the "no vacancy" sign.


Not going to happen. Next infantile fantasy?


I agree with you that it isn't going to happen, but let's not forget that it DID happen.


. "Earlier American presidents, Republicans and Democrats alike, agreed on two basic goals: teach the newcomers English and make them Americans. The clear aim was to strengthen our national identity--to reinforce the unum in e pluribus unum--by assimilating the new arrivals into American civilization."
Anti-Americanization

America was founded as a unique, singular experiment with the two definitions of conservatism as its parameters, and from much of American history, it was expected that immigrants came here respecting those views, and/or were ready to assume them.


In fact, due to the huge wave of immigration in earlier times, the nation took a breather, as it were, from immigration....and, from 1924 to 1965, immigration was almost completely discontinued.
That was the time allowed for new Americans to incorporate the views and values that would make them Americans....real Americans.
Not Liberals, or Progressives.





Liberals/Democrats insisted on changing immigration policies in the country, claiming that it would not alter national traditions...
" just after Kennedy’s election to the United States Senate in 1952, he co-sponsored legislation – drafted by Senator Herbert H. Lehman – proposing to recast the nation’s immigration policy. Senator Kennedy subsequently would assume a supporting role in drafting the Refugee-Escapee Act (1957). Two years later he collaborated with Senators Hubert H. Humphrey and Philip A. Hart on the preparation of comprehensive immigration reform legislation. "The Compromise Over Immigration in 1965 that Is to Blame for Much of the Mess Today
 
STATUE OF LIBERTY
“Give me your tired, your poor/Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free/The wretched refuse of your teeming shore/Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me/I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”

"The Statue of Liberty Enlightening the World" was a gift of friendship from the people of France to the United States and is recognized as a universal symbol of freedom and democracy. The Statue of Liberty was dedicated on October 28, 1886. It was designated as a National Monument in 1924. Employees of the National Park Service have been caring for the colossal copper statue since 1933.

In 1892, the U.S. government opened a federal immigration station on Ellis Island, located near Bedloe’s Island in Upper New York Bay. Between 1892 and 1954, some 12 million immigrants were processed on Ellis Island before receiving permission to enter the United States. From 1900-14, during the peak years of its operation, some 5,000 to 10,000 people passed through every day.

Ellis Island, in Upper New York Bay, was the gateway for over 12 million immigrants to the U.S. as the United States' busiest immigrant inspection station for over 60 years from 1892 until 1954. Ellis Island was opened January 1, 1892. Wikipedia

How far would you travel to find a better life? What if the journey took weeks under difficult conditions? If you answered "Whatever it takes," you echo the feelings of the 12 million immigrants who passed through these now quiet halls from 1892 to 1954. Ellis Island afforded them the opportunity to attain the American dream for themselves and their descendants. Come hear their stories
Ellis Island Part of Statue of Liberty National Monument (U.S. National Park Service)
 
STATUE OF LIBERTY
“Give me your tired, your poor/Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free/The wretched refuse of your teeming shore/Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me/I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”

"The Statue of Liberty Enlightening the World" was a gift of friendship from the people of France to the United States and is recognized as a universal symbol of freedom and democracy. The Statue of Liberty was dedicated on October 28, 1886. It was designated as a National Monument in 1924. Employees of the National Park Service have been caring for the colossal copper statue since 1933.

In 1892, the U.S. government opened a federal immigration station on Ellis Island, located near Bedloe’s Island in Upper New York Bay. Between 1892 and 1954, some 12 million immigrants were processed on Ellis Island before receiving permission to enter the United States. From 1900-14, during the peak years of its operation, some 5,000 to 10,000 people passed through every day.

Ellis Island, in Upper New York Bay, was the gateway for over 12 million immigrants to the U.S. as the United States' busiest immigrant inspection station for over 60 years from 1892 until 1954. Ellis Island was opened January 1, 1892. Wikipedia

How far would you travel to find a better life? What if the journey took weeks under difficult conditions? If you answered "Whatever it takes," you echo the feelings of the 12 million immigrants who passed through these now quiet halls from 1892 to 1954. Ellis Island afforded them the opportunity to attain the American dream for themselves and their descendants. Come hear their stories
Ellis Island Part of Statue of Liberty National Monument (U.S. National Park Service)



That's a poem, not a public policy, you dunce.

More to the point, it was put on the statue in 1903.


Ten years later the income tax amendment was passed, and hordes could now come for welfare, rather than opportunity.


Get it, moron?????
 
Get it, moron?????

Oh wise one, you leave me speechless; Your intellect is beyond reproach, your beauty shines even in the dark. Yet I must admit, you stink like pig poop.

:)-



I provided facts that you are unable to deal with.

Here's the prob for Liberals....when you're a part of the 'masses'.....sometimes the 'm' is silent.
 
.....and why?


“In all, nearly 60 percent of immigrants—legal and illegal—are on government assistance, compared with 39 percent of native households. Why would any country voluntarily bring in people who have to be supported by the taxpayer?”
Ann Coulter, ¡Adios, America!: The Left's Plan to Turn Our Country into a Third World Hellhole



1. Here's the answer: the reason that the Democrats/Liberals encourage illegal immigration is for one reason and one reason only: illegals vote for the Democrats.

There is no other benefit to this nation.
None.
Illegals keep wages low, and unemployment of Americans high; it costs billions in welfare services and police costs high.
It is only through the actions of Democrats and illegal aliens that the Left is able to claim a popular vote victory in the last election.
After all, Obama told illegal aliens to get out and vote.


2. Continuing on the theme, one of education for the deluded Democrat voters....

“The New York State Department of Corrections has collected information about the top ten nationalities in its prisons for years—.... Foreign inmates were 70 percent more likely to have committed a violent crime than American criminals. They were also twice as likely to have committed a class A felony, such as aggravated murder, kidnapping, and terrorism."
Data here: http://www.doccs.ny.gov/Research/Reports/2008/Impact_of_Foreign-Born_Inmates_2008.pdf

But....what the heck.....they vote Democrat.



3. In 2010, the top ten countries of the foreign-born inmates in NY were:

Dominican Republic: 1,314

Jamaica: 849

Mexico: 523

Guyana: 289

El Salvador: 245

Cuba: 242

Trinidad and Tobago: 237

Haiti: 201

Ecuador: 189

Colombia: 168


BTW....between 1985 and 1999, the native-born in the prison population increased 99%.
During that time, the foreign-born in the prison population increased 251%.
http://www.doccs.ny.gov/Research/Reports/2010/ForeignBorn_IRP_Report_2009.pdf

Gee.....it's almost as if they were invited in......


4. Of course this is not the slant one gets from the house organ of the Democrat Party, the NYTimes.

"Most readers are agog at the number of Dominicans in New York prisons, having spent years reading New York Times articles about Dominicans’ “entrepreneurial zeal,”21 and “traditional immigrant virtues.” Even in an article about the Dominicans’ domination of the crack cocaine business, the Times praised their “savvy,” which had allowed them to become “highly successful” drug dealers, then hailed their drug-infested neighborhoods as the “embodiment of the American Dream—a vibrant, energetic urban melting pot.”
Ann Coulter, ¡Adios, America!: The Left's Plan to Turn Our Country into a Third World Hellhole


Hence, the importance of re-education camps for Liberal simpletons: balance the truth about what Democrat policies have done, and who they have invited to a neighborhood near you.



There is an answer.....I'll get to it.
60% of immigrants are not on government assistance. This number has been widely circulated for some time and is no more true today than it was when first released. What is true is that a study found 60% of immigrant families have had at least one person on government assistance at one time or another, typically either and free and reduce lunch programs or SNAP. Thus if one person, say a child is on a free and reduced lunch program, the entire family is considered to be on government support.

A much more unbiased recent study has been released by the CATO institute, a libertarian, conservative think tank which found immigrants had a lower usage than native born Americans when considerably all government support. Even when the study looked at strictly welfare benefits, there was only a slightly higher use by immigrants.

The study found that immigrants consume 39 percent fewer federal benefits relative to all natives, largely because they are less likely to receive Social Security retirement benefits and Medicare. Immigrants consume 27 percent fewer benefits relative to natives with similar incomes and ages. Only when you look at SNAP and free and reduced lunch programs do we see significantly higher usage. However, since those programs reports usage by family and not individuals, so the actually per person usage may be much less.

https://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/irpb6.pdf
Key findings about U.S. immigrants
about-u-s-immigrants/

Do we need to do a better job of selecting immigrants. You bet we do. The selection process today is based on national origin or race, a section process that would be illegal and unconstitutional for native Americans. Most of the selection process is done by computer, checking nationality, terrorist and criminal databases, profession, and educational level. However, for most countries nationality is the most important criteria which out weights almost everything else. In the 20 minute immigration interview which focuses on checking documents and clarifying application data, there is is essential no part of the immigration process that focuses on the personnel accomplishments of the individual. It is a bureaucratic process that completely ignores the traits that have made America great.


"60% of immigrants are not on government assistance. This number has been widely circulated for some time and is no more true today than it was when first released. What is true is that a study found 60% of immigrant families have had at least one person on government assistance at one time or another, typically either and free and reduce lunch programs or SNAP. Thus if one person, say a child is on a free and reduced lunch program, the entire family is considered to be on government support."


How about you pay for them, rather than stealing from the public fisc to support your party?





"...immigrants consume 39 percent fewer federal benefits relative to all natives, ..."
Why must you Liberals lie, and conflate immigrants with illegal immigrants????

“The conservative Heritage Foundation estimated unlawful immigrant households paid $39.2 billion in 2010, but received $93.7 billion in government services.” -- Oliver Darcy

[So much for that fable.]

15 Stats That Destroy Liberal Narratives



And, the money taken from working Americans is sent to Mexico by these Mexican citizens....more money than the

"Remittances totaled more than oil income

Money sent from abroad came to $24.8 billion last year, up 4.75%

Mexico News Daily | Tuesday, February 2, 2016

Remittances sent home by Mexicans working outside the country surpassed [Mexican] petroleum revenues in 2015 for the first time.

There was a 4.75% increase in money sent from abroad, most of which comes from the U.S., to total US $24.8 billion last year, up from $23.6 billion in 2014, said the Bank of México.


The bank said it was the first time remittances had totaled more than petroleum revenues since it began tracking them in 1995.


Oil revenues last year totaled $23.4 billion."

Remittances totaled more than Mexico's oil income








"Do we need to do a better job of selecting immigrants. You bet we do. "

Here I am.....now, what are your other two wishes?


they are willing to work. their remittances Prove it.
 
.....and why?


“In all, nearly 60 percent of immigrants—legal and illegal—are on government assistance, compared with 39 percent of native households. Why would any country voluntarily bring in people who have to be supported by the taxpayer?”
Ann Coulter, ¡Adios, America!: The Left's Plan to Turn Our Country into a Third World Hellhole



1. Here's the answer: the reason that the Democrats/Liberals encourage illegal immigration is for one reason and one reason only: illegals vote for the Democrats.

There is no other benefit to this nation.
None.
Illegals keep wages low, and unemployment of Americans high; it costs billions in welfare services and police costs high.
It is only through the actions of Democrats and illegal aliens that the Left is able to claim a popular vote victory in the last election.
After all, Obama told illegal aliens to get out and vote.


2. Continuing on the theme, one of education for the deluded Democrat voters....

“The New York State Department of Corrections has collected information about the top ten nationalities in its prisons for years—.... Foreign inmates were 70 percent more likely to have committed a violent crime than American criminals. They were also twice as likely to have committed a class A felony, such as aggravated murder, kidnapping, and terrorism."
Data here: http://www.doccs.ny.gov/Research/Reports/2008/Impact_of_Foreign-Born_Inmates_2008.pdf

But....what the heck.....they vote Democrat.



3. In 2010, the top ten countries of the foreign-born inmates in NY were:

Dominican Republic: 1,314

Jamaica: 849

Mexico: 523

Guyana: 289

El Salvador: 245

Cuba: 242

Trinidad and Tobago: 237

Haiti: 201

Ecuador: 189

Colombia: 168


BTW....between 1985 and 1999, the native-born in the prison population increased 99%.
During that time, the foreign-born in the prison population increased 251%.
http://www.doccs.ny.gov/Research/Reports/2010/ForeignBorn_IRP_Report_2009.pdf

Gee.....it's almost as if they were invited in......


4. Of course this is not the slant one gets from the house organ of the Democrat Party, the NYTimes.

"Most readers are agog at the number of Dominicans in New York prisons, having spent years reading New York Times articles about Dominicans’ “entrepreneurial zeal,”21 and “traditional immigrant virtues.” Even in an article about the Dominicans’ domination of the crack cocaine business, the Times praised their “savvy,” which had allowed them to become “highly successful” drug dealers, then hailed their drug-infested neighborhoods as the “embodiment of the American Dream—a vibrant, energetic urban melting pot.”
Ann Coulter, ¡Adios, America!: The Left's Plan to Turn Our Country into a Third World Hellhole


Hence, the importance of re-education camps for Liberal simpletons: balance the truth about what Democrat policies have done, and who they have invited to a neighborhood near you.



There is an answer.....I'll get to it.
I voted today, and called my Democrat Senator Jones. This illegal entry to the Nation is got to stop. Stopping it will help solve the drug problem and crime problems and save money on welfare. At the end of this year we will be better then before or starting to be a third world country as Soros wants.

Soros himself made the statement many times he needs this country to fail from within.


A current tool of deconstruction is the immigration chaos caused by 20 million illegal aliens residing in the United States. Add to this the proposed U.S. Senate immigration legislation supported by Soros-funded special interest groups. Open-society advocates realize that open borders can only mean a devaluation of citizenship, of voting, of patriotism, and love of country. Open borders mean equal opportunity for dismantling the United States.
our drug war should stop first. You don't want to Pay for it, and it only destabilizes less developed countries causing more refugees.
 

Forum List

Back
Top