Immigrants Coming to America should be prepared to Support Themselves for the first 5 years!

[Jackson]

That's from the mouth of President Trump! Yes! It's called "Common Sense!" A Thomas Paine for our era!

Why should we give them entitlements for breaking our laws?

 

[Jackson]

Mexico has that same provision for incoming immigrants to their country!

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Only 5 years? Why not for life?

 

[Siete]

That's from the mouth of President Trump! Yes! It's called "Common Sense!" A Thomas Paine for our era!

Why should we give them entitlements for breaking our laws?

from the mouth of Trump ... we all know how much thats worth ...

 

[Jackson]

That's from the mouth of President Trump! Yes! It's called "Common Sense!" A Thomas Paine for our era!

Why should we give them entitlements for breaking our laws?

from the mouth of Trump ... we all know how much thats worth ...

A lot of votes for the GOP.

 

[Jackson]

Only 5 years? Why not for life?

I can see that an immigrant may come and be solvent but perhaps something happens where they need help TEMPORARILY. By the time 5 years is up, all abled bodies should be required to support themselves without welfare. Two years on welfare for everyone, not just on segment of the population.

 

[Dschrute3]

Seems reasonable and fair. A wise suggestion. Good post.

 

[brummelben]

Mexico has that same provision for incoming immigrants to their country!

What exactly is the provision that Mexico has? Surely you can tell us right now

 

[whitehall]

That's "legal" immigrants. Sometimes you have to remind lefties of the difference between "legal" and "illegal".

 

[debbiedowner]

That's from the mouth of President Trump! Yes! It's called "Common Sense!" A Thomas Paine for our era!

Why should we give them entitlements for breaking our laws?

And Clinton in the 90's did just that.

 

[brummelben]

That's "legal" immigrants. Sometimes you have to remind lefties of the difference between "legal" and "illegal".

So, only the wealthy can immigrate to the US?

 

[Siete]

That's from the mouth of President Trump! Yes! It's called "Common Sense!" A Thomas Paine for our era!

Why should we give them entitlements for breaking our laws?

from the mouth of Trump ... we all know how much thats worth ...

A lot of votes for the GOP.

SUCKERS !

 

[Jackson]

Mexico has that same provision for incoming immigrants to their country!

What exactly is the provision that Mexico has? Surely you can tell us right now

• Mexico welcomes only foreigners who will be useful to Mexican society:
– Foreigners are admitted into Mexico “according to their possibilities of contributing to national progress.” (Article 32)
– Immigration officials must “ensure” that “immigrants will be useful elements for the country and that they have the necessary funds for their sustenance” and for their dependents. (Article 34)

MEXICO VS. UNITED STATES: MEXICAN IMMIGRATION LAWS ARE TOUGHER

 

[brummelben]

Mexico has that same provision for incoming immigrants to their country!

What exactly is the provision that Mexico has? Surely you can tell us right now

• Mexico welcomes only foreigners who will be useful to Mexican society:
– Foreigners are admitted into Mexico “according to their possibilities of contributing to national progress.” (Article 32)
– Immigration officials must “ensure” that “immigrants will be useful elements for the country and that they have the necessary funds for their sustenance” and for their dependents. (Article 34)

MEXICO VS. UNITED STATES: MEXICAN IMMIGRATION LAWS ARE TOUGHER

It took your handlers long enough to come up with a 7 year old article. What a joke your kind is

 

[Jackson]

Mexico has that same provision for incoming immigrants to their country!

What exactly is the provision that Mexico has? Surely you can tell us right now

• Mexico welcomes only foreigners who will be useful to Mexican society:
– Foreigners are admitted into Mexico “according to their possibilities of contributing to national progress.” (Article 32)
– Immigration officials must “ensure” that “immigrants will be useful elements for the country and that they have the necessary funds for their sustenance” and for their dependents. (Article 34)

MEXICO VS. UNITED STATES: MEXICAN IMMIGRATION LAWS ARE TOUGHER

NMore Info:
– Foreigners may be barred from the country if their presence upsets “the equilibrium of the national demographics,” when foreigners are deemed detrimental to “economic or national interests,” when they do not behave like good citizens in their own country, when they have broken Mexican laws, and when “they are not found to be physically or mentally healthy.” (Article 37)
– The Secretary of Governance may “suspend or prohibit the admission of foreigners when he determines it to be in the national interest.” (Article 38)

 

[Jackson]

Mexico has that same provision for incoming immigrants to their country!

What exactly is the provision that Mexico has? Surely you can tell us right now

• Mexico welcomes only foreigners who will be useful to Mexican society:
– Foreigners are admitted into Mexico “according to their possibilities of contributing to national progress.” (Article 32)
– Immigration officials must “ensure” that “immigrants will be useful elements for the country and that they have the necessary funds for their sustenance” and for their dependents. (Article 34)

MEXICO VS. UNITED STATES: MEXICAN IMMIGRATION LAWS ARE TOUGHER

It took your handlers long enough to come up with a 7 year old article. What a joke your kind is

My handlers??? LMAO. So, show me a link that is negating mine.

 

[brummelben]

Mexico has that same provision for incoming immigrants to their country!

What exactly is the provision that Mexico has? Surely you can tell us right now

• Mexico welcomes only foreigners who will be useful to Mexican society:
– Foreigners are admitted into Mexico “according to their possibilities of contributing to national progress.” (Article 32)
– Immigration officials must “ensure” that “immigrants will be useful elements for the country and that they have the necessary funds for their sustenance” and for their dependents. (Article 34)

MEXICO VS. UNITED STATES: MEXICAN IMMIGRATION LAWS ARE TOUGHER

NMore Info:
– Foreigners may be barred from the country if their presence upsets “the equilibrium of the national demographics,” when foreigners are deemed detrimental to “economic or national interests,” when they do not behave like good citizens in their own country, when they have broken Mexican laws, and when “they are not found to be physically or mentally healthy.” (Article 37)
– The Secretary of Governance may “suspend or prohibit the admission of foreigners when he determines it to be in the national interest.” (Article 38)

Got something better than a 7 year old article, homer. If not go phyuck yourself

 

[rightwinger]

Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free

 

[Jackson]

Mexico has that same provision for incoming immigrants to their country!

What exactly is the provision that Mexico has? Surely you can tell us right now

• Mexico welcomes only foreigners who will be useful to Mexican society:
– Foreigners are admitted into Mexico “according to their possibilities of contributing to national progress.” (Article 32)
– Immigration officials must “ensure” that “immigrants will be useful elements for the country and that they have the necessary funds for their sustenance” and for their dependents. (Article 34)

MEXICO VS. UNITED STATES: MEXICAN IMMIGRATION LAWS ARE TOUGHER

NMore Info:
– Foreigners may be barred from the country if their presence upsets “the equilibrium of the national demographics,” when foreigners are deemed detrimental to “economic or national interests,” when they do not behave like good citizens in their own country, when they have broken Mexican laws, and when “they are not found to be physically or mentally healthy.” (Article 37)
– The Secretary of Governance may “suspend or prohibit the admission of foreigners when he determines it to be in the national interest.” (Article 38)

Got something better than a 7 year old article, homer. If not go phyuck yourself

So, show me with proof that it is wrong

 

[Jackson]

Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free

And it continues..."we will provide them housing food and money each month." Oh, wait a minute, it doesn't say that, does it?