Imagine if London was occupied by Israel

[Roudy]

What was the name of that mandate again?

Those pesky facts seem to keep annoying you. Good.

British Mandate for Palestine (legal instrument) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The British Mandate for Palestine, or simply the Mandate for Palestine, was a legal commission for the administration of the territory that had formerly constituted the Ottoman Sanjaks of Nablus, Acre, the Southern portion of the Beirut Vilayet, and the Mutasarrifate of Jerusalem, prior to the Armistice of Mudros. The draft of the Mandate was formally confirmed by the Council of the League of Nations on 24 July 1922, amended via the 16 September 1922 Transjordan memorandum[1][2] and which came into effect on 29 September 1923[1] following the ratification of the Treaty of Lausanne.[3][4] The mandate ended at midnight on 14 May 1948.

The formal objective of the League of Nations Mandate system was to administer parts of the defunct Ottoman Empire, which had been in control of the Middle East since the 16th century, "until such time as they are able to stand alone."[5] The mandate document formalised the creation of two distinct British protectorates - Palestine, as a national home for the Jewish people under direct British rule, and Transjordan, an Emirate governed semi-autonomously from Britain under the rule of the Hashemite family.[1]

The British Mandate for Palestine, or simply the Mandate for Palestine,

Indeed.

I didn't see any Arab savages in that title and description did you? Idiot.

 

[Roudy]

A fast google will explain a lot.
London's population is at about 7.5 million.
There seem to be around 88,000 people from Bangladesh and 67,000 from Pakistan.

So, with 150,000 middle eastern people (Wide acceptance of the middle east) out of 7.5 million - How exactly does than make an occupation?

Not really acceptance. There are areas in and around London that nobody steps in, because the Muslims have turned it into a little copy of the shithole they come from. They're even imposing their own barbaric Islamic Shariah laws. It's like that all over Europe. Comes from Muslim inability to co exist, assimilate, and respect and accept the culture and traditions of the countries they have invaded. Even the extremely progressive and liberal Europeans are fed up with them.

As much as I've locked horns with the Jews on USMB, what I've quoted Roudy on encompasses the main reasons I joined the EDL. We get huge support from our friends in the American Tea Party. Look us up: English Defense League.

Thank you for confirming my claim. I have friends I'm in touch with that live in several European countries, especially in UK and France.

 

[P F Tinmore]

What was the name of that mandate again?

Those pesky facts seem to keep annoying you. Good.

British Mandate for Palestine (legal instrument) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The British Mandate for Palestine, or simply the Mandate for Palestine, was a legal commission for the administration of the territory that had formerly constituted the Ottoman Sanjaks of Nablus, Acre, the Southern portion of the Beirut Vilayet, and the Mutasarrifate of Jerusalem, prior to the Armistice of Mudros. The draft of the Mandate was formally confirmed by the Council of the League of Nations on 24 July 1922, amended via the 16 September 1922 Transjordan memorandum[1][2] and which came into effect on 29 September 1923[1] following the ratification of the Treaty of Lausanne.[3][4] The mandate ended at midnight on 14 May 1948.

The formal objective of the League of Nations Mandate system was to administer parts of the defunct Ottoman Empire, which had been in control of the Middle East since the 16th century, "until such time as they are able to stand alone."[5] The mandate document formalised the creation of two distinct British protectorates - Palestine, as a national home for the Jewish people under direct British rule, and Transjordan, an Emirate governed semi-autonomously from Britain under the rule of the Hashemite family.[1]

The British Mandate for Palestine, or simply the Mandate for Palestine,

Indeed.

ARTICLE 22.

To those colonies and territories which as a consequence of the late war have ceased to be under the sovereignty of the States which formerly governed them and which are inhabited by peoples not yet able to stand by themselves under the strenuous conditions of the modern world, there should be applied the principle that the well-being and development of such peoples form a sacred trust of civilisation and that securities for the performance of this trust should be embodied in this Covenant.

The best method of giving practical effect to this principle is that the tutelage of such peoples should be entrusted to advanced nations who by reason of their resources, their experience or their geographical position can best undertake this responsibility, and who are willing to accept it, and that this tutelage should be exercised by them as Mandatories on behalf of the League.

The character of the mandate must differ according to the stage of the development of the people, the geographical situation of the territory, its economic conditions and other similar circumstances.

Certain communities formerly belonging to the Turkish Empire have reached a stage of development where their existence as independent nations can be provisionally recognized subject to the rendering of administrative advice and assistance by a Mandatory until such time as they are able to stand alone. The wishes of these communities must be a principal consideration in the selection of the Mandatory.

Avalon Project - The Covenant of the League of Nations

 

[Lipush]

For anyone who doesn't think the "occupation" of Palestinian land by Israel for the last 45 years is not the main cause of all the hostility in that area, all they have to do, is ask themselves how would they handle it, if their neighborhood was "occupied" by a foreign force? This video tends to shed a little light on that subject.


Imagine If London Was Occupied by Israel [HQ].mp4 - YouTube

London will soon be occupied by Islam.

Then Israel will be the hope in the darkness

 

[ima]

For anyone who doesn't think the "occupation" of Palestinian land by Israel for the last 45 years is not the main cause of all the hostility in that area, all they have to do, is ask themselves how would they handle it, if their neighborhood was "occupied" by a foreign force? This video tends to shed a little light on that subject.


Imagine If London Was Occupied by Israel [HQ].mp4 - YouTube

London will soon be occupied by Islam.

Then Israel will be the hope in the darkness

Hey Lips, if Islam occupies London, they'll have sophisticated nukes at their disposal (assuming of course that England even has any working nukes to start with), so wouldn't that be bye-bye birdy for Israel?

 

[Swagger]

For anyone who doesn't think the "occupation" of Palestinian land by Israel for the last 45 years is not the main cause of all the hostility in that area, all they have to do, is ask themselves how would they handle it, if their neighborhood was "occupied" by a foreign force? This video tends to shed a little light on that subject.


Imagine If London Was Occupied by Israel [HQ].mp4 - YouTube

London will soon be occupied by Islam.

Then Israel will be the hope in the darkness

That's disingenuous to say the least. Besides, proportionately speaking, Israel's more at risk of being overwhelmed by Islam and/or its worshippers than any city in the UK.

 

[Roudy]

Those pesky facts seem to keep annoying you. Good.

British Mandate for Palestine (legal instrument) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The British Mandate for Palestine, or simply the Mandate for Palestine, was a legal commission for the administration of the territory that had formerly constituted the Ottoman Sanjaks of Nablus, Acre, the Southern portion of the Beirut Vilayet, and the Mutasarrifate of Jerusalem, prior to the Armistice of Mudros. The draft of the Mandate was formally confirmed by the Council of the League of Nations on 24 July 1922, amended via the 16 September 1922 Transjordan memorandum[1][2] and which came into effect on 29 September 1923[1] following the ratification of the Treaty of Lausanne.[3][4] The mandate ended at midnight on 14 May 1948.

The formal objective of the League of Nations Mandate system was to administer parts of the defunct Ottoman Empire, which had been in control of the Middle East since the 16th century, "until such time as they are able to stand alone."[5] The mandate document formalised the creation of two distinct British protectorates - Palestine, as a national home for the Jewish people under direct British rule, and Transjordan, an Emirate governed semi-autonomously from Britain under the rule of the Hashemite family.[1]

The British Mandate for Palestine, or simply the Mandate for Palestine,

Indeed.

ARTICLE 22.

To those colonies and territories which as a consequence of the late war have ceased to be under the sovereignty of the States which formerly governed them and which are inhabited by peoples not yet able to stand by themselves under the strenuous conditions of the modern world, there should be applied the principle that the well-being and development of such peoples form a sacred trust of civilisation and that securities for the performance of this trust should be embodied in this Covenant.

The best method of giving practical effect to this principle is that the tutelage of such peoples should be entrusted to advanced nations who by reason of their resources, their experience or their geographical position can best undertake this responsibility, and who are willing to accept it, and that this tutelage should be exercised by them as Mandatories on behalf of the League.

The character of the mandate must differ according to the stage of the development of the people, the geographical situation of the territory, its economic conditions and other similar circumstances.

Certain communities formerly belonging to the Turkish Empire have reached a stage of development where their existence as independent nations can be provisionally recognized subject to the rendering of administrative advice and assistance by a Mandatory until such time as they are able to stand alone. The wishes of these communities must be a principal consideration in the selection of the Mandatory.

Avalon Project - The Covenant of the League of Nations

Gee still no mention of Arab Palestinian. And if you read properly, the "Palestinians" did get their state, IT'S CALLED JORDAN.

Sorry, and NO THANK YOU, the world is better off without another Islamic terrorist shithole. We already have enough.

 

[Roudy]

For anyone who doesn't think the "occupation" of Palestinian land by Israel for the last 45 years is not the main cause of all the hostility in that area, all they have to do, is ask themselves how would they handle it, if their neighborhood was "occupied" by a foreign force? This video tends to shed a little light on that subject.


Imagine If London Was Occupied by Israel [HQ].mp4 - YouTube

London will soon be occupied by Islam.

Then Israel will be the hope in the darkness

That's disingenuous to say the least. Besides, proportionately speaking, Israel's more at risk of being overwhelmed by Islam and/or its worshippers than any city in the UK.

UK is infected with this liberal politically correct appeasement mindset, which the invading Muslims are abusing to their advantage.

 

[Roudy]

Israel occupying London? Man, you're going to piss off half the world's pakis.

Tee hee! That was the first thing you said that I agree with!

 

[Roudy]

Apparently you have reading comprehension problems? So let go ahead and bitchslap you with the truth:

The British Mandate for Palestine, or simply the Mandate for Palestine, was a legal commission for the administration of the territory that had formerly constituted the Ottoman Sanjaks of Nablus, Acre, the Southern portion of the Beirut Vilayet, and the Mutasarrifate of Jerusalem, prior to the Armistice of Mudros. The draft of the Mandate was formally confirmed by the Council of the League of Nations on 24 July 1922, amended via the 16 September 1922 Transjordan memorandum[1][2] and which came into effect on 29 September 1923[1] following the ratification of the Treaty of Lausanne.[3][4] The mandate ended at midnight on 14 May 1948.

The formal objective of the League of Nations Mandate system was to administer parts of the defunct Ottoman Empire, which had been in control of the Middle East since the 16th century, "until such time as they are able to stand alone."[5] The mandate document formalised the creation of two distinct British protectorates - Palestine, as a national home for the Jewish people under direct British rule, and Transjordan, an Emirate governed semi-autonomously from Britain under the rule of the Hashemite family.[1]

British Mandate for Palestine (legal instrument) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[P F Tinmore]

That is all well and good, however, Britain violated the League of Nations Covenant, its own mandate, and the rights of the Palestinians.

Britain quit its mandate without giving any of Palestine to anyone else.

 

[theliq]

Not really acceptance. There are areas in and around London that nobody steps in, because the Muslims have turned it into a little copy of the shithole they come from. They're even imposing their own barbaric Islamic Shariah laws. It's like that all over Europe. Comes from Muslim inability to co exist, assimilate, and respect and accept the culture and traditions of the countries they have invaded. Even the extremely progressive and liberal Europeans are fed up with them.

As much as I've locked horns with the Jews on USMB, what I've quoted Roudy on encompasses the main reasons I joined the EDL. We get huge support from our friends in the American Tea Party. Look us up: English Defense League.

Thank you for confirming my claim. I have friends I'm in touch with that live in several European countries, especially in UK and France.

INSERT "TERRORISTS" for "FRIENDS" here folks. Say to Roudy

 

[theliq]

Apparently you have reading comprehension problems? So let go ahead and bitchslap you with the truth:

The British Mandate for Palestine, or simply the Mandate for Palestine, was a legal commission for the administration of the territory that had formerly constituted the Ottoman Sanjaks of Nablus, Acre, the Southern portion of the Beirut Vilayet, and the Mutasarrifate of Jerusalem, prior to the Armistice of Mudros. The draft of the Mandate was formally confirmed by the Council of the League of Nations on 24 July 1922, amended via the 16 September 1922 Transjordan memorandum[1][2] and which came into effect on 29 September 1923[1] following the ratification of the Treaty of Lausanne.[3][4] The mandate ended at midnight on 14 May 1948.

The formal objective of the League of Nations Mandate system was to administer parts of the defunct Ottoman Empire, which had been in control of the Middle East since the 16th century, "until such time as they are able to stand alone."[5] The mandate document formalised the creation of two distinct British protectorates - Palestine, as a national home for the Jewish people under direct British rule, and Transjordan, an Emirate governed semi-autonomously from Britain under the rule of the Hashemite family.[1]

British Mandate for Palestine (legal instrument) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I THINK ROUDY HAS "SHORT(ASS) MAN,SYNDROME"

 

[Billo_Really]

I would argue, as others here have, that there never was "Palestinian land" to take. It was British land, previously part of the Ottoman empire. Of course, there were people when the Jews began arriving, squatters really, many of whom decided they could not live side-by-side with Jews. It took literally days for Muslims to attack Israel in 1948, which continue to this day. Certainly they have a right to defend themselves, no?

Almost a million people living in this area for generations are not squatters. Real estate records for that period show the arabs were the majority land owners.



And hostilities didn't just happen overnight. It was built up over several years as the zionists migrated into the area and treated the indigenous population with disdain and contempt. This should give you a good idea of what I'm talking about.

Here's what a zionist living during that time had to say about his fellow zionists...

Ahad Ha'am (famous zionist humanist):

The Zionists drew on this ancient spiritual potential to build a political movement. A stirring slogan was spread abroad:

"A land without people for a people without land"​

ignoring the fact that the Palestinians themselves, well over half a million at the turn of the century, lived in Palestine, that it was their home

He went on to say...

"...the settlers must under no circumstances arouse the wrath of the natives ... 'Yet what do our brethren do in Palestine? Just the very opposite! Serfs they were in the lands of the Diaspora and suddenly they find themselves in unrestricted freedom and this change has awakened in them an inclination to despotism. They treat the Arabs with hostility and cruelty, deprive them of their rights, offend them without cause and even boast of these deeds; and nobody among us opposes this despicable and dangerous inclination ...'

What do we have so far? A bunch of people moving into an area and treating the local residents like crap.

That's the racist part. Now here's the apartheid part.

To give you a good idea of that, here's a couple land ownership policies they were enforcing at the time, which basically stated that only a jew could buy land and only jews could work that land.

"The Constitution of the Jewish Agency: Land Holding and Employment Clauses ...

"(d) Land is to be acquired as Jewish property and ... the same shall be held as the inalienable property of the Jewish people.

"(e) The Agency shall promote agricultural colonization based on Jewish labour ... it shall be deemed to be a matter of principle that Jewish labour shall be employed ..."​

"Keren Kayemet draft lease: Employment of Jewish labour only

"... The lessee undertakes to execute all works connected with the cultivation of the holding only with Jewish labour. Failure to comply with this duty by the employment of non-Jewish labour shall render the lessee liable to the payment of compensation ..."

"The lease also provides that the holding shall never be held by any but a Jew ..."​

Then you have jewish terrorist groups like Irgun, driving out over 750,000 arabs from the area.

So, the hostility didn't just all of a sudden, begin in a few days and it wasn't a result of the Pals just deciding to hate jews. I don't know why people act like the zionists didn't do anything wrong?

But this is just history. What I'm really interested in from you is what would you do about it all now? Shall we exterminate Israelis? Should we make them live elsewhere? Where? Should we create a new country for "Palestinians"? If so, from whose country should the land be taken? Who will be displaced in this new land and where shall they go?

Stated differently, what are you suggesting we do?

So where do we go from here? What do I suggest?

Before I give you my list, let me just say, "Thank you, for asking!" That kind of language, is a minority in these parts, but is always appreciated when it happens.​

This is my take on it:

• Israeli's end the illegal and immoral blockade of Gaza
• dismantle over 500 checkpoints in the West Bank
• remove all IDF soldiers from the occupied territories
• end the occupation
• get their military and relocated nationals, back past the Green Line, because that's where Israel exists
• jewish settlers who insist to remain, can apply for resident visas, just like any other alien
• offer to train Fateh and Hamas security forces with the caveat of protecting settlers with visa's and controlling the population to prevent anymore rocket attacks

Once Israel is no longer in violation of IHL, the burden of proof shifts to the Pals to deliver the goods. Which is no more rocket attacks or suicide bombers against innocent civilians.

Bottom line is, for peace to occur, the door has gotta swing both ways.

 

[Roudy]

That is all well and good, however, Britain violated the League of Nations Covenant, its own mandate, and the rights of the Palestinians.

Britain quit its mandate without giving any of Palestine to anyone else.

Yes it's all and well, Arabs never controlled, owned, or ran an inch of that land, it was part of the collapsed Ottoman empire under British rule? Palestine was supposed to go to the Jews, the Arabs who now call themselves Palestinians were to live under Jordanian Hashemite rule. WAIT! That's exactly what happened! Ha ha ha...

 

[Roudy]

I would argue, as others here have, that there never was "Palestinian land" to take. It was British land, previously part of the Ottoman empire. Of course, there were people when the Jews began arriving, squatters really, many of whom decided they could not live side-by-side with Jews. It took literally days for Muslims to attack Israel in 1948, which continue to this day. Certainly they have a right to defend themselves, no?

Almost a million people living in this area for generations are not squatters. Real estate records for that period show the arabs were the majority land owners.



And hostilities didn't just happen overnight. It was built up over several years as the zionists migrated into the area and treated the indigenous population with disdain and contempt. This should give you a good idea of what I'm talking about.

Here's what a zionist living during that time had to say about his fellow zionists...

Ahad Ha'am (famous zionist humanist):

The Zionists drew on this ancient spiritual potential to build a political movement. A stirring slogan was spread abroad:

"A land without people for a people without land"​

ignoring the fact that the Palestinians themselves, well over half a million at the turn of the century, lived in Palestine, that it was their home

He went on to say... What do we have so far? A bunch of people moving into an area and treating the local residents like crap.

That's the racist part. Now here's the apartheid part.

To give you a good idea of that, here's a couple land ownership policies they were enforcing at the time, which basically stated that only a jew could buy land and only jews could work that land.

"The Constitution of the Jewish Agency: Land Holding and Employment Clauses ...

"(d) Land is to be acquired as Jewish property and ... the same shall be held as the inalienable property of the Jewish people.

"(e) The Agency shall promote agricultural colonization based on Jewish labour ... it shall be deemed to be a matter of principle that Jewish labour shall be employed ..."​

"Keren Kayemet draft lease: Employment of Jewish labour only

"... The lessee undertakes to execute all works connected with the cultivation of the holding only with Jewish labour. Failure to comply with this duty by the employment of non-Jewish labour shall render the lessee liable to the payment of compensation ..."

"The lease also provides that the holding shall never be held by any but a Jew ..."​

Then you have jewish terrorist groups like Irgun, driving out over 750,000 arabs from the area.

So, the hostility didn't just all of a sudden, begin in a few days and it wasn't a result of the Pals just deciding to hate jews. I don't know why people act like the zionists didn't do anything wrong?

But this is just history. What I'm really interested in from you is what would you do about it all now? Shall we exterminate Israelis? Should we make them live elsewhere? Where? Should we create a new country for "Palestinians"? If so, from whose country should the land be taken? Who will be displaced in this new land and where shall they go?

Stated differently, what are you suggesting we do?

So where do we go from here? What do I suggest?

Before I give you my list, let me just say, "Thank you, for asking!" That kind of language, is a minority in these parts, but is always appreciated when it happens.​

This is my take on it:

• Israeli's end the illegal and immoral blockade of Gaza
• dismantle over 500 checkpoints in the West Bank
• remove all IDF soldiers from the occupied territories
• end the occupation
• get their military and relocated nationals, back past the Green Line, because that's where Israel exists
• jewish settlers who insist to remain, can apply for resident visas, just like any other alien
• offer to train Fateh and Hamas security forces with the caveat of protecting settlers with visa's and controlling the population to prevent anymore rocket attacks

Once Israel is no longer in violation of IHL, the burden of proof shifts to the Pals to deliver the goods. Which is no more rocket attacks or suicide bombers against innocent civilians.

Bottom line is, for peace to occur, the door has gotta swing both ways.

The million you are talking about, approximately 80% became Jordanians.

Jordan is Palestine. Majority of Jordanians are Palestinians Israel actually got less land than it was supposed to.

Irgun was created because Arab animals kept attacking and Massacring Jews. Look up Hebron massacre of 1929. You know, Muslims doing what they do best....KILL.

 

[P F Tinmore]

That is all well and good, however, Britain violated the League of Nations Covenant, its own mandate, and the rights of the Palestinians.

Britain quit its mandate without giving any of Palestine to anyone else.

Yes it's all and well, Arabs never controlled, owned, or ran an inch of that land, it was part of the collapsed Ottoman empire under British rule? Palestine was supposed to go to the Jews, the Arabs who now call themselves Palestinians were to live under Jordanian Hashemite rule. WAIT! That's exactly what happened! Ha ha ha...

Palestine was supposed to go to the Jews,

Who said so? Foreigners?

The right to self-determination

There is a recognised right to self-determination in international law. It is controversial whether a positive right to armed struggle to fulfil this right exists. It is clearly illegal under international law to deprive a people of their right to self-determination by using forcible actions including use of violence.

UN Charter definition

“By virtue of the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations, all peoples have the right freely to determine, without external interference, their political status and to pursue their economic, social and cultural development, and every State has the duty to respect this right in accordance with the provisions of the Charter.”

The right to self-determination - IHL

External interference is illegal.

 

[Roudy]

That is all well and good, however, Britain violated the League of Nations Covenant, its own mandate, and the rights of the Palestinians.

Britain quit its mandate without giving any of Palestine to anyone else.

Yes it's all and well, Arabs never controlled, owned, or ran an inch of that land, it was part of the collapsed Ottoman empire under British rule? Palestine was supposed to go to the Jews, the Arabs who now call themselves Palestinians were to live under Jordanian Hashemite rule. WAIT! That's exactly what happened! Ha ha ha...

Palestine was supposed to go to the Jews,

Who said so? Foreigners?

The right to self-determination

There is a recognised right to self-determination in international law. It is controversial whether a positive right to armed struggle to fulfil this right exists. It is clearly illegal under international law to deprive a people of their right to self-determination by using forcible actions including use of violence.

UN Charter definition

“By virtue of the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations, all peoples have the right freely to determine, without external interference, their political status and to pursue their economic, social and cultural development, and every State has the duty to respect this right in accordance with the provisions of the Charter.”

The right to self-determination - IHL

External interference is illegal.

So you agree that the Arabs did not own or control or run that land ging back for at least 700 years, then. And therefore, the Jews did not "steal" Arab land that they never owned, as is commonly repeated by morons.

Good, glad we are on the same page on that.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Yes it's all and well, Arabs never controlled, owned, or ran an inch of that land, it was part of the collapsed Ottoman empire under British rule? Palestine was supposed to go to the Jews, the Arabs who now call themselves Palestinians were to live under Jordanian Hashemite rule. WAIT! That's exactly what happened! Ha ha ha...

Who said so? Foreigners?

The right to self-determination

There is a recognised right to self-determination in international law. It is controversial whether a positive right to armed struggle to fulfil this right exists. It is clearly illegal under international law to deprive a people of their right to self-determination by using forcible actions including use of violence.

UN Charter definition

“By virtue of the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations, all peoples have the right freely to determine, without external interference, their political status and to pursue their economic, social and cultural development, and every State has the duty to respect this right in accordance with the provisions of the Charter.”

The right to self-determination - IHL

External interference is illegal.

So you agree that the Arabs did not own or control or run that land ging back for at least 700 years, then. And therefore, the Jews did not "steal" Arab land that they never owned, as is commonly repeated by morons.

Good, glad we are on the same page on that.

Criteria for the right to self-determination

A people can be said to have realised its right to self-determination when they have either (1) established a sovereign and independent state; (2) freely associated with another state or (3) integrated with another state after freely having expressed their will to do so . The definition of realisation of self-determination was confirmed in the Declaration of Friendly Relations .

The right to self-determination - IHL

Sovereignty and statehood are the realization of self determination not prerequisites.

 

[Billo_Really]

The million you are talking about, approximately 80% became Jordanians.

Jordan is Palestine. Majority of Jordanians are Palestinians Israel actually got less land than it was supposed to.

Irgun was created because Arab animals kept attacking and Massacring Jews. Look up Hebron massacre of 1929. You know, Muslims doing what they do best....KILL.

Alright, I took your advice and I looked up the '29 massacre and this is what I found:

- During the massacre, 67 Jews were killed and Jewish homes and synagogues were ransacked;
[It's unfortunate this occured. And for once, you were right about something!]

- nineteen local Arab families saved 435 Jews by hiding them in their houses at great risk to themselves [19 arab animals save jewish ass, film at eleven!]

- Despite growing tensions between the Arab and Jewish communities of Palestine following the Balfour Declaration of 1917, an otherwise peaceful relationship existed between the Jewish and Arab communities of Hebron [I thought you said they never got along? Or maybe it's you, who doesn't get along with others? That's a rhetorical statement; I really don't care to hear your answer.]

- On 15 August 1929, several hundred members of Joseph Klausner's Pro-Wailing Wall Committee, among them members of Vladimir Jabotinsky's Revisionist Zionism movement Betar youth organisation, under the leadership of Jeremiah Halpern, assembled at the Western Wall in Jerusalem shouting "the Wall is ours". They raised the Jewish national flag and sang the song "Hatikvah" ("The Hope"), which later became the Israeli national anthem. [Why is it, you never mention what precipitated the arab violence? Because I can see where this would really piss them off! I know if you came over to my house and declared my lawn chair yours, well, we won't go there...]

- Inflammatory articles calculated to incite disorder appeared in the Arab media and one flyer, signed by "the Committee of the Holy Warriors in Palestine" stated that the Jews had violated the honor of Islam, and declared: "Hearts are in tumult because of these barbaric deeds, and the people began to break out in shouts of 'war [A bunch of stupid assholes who take their religion way to seriously!]

- awaken your religious feelings and national zealotry to rise up against the enemy who violated the honor of Islam and raped the women and murdered widows and babies. [Hey, that's what you say about them!]

- Several cases of rape, mutilation and torture were reported in the Jewish press. These claims were contested by Arab spokesmen. When the bodies were exhumed no conclusions could be made one way or another. [Are you related to these people? Because they make the same baseless accusations you constantly make and are never proven to be true!]​

[But this is my favorite story of the entire tragedy. About how an arab neighbor, saved a jewish family, by telling the mob when they got to his house, "We've already killed our jews!" And the mob went on its merry way]

Molchadsky story

In August 1929, Yonah Molchadsky was nearing the end of her pregnancy when, on August 23, the disturbing news reached them that there had been attempts to harm Jews in Jerusalem. The following day, Yonah started to feel labor pains and a doctor was called. "Don't give birth yet, wait a bit," he told her. But the pains got worse and the birth approached, so the family went to the neighboring family, an Arab family, who put them up in their basement. As Yonah gave birth to her second daughter in the basement of the Arab family's house, the masses outside began looking for Jews. Yonah related, after many years of silence, that the mob came to the home of the Arab family, looking for the Molchadskys. "We have already killed our Jews," the Molchadskys' hosts and saviors told the mob, who believed them and departed.

And this last bit of history, is one of the reasons I'm so hostile towards you fuckers! Another jewish family was saved by an arab neighbor and how was he thanked? The IDF took his house and now uses it as a kindergarden.

- The Mani family was saved by an Arab neighbour, Abu 'Id Zeitun, who was accompanied by his brother and son. Nowadays (in 1999), according to Abu 'Id Zeitun, the house in which the Jews were hidden – his father's house - had been confiscated by the IDF, and today it houses a kindergarten for the settlers.​

It's because of shit like that, if I ever saw you drowning 10 feet off a river bank, I would have a tough decision to make:

- do I take a walk?
- or do I take a nap?​