Imagine if London was occupied by Israel

Billo_Really

Litre of the Band
Aug 14, 2005
42,137
7,492
1,830
Long Beach, Ca
For anyone who doesn't think the "occupation" of Palestinian land by Israel for the last 45 years is not the main cause of all the hostility in that area, all they have to do, is ask themselves how would they handle it, if their neighborhood was "occupied" by a foreign force? This video tends to shed a little light on that subject.


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dYamviV7ZSY&feature=player_embedded]Imagine If London Was Occupied by Israel [HQ].mp4 - YouTube[/ame]
 
It's easier to imagine if London was occupied or taken over by middle eastern immigrants, because it is.
 
It's easier to imagine if London was occupied or taken over by middle eastern immigrants, because it is.

A fast google will explain a lot.
London's population is at about 7.5 million.
There seem to be around 88,000 people from Bangladesh and 67,000 from Pakistan.

So, with 150,000 middle eastern people (Wide acceptance of the middle east) out of 7.5 million - How exactly does than make an occupation?
 
It's easier to imagine if London was occupied or taken over by middle eastern immigrants, because it is.

A fast google will explain a lot.
London's population is at about 7.5 million.
There seem to be around 88,000 people from Bangladesh and 67,000 from Pakistan.

So, with 150,000 middle eastern people (Wide acceptance of the middle east) out of 7.5 million - How exactly does than make an occupation?
Not really acceptance. There are areas in and around London that nobody steps in, because the Muslims have turned it into a little copy of the shithole they come from. They're even imposing their own barbaric Islamic Shariah laws. It's like that all over Europe. Comes from Muslim inability to co exist, assimilate, and respect and accept the culture and traditions of the countries they have invaded. Even the extremely progressive and liberal Europeans are fed up with them.
 
Ask the Irish.

A lot in the US funded IRA terrorism.
And there was I thinking the US was against terrorists.

One man's terrorist, is another man's freedom fighter. Ask the jews, they had many that became the leaders in their early govt.
But to the British the same could be said of Americans after the War for Independance.
 
It's easier to imagine if London was occupied or taken over by middle eastern immigrants, because it is.

A fast google will explain a lot.
London's population is at about 7.5 million.
There seem to be around 88,000 people from Bangladesh and 67,000 from Pakistan.

So, with 150,000 middle eastern people (Wide acceptance of the middle east) out of 7.5 million - How exactly does than make an occupation?
Since when did you need the numbers in your favor to complete an occupation?

Londonistan Calling | Politics | Vanity Fair

Did the US have more soldiers in country than Iraqi citizens when we occupied Iraq?

Ignoring the problem doesn't make it go away.
 
It's easier to imagine if London was occupied or taken over by middle eastern immigrants, because it is.

A fast google will explain a lot.
London's population is at about 7.5 million.
There seem to be around 88,000 people from Bangladesh and 67,000 from Pakistan.

So, with 150,000 middle eastern people (Wide acceptance of the middle east) out of 7.5 million - How exactly does than make an occupation?

The occupation you ignore has spawned a resurgence of the Jack-Booted Euro-guy. The next time the shiite hits the fan there - and it most surely will - it won't be Jews they stuff into ovens.

Mohammed is now the most popular name for baby boys ahead of Jack and Harry
By Jack Doyle - UPDATED:19:41 EST, 27 October 2010

Mohammed has become the most popular name for newborn boys in Britain.

It shot up from third the previous year, overtaking Jack, which had topped the list for the past 14 years but was relegated to third spot.

Olivia topped the list for little girls for the second year in a row, behind Ruby and Chloe.

A total of 7,549 newborns were given 12 variations of the Islamic prophet Mohammed’s name last year, such as Muhammad and Mohammad.

Read more: Mohammed is now the most popular name for baby boys ahead of Jack and Harry | Mail Online
 
Ask the Irish.

A lot in the US funded IRA terrorism.
And there was I thinking the US was against terrorists.

One man's terrorist, is another man's freedom fighter. Ask the jews, they had many that became the leaders in their early govt.
But to the British the same could be said of Americans after the War for Independance.

That’s a horrible analogy.

What freedoms is Hamas fighting for? When they were elected to political office in Gaza, what freedoms were instituted? How did they advance the cause of the Syrian, Lebanese and Jordanian Arabs collectively calling themselves “Palestinians”?

While Hamas turns Gaza into an Islamist state, the Western media praise it for keeping 'law and order'

While Hamas turns Gaza into an Islamist state, the Western media praise it for keeping 'law and order' – Telegraph Blogs

Hamas has not only created the conditions in Gaza that breed schismatic ultras but also has long record of encouraging Salafi-Jihadis. An early group was Jaysh al-Islam (“Army of Islam”). Jaysh became famous in 2007 when it kidnapped BBC correspondent Alan Johnston and held him captive for nearly four months. Hamas was newly in control of a de facto government and reckoned that Johnston’s detention was too high a PR price to pay for ownership of Gaza. It issued an ultimatum to Jaysh to release Johnston. Jaysh’s response was to threaten to go public with details of its collaboration with Hamas, including plots to assassinate Palestinian Authority officials.

Jaysh also played a role in Hamas’s cross-border raid in 2006 that culminated in the death of two Israeli soldiers and the capture of a third, Gilad Shalit, who has been denied access to humanitarian monitors for the five years of his captivity. Khalid Abu Hilal, a member of al-Ahrar, an Islamist faction close to Hamas, boasted of the ruling party’s big-tent approach to snatching him: “Hamas wanted the Shalit operation to be a national undertaking, not purely Hamas. They had just formed a government it was a political calculation.” Last Sunday, just as the news broke of Arrigoni’s kidnapping, a senior Hamas lawmaker called on Palestinians to kidnap more Israelis.

In the US, kidnapping is a felony. In most societies, it's considered... you know... in bad form. Except, that is, in the surreal world of islamic terrorists where the islamic terrorist lawmakers encourage kidnapping.
 
Not really acceptance. There are areas in and around London that nobody steps in, because the Muslims have turned it into a little copy of the shithole they come from. They're even imposing their own barbaric Islamic Shariah laws. It's like that all over Europe. Comes from Muslim inability to co exist, assimilate, and respect and accept the culture and traditions of the countries they have invaded. Even the extremely progressive and liberal Europeans are fed up with them.
Don't even talk about someone else's invasion, until you get your fuckin' ass out of the OPT! Muslim's can't co-exist, because you won't let them. You put up over 500 checkpoints on land that isn't yours, even your presence there is illegal and you fuck with the people who are there legally. And the reason that a few people want to wipe you out, is because that's what you are trying to do to them.

You take their land. You take their identity. You take their history. Then you take their life. I don't condone the rocket attacks, but I do understand them. You are causing 90% of the violence in that area. You're just a bunch of fuckin' whiney little bitches, who can go to hell!
 
A lot in the US funded IRA terrorism.
And there was I thinking the US was against terrorists.

One man's terrorist, is another man's freedom fighter. Ask the jews, they had many that became the leaders in their early govt.
But to the British the same could be said of Americans after the War for Independance.

That’s a horrible analogy.

What freedoms is Hamas fighting for? When they were elected to political office in Gaza, what freedoms were instituted? How did they advance the cause of the Syrian, Lebanese and Jordanian Arabs collectively calling themselves “Palestinians”?

While Hamas turns Gaza into an Islamist state, the Western media praise it for keeping 'law and order'

While Hamas turns Gaza into an Islamist state, the Western media praise it for keeping 'law and order' – Telegraph Blogs

Hamas has not only created the conditions in Gaza that breed schismatic ultras but also has long record of encouraging Salafi-Jihadis. An early group was Jaysh al-Islam (“Army of Islam”). Jaysh became famous in 2007 when it kidnapped BBC correspondent Alan Johnston and held him captive for nearly four months. Hamas was newly in control of a de facto government and reckoned that Johnston’s detention was too high a PR price to pay for ownership of Gaza. It issued an ultimatum to Jaysh to release Johnston. Jaysh’s response was to threaten to go public with details of its collaboration with Hamas, including plots to assassinate Palestinian Authority officials.

Jaysh also played a role in Hamas’s cross-border raid in 2006 that culminated in the death of two Israeli soldiers and the capture of a third, Gilad Shalit, who has been denied access to humanitarian monitors for the five years of his captivity. Khalid Abu Hilal, a member of al-Ahrar, an Islamist faction close to Hamas, boasted of the ruling party’s big-tent approach to snatching him: “Hamas wanted the Shalit operation to be a national undertaking, not purely Hamas. They had just formed a government it was a political calculation.” Last Sunday, just as the news broke of Arrigoni’s kidnapping, a senior Hamas lawmaker called on Palestinians to kidnap more Israelis.

In the US, kidnapping is a felony. In most societies, it's considered... you know... in bad form. Except, that is, in the surreal world of islamic terrorists where the islamic terrorist lawmakers encourage kidnapping.

On duty soldiers are not kidnapped. They are captured.
 
Not really acceptance. There are areas in and around London that nobody steps in, because the Muslims have turned it into a little copy of the shithole they come from. They're even imposing their own barbaric Islamic Shariah laws. It's like that all over Europe. Comes from Muslim inability to co exist, assimilate, and respect and accept the culture and traditions of the countries they have invaded. Even the extremely progressive and liberal Europeans are fed up with them.
Don't even talk about someone else's invasion, until you get your fuckin' ass out of the OPT! Muslim's can't co-exist, because you won't let them. You put up over 500 checkpoints on land that isn't yours, even your presence there is illegal and you fuck with the people who are there legally. And the reason that a few people want to wipe you out, is because that's what you are trying to do to them.

You take their land. You take their identity. You take their history. Then you take their life. I don't condone the rocket attacks, but I do understand them. You are causing 90% of the violence in that area. You're just a bunch of fuckin' whiney little bitches, who can go to hell!
Nice try at deflecting the fact that Muslims can't coexist with ANYBODY. Israel is just another flashpoint. Problem is the land wasn't the Muslims, there were no Palestinian people, nor was there a history. Unless of course you're talking about the Jewish people. The Palestinian Arab is an invention as of 1967.

Now go fuck yourself, MOHOMMOD.
 
What freedoms is Hamas fighting for?
Their own. You've been trying to wipe them out since 2006.

That's a perfect video, which shows just how fucked Israeli's are and how little they value human life.
Shut your stupid ignorant ass up, you trailor trash IslamoNazi dickhead. Nobody has shown to value life as little as Hamas Muslim animals. And take that coat hanger out of your filthy forehead! Ha ha ha!
 
Where LOGIC is the "principles of correct reasoning",
ROUDY LOGIC is..........well............not that!

The best way to describe ROUDY LOGIC,
is with a demonstration...​



Loinboy: You take their land.
Roudy: the land wasn't the Muslims,

Loinboy: You take their identity.
Roudy: there were no Palestinian people,

Loinboy: You take their history.
Roudy: nor was there a history.

Roudy: Nice try at deflecting the fact
Loinboy: Huh?
 
Where LOGIC is the "principles of correct reasoning",
ROUDY LOGIC is..........well............not that!

The best way to describe ROUDY LOGIC,
is with a demonstration...​



Loinboy: You take their land.
Roudy: the land wasn't the Muslims,

Loinboy: You take their identity.
Roudy: there were no Palestinian people,

Loinboy: You take their history.
Roudy: nor was there a history.

Roudy: Nice try at deflecting the fact
Loinboy: Huh?
Bipolar disease hit your brain again? We were talking about Musim inability to coexist. which is what is happening all over Europe.

Do you:

A- deny
B - agree
C- change subject!

And none of those statements are false. I repeat, the land did not belong to the Palestinians, it was owned and run by the British and before that for 600 years it was the Ottoman Turks. The Arabs did not call themselves Palestinians up until 1967, there has never been an Arab Palestinian nation, with rulers, capitals, currencies, etc. the Palestinians are invading Arab squatters from neighboring countries.

I understand these are inconvenient facts for terrorist ass kissers like yourself. Deal with it, MOHOMMOD!
 
Where LOGIC is the "principles of correct reasoning",
ROUDY LOGIC is..........well............not that!

The best way to describe ROUDY LOGIC,
is with a demonstration...​



Loinboy: You take their land.
Roudy: the land wasn't the Muslims,

Loinboy: You take their identity.
Roudy: there were no Palestinian people,

Loinboy: You take their history.
Roudy: nor was there a history.

Roudy: Nice try at deflecting the fact
Loinboy: Huh?
Bipolar disease hit your brain again? We were talking about Musim inability to coexist. which is what is happening all over Europe.

Do you:

A- deny
B - agree
C- change subject!

And none of those statements are false. I repeat, the land did not belong to the Palestinians, it was owned and run by the British and before that for 600 years it was the Ottoman Turks. The Arabs did not call themselves Palestinians up until 1967, there has never been an Arab Palestinian nation, with rulers, capitals, currencies, etc. the Palestinians are invading Arab squatters from neighboring countries.

I understand these are inconvenient facts for terrorist ass kissers like yourself. Deal with it, MOHOMMOD!

Mandates did not own anything. Their job was to assist other countries.
 
For anyone who doesn't think the "occupation" of Palestinian land by Israel for the last 45 years is not the main cause of all the hostility in that area, all they have to do, is ask themselves how would they handle it, if their neighborhood was "occupied" by a foreign force? This video tends to shed a little light on that subject.


Imagine If London Was Occupied by Israel [HQ].mp4 - YouTube

:lol::eusa_boohoo::rofl::eusa_boohoo::lol:

Israel has little violence compared to the shitte vs sunni murders.
not to mention acid attachs
"honor" killings, many generations old
vast executions of women
muslims going after christians



krist

after to god damn long you'd think the Pals would have tried, sincerely tried to live in peace one damn time.

but no, the like seeing their women and children die in front of them as they try to kill people.

as insane as that is, it's the only logical conclusion.
 
It's easier to imagine if London was occupied or taken over by middle eastern immigrants, because it is.

A fast google will explain a lot.
London's population is at about 7.5 million.
There seem to be around 88,000 people from Bangladesh and 67,000 from Pakistan.

So, with 150,000 middle eastern people (Wide acceptance of the middle east) out of 7.5 million - How exactly does than make an occupation?

That's why he's called MAD, Indofred.....MAD INDEED:cool:
 

Forum List

Back
Top