Imagine a US where we all lived by the Bible

[presonorek]

Why does this matter? Slavery is illegal. These scriptures do not apply to anybody in 2015. The Israelite tradition favors life over death. Their whole religion is based on that concept. It makes perfect sense for them to have a law discouraging the death of slaves. Even though they were considered property they still contained life which was paramount in the Israelite religion.

People act like the scriptures in the Bible pertaining to slavery are so morbid.

Slavery was a widely accepted institution even as recent as 1865. Whoop ti freaking do. Slavery was mentioned. Oh wow! The Bible says ass too. He he snicker snicker. I am a twelve year old boy.

Grow up. These scriptures have nothing to do with our modern culture.

Unlike 150 years ago, slavery is consider illegal and immoral today. The scripture that you are whining about has no bearing on anything going on today.

Try to shock us with something of substance. Most Christians know that slavery and donkeys were in the Bible.

Most Christians today have no clue what Christ was about.

Do you have a clue what Christ is about?

 

[Moonglow]

These refugees are going to die if someone doesn't take them in. The general is giving the soldiers an incentive to provide for these girls for the rest of their lives so that they do not die in miserable poverty. If the United States engaged in conquering nations we would need a system similar to this in place too. Otherwise the welfare system would be too overloaded to function. Why did you bring this up? It isn't applicable to the United States. We don't engage in conquering nations. This brings up no valuable point for discussion.

The US did not get to the size it is today by God giving the USA all it's conquered territories, they were taken by death at the end of a sword or gun....

The English did that several hundred years beforehand. The only people that were killed were British soldiers. There were no excess women and children as part of the spoils. It really was a different situation. Israel was conquering densely populated areas. There were natives here in the Americas but there really was so few that they couldn't assimilate or be slaughtered off.

There was Natives that lived on the land before the US, it was not the British that drove them out.......I happen to be part Cherokee, if you have never heard of the Trail of Tears, maybe you could see what generous, gentle, kind God fearing people were in the US in the mid 1800's... The Mexicans were driven off lands they inhabited by US soldiers and citizens..Shall I continue, or do you doubt history?

 

[Moonglow]

Why does this matter? Slavery is illegal. These scriptures do not apply to anybody in 2015. The Israelite tradition favors life over death. Their whole religion is based on that concept. It makes perfect sense for them to have a law discouraging the death of slaves. Even though they were considered property they still contained life which was paramount in the Israelite religion.

People act like the scriptures in the Bible pertaining to slavery are so morbid.

Slavery was a widely accepted institution even as recent as 1865. Whoop ti freaking do. Slavery was mentioned. Oh wow! The Bible says ass too. He he snicker snicker. I am a twelve year old boy.

Grow up. These scriptures have nothing to do with our modern culture.

Unlike 150 years ago, slavery is consider illegal and immoral today. The scripture that you are whining about has no bearing on anything going on today.

Try to shock us with something of substance. Most Christians know that slavery and donkeys were in the Bible.

Most Christians today have no clue what Christ was about.

Do you have a clue what Christ is about?

Something imperfect humans could ever never be...

 

[presonorek]

The last sentence of that article says this, "We left a message for Anderson at his church but we're still waiting to hear back."

They must have waiting 5 minutes. Steve Anderson loves air time. That last sentence was a lie or an extreme exaggeration.

A situation like "He goes on to say killing gays is the way to an AIDS-free world by Christmas." is a problem for a psychiatric hospital. The problem "Aids and homosexuality" is by the way a problem of "Aids and anal sex" or "Aids and drugs". And anal sex or drugs is not only a problem of gay men but also of others. He has a lot to do if he likes to kill all men in the world until Christmas because he lives in fear on Aids. As I said yet: The best could be he restarts into a normal life in a psychiatric hospital under control of a professional team of doctors, therapists and care attendents.

I am confused. I think he only advocated for the death of sodomites, adulterers and fornicators. That leaves all faithful married men alive and incapable of spreading AIDS.

AIDS cannot spread without sexual perversion. It is impossible.

These others that you describe are not two heterosexuals in committed relationships. Pastor Steven Anderson does not believe in gay men. According to scripture all gay men are actively bisexual. Of course others are affected but not all people are vulnerable.

The benefits of sexual purity isn't hard to understand but apparently it is easy to ignore.

Blood transfusions and drug use

Potatoes and corn flakes

 

[presonorek]

These refugees are going to die if someone doesn't take them in. The general is giving the soldiers an incentive to provide for these girls for the rest of their lives so that they do not die in miserable poverty. If the United States engaged in conquering nations we would need a system similar to this in place too. Otherwise the welfare system would be too overloaded to function. Why did you bring this up? It isn't applicable to the United States. We don't engage in conquering nations. This brings up no valuable point for discussion.

The US did not get to the size it is today by God giving the USA all it's conquered territories, they were taken by death at the end of a sword or gun....

The English did that several hundred years beforehand. The only people that were killed were British soldiers. There were no excess women and children as part of the spoils. It really was a different situation. Israel was conquering densely populated areas. There were natives here in the Americas but there really was so few that they couldn't assimilate or be slaughtered off.

There was Natives that lived on the land before the US, it was not the British that drove them out.......I happen to be part Cherokee, if you have never heard of the Trail of Tears, maybe you could see what generous, gentle, kind God fearing people were in the US in the mid 1800's... The Mexicans were driven off lands they inhabited by US soldiers and citizens..Shall I continue, or do you doubt history?

We didn't follow the Bible. We marched them to Oklahoma instead.

 

[presonorek]

Instigators of very heavy crimes like murder are not in a good position.

Pastor Steven Anderson wasn't advocating murder. The Bible wasn't advocating murder.

You said before:

... In the video, Anderson cites a Bible passage he says is the "cure" for AIDS:

"Here's what the Bible says, Leviticus 20:13, 'If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination. They shall surely be put to death. Their blood shall be upon them.' And that, my friend, is the cure for AIDS. It was right there in the Bible all along."

His message is that killing gays is a divinely sanctioned way to rid the world of AIDS. ...

I would say this speaks not only about murder - this speaks even about mass-murder.

He was referring to capital punishment. The government would execute offenders justly and humanely. Pastor Steven Anderson is strongly opposed to vigilante behavior. You have it all wrong.

A lawful execution is not murder. By the way, this method would rid the United States of AIDS more efficiently than raising money and conducting research. Anybody can tell that. They are just afraid to admit it.

 

[Moonglow]

These refugees are going to die if someone doesn't take them in. The general is giving the soldiers an incentive to provide for these girls for the rest of their lives so that they do not die in miserable poverty. If the United States engaged in conquering nations we would need a system similar to this in place too. Otherwise the welfare system would be too overloaded to function. Why did you bring this up? It isn't applicable to the United States. We don't engage in conquering nations. This brings up no valuable point for discussion.

The US did not get to the size it is today by God giving the USA all it's conquered territories, they were taken by death at the end of a sword or gun....

The English did that several hundred years beforehand. The only people that were killed were British soldiers. There were no excess women and children as part of the spoils. It really was a different situation. Israel was conquering densely populated areas. There were natives here in the Americas but there really was so few that they couldn't assimilate or be slaughtered off.

There was Natives that lived on the land before the US, it was not the British that drove them out.......I happen to be part Cherokee, if you have never heard of the Trail of Tears, maybe you could see what generous, gentle, kind God fearing people were in the US in the mid 1800's... The Mexicans were driven off lands they inhabited by US soldiers and citizens..Shall I continue, or do you doubt history?

We didn't follow the Bible. We marched them to Oklahoma instead.

The last sentence of that article says this, "We left a message for Anderson at his church but we're still waiting to hear back."

They must have waiting 5 minutes. Steve Anderson loves air time. That last sentence was a lie or an extreme exaggeration.

A situation like "He goes on to say killing gays is the way to an AIDS-free world by Christmas." is a problem for a psychiatric hospital. The problem "Aids and homosexuality" is by the way a problem of "Aids and anal sex" or "Aids and drugs". And anal sex or drugs is not only a problem of gay men but also of others. He has a lot to do if he likes to kill all men in the world until Christmas because he lives in fear on Aids. As I said yet: The best could be he restarts into a normal life in a psychiatric hospital under control of a professional team of doctors, therapists and care attendents.

I am confused. I think he only advocated for the death of sodomites, adulterers and fornicators. That leaves all faithful married men alive and incapable of spreading AIDS.

AIDS cannot spread without sexual perversion. It is impossible.

These others that you describe are not two heterosexuals in committed relationships. Pastor Steven Anderson does not believe in gay men. According to scripture all gay men are actively bisexual. Of course others are affected but not all people are vulnerable.

The benefits of sexual purity isn't hard to understand but apparently it is easy to ignore.

Blood transfusions and drug use

Potatoes and corn flakes

yet veggies do not pass on the AIDS virus...Sex is not the only whey to contract the disease...

 

[Moonglow]

Instigators of very heavy crimes like murder are not in a good position.

Pastor Steven Anderson wasn't advocating murder. The Bible wasn't advocating murder.

You said before:

... In the video, Anderson cites a Bible passage he says is the "cure" for AIDS:

"Here's what the Bible says, Leviticus 20:13, 'If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination. They shall surely be put to death. Their blood shall be upon them.' And that, my friend, is the cure for AIDS. It was right there in the Bible all along."

His message is that killing gays is a divinely sanctioned way to rid the world of AIDS. ...

I would say this speaks not only about murder - this speaks even about mass-murder.

He was referring to capital punishment. The government would execute offenders justly and humanely. Pastor Steven Anderson is strongly opposed to vigilante behavior. You have it all wrong.

A lawful execution is not murder.

An eye for and eye is a code of justice, not a code of vengeance...

 

[presonorek]

Instigators of very heavy crimes like murder are not in a good position.

Pastor Steven Anderson wasn't advocating murder. The Bible wasn't advocating murder.

You said before:

... In the video, Anderson cites a Bible passage he says is the "cure" for AIDS:

"Here's what the Bible says, Leviticus 20:13, 'If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination. They shall surely be put to death. Their blood shall be upon them.' And that, my friend, is the cure for AIDS. It was right there in the Bible all along."

His message is that killing gays is a divinely sanctioned way to rid the world of AIDS. ...

I would say this speaks not only about murder - this speaks even about mass-murder.

He was referring to capital punishment. The government would execute offenders justly and humanely. Pastor Steven Anderson is strongly opposed to vigilante behavior. You have it all wrong.

A lawful execution is not murder.

An eye for and eye is a code of justice, not a code of vengeance...

This is a cure for AIDS. It has nothing to do with vengeance.

 

[Avatar4321]

Instigators of very heavy crimes like murder are not in a good position.

Pastor Steven Anderson wasn't advocating murder. The Bible wasn't advocating murder.

You said before:

... In the video, Anderson cites a Bible passage he says is the "cure" for AIDS:

"Here's what the Bible says, Leviticus 20:13, 'If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination. They shall surely be put to death. Their blood shall be upon them.' And that, my friend, is the cure for AIDS. It was right there in the Bible all along."

His message is that killing gays is a divinely sanctioned way to rid the world of AIDS. ...

I would say this speaks not only about murder - this speaks even about mass-murder.

He was referring to capital punishment. The government would execute offenders justly and humanely. Pastor Steven Anderson is strongly opposed to vigilante behavior. You have it all wrong.

A lawful execution is not murder.

An eye for and eye is a code of justice, not a code of vengeance...

This is a cure for AIDS. It has nothing to do with vengeance.

We have a cure for aids?

 

[Moonglow]

Instigators of very heavy crimes like murder are not in a good position.

Pastor Steven Anderson wasn't advocating murder. The Bible wasn't advocating murder.

You said before:

... In the video, Anderson cites a Bible passage he says is the "cure" for AIDS:

"Here's what the Bible says, Leviticus 20:13, 'If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination. They shall surely be put to death. Their blood shall be upon them.' And that, my friend, is the cure for AIDS. It was right there in the Bible all along."

His message is that killing gays is a divinely sanctioned way to rid the world of AIDS. ...

I would say this speaks not only about murder - this speaks even about mass-murder.

He was referring to capital punishment. The government would execute offenders justly and humanely. Pastor Steven Anderson is strongly opposed to vigilante behavior. You have it all wrong.

A lawful execution is not murder.

An eye for and eye is a code of justice, not a code of vengeance...

This is a cure for AIDS. It has nothing to do with vengeance.

Death by an executioner for sexual activity, would be considered cruel and unusual punishment...

 

[Moonglow]

Pastor Steven Anderson wasn't advocating murder. The Bible wasn't advocating murder.

You said before:

... In the video, Anderson cites a Bible passage he says is the "cure" for AIDS:

"Here's what the Bible says, Leviticus 20:13, 'If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination. They shall surely be put to death. Their blood shall be upon them.' And that, my friend, is the cure for AIDS. It was right there in the Bible all along."

His message is that killing gays is a divinely sanctioned way to rid the world of AIDS. ...

I would say this speaks not only about murder - this speaks even about mass-murder.

He was referring to capital punishment. The government would execute offenders justly and humanely. Pastor Steven Anderson is strongly opposed to vigilante behavior. You have it all wrong.

A lawful execution is not murder.

An eye for and eye is a code of justice, not a code of vengeance...

This is a cure for AIDS. It has nothing to do with vengeance.

We have a cure for aids?

He is mentioning how a pastor wants to euthanize humans with AIDS...See there are progressive religious people...with a tinge of social Darwinism...

 

[presonorek]

Pastor Steven Anderson wasn't advocating murder. The Bible wasn't advocating murder.

You said before:

... In the video, Anderson cites a Bible passage he says is the "cure" for AIDS:

"Here's what the Bible says, Leviticus 20:13, 'If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination. They shall surely be put to death. Their blood shall be upon them.' And that, my friend, is the cure for AIDS. It was right there in the Bible all along."

His message is that killing gays is a divinely sanctioned way to rid the world of AIDS. ...

I would say this speaks not only about murder - this speaks even about mass-murder.

He was referring to capital punishment. The government would execute offenders justly and humanely. Pastor Steven Anderson is strongly opposed to vigilante behavior. You have it all wrong.

A lawful execution is not murder.

An eye for and eye is a code of justice, not a code of vengeance...

This is a cure for AIDS. It has nothing to do with vengeance.

We have a cure for aids?

Yes but you have to watch the hour long video.

 

[presonorek]

Pastor Steven Anderson wasn't advocating murder. The Bible wasn't advocating murder.

You said before:

... In the video, Anderson cites a Bible passage he says is the "cure" for AIDS:

"Here's what the Bible says, Leviticus 20:13, 'If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination. They shall surely be put to death. Their blood shall be upon them.' And that, my friend, is the cure for AIDS. It was right there in the Bible all along."

His message is that killing gays is a divinely sanctioned way to rid the world of AIDS. ...

I would say this speaks not only about murder - this speaks even about mass-murder.

He was referring to capital punishment. The government would execute offenders justly and humanely. Pastor Steven Anderson is strongly opposed to vigilante behavior. You have it all wrong.

A lawful execution is not murder.

An eye for and eye is a code of justice, not a code of vengeance...

This is a cure for AIDS. It has nothing to do with vengeance.

Death by an executioner for sexual activity, would be considered cruel and unusual punishment...

We do it for murderers. It would be done in the same manner. It would probably be lethal injection.

We probably wouldn't use stoning or anything cruel like that. It would be done justly and humanely.

Some people admit that they have no control over their sexual urges. That's a dangerous individual.

It is more dangerous when they prove it.

 

[presonorek]

Almost everybody has an internet connection and access to porn. There is no excuse for engaging in dangerous sexual behavior in these modern times.

 

[Moonglow]

You said before:

I would say this speaks not only about murder - this speaks even about mass-murder.

He was referring to capital punishment. The government would execute offenders justly and humanely. Pastor Steven Anderson is strongly opposed to vigilante behavior. You have it all wrong.

A lawful execution is not murder.

An eye for and eye is a code of justice, not a code of vengeance...

This is a cure for AIDS. It has nothing to do with vengeance.

Death by an executioner for sexual activity, would be considered cruel and unusual punishment...

We do it for murderers. It would be done in the same manner. It would probably be lethal injection.

We probably wouldn't use stoning or anything cruel like that. It would be done justly and humanely.

Some people admit that they have no control over their sexual urges. That's a dangerous individual.

It is more dangerous when they prove it.

Execution is for capital crimes only.....and many do not execute prisoners because of the faults in the judicial system...You'll just have to learn to drown the fire aids infested...

 

[Moonglow]

Almost everybody has an internet connection and access to porn. There is no excuse for engaging in dangerous sexual behavior in these modern times.

Internet porn does not compare to the feel of real flesh.....or do you not know that?

 

[presonorek]

Almost everybody has an internet connection and access to porn. There is no excuse for engaging in dangerous sexual behavior in these modern times.

Internet porn does not compare to the feel of real flesh.....or do you not know that?

There is a healthy way to do that too.

 

[presonorek]

Almost everybody has an internet connection and access to porn. There is no excuse for engaging in dangerous sexual behavior in these modern times.

Internet porn does not compare to the feel of real flesh.....or do you not know that?

I have been married 13 years so yes. I do know that but I am not an animal with no self control. I see lots of booty that I would love to grab but I don't. I would hate to get the itchy Willy or anything silly like that. I kind of use my brain and it has worked so far.

Getting AIDS is dumb.

 

[Moonglow]

Almost everybody has an internet connection and access to porn. There is no excuse for engaging in dangerous sexual behavior in these modern times.

Internet porn does not compare to the feel of real flesh.....or do you not know that?

I have been married 13 years so yes. I do know that but I am not an animal with no self control. I see lots of booty that I would love to grab but I don't. I would hate to get the itchy Willy or anything silly like that. I kind of use my brain and it has worked so far.

Getting AIDS is dumb.

So a patient that contracts AIDS by a blood transfusion is dumb and should be executed for the good of the Godly....How ironic...Do you always lust for the death of children?