Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Doesn't more CO2 mean faster plant growth, which means more food for people? Why do liberals want to take food from people?
Doesn't more CO2 mean faster plant growth, which means more food for people? Why do liberals want to take food from people?
Your pretty much an idiot, aren't you?
Doesn't more CO2 mean faster plant growth, which means more food for people? Why do liberals want to take food from people?
Your pretty much an idiot, aren't you?
Do you deny that libbys are the reason that corn crops have been diverted for ethanol production, leading to higher food prices which hurt the poor of the world disproportionally?
Doesn't more CO2 mean faster plant growth, which means more food for people? Why do liberals want to take food from people?
Your pretty much an idiot, aren't you?
Doesn't more CO2 mean faster plant growth, which means more food for people? Why do liberals want to take food from people?
Your pretty much an idiot, aren't you?
Doesn't more CO2 mean faster plant growth, which means more food for people? Why do liberals want to take food from people?
Your pretty much an idiot, aren't you?
Let me correct your sentence so you don't look too much like an idiot.
You meant to write
"You're pretty much an idiot aren't you?"
You'll notice the change in the spelling of you're. Right? You see you're is a contraction of you are.
Your is a possessive form of you which I believe is called an attributive adjective in English classes.
You called Liberty an idiot for pointing out that increased CO2 helps plants grow faster, inferring that the cause for increased CO2 is worse than the benefits. I was pointing out that 'fixes' for one problem that gets a lot of press often involve 'The Law of Unintended Consequences' by causing worse problems than the original situation. As this forum deals mostly with AGW, I am warning that changes implimented to decrease CO2 emmissions will likely cause more harm than good.
Doesn't more CO2 mean faster plant growth, which means more food for people? Why do liberals want to take food from people?
Your pretty much an idiot, aren't you?
why don't you disprove my point instead of openly being a douche?
You called Liberty an idiot for pointing out that increased CO2 helps plants grow faster, inferring that the cause for increased CO2 is worse than the benefits. I was pointing out that 'fixes' for one problem that gets a lot of press often involve 'The Law of Unintended Consequences' by causing worse problems than the original situation. As this forum deals mostly with AGW, I am warning that changes implimented to decrease CO2 emmissions will likely cause more harm than good.
exactly! now, METHANE on the other hand....curbing that SOB should be top priority, not life/food creating gases like CO2.
You called Liberty an idiot for pointing out that increased CO2 helps plants grow faster, inferring that the cause for increased CO2 is worse than the benefits. I was pointing out that 'fixes' for one problem that gets a lot of press often involve 'The Law of Unintended Consequences' by causing worse problems than the original situation. As this forum deals mostly with AGW, I am warning that changes implimented to decrease CO2 emmissions will likely cause more harm than good.
exactly! now, METHANE on the other hand....curbing that SOB should be top priority, not life/food creating gases like CO2.
But I like eating beef! Cows are big methane producers but I don't want to do without them.
exactly! now, METHANE on the other hand....curbing that SOB should be top priority, not life/food creating gases like CO2.
But I like eating beef! Cows are big methane producers but I don't want to do without them.
there are much larger methane sources out there, unfortunately its almost all natural. that was the point...i gaffed.
Doesn't more CO2 mean faster plant growth, which means more food for people? Why do liberals want to take food from people?
Doesn't more CO2 mean faster plant growth, which means more food for people? Why do liberals want to take food from people?
Doesn't more CO2 mean faster plant growth, which means more food for people? Why do liberals want to take food from people?
For Your information:
Newspapers Retract 'Climategate' Claims, but Damage Still Done
Newspapers Retract 'Climategate' Claims, but Damage Still Done - Newsweek