Illinois Election Officials Caught Lying about Military Ballots

[teapartysamurai]

I really can't give you a good money quote. You should really read it all:

EXCLUSIVE: Illinois Elections Officials Caught Lying About Military Ballots - Big Government

But it's pretty obvious Illinois has a vested interest in disinfranchizing military voters. So much of a vested interest they will lie and cover up.

They sent the ballots, oops, they didn't send the ballots.

It's obvious Democrats don't want military votes counted, and this is not the only state where this is happening.

 

[Full-Auto]

I really can't give you a good money quote. You should really read it all:

EXCLUSIVE: Illinois Elections Officials Caught Lying About Military Ballots - Big Government

But it's pretty obvious Illinois has a vested interest in disinfranchizing military voters. So much of a vested interest they will lie and cover up.

They sent the ballots, oops, they didn't send the ballots.

It's obvious Democrats don't want military votes counted, and this is not the only state where this is happening.

This is so very typical of democrats. Remember 79k stimulus checks were issued to the dead. I bet they rise once again to vote. History of the dem party demands it.

 

[Mr. H.]

The name isn't "Whitey!"

Rich Whitney, the Green Party gubernatorial candidate in Illinois, is turning red with anger over the misspelling of his name as ‘Whitey’ on the printout of electronic ballots. He wants the error corrected by Election Day, if not sooner.

Oops... whatever it takes to help Quinn, right?

 

[Trajan]

The name isn't "Whitey!"

Rich Whitney, the Green Party gubernatorial candidate in Illinois, is turning red with anger over the misspelling of his name as ‘Whitey’ on the printout of electronic ballots. He wants the error corrected by Election Day, if not sooner.

Oops... whatever it takes to help Quinn, right?

thats a classic...


NY too is caught in a ballot morass ala military ballots. They were told years ago to fix it...and....

 

[edthecynic]

I really can't give you a good money quote. You should really read it all:

EXCLUSIVE: Illinois Elections Officials Caught Lying About Military Ballots - Big Government

But it's pretty obvious Illinois has a vested interest in disinfranchizing military voters. So much of a vested interest they will lie and cover up.

They sent the ballots, oops, they didn't send the ballots.

It's obvious Democrats don't want military votes counted, and this is not the only state where this is happening.

Bigotbart has no credibility.

To swallow Bigotbart's BS we're supposed to believe that Democrats are trying to suppress the votes from a district that is 97% black, a group that votes over 90% Democratic!!!

This is an example of both how sophisticated the GOP false flag operations are and how stupid and gullible CON$ are.

 

[teapartysamurai]

I really can't give you a good money quote. You should really read it all:

EXCLUSIVE: Illinois Elections Officials Caught Lying About Military Ballots - Big Government

But it's pretty obvious Illinois has a vested interest in disinfranchizing military voters. So much of a vested interest they will lie and cover up.

They sent the ballots, oops, they didn't send the ballots.

It's obvious Democrats don't want military votes counted, and this is not the only state where this is happening.

Bigotbart has no credibility.

To swallow Bigotbart's BS we're supposed to believe that Democrats are trying to suppress the votes from a district that is 97% black, a group that votes over 90% Democratic!!!

This is an example of both how sophisticated the GOP false flag operations are and how stupid and gullible CON$ are.

And Ed says so with NO evidence and no credibility.

Boy we can't use Breitbart again!

 

[edthecynic]

I really can't give you a good money quote. You should really read it all:

EXCLUSIVE: Illinois Elections Officials Caught Lying About Military Ballots - Big Government

But it's pretty obvious Illinois has a vested interest in disinfranchizing military voters. So much of a vested interest they will lie and cover up.

They sent the ballots, oops, they didn't send the ballots.

It's obvious Democrats don't want military votes counted, and this is not the only state where this is happening.

Bigotbart has no credibility.

To swallow Bigotbart's BS we're supposed to believe that Democrats are trying to suppress the votes from a district that is 97% black, a group that votes over 90% Democratic!!!

This is an example of both how sophisticated the GOP false flag operations are and how stupid and gullible CON$ are.

And Ed says so with NO evidence and no credibility.

Boy we can't use Breitbart again!

Bigotbart is the CON$ervative equivalent of Dan Rather. Can the Libs use Rather again?

Again, why would the Dems try to suppress the votes of people who vote overwhelmingly Democratic?

Obviously they wouldn't!!! The GOP sure would though, and to cover themselves would try to make it look like the Dems did it because they know CON$ are too STUPID to give it any thought whatsoever, as you have proven here and on other threads of the same topic.

 

[xotoxi]

I really can't give you a good money quote. You should really read it all:

EXCLUSIVE: Illinois Elections Officials Caught Lying About Military Ballots - Big Government

But it's pretty obvious Illinois has a vested interest in disinfranchizing military voters. So much of a vested interest they will lie and cover up.

They sent the ballots, oops, they didn't send the ballots.

It's obvious Democrats don't want military votes counted, and this is not the only state where this is happening.

Isn't Big Government run by Breitbart?

Okay...lets get some unbiased sources.

 

[WillowTree]

Oh but the only fucking thing the libturds care about is that they aren't getting "polled" on their cell phones. Soldiers fight and die for this country and are disenfranchised. Where the fuck is that idiot TruthMattersNot?

 

[Charles_Main]

Deliberate attempt by Democrats to suppress the mostly republican Military vote, and it looks like It is going to work.

The Vote Fraud has already begun.

Yay.

 

[edthecynic]

Deliberate attempt by Democrats to suppress the mostly republican Military vote, and it looks like It is going to work.

The Vote Fraud has already begun.

Yay.

How the hell would you know how the military votes with a SECRET ballot?????
That district is 97% black and you CON$ whine that blacks vote over 90% Democratic. The only way those blacks in the military are suddenly voting mostly GOP is if the General is changing their vote.

The CON$ claim about the military vote reminds me of the CON$ claim that the Libs are the slackers and CON$ are the achievers and then we find out that when CON$ bragged about how generous they are, they inadvertently revealed that Libs on the average earn more money than CON$.

 

[Revere]

If members of the military were Democrats, the blue states that are suppressing those votes would send the military two ballots each.

They'd send union goons overseas personally to see that they were filled out.

 

[edthecynic]

If members of the military were Democrats, the blue states that are suppressing those votes would send the military two ballots each.

They'd send union goons overseas personally to see that they were filled out.

CON$ always argue both sides of any issue depending on what suits them.

If there weren't any Democrats in the military, how could people like John Kerry get awarded phony medals as you CON$ claimed???? One day the Dems dominate everything in the military passing out awards to the unworthy and on another day there are no Dems in the military.

 

[Revere]

Was John Kerry's medal phony?

 

[edthecynic]

Was John Kerry's medal phony?

You CON$ claim it was! Why would the CON$ in the military give Kerry awards he didn't deserve? Obviously CON$ wouldn't give a Lib a combat medal he didn't deserve, so it must have been the Lib brass that gave Kerry awards that CON$ say he didn't earn. But how could there be a Lib brass if there are no Libs in the military?????

Obviously there is about the same distribution of Libs, CON$ and independents in the military as there are in the country in general, in spite of all CON$ervoFascist claims to the contrary.

 

[shintao]

I really can't give you a good money quote. You should really read it all:

EXCLUSIVE: Illinois Elections Officials Caught Lying About Military Ballots - Big Government

But it's pretty obvious Illinois has a vested interest in disinfranchizing military voters. So much of a vested interest they will lie and cover up.

They sent the ballots, oops, they didn't send the ballots.

It's obvious Democrats don't want military votes counted, and this is not the only state where this is happening.

Looks like everything was done correctly, so I see no problem. It's obvious Republicans are making up this story as they go along, and idiots actually post these conspiracies to drum up hate.

 

[syrenn]

Now where is truthdoesntmatter when you want her?

 

[Ame®icano]

Well, if truth... bring soldiers home to vote.

 

[SFC Ollie]

Military Times Poll...............

Published:
Dec. 31, 2007

Politics, Civilians and Policy

1) How would you describe your political views?
Very conservative
8.8%

Conservative
37%
Moderate
38.7%

Liberal
7%
Very liberal
1.4%

Decline to answer
7.1%

 

[edthecynic]

Military Times Poll...............

Published:
Dec. 31, 2007

Politics, Civilians and Policy

1) How would you describe your political views?
Very conservative
8.8%

Conservative
37%
Moderate
38.7%

Liberal
7%
Very liberal
1.4%

Decline to answer
7.1%

January 13, 2009
Nathaniel Frank, Senior Research Fellow
MILITARY TIMES POLL FLAWED

Military Times acknowledges that its survey is not based on a random sample of military personnel. What is not explained, however, is how the non-random sampling may bias responses. Dr. Gates as well as Palm researchers looked closely at the Times's raw data and found that in at least two important areas the Military Times pool of respondents looks different from the actual military: gender and partisan identification. For example, among the Times's 1,947 active-duty respondents, only 10 percent were women, compared to 15 percent of the actual military; among enlisted personnel, only 22.6 percent of the Times’s respondents were independents, compared to 66 percent of enlisted personnel in the Army.