Illegals In Mexico Begin Hunger Stike - 'We Are Fighting For 'OUR RIGHTS'?!

Dollar valuations prevent that. Also centralized government prevents that.
Dollar valuations prevent a wall. So does centralized government.
You can not build a wall tall enough to balance a $7.50(?) per hour minimum wage country against a less than a dollar a day crowd.
We are raising the minimum wage to raise more tax revenue.
That is just dog chasing its tail.

By the way, taxes are stupid because you need exports to create a tax base, but you can't tax exports but only working households. Therein stands the foundamentally futile and predatory nature of all taxes.
nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics.

higher paid labor pays more in taxes and creates more in demand.

No it does not, because there is no demand for their supply. And their 3rd party guarantor, the communist party, doesn't get money either.
 
No it is not in the constitution. Also it was only in the late 1980's or 1990's when the state specific naturalization laws were unified into a federal naturalization law.
Yes, it is. You are on the right wing; you have no "gospel Truth".
So where is that in the constitution then?
Where it is supposed to be.
So you have answered your own question. Nowhere indeed, because it is not in the constitution. It doesn't need to be in the constitution either, or anywhere, because it is unnecessary and meaningless.
There is no appeal to ignorance of the law. Where do you think the powers are listed in our Constitution?
That has nothing to do with unified naturalization.
 
Dollar valuations prevent a wall. So does centralized government.
You can not build a wall tall enough to balance a $7.50(?) per hour minimum wage country against a less than a dollar a day crowd.
We are raising the minimum wage to raise more tax revenue.
That is just dog chasing its tail.

By the way, taxes are stupid because you need exports to create a tax base, but you can't tax exports but only working households. Therein stands the foundamentally futile and predatory nature of all taxes.
nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics.

higher paid labor pays more in taxes and creates more in demand.

No it does not, because there is no demand for their supply. And their 3rd party guarantor, the communist party, doesn't get money either.
the right wing knows, Nothing about economics.

Yes, it does. Simply Because, higher paid labor creates more in demand and pay more in taxes.
 
Yes, it is. You are on the right wing; you have no "gospel Truth".
So where is that in the constitution then?
Where it is supposed to be.
So you have answered your own question. Nowhere indeed, because it is not in the constitution. It doesn't need to be in the constitution either, or anywhere, because it is unnecessary and meaningless.
There is no appeal to ignorance of the law. Where do you think the powers are listed in our Constitution?
That has nothing to do with unified naturalization.
You don't even know our own Constitution.
 
You can not build a wall tall enough to balance a $7.50(?) per hour minimum wage country against a less than a dollar a day crowd.
We are raising the minimum wage to raise more tax revenue.
That is just dog chasing its tail.

By the way, taxes are stupid because you need exports to create a tax base, but you can't tax exports but only working households. Therein stands the foundamentally futile and predatory nature of all taxes.
nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics.

higher paid labor pays more in taxes and creates more in demand.

No it does not, because there is no demand for their supply. And their 3rd party guarantor, the communist party, doesn't get money either.
the right wing knows, Nothing about economics.

Yes, it does. Simply Because, higher paid labor creates more in demand and pay more in taxes.

Socialist economics has already failed very obviously. It is obvious that it is you socialists who know nothing about it.

And as for higher wages without higher export, the equation is that it together with its associate taxes will be simply passed down to the sales prices, thereby reducing demand even worse. So it is still dog chasing its tail. You simply collect taxes from monies that you pay out from tax collections. Bravo. Socialists are idiots.
 
So where is that in the constitution then?
Where it is supposed to be.
So you have answered your own question. Nowhere indeed, because it is not in the constitution. It doesn't need to be in the constitution either, or anywhere, because it is unnecessary and meaningless.
There is no appeal to ignorance of the law. Where do you think the powers are listed in our Constitution?
That has nothing to do with unified naturalization.
You don't even know our own Constitution.
Says the socialist that wants to distort the constitution. My monkey knows more about the constitution than you.
 
We are raising the minimum wage to raise more tax revenue.
That is just dog chasing its tail.

By the way, taxes are stupid because you need exports to create a tax base, but you can't tax exports but only working households. Therein stands the foundamentally futile and predatory nature of all taxes.
nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics.

higher paid labor pays more in taxes and creates more in demand.

No it does not, because there is no demand for their supply. And their 3rd party guarantor, the communist party, doesn't get money either.
the right wing knows, Nothing about economics.

Yes, it does. Simply Because, higher paid labor creates more in demand and pay more in taxes.

Socialist economics has already failed very obviously. It is obvious that it is you socialists who know nothing about it.

And as for higher wages without higher export, the equation is that it together with its associate taxes will be simply passed down to the sales prices, thereby reducing demand even worse. So it is still dog chasing its tail. You simply collect taxes from monies that you pay out from tax collections. Bravo. Socialists are idiots.
the laws of demand and supply don't cease to exist for right wing fantasy.
 
Where it is supposed to be.
So you have answered your own question. Nowhere indeed, because it is not in the constitution. It doesn't need to be in the constitution either, or anywhere, because it is unnecessary and meaningless.
There is no appeal to ignorance of the law. Where do you think the powers are listed in our Constitution?
That has nothing to do with unified naturalization.
You don't even know our own Constitution.
Says the socialist that wants to distort the constitution. My monkey knows more about the constitution than you.
lol. maybe in right wing fantasy. in the ordinary world, there is very little reason to take the right wing seriously about the law, Constitutional or otherwise. Our welfare clause is General and we have a Commerce Clause; we should have no illegal problem on our border.
 
So you have answered your own question. Nowhere indeed, because it is not in the constitution. It doesn't need to be in the constitution either, or anywhere, because it is unnecessary and meaningless.
There is no appeal to ignorance of the law. Where do you think the powers are listed in our Constitution?
That has nothing to do with unified naturalization.
You don't even know our own Constitution.
Says the socialist that wants to distort the constitution. My monkey knows more about the constitution than you.
lol. maybe in right wing fantasy. in the ordinary world, there is very little reason to take the right wing seriously about the law, Constitutional or otherwise. Our welfare clause is General and we have a Commerce Clause; we should have no illegal problem on our border.
I am tired of debating with a word repeating robosoftware.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top