If you were forced to choose...

[DiamondDave]

Between following the constitution strictly as written, and eliminating it all together and empowering government to do whatever it felt it had to do... Which would you choose and why??

It is indeed a simple question... and take this like an all powerful megabeing (God, Superman, invading alien force or whatever) was making it that there was indeed no in between choice or option

 

[PratchettFan]

On what conceivable basis do you think that is a simple question?

 

[koshergrl]

"and take this like an all powerful megabeing (God, Superman, invading alien force or whatever) was making it that there was indeed no in between choice or option"

??? What was the purpose of adding that?

Follow the Constitution.

 

[onecut39]

Between following the constitution strictly as written, and eliminating it all together and empowering government to do whatever it felt it had to do... Which would you choose and why??

It is indeed a simple question... and take this like an all powerful megabeing (God, Superman, invading alien force or whatever) was making it that there was indeed no in between choice or option

Your "poll" is a classic example of the false choice. The choice offered is ridiculous. Both options suck!

 

[strollingbones]

following the constitution is easier said than done....

Ten things you may not have known about your Constitution : Socratic Rhythm Method

 

[pvsi.]

Eliminating the constitution and government running by what it felt necessary or proper to do

I was about to vote for this choice, but then I noticed the little word "it", rather then the people.

 

[onecut39]

Between following the constitution strictly as written, and eliminating it all together and empowering government to do whatever it felt it had to do... Which would you choose and why??

It is indeed a simple question... and take this like an all powerful megabeing (God, Superman, invading alien force or whatever) was making it that there was indeed no in between choice or option

Sorry Diamond. I seem to have repeated your excellent answer.

 

[RDD_1210]

More "Simple" questions from one of the simple minds. At least you're consistent simpleton.

 

[elvis]

Between following the constitution strictly as written, and eliminating it all together and empowering government to do whatever it felt it had to do... Which would you choose and why??

It is indeed a simple question... and take this like an all powerful megabeing (God, Superman, invading alien force or whatever) was making it that there was indeed no in between choice or option

Lincoln and FDR violated the constitution and were right in doing so....

I disagree about it being a simple question.

 

[DiamondDave]

"and take this like an all powerful megabeing (God, Superman, invading alien force or whatever) was making it that there was indeed no in between choice or option"

??? What was the purpose of adding that?

Follow the Constitution.

TO prevent those making answers about changing the constitution to something different, etc...

 

[DiamondDave]

Eliminating the constitution and government running by what it felt necessary or proper to do

I was about to vote for this choice, but then I noticed the little word "it", rather then the people.

Government does not let everything go to popular vote

 

[DiamondDave]

Between following the constitution strictly as written, and eliminating it all together and empowering government to do whatever it felt it had to do... Which would you choose and why??

It is indeed a simple question... and take this like an all powerful megabeing (God, Superman, invading alien force or whatever) was making it that there was indeed no in between choice or option

Lincoln and FDR violated the constitution and were right in doing so....

I disagree about it being a simple question.

To violate the constitution is indeed wrong... to go thru the included amendment process to change things as allowed, is the right approach

 

[elvis]

Between following the constitution strictly as written, and eliminating it all together and empowering government to do whatever it felt it had to do... Which would you choose and why??

It is indeed a simple question... and take this like an all powerful megabeing (God, Superman, invading alien force or whatever) was making it that there was indeed no in between choice or option

Lincoln and FDR violated the constitution and were right in doing so....

I disagree about it being a simple question.

To violate the constitution is indeed wrong... to go thru the included amendment process to change things as allowed, is the right approach

Who says its always wrong? Is it on par with the bible?

 

[elvis]

With a gun to the nation's head, you violate the constitution.

 

[Ravi]

With a gun to the nation's head, you violate the constitution.

Exactly. And be prepared to pay the price.

Pretty simple.

 

[Jackson]

Our Constitution has served us well...when followed and has the mechanics to alter any part of it to meet our needs today. Keep and abide by this marvelous document!!!!

 

[DiamondDave]

Lincoln and FDR violated the constitution and were right in doing so....

I disagree about it being a simple question.

To violate the constitution is indeed wrong... to go thru the included amendment process to change things as allowed, is the right approach

Who says its always wrong? Is it on par with the bible?

To violate the constitution and make it ok to do so, puts us where we are... Taking the power away from it to limit the operation of government itself... You throw out 1 part on a whim or add power on a whim, and you might as well have no limitations at all...

Knowing there needs to be change is one thing... Going against the process that makes sure the change goes the proper checks and balances is another.. It goes against the reason to have a constitution in the first place.. it makes the government infinitely powerful and without constraint

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

On what conceivable basis do you think that is a simple question?

It couldn't be more simple. Either you believe in our founding principles or you enjoy anarchy.

 

[strollingbones]

perhaps a better question would be...is the constitution a living and breathing document that can evolve as needed?

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Between following the constitution strictly as written, and eliminating it all together and empowering government to do whatever it felt it had to do... Which would you choose and why??

It is indeed a simple question... and take this like an all powerful megabeing (God, Superman, invading alien force or whatever) was making it that there was indeed no in between choice or option

Lincoln and FDR violated the constitution and were right in doing so....

I disagree about it being a simple question.

The question is simple. The act of following it may be complicated but that really isn't the question.