Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
LolPainting young women into a corner.Would you then support mandatory coverage for birth control in health care insurance plans?
No...
Would you support condom distribution in schools?
Hell No...
Would you support a national sex Ed program?
Phuck No...
If you want fewer abortions, provide an alternative.
Would you then support mandatory coverage for birth control in health care insurance plans? Would you support condom distribution in schools? Would you support a national sex Ed program?
lolIf a bitch wants to fuck, let her, but when it comes to an abortion, since she did it, she needs to pay for the abortion, not me.
As long as I have to pay for wars and corporate welfare, you should pay for abortions.
LolNo, no and no.
Old people don't need birth control because of their age induced sterility, so why should they buy a policy that includes it? Sodomy as well is non-procreative, homos don't need birth control either. Same with celibate individuals- why should groups of nuns or monks or incel individuals have to buy a policy that doesn't cover them. Further, some major religious groups including the Catholic Church are morally opposed to contraception.
Ditto for schools, a lot of students belong to religious faiths that do not sanction prophylactics.
As far as a national sex ed program, different Americans have different ideas about sex ed.
Old people, or really anyone without kids do not need schools, but yet they all help pay for them.
It all comes down to if your political ideology is more important than decreasing the number of abortion
No, no and no.
Old people don't need birth control because of their age induced sterility, so why should they buy a policy that includes it? Sodomy as well is non-procreative, homos don't need birth control either. Same with celibate individuals- why should groups of nuns or monks or incel individuals have to buy a policy that doesn't cover them. Further, some major religious groups including the Catholic Church are morally opposed to contraception.
Ditto for schools, a lot of students belong to religious faiths that do not sanction prophylactics.
As far as a national sex ed program, different Americans have different ideas about sex ed.
Old people, or really anyone without kids do not need schools, but yet they all help pay for them.
It all comes down to if your political ideology is more important than decreasing the number of abortion
I thought you were a libertarian?
Can you explain how forcing someone to buy a policy they don't want fits into the libertarian framework?
LolNo, no and no.
Old people don't need birth control because of their age induced sterility, so why should they buy a policy that includes it? Sodomy as well is non-procreative, homos don't need birth control either. Same with celibate individuals- why should groups of nuns or monks or incel individuals have to buy a policy that doesn't cover them. Further, some major religious groups including the Catholic Church are morally opposed to contraception.
Ditto for schools, a lot of students belong to religious faiths that do not sanction prophylactics.
As far as a national sex ed program, different Americans have different ideas about sex ed.
Old people, or really anyone without kids do not need schools, but yet they all help pay for them.
It all comes down to if your political ideology is more important than decreasing the number of abortion
I thought you were a libertarian?
Can you explain how forcing someone to buy a policy they don't want fits into the libertarian framework?
It does not fit into that framework. But then again neither does being against abortion in general.
This is what I meant above when I spoke of political ideology vs desire to see less abortions.
My views against abortion are strong enough to override my other political views.
I want to see fewer abortions and the best way to do that is to have fewer pregnancies.
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Lol
Poor life choices are the driver of the vast majority of abortions... People need to own their fuck ups.
The collective never has the moral high ground
I think murder is an appropriate term actually. When everyone thinks of murder they’re not thinking about the strict legal interpretation. Killing someone who doesn’t represent a threat to you or hasn’t done anything to you to justify you killing them is murder. It’s even worse when the person who is killed is a helpless victim. You’re correct only in terms of semantics.
do you call it murder when the military kills civilians during a war?
No, no and no.
Old people don't need birth control because of their age induced sterility, so why should they buy a policy that includes it? Sodomy as well is non-procreative, homos don't need birth control either. Same with celibate individuals- why should groups of nuns or monks or incel individuals have to buy a policy that doesn't cover them. Further, some major religious groups including the Catholic Church are morally opposed to contraception.
Ditto for schools, a lot of students belong to religious faiths that do not sanction prophylactics.
As far as a national sex ed program, different Americans have different ideas about sex ed.
Old people, or really anyone without kids do not need schools, but yet they all help pay for them.
It all comes down to if your political ideology is more important than decreasing the number of abortion
I thought you were a libertarian?
Can you explain how forcing someone to buy a policy they don't want fits into the libertarian framework?
It does not fit into that framework. But then again neither does being against abortion in general.
This is what I meant above when I spoke of political ideology vs desire to see less abortions.
My views against abortion are strong enough to override my other political views.
I want to see fewer abortions and the best way to do that is to have fewer pregnancies.
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
I think murder is an appropriate term actually. When everyone thinks of murder they’re not thinking about the strict legal interpretation. Killing someone who doesn’t represent a threat to you or hasn’t done anything to you to justify you killing them is murder. It’s even worse when the person who is killed is a helpless victim. You’re correct only in terms of semantics.
do you call it murder when the military kills civilians during a war?
No, because there’s no intent.
LolLol
Poor life choices are the driver of the vast majority of abortions... People need to own their fuck ups.
The collective never has the moral high ground
They own their fuck up by killing the baby.
I think that is a bad thing and would like to see less of it. You do not care about the baby as long you get to make stupid political slogans.
That is the difference between us
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
No, no and no.
Old people don't need birth control because of their age induced sterility, so why should they buy a policy that includes it? Sodomy as well is non-procreative, homos don't need birth control either. Same with celibate individuals- why should groups of nuns or monks or incel individuals have to buy a policy that doesn't cover them. Further, some major religious groups including the Catholic Church are morally opposed to contraception.
Ditto for schools, a lot of students belong to religious faiths that do not sanction prophylactics.
As far as a national sex ed program, different Americans have different ideas about sex ed.
Old people, or really anyone without kids do not need schools, but yet they all help pay for them.
It all comes down to if your political ideology is more important than decreasing the number of abortion
I thought you were a libertarian?
Can you explain how forcing someone to buy a policy they don't want fits into the libertarian framework?
It does not fit into that framework. But then again neither does being against abortion in general.
This is what I meant above when I spoke of political ideology vs desire to see less abortions.
My views against abortion are strong enough to override my other political views.
I want to see fewer abortions and the best way to do that is to have fewer pregnancies.
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Wow, it sounds like you are really, really worried about all the abortions.
Are you not pro-choice?
LolLol
Poor life choices are the driver of the vast majority of abortions... People need to own their fuck ups.
The collective never has the moral high ground
They own their fuck up by killing the baby.
I think that is a bad thing and would like to see less of it. You do not care about the baby as long you get to make stupid political slogans.
That is the difference between us
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Abortion is as politically correct as you can get, in fact it is part of what represents political correctness.
I think abortion should be an states issue, But that’s just me.
The fact remains all abortions are the same, there are three parties involved… The most innocent party pays the ultimate price. Fact
And forcing people that want nothing to do with baby butchery to pay for it… That’s beyond fucked up
I support abortion bans in principle, because abortion is murder. However if abortion is banned, women will still have them.
How many (what percentage?) of women would still seek abortions, if every medical and legal source was informing them of the biological fact that a child's life and rights begins at conception?
And there is the problem it seems no one can agree on even a legal definition of where the crossover is.So at what point do you begin to claim it is murder? A year after birth? A week after birth? Immediately after? A week before? What determines the difference between abortion and murder? At what point does the father have a say? Never or at some point in the process?Abortion is not ‘murder’ – and the notion of ‘banning’ abortion is devoid of principle, it’s just authoritarianism.I support abortion bans in principle, because abortion is murder. However if abortion is banned, women will still have them.
Do you agree that a premature birth should be eligible for abortion? If not would that be murder? If so then why is it not murder?
Murder is 100% a legal term, so it matters not what you or Clayton claim, all that matters is what the legal system states.
I had a friend one time. She was a happy girl but not too bright. She had an abortion. Subsequently she went into a spiraling depression. She didn’t understand why, but I knew it had to do with the abortion. I’ve also known women who have had abortions, also felt depressed afterwards, and have later on lived to regret their decision.
And there is the problem it seems no one can agree on even a legal definition of where the crossover is.
