If There Was No Israel

Annie

Diamond Member
Nov 22, 2003
50,848
4,828
1,790
http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/files/story2737.php?PHPSESSID=01151f05c64815ef4551cbd9c8fe9d8b

Imagine that Israel never existed. Would the economic malaise and political repression that drive angry young men to become suicide bombers vanish? Would the Palestinians have an independent state? Would the United States, freed of its burdensome ally, suddenly find itself beloved throughout the Muslim world? Wishful thinking. Far from creating tensions, Israel actually contains more antagonisms than it causes.

The denigration comes in two guises. The first, the soft version, blames Israel first and most for whatever ails the Middle East, and for having corrupted U.S. foreign policy. It is the standard fare of editorials around the world, not to mention the sheer venom oozing from the pages of the Arab-Islamic press. The more recent hard version zeroes in on Israel’s very existence. According to this dispensation, it is Israel as such, and not its behavior, that lies at the root of troubles in the Middle East. Hence the “statocidal” conclusion that Israel’s birth, midwifed by both the United States and the Soviet Union in 1948, was a grievous mistake, grandiose and worthy as it may have been at the time.

So let us assume that Israel is an anachronism and a historical mistake without which the Arab-Islamic world stretching from Algeria to Egypt, from Syria to Pakistan, would be a far happier place, above all because the original sin, the establishment of Israel, never would have been committed. Then let’s move from the past to the present, pretending that we could wave a mighty magic wand, and “poof,” Israel disappears from the map.

Civilization of Clashes
Let us start the what-if procession in 1948, when Israel was born in war. Would stillbirth have nipped the Palestinian problem in the bud? Not quite. Egypt, Transjordan (now Jordan), Syria, Iraq, and Lebanon marched on Haifa and Tel Aviv not to liberate Palestine, but to grab it. The invasion was a textbook competitive power play by neighboring states intent on acquiring territory for themselves. If they had been victorious, a Palestinian state would not have emerged, and there still would have been plenty of refugees. (Recall that half the population of Kuwait fled Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein’s “liberation” of that country in 1990.) Indeed, assuming that Palestinian nationalism had awakened when it did in the late 1960s and 1970s, the Palestinians might now be dispatching suicide bombers to Egypt, Syria, and elsewhere.

There is so much more, including 'what if' scenarios...
 
I am always so happy when people bother to look at the big picture. I agree tremendously that this is a cultural war. I wonder how Egypt, Syria, and Jordan would have handled a Palestinian uprising
 
Kathianne said:
Indeed, assuming that Palestinian nationalism had awakened when it did in the late 1960s and 1970s, the Palestinians might now be dispatching suicide bombers to Egypt, Syria, and elsewhere.
But that's impossible. Muslims would never harm other Muslims, they only kill democratic crusaders and the sons of pigs and dogs, right?
:rotflmao:
 
HorhayAtAMD said:
But that's impossible. Muslims would never harm other Muslims, they only kill democratic crusaders and the sons of pigs and dogs, right?
:rotflmao:

Oh yea! How quickly that is forgotten, unless of course it is the will of allah!
 
told ya it was a great article... justifies bush's emphasis on overall reform of the middle east rather than just middle east peace with israel and the palestinians
 

Forum List

Back
Top