If the Communist Party of US thinks Pork Bill was a success then it must be

Neotrotsky

Council to Supreme Soviet
Dec 12, 2009
10,490
1,280
245
People's Republic
If the Communist Party of US thinks Pork Bill was a success then it must be


Communist Party USA’s Peoples World (formerly the Daily Worker):

Recovery Act success stimulates the push for job creation
by: John Wojcik
February 18 2010


Reports released this week show that Republican claims that the stimulus was a failure are dead wrong and the labor movement is losing no time by demanding even more government spending on jobs to break the neck of the Great Recession.

"The fact is that the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act is still working," the AFL-CIO said in a statement late yesterday, "generating more than 2 million jobs and laying the foundation for future economic growth." The federation said the positive results indicate that the government must continue spending heavily to create millions of additional jobs.

In a report also issued yesterday, Ross Eisenberry, vice president of the Economic Policy Institute, tracked monthly job losses before and after the Recovery Act.

"With unemployment at 9.7 percent today, it’s hard to appreciate how much more damage the stimulus investments prevented," he said, adding, "Without the more than 2 million jobs generated by the Recovery Act, the unemployment rate would now exceed 11 percent."

Another indication that the recovery package is working, some economists say, is that the economy grew 5.7 percent last quarter – the largest gain in six years. These economists are saying the growth is largely due to the Recovery Act and that those who say President Obama’s stimulus plan didn’t work are just plain wrong.

"The fact is that the Recovery Act did work," declared EPI President Lawrence Mishel, "precisely as it was designed to work and it has helped to produce roughly 2 million jobs that wouldn’t exist if it hadn’t become law." …

One union leader said the Recovery Act impacted on much more than just the critical area of job creation, as essential as that is to an economic recovery. AFT President Randi Weingarten called the stimulus a "life preserver."

"Kids don’t get a second chance to get a good education. The Recovery Act was the help they needed, ensuring that schools continued to receive resources so that teachers could teach and students could learn."

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What did Papa Obama say unemployment would only go up to?
Do they count the jobs in phantom districts ?

Funny, Papa Obama said the Pork Bill was going to put it around 8 percent

Unemployment-december-2009-smaller.jpg



Now if someone would just tell the American People the Pork Bill was a success-
Oh wait.... that's right- according to the Left, the American People are just too stupid to understand

-That is a lot of people-
:eusa_whistle:

52% Say Obama Doesn't Deserve Second Term

A new CNN poll contains some troubling numbers for President Obama. Among Americans -- and those registered to vote -- 52% believe Obama does not deserve a second term, while 44% think he does. A paltry 4% don't have an opinion on the matter.
 
Red Baiting has no probative value other than evidence that the Red Baiter has no ability to offer a credible argument and must resort to hate and fear rhetoric.
 
The problem isn't so much that the Stimulus is a failure, it's the fact that Obama is the primary cause of unemployment. His confusing and alarming everyone with his marxist rhetoric.

Everything he said last year was anti-business and now all of the sudden he tries to say what everyone has been telling him since before he was elected and he dares to talk as though it was his idea. It just doesn't wash.

Nobody trusts him or his pack of cronies. It's that simple. We're tired of the shell game.
 
Red Baiting has no probative value other than evidence that the Red Baiter has no ability to offer a credible argument and must resort to hate and fear rhetoric.

For evidence

See: soviet history
:eusa_whistle:

Now then, to be polite, "soviet history" has nothing to do with Red Baiting. For evidence, see Sen. Joe McCarthy.



Oh I see then Soviet History shows us we had nothing to fear from them

Let me guess, you probably still think unilateral disarmament
is good idea

As for McCarthy, I have noticed the Soviet apologists never want to talk about communism's atrocities
Funny how that works
:eusa_whistle:


Of course if it makes you happy we can point to another "progressive leader"


What political leader said:

"We are socialists, we are enemies of today's capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak..."


Hope that makes you feel better
:eusa_angel:
 
Last edited:

Distasteful comments about family are not allowed. CW

I have flagged this cowardly post of DD. What better evidence then his own words as proof he is a cowardly asshole?


No surprise that you would turn to the "controlling powers" to fight your battles
Individualism means so little to "statists"
:eusa_whistle:

Oh boo hoo.... the waste of oxygen does the very thing he complains about in the post where he is complaining about it... then when called to the mat, he has to cry....

If he opened up a fortune cookie, the paper inside would state "Kill yourself, it's not worth the vast effort it would take to improve'
 
For evidence

See: soviet history
:eusa_whistle:

Now then, to be polite, "soviet history" has nothing to do with Red Baiting. For evidence, see Sen. Joe McCarthy.



Oh I see then Soviet History shows us we had nothing to fear from them

Let me guess, you probably still think unilateral disarmament
is good idea

As for McCarthy, I have noticed the Soviet apologists never want to talk about communism's atrocities
Funny how that works
:eusa_whistle:

Soviet history. Let's talk about it. In response to a king (Czar) the people of Russia revolted, in 1917. The new government murdered the Czar and his family and established a totalitarian autocratic rule. The people were no better off under Lenin, Stalin, et al.
It was not 'Communism', per se, it was the conservative nature of autoratic rule which created the terror so well characterized by Arthur Koestler in "Darkness at Noon" and documented by Solzhenitsyn in "The Gulag Archipelago".
I've not read any posts celebrating soviet history or "Communism" on this message board. If there are, they are few (post a reference if I'm wrong).

Red Baiting on the other hand is prolific on this MB however, and a common practice by some very stupid regular posters. Shall I name names?
 
Last edited:
Wry catcher
It was not 'Communism', per se, it was the conservative nature of autoratic rule which created the terror so well characterized by Arthur Koestler in "Darkness at Noon" and documented by Solzhenitsyn in "The Gulag Archipelago".

it's autocratic rule. And the only unlimited power I see now is a democrat controlled government fucking up America.
 
I have flagged this cowardly post of DD. What better evidence then his own words as proof he is a cowardly asshole?


No surprise that you would turn to the "controlling powers" to fight your battles
Individualism means so little to "statists"
:eusa_whistle:

Oh boo hoo.... the waste of oxygen does the very thing he complains about in the post where he is complaining about it... then when called to the mat, he has to cry....

If he opened up a fortune cookie, the paper inside would state "Kill yourself, it's not worth the vast effort it would take to improve'

Have you always been a coward Dave? Really, not in your fantasy life, I'm sure your brave and strong in your own little mind - but really, being a cyber bully is being a bully, and deep down bullies are chicken shits.
 
Now then, to be polite, "soviet history" has nothing to do with Red Baiting. For evidence, see Sen. Joe McCarthy.



Oh I see then Soviet History shows us we had nothing to fear from them

Let me guess, you probably still think unilateral disarmament
is good idea

As for McCarthy, I have noticed the Soviet apologists never want to talk about communism's atrocities
Funny how that works
:eusa_whistle:

Soviet history. Let's talk about it. In response to a king (Czar) the people of Russia revolted, in 1917. The new government murdered the Czar and his family and established a totalitarian autocratic rule. The people were no better off under Lenin, Stalin, et al.
It was not 'Communism', per se, it was the conservative nature of autoratic rule which created the terror so well characterized by Arthur Koestler in "Darkness at Noon" and documented by Solzhenitsyn in "The Gulag Archipelago".
I've not read any posts celebrating soviet history or "Communism" on this message board. If there are, they are few (post a reference if I'm wrong).

Red Baiting on the other hand is prolific on this MB however, and a common practice by some very stupid regular posters. Shall I name names?

Speaking of stupid

the left apologists for the Soviet Union always try to make the excuse that "it was not really communist"

Let me guess, the US left would go a better job at it?

According the to Marx, Communism is the end result after what?

Dictatorship of the proletariat

So you and the rest of the left can twist and spin, poorly, on how the Soviet Union was not really "communist", if it makes you feel better about yourself

The rest of us will see it for what it is- a poor attempt to rewrite history
This is up there with the other great lie of the left that nazi's were not socialists


Of course, to be fair, with the horrific failures of communism, one can understand the left's desire to not be associated with them.
It might make people question their ideas
 
Last edited:
Wry catcher
It was not 'Communism', per se, it was the conservative nature of autoratic rule which created the terror so well characterized by Arthur Koestler in "Darkness at Noon" and documented by Solzhenitsyn in "The Gulag Archipelago".

it's autocratic rule. And the only unlimited power I see now is a democrat controlled government fucking up America.

"ulimited power", LOL, Harry Reid is a wimp; and the Senate (both sides of the aisle) are arrogant jerks concerned only with thier own political futures.
 
Last edited:
Oh I see then Soviet History shows us we had nothing to fear from them

Let me guess, you probably still think unilateral disarmament
is good idea

As for McCarthy, I have noticed the Soviet apologists never want to talk about communism's atrocities
Funny how that works
:eusa_whistle:

Soviet history. Let's talk about it. In response to a king (Czar) the people of Russia revolted, in 1917. The new government murdered the Czar and his family and established a totalitarian autocratic rule. The people were no better off under Lenin, Stalin, et al.
It was not 'Communism', per se, it was the conservative nature of autoratic rule which created the terror so well characterized by Arthur Koestler in "Darkness at Noon" and documented by Solzhenitsyn in "The Gulag Archipelago".
I've not read any posts celebrating soviet history or "Communism" on this message board. If there are, they are few (post a reference if I'm wrong).

Red Baiting on the other hand is prolific on this MB however, and a common practice by some very stupid regular posters. Shall I name names?

Speaking of stupid

the left apologists for the Soviet Union always try to make the excuse that "it was not really communist"

Let me guess, the US left would go a better job at it?

According the Marx, Communism is the end result after what?

Dictatorship of the proletariat

So you and the rest of the left can twist and spin, poorly, on how the Soviet Union was not really "communist", if it makes you feel better about yourself

The rest of us will see it for what it is- a poor attempt to rewrite history


Of course, to be fair, with the horrific failures of communism, one can understand the left's desire to not be associated with them.
It might make people question their ideas

I don't "twist and spin" nor am I a party of the "left". To so characterize me is nothing more than an ad hominem attack. Your post is that, and it's probative value suggests you are a dilettant in political discourse, willfully ignorant and an extreme partisan.
 
"The care of human life and happiness, and not their destruction, is the first and only object of good government." Thomas Jefferson

Obama is just engaging in good government.
 

Forum List

Back
Top