If removing the 1st Amendment saved even one child, would you?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by RetiredGySgt, Jan 16, 2013.

  1. RetiredGySgt
    Offline

    RetiredGySgt Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    41,106
    Thanks Received:
    6,369
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +10,951
    I mean I can think of all kinds of protected speech that leads to dead people in one way or another, and we all know mobs can form and of course religion is dangerous and causes death.

    Why stop at one right? Lets take them all, I mean if it saves one child, isn't it worth it? Think of what the 5th allows criminals, murderers and gangsters to do?
     
  2. P@triot
    Offline

    P@triot Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2011
    Messages:
    35,089
    Thanks Received:
    4,051
    Trophy Points:
    1,160
    Location:
    United States
    Ratings:
    +17,316
    Of course the dumbocrats would. Rights, freedom, and the U.S. Constitution mean nothing to the greedy idiot liberals who only care about government handouts.
     
  3. Mr. H.
    Offline

    Mr. H. Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2009
    Messages:
    44,173
    Thanks Received:
    9,279
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    A warm place with no memory.
    Ratings:
    +15,484
    I do believe this is the goal of the Liberal Left.

    Chip away. Erode. Executive Order our way out of the Document.
     
  4. RetiredGySgt
    Offline

    RetiredGySgt Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    41,106
    Thanks Received:
    6,369
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +10,951
    We have a poll asking if we would ban assault weapons if it saved even one child. And there are a lot of replies. Since the 2nd is fair game, just asking why, if the criteria is saving a single child, we can't do away with all those pesky rights?
     
  5. Mr. H.
    Offline

    Mr. H. Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2009
    Messages:
    44,173
    Thanks Received:
    9,279
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    A warm place with no memory.
    Ratings:
    +15,484
    What impresses me is that the 2nd is just that... the 2nd.

    Not the 14th, 20th, 27th...

    They have been enacted by priority for a reason.
     
  6. Mr. H.
    Offline

    Mr. H. Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2009
    Messages:
    44,173
    Thanks Received:
    9,279
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    A warm place with no memory.
    Ratings:
    +15,484
    We are a nation of many failures. Gun ownership with all its accompanying accoutrements is the least of them.
     
  7. Barb
    Offline

    Barb Carpe Scrotum

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2009
    Messages:
    5,717
    Thanks Received:
    1,569
    Trophy Points:
    153
    Location:
    in a house.
    Ratings:
    +1,587
    Speech is already regulated by law.
     
  8. daveman
    Offline

    daveman Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2010
    Messages:
    51,301
    Thanks Received:
    5,694
    Trophy Points:
    1,775
    Location:
    On the way to the Dark Tower.
    Ratings:
    +5,763
    When fascism comes to America, it will be carrying a protest sign and screeching, "It's for the CHILDREN!!"
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  9. 007
    Offline

    007 Charter Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2004
    Messages:
    39,860
    Thanks Received:
    8,189
    Trophy Points:
    1,330
    Ratings:
    +14,076
    If the kenyan appeared on TV surrounded by CHILDREN and said we need to repeal the first amendment, THE LIBROIDS WOULD ALL BE WITH HIM.
     
  10. Mr. H.
    Offline

    Mr. H. Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2009
    Messages:
    44,173
    Thanks Received:
    9,279
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    A warm place with no memory.
    Ratings:
    +15,484
    Make that "post-birth children".
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1

Share This Page