If our Constitution made liberalism, in effect, illegal what should we do with them?.

I'm here to defend the English language and its terms from rhetorical rape.
Hate to rock your world dear but you're here in a state of self-delusion pretending liberalism belongs in America and at the Founding.

Sigh....

>> Liberalism is a political and moral philosophy based on liberty and equality.[1][2][3] Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but they generally support Civil rights, Democracy, Secularism, Gender equality, Racial equality, Internationalism, Freedom of speech, Freedom of the press and Freedom of religion.[4][5][6][7][8][9][10]

Liberalism became a distinct movement in the Age of Enlightenment, when it became popular among Western philosophers and economists. Liberalism sought to replace the norms of hereditary privilege, state religion, absolute monarchy, the divine right of kings and traditional conservatism with representative democracy and the rule of law. Liberals also ended mercantilist policies, royal monopolies and other barriers to trade, instead promoting free markets.[11] Philosopher John Locke is often credited with founding liberalism as a distinct tradition, arguing that each man has a natural right to life, liberty and property,[12]adding that governments must not violate these rights based on the social contract. While the British liberal tradition has emphasised expanding democracy, French liberalism has emphasised rejecting authoritarianism and is linked to nation-building.[13]

Leaders in the Glorious Revolution of 1688,[14] the American Revolution of 1776 and the French Revolution of 1789 used liberal philosophy to justify the armed overthrow of royal tyranny. << -- Wiki

I told you this as soon as you started this mindless retarded thread, Dumbass. Liberalism is the basis of the United States Constitution. If you can't handle it ---------- fucking leave.
Spare us the references to 18th Century liberalism. Modern liberalism bares no resemblance to it.

End of story.

Sorry Fingerboy, I'm afraid your inability to navigate political (or any other) terms is not the terms' problem.

AGAIN, there are no temporal variants in what Liberalism is. It just IS, and there's nothing you can do about that. Not even sitting on the internet trying to pretend words mean their own opposites.
 
I'm here to defend the English language and its terms from rhetorical rape.
Hate to rock your world dear but you're here in a state of self-delusion pretending liberalism belongs in America and at the Founding.

Sigh....

>> Liberalism is a political and moral philosophy based on liberty and equality.[1][2][3] Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but they generally support Civil rights, Democracy, Secularism, Gender equality, Racial equality, Internationalism, Freedom of speech, Freedom of the press and Freedom of religion.[4][5][6][7][8][9][10]

Liberalism became a distinct movement in the Age of Enlightenment, when it became popular among Western philosophers and economists. Liberalism sought to replace the norms of hereditary privilege, state religion, absolute monarchy, the divine right of kings and traditional conservatism with representative democracy and the rule of law. Liberals also ended mercantilist policies, royal monopolies and other barriers to trade, instead promoting free markets.[11] Philosopher John Locke is often credited with founding liberalism as a distinct tradition, arguing that each man has a natural right to life, liberty and property,[12]adding that governments must not violate these rights based on the social contract. While the British liberal tradition has emphasised expanding democracy, French liberalism has emphasised rejecting authoritarianism and is linked to nation-building.[13]

Leaders in the Glorious Revolution of 1688,[14] the American Revolution of 1776 and the French Revolution of 1789 used liberal philosophy to justify the armed overthrow of royal tyranny. << -- Wiki

I told you this as soon as you started this mindless retarded thread, Dumbass. Liberalism is the basis of the United States Constitution. If you can't handle it ---------- fucking leave.
Spare us the references to 18th Century liberalism. Modern liberalism bares no resemblance to it.

End of story.

Sorry Fingerboy, I'm afraid your inability to navigate political (or any other) terms is not the terms' problem.

AGAIN, there are no temporal variants in what Liberalism is. It just IS, and there's nothing you can do about that. Not even sitting on the internet trying to pretend words mean their own opposites.
The problem is your incessant lying about the fact the term "liberal" applies to something entirely different than what it applied to in the 18th Century. You theory that the meaning of words never changes is utterly idiotic.
 
I'm here to defend the English language and its terms from rhetorical rape.
Hate to rock your world dear but you're here in a state of self-delusion pretending liberalism belongs in America and at the Founding.

Sigh....

>> Liberalism is a political and moral philosophy based on liberty and equality.[1][2][3] Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but they generally support Civil rights, Democracy, Secularism, Gender equality, Racial equality, Internationalism, Freedom of speech, Freedom of the press and Freedom of religion.[4][5][6][7][8][9][10]

Liberalism became a distinct movement in the Age of Enlightenment, when it became popular among Western philosophers and economists. Liberalism sought to replace the norms of hereditary privilege, state religion, absolute monarchy, the divine right of kings and traditional conservatism with representative democracy and the rule of law. Liberals also ended mercantilist policies, royal monopolies and other barriers to trade, instead promoting free markets.[11] Philosopher John Locke is often credited with founding liberalism as a distinct tradition, arguing that each man has a natural right to life, liberty and property,[12]adding that governments must not violate these rights based on the social contract. While the British liberal tradition has emphasised expanding democracy, French liberalism has emphasised rejecting authoritarianism and is linked to nation-building.[13]

Leaders in the Glorious Revolution of 1688,[14] the American Revolution of 1776 and the French Revolution of 1789 used liberal philosophy to justify the armed overthrow of royal tyranny. << -- Wiki

I told you this as soon as you started this mindless retarded thread, Dumbass. Liberalism is the basis of the United States Constitution. If you can't handle it ---------- fucking leave.
Spare us the references to 18th Century liberalism. Modern liberalism bares no resemblance to it.

End of story.

Sorry Fingerboy, I'm afraid your inability to navigate political (or any other) terms is not the terms' problem.

AGAIN, there are no temporal variants in what Liberalism is. It just IS, and there's nothing you can do about that. Not even sitting on the internet trying to pretend words mean their own opposites.
The problem is your incessant lying about the fact the term "liberal" applies to something entirely different than what it applied to in the 18th Century. You theory that the meaning of words never changes is utterly idiotic.

NO Fingerboy, the problem is that your ilk insists on pretending it means something completely different now, or that you have your fingers crossed behind your back when you type it so it doesn't count or some shit.

The OP has his head completely up its ass. The Constitution making Liberalism illegal would be like the NFL prohibiting the use of footballs. It would be like the Catholic Church banning Jesus. It would be like McDonald's going to an all-salad menu. You can't "make illegal" what you're literally CONSTITUTED OF.

If you can't figure that out you need to quit skipping school and go get an edumacation.
 
I'm here to defend the English language and its terms from rhetorical rape.
Hate to rock your world dear but you're here in a state of self-delusion pretending liberalism belongs in America and at the Founding.

Sigh....

>> Liberalism is a political and moral philosophy based on liberty and equality.[1][2][3] Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but they generally support Civil rights, Democracy, Secularism, Gender equality, Racial equality, Internationalism, Freedom of speech, Freedom of the press and Freedom of religion.[4][5][6][7][8][9][10]

Liberalism became a distinct movement in the Age of Enlightenment, when it became popular among Western philosophers and economists. Liberalism sought to replace the norms of hereditary privilege, state religion, absolute monarchy, the divine right of kings and traditional conservatism with representative democracy and the rule of law. Liberals also ended mercantilist policies, royal monopolies and other barriers to trade, instead promoting free markets.[11] Philosopher John Locke is often credited with founding liberalism as a distinct tradition, arguing that each man has a natural right to life, liberty and property,[12]adding that governments must not violate these rights based on the social contract. While the British liberal tradition has emphasised expanding democracy, French liberalism has emphasised rejecting authoritarianism and is linked to nation-building.[13]

Leaders in the Glorious Revolution of 1688,[14] the American Revolution of 1776 and the French Revolution of 1789 used liberal philosophy to justify the armed overthrow of royal tyranny. << -- Wiki

I told you this as soon as you started this mindless retarded thread, Dumbass. Liberalism is the basis of the United States Constitution. If you can't handle it ---------- fucking leave.
Spare us the references to 18th Century liberalism. Modern liberalism bares no resemblance to it.

End of story.

Sorry Fingerboy, I'm afraid your inability to navigate political (or any other) terms is not the terms' problem.

AGAIN, there are no temporal variants in what Liberalism is. It just IS, and there's nothing you can do about that. Not even sitting on the internet trying to pretend words mean their own opposites.
The problem is your incessant lying about the fact the term "liberal" applies to something entirely different than what it applied to in the 18th Century. You theory that the meaning of words never changes is utterly idiotic.



Communist John Dewey prevailed on the Socialist Party to change its name to "Liberal"

And those are today's Liberals.
 
Hate to rock your world dear but you're here in a state of self-delusion pretending liberalism belongs in America and at the Founding.

Sigh....

>> Liberalism is a political and moral philosophy based on liberty and equality.[1][2][3] Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but they generally support Civil rights, Democracy, Secularism, Gender equality, Racial equality, Internationalism, Freedom of speech, Freedom of the press and Freedom of religion.[4][5][6][7][8][9][10]

Liberalism became a distinct movement in the Age of Enlightenment, when it became popular among Western philosophers and economists. Liberalism sought to replace the norms of hereditary privilege, state religion, absolute monarchy, the divine right of kings and traditional conservatism with representative democracy and the rule of law. Liberals also ended mercantilist policies, royal monopolies and other barriers to trade, instead promoting free markets.[11] Philosopher John Locke is often credited with founding liberalism as a distinct tradition, arguing that each man has a natural right to life, liberty and property,[12]adding that governments must not violate these rights based on the social contract. While the British liberal tradition has emphasised expanding democracy, French liberalism has emphasised rejecting authoritarianism and is linked to nation-building.[13]

Leaders in the Glorious Revolution of 1688,[14] the American Revolution of 1776 and the French Revolution of 1789 used liberal philosophy to justify the armed overthrow of royal tyranny. << -- Wiki

I told you this as soon as you started this mindless retarded thread, Dumbass. Liberalism is the basis of the United States Constitution. If you can't handle it ---------- fucking leave.
Spare us the references to 18th Century liberalism. Modern liberalism bares no resemblance to it.

End of story.

Sorry Fingerboy, I'm afraid your inability to navigate political (or any other) terms is not the terms' problem.

AGAIN, there are no temporal variants in what Liberalism is. It just IS, and there's nothing you can do about that. Not even sitting on the internet trying to pretend words mean their own opposites.
The problem is your incessant lying about the fact the term "liberal" applies to something entirely different than what it applied to in the 18th Century. You theory that the meaning of words never changes is utterly idiotic.



Communist John Dewey prevailed on the Socialist Party to change its name to "Liberal"

And those are today's Liberals.

Cult of Ignorance Goddess Speaketh.

----------- Link?
 
Sigh....

>> Liberalism is a political and moral philosophy based on liberty and equality.[1][2][3] Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but they generally support Civil rights, Democracy, Secularism, Gender equality, Racial equality, Internationalism, Freedom of speech, Freedom of the press and Freedom of religion.[4][5][6][7][8][9][10]

Liberalism became a distinct movement in the Age of Enlightenment, when it became popular among Western philosophers and economists. Liberalism sought to replace the norms of hereditary privilege, state religion, absolute monarchy, the divine right of kings and traditional conservatism with representative democracy and the rule of law. Liberals also ended mercantilist policies, royal monopolies and other barriers to trade, instead promoting free markets.[11] Philosopher John Locke is often credited with founding liberalism as a distinct tradition, arguing that each man has a natural right to life, liberty and property,[12]adding that governments must not violate these rights based on the social contract. While the British liberal tradition has emphasised expanding democracy, French liberalism has emphasised rejecting authoritarianism and is linked to nation-building.[13]

Leaders in the Glorious Revolution of 1688,[14] the American Revolution of 1776 and the French Revolution of 1789 used liberal philosophy to justify the armed overthrow of royal tyranny. << -- Wiki

I told you this as soon as you started this mindless retarded thread, Dumbass. Liberalism is the basis of the United States Constitution. If you can't handle it ---------- fucking leave.
Spare us the references to 18th Century liberalism. Modern liberalism bares no resemblance to it.

End of story.

Sorry Fingerboy, I'm afraid your inability to navigate political (or any other) terms is not the terms' problem.

AGAIN, there are no temporal variants in what Liberalism is. It just IS, and there's nothing you can do about that. Not even sitting on the internet trying to pretend words mean their own opposites.
The problem is your incessant lying about the fact the term "liberal" applies to something entirely different than what it applied to in the 18th Century. You theory that the meaning of words never changes is utterly idiotic.



Communist John Dewey prevailed on the Socialist Party to change its name to "Liberal"

And those are today's Liberals.

Cult of Ignorance Goddess Speaketh.

----------- Link?




"...[John] Dewey arguably did more than any other reformer to repackage progressive social theory in a way that obscured just how radically its principles departed from those of the American founding. Like Ely and many of his fellow progressive academics, Dewey initially embraced the term “socialism” to describe his social theory. Only after realizing how damaging the name was to the socialist cause did he, like other progressives, begin to avoid it. In the early 1930s, accordingly, Dewey begged the Socialist party, of which he was a longtime member, to change its name. “The greatest handicap from which special measures favored by the Socialists suffer,” Dewey declared, “is that they are advanced by the Socialist party as Socialism. The prejudice against the name may be a regrettable prejudice but its influence is so powerful that it is much more reasonable to imagine all but the most dogmatic Socialists joining a new party than to imagine any considerable part of the American people going over to them.” Dewey’s influential 1935 tract, Liberalism and Social Action, should be read in the light of this." The Refounding of America | National Review



Now, slither off, Stinky.
 
Hate to rock your world dear but you're here in a state of self-delusion pretending liberalism belongs in America and at the Founding.

Sigh....

>> Liberalism is a political and moral philosophy based on liberty and equality.[1][2][3] Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but they generally support Civil rights, Democracy, Secularism, Gender equality, Racial equality, Internationalism, Freedom of speech, Freedom of the press and Freedom of religion.[4][5][6][7][8][9][10]

Liberalism became a distinct movement in the Age of Enlightenment, when it became popular among Western philosophers and economists. Liberalism sought to replace the norms of hereditary privilege, state religion, absolute monarchy, the divine right of kings and traditional conservatism with representative democracy and the rule of law. Liberals also ended mercantilist policies, royal monopolies and other barriers to trade, instead promoting free markets.[11] Philosopher John Locke is often credited with founding liberalism as a distinct tradition, arguing that each man has a natural right to life, liberty and property,[12]adding that governments must not violate these rights based on the social contract. While the British liberal tradition has emphasised expanding democracy, French liberalism has emphasised rejecting authoritarianism and is linked to nation-building.[13]

Leaders in the Glorious Revolution of 1688,[14] the American Revolution of 1776 and the French Revolution of 1789 used liberal philosophy to justify the armed overthrow of royal tyranny. << -- Wiki

I told you this as soon as you started this mindless retarded thread, Dumbass. Liberalism is the basis of the United States Constitution. If you can't handle it ---------- fucking leave.
Spare us the references to 18th Century liberalism. Modern liberalism bares no resemblance to it.

End of story.

Sorry Fingerboy, I'm afraid your inability to navigate political (or any other) terms is not the terms' problem.

AGAIN, there are no temporal variants in what Liberalism is. It just IS, and there's nothing you can do about that. Not even sitting on the internet trying to pretend words mean their own opposites.
The problem is your incessant lying about the fact the term "liberal" applies to something entirely different than what it applied to in the 18th Century. You theory that the meaning of words never changes is utterly idiotic.

NO Fingerboy, the problem is that your ilk insists on pretending it means something completely different now, or that you have your fingers crossed behind your back when you type it so it doesn't count or some shit.

The OP has his head completely up its ass. The Constitution making Liberalism illegal would be like the NFL prohibiting the use of footballs. It would be like the Catholic Church banning Jesus. It would be like McDonald's going to an all-salad menu. You can't "make illegal" what you're literally CONSTITUTED OF.

If you can't figure that out you need to quit skipping school and go get an edumacation.
We don't pretend. We know it. We simply look at what the Found Fathers stood for, and then we look at what modern douchebag snowflakes stand for, and the two couldn't be more different.

You can lie and lie and lie and pretend you have something in common with 18th Century liberals, but anyone with two brain cells to rub together can see that you don't.
 
your ilk insists on pretending it means something completely different now,

1+1=2 common usage defines a word. Wm. Buckley Jr. was most important post war conservative. He defined it, in short, as "those of us against government". Liberals then were the opposite and so had nothing in common with Founding ideas but nevertheless try to convince us every day with the most treasonous and egregious propaganda that communism is somehow American. Would anyone in their right mind believe that for a second?
 
We can argue about liberals, but we can't argue how the Trumpflakes on this thread are so openly Stalinist, with their talk about deporting fellow citizens for having differing political opinions. That's some serious brownshirt stuff.

And note how that liberals don't want to deport or prosecute those Trumpflakes for their Stalinist leanings. Being a Stalinist isn't a crime, so the Trump backers are safe. And deportation is not the answer to a criminal offense in any case.

So, as is always the case, moral, constitutional and intellectual high ground to the liberals.
 
We can argue about liberals, but we can't argue how the Trumpflakes on this thread are so openly Stalinist, with their talk about deporting fellow citizens for having differing political opinions. That's some serious brownshirt stuff.

maybe not deport them but since Constitution prevents them from serving in office what good are they here?
 
And note how that liberals don't want to deport or prosecute those Trumpflakes for their Stalinist leanings.

are you afraid to present the best example of these Stalinist leanings? What do you learn from your fear?
 
Being a Stalinist isn't a crime,

so long as its just talk its not a crime. Our liberals spied for Stalin and gave him the bomb while he was slowly killing 60 million so deserve to be watched perhaps for signs that they intend to take action.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top