If Obama Is So Unbeatable ,Then Why Does He Need A Billion Dollars In Campaign Funds?

[EriktheRed]

This would be a great question for Hannity and O'Reilly to ask of Juan Williams and Alan Colmes. Every Democrat Spokesperson/News Anchor has been gloating that "No One Can Beat Obama" in 2012. Right? Ok,then if Obama is a shoe in come 2012, then why does he need to campaign? If Obama is as electable as Ronald Reagan,he may as well just stay in D.C. and do his job. Hmm, Maybe Obama Is Aware Of his 40% Approval Rating? And needs to find a way to rig the election again? It does cost a lot of money to create 20 to 30 million Democrats? Maybe Obama will need the assistance of George Soros and Corrupt Union Thugs in Swing States to Pull another "Harry Reid Nevada" Stunt ? Oh, and don't forget the costs of filling up Air-Force one for every campaign trip(what is it,around $400,000 in jet fuel ?) So what are your views regarding the One Billion Dollar goal to re-elecet the "Non-Beatable" Obama?

Thanks to the USSC decision in Citizens United, there is no longer any law governing the amount of donations. Why shouldn't he reach for a billion when the other side certainly will? Perhaps George Soros will donate several million; nothing stopping him from forming dummy organizations for the purpose. You can be sure the Koch Brothers will donate at least several million to the Republican candidate.

Funny how that USSC decision has now turned a few screws on those from the right who were celebrating.

Oh, silly Maggie...

The Citizens United ruling was supposed to insure that from here on out the Dems keep bringing knives to a gunfight because of the huge cash advantage the GOP would have as a result of it. They're not supposed to be getting any big $$$ themselves.


Hope that clears things up for ya.

 

[Mr. Shaman]

During the presidential debate on October 7, Obama said, "We will kill bin Laden. We will crush Al Qaeda. That has to be our biggest national security priority," Obama said . Bush, by his own account said, he was unconcerned about the terrorist mastermind. Asked about the hunt for Bin Laden at a March, 2002 press conference, Bush said, “I truly am not that concerned about him. I am deeply concerned about Iraq.” Bush changed the focus and Obama refocused our efforts on Bin Laden.

Under Obama leadership the US ramped up the hunt, found Bin Laden, and killed him. This was a risky operation that could easily have gone wrong. Obama had the guts to order the attack and he deserves the credit. Had it gone wrong, he would have paid dearly.

....Not-to-MENTION.....when BUSHCO had the opportunity to GET bin Laden.....they were (already) committed to jumpin'-into Iraq!!!!!​

"The American campaign was conducted primarily from the air. Despite the pleas from CIA operatives, U.S. officials were reluctant to send in ground troops to flush out bin Laden. They told officers on the ground in Afghanistan that Pakistani troops would help them, cutting off bin Laden if he tried to cross into their country.

But in early December, over lunch at his palace in Islamabad, Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf made it clear to U.S. officials that he didn't want to commit troops unless the Americans would help transport them to the border by air. According to Wendy Chamberlin, then the U.S. ambassador to Pakistan, Musharraf told her and Gen. Tommy R. Franks, commander of U.S. Central Command: "I'd put the troops in trucks, but that'll take weeks. Could you give me air support?"

Franks would not comment for this article, but according to Chamberlin, he was noncommital about air support. Only later did she learn that the general was already "planning for Iraq," she said. "Even if he could have helped out, he was already starting to have to reshuffle." Without the air support, the Pakistanis sent some soldiers to the border, but never enough to secure it.

Back in Tora Bora, a team from Delta Force - the military's secretive, elite Special Operations unit - planned to sneak up on bin Laden from behind, crossing into the terrorist's suspected lair from Pakistan, through an undefended back door. That would have required using supplemental oxygen to scale a 14,000-foot peak, but according to the leader of the Delta Force team, who later wrote a book under the pseudonym Dalton Fury, the plan had a better chance of succeeding than any frontal assault that relied on help from Afghan fighters.

Fury, the assault troop commander who retired from the Army as a major, said in an e-mail interview that the Pakistani forces who were supposed to seal the border "never made it there." He said his superiors told him to skip the border-side assault and instead "align our mission with the Afghan mujaheddin to put an Afghan face on killing" bin Laden.

Fury didn't trust the Afghans. "The mujaheddin were not very skilled or motivated fighters," he said. But following orders, the Delta Force team stayed on the Afghan side of the border."

Chapter 2:
Lessons Learned​

*

See:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mmtPBTybQ9k]YouTube - The Hunt For Bin Laden[/ame]

*

"See George & The DICK run.
RUN George & The DICK! RUN!!"

*

 

[Zona]

If Obama Is So Unbeatable ,Then Why Does He Need A Billion Dollars In Campaign Funds?


Why...because he wants to really really kick your asses and that takes money to clear up the bullshit your side will be throwing out.
Defending against..

Death camps
Birthers
Deathers
Skoolers
Death panels
Gay accusations
Kenyan accusations
marxist accusations
socialist accusations
idiots defaming him even though he fucking killed bin laden
the entire fox network
etc
etc

Good luck to your side in 2012...he is going to beat you silly. I guarantee you he will win in 2012! Eat that.

All hail King Brackets the First! He's so awesome if you can't see his clothes you're a moron! All hail!

Seig HEIL!
Seig HEIL!

Liberal 'you godwinned yourself and we don't worship him' meltdown for making fun of those praising the inWINCEbillity of Brackets in 3...2...1...

Can someone decipher this? I didnt take gibberish in college. Thanks so much.

 

[rdean]

If Obama Is So Unbeatable ,Then Why Does He Need A Billion Dollars In Campaign Funds?

Because he has to fight all that corporate money funding Republicans. It's not like it's a secret.

 

[rdean]

If Obama Is So Unbeatable ,Then Why Does He Need A Billion Dollars In Campaign Funds?


Why...because he wants to really really kick your asses and that takes money to clear up the bullshit your side will be throwing out.
Defending against..

Death camps
Birthers
Deathers
Skoolers
Death panels
Gay accusations
Kenyan accusations
marxist accusations
socialist accusations
idiots defaming him even though he fucking killed bin laden
the entire fox network
etc
etc

Good luck to your side in 2012...he is going to beat you silly. I guarantee you he will win in 2012! Eat that.

All hail King Brackets the First! He's so awesome if you can't see his clothes you're a moron! All hail!

Seig HEIL!
Seig HEIL!

Liberal 'you godwinned yourself and we don't worship him' meltdown for making fun of those praising the inWINCEbillity of Brackets in 3...2...1...

Can someone decipher this? I didnt take gibberish in college. Thanks so much.

Obviously, he thinks he's clever throwing in a "Hitler" reference. The right wing is so dirty. Whatever happened to "Eisenhower's Party"? Dwight would be so ashamed.

 

[Truthseeker420]

unbeatable? never underestimate the power of right wing(neocons) ignorance, fearmongering and corporate money.

 

[EdSchultzIsFat]

As they say, most people vote according to their bank account, and in 2012,it will be gas prices too. So long as gas prices start with a THREE, Obama is toast !!!

 

[Zona]

unbeatable? never underestimate the power of right wing(neocons) ignorance, fearmongering and corporate money.

They are actually making these morons say killing bin laden is a bad thing. This is as dumb as these people actually defending health insurance companies. They were actaully defending the yearly increases. Its amazing really. Poor insurance companies! lolololol

 

[Zona]

As they say, most people vote according to their bank account, and in 2012,it will be gas prices too. So long as gas prices start with a THREE, Obama is toast !!!

Well, you have a point but isnt it amazing how dumb the average voter is...they forgot how close we were to a depression PRIOR to Obama taking the office.

 

[Truthseeker420]

As they say, most people vote according to their bank account, and in 2012,it will be gas prices too. So long as gas prices start with a THREE, Obama is toast !!!

Well, you have a point but isnt it amazing how dumb the average voter is...they forgot how close we were to a depression PRIOR to Obama taking the office.

true dat

 

[BolshevikHunter]

Unfortunately, Obama has purchased everything that he needed to buy with his international bail out of the banks. Bush, did a smaller bail out just before Obama being elected in order to beat Obama to the punch concerning this subject, but Obama the nutcase just doubled the bail out in order to win in 2012. It's simple really, The puppet masters (International Bankers) desire is to give the madman Obama another 4 years to screw us all in the ass, this time ball sack and all, while he continues their wars that their other puppet Bush started for them. Obama was the so-called anti-war canidate right? LMAO! What a fucking circus side-show. ~BH

 

[Big Fitz]

This would be a great question for Hannity and O'Reilly to ask of Juan Williams and Alan Colmes. Every Democrat Spokesperson/News Anchor has been gloating that "No One Can Beat Obama" in 2012. Right? Ok,then if Obama is a shoe in come 2012, then why does he need to campaign? If Obama is as electable as Ronald Reagan,he may as well just stay in D.C. and do his job. Hmm, Maybe Obama Is Aware Of his 40% Approval Rating? And needs to find a way to rig the election again? It does cost a lot of money to create 20 to 30 million Democrats? Maybe Obama will need the assistance of George Soros and Corrupt Union Thugs in Swing States to Pull another "Harry Reid Nevada" Stunt ? Oh, and don't forget the costs of filling up Air-Force one for every campaign trip(what is it,around $400,000 in jet fuel ?) So what are your views regarding the One Billion Dollar goal to re-elecet the "Non-Beatable" Obama?

Thanks to the USSC decision in Citizens United, there is no longer any law governing the amount of donations. Why shouldn't he reach for a billion when the other side certainly will? Perhaps George Soros will donate several million; nothing stopping him from forming dummy organizations for the purpose. You can be sure the Koch Brothers will donate at least several million to the Republican candidate.

Funny how that USSC decision has now turned a few screws on those from the right who were celebrating.

Oh, silly Maggie...

The Citizens United ruling was supposed to insure that from here on out the Dems keep bringing knives to a gunfight because of the huge cash advantage the GOP would have as a result of it. They're not supposed to be getting any big $$$ themselves.


Hope that clears things up for ya.

Hey, I'd be fine with reversing citizens united if you included all unions, 527s and other political action groups as well. No PAC money, only hard money from individuals directly to the candidates with full track record of who paid what.

Are YOU willing to lose your unfair advantage you've enjoyed for 70 years?

 

[EriktheRed]

Thanks to the USSC decision in Citizens United, there is no longer any law governing the amount of donations. Why shouldn't he reach for a billion when the other side certainly will? Perhaps George Soros will donate several million; nothing stopping him from forming dummy organizations for the purpose. You can be sure the Koch Brothers will donate at least several million to the Republican candidate.

Funny how that USSC decision has now turned a few screws on those from the right who were celebrating.

Oh, silly Maggie...

The Citizens United ruling was supposed to insure that from here on out the Dems keep bringing knives to a gunfight because of the huge cash advantage the GOP would have as a result of it. They're not supposed to be getting any big $$$ themselves.


Hope that clears things up for ya.

Hey, I'd be fine with reversing citizens united if you included all unions, 527s and other political action groups as well. No PAC money, only hard money from individuals directly to the candidates with full track record of who paid what.

Are YOU willing to lose your unfair advantage you've enjoyed for 70 years?

What "unfair advantage"??? Unions have declined in influence and both sides have been able to use 527s and PACs. Furthermore, which side do you think has more people able to afford the maximum personal donation?

 

[rdean]

unbeatable? never underestimate the power of right wing(neocons) ignorance, fearmongering and corporate money.

They are actually making these morons say killing bin laden is a bad thing. This is as dumb as these people actually defending health insurance companies. They were actaully defending the yearly increases. Its amazing really. Poor insurance companies! lolololol

There is a reason for all that. Obama wasn't born here, he's friends with Muslim terrorists and he's black.

Two out of three are now off the table.

And now that Republicans voted for a bill that might send seniors back to eating cat food, the votes from the Republican's biggest supporters are now in play. And it didn't cost Democrats a thing.

 

[Big Fitz]

Oh, silly Maggie...

The Citizens United ruling was supposed to insure that from here on out the Dems keep bringing knives to a gunfight because of the huge cash advantage the GOP would have as a result of it. They're not supposed to be getting any big $$$ themselves.


Hope that clears things up for ya.

Hey, I'd be fine with reversing citizens united if you included all unions, 527s and other political action groups as well. No PAC money, only hard money from individuals directly to the candidates with full track record of who paid what.

Are YOU willing to lose your unfair advantage you've enjoyed for 70 years?

What "unfair advantage"??? Unions have declined in influence and both sides have been able to use 527s and PACs. Furthermore, which side do you think has more people able to afford the maximum personal donation?

Unions have declined in influence

But not in giving, and you obviously don't work in a union shop if you think that's true. They just have to hide their support.

That still doesn't answer my question. Are you willing to ban support and influence from ALL these sources or not? No more side stepping.

 

[EriktheRed]

Hey, I'd be fine with reversing citizens united if you included all unions, 527s and other political action groups as well. No PAC money, only hard money from individuals directly to the candidates with full track record of who paid what.

Are YOU willing to lose your unfair advantage you've enjoyed for 70 years?

What "unfair advantage"??? Unions have declined in influence and both sides have been able to use 527s and PACs. Furthermore, which side do you think has more people able to afford the maximum personal donation?

Unions have declined in influence

But not in giving, and you obviously don't work in a union shop if you think that's true. They just have to hide their support.

That still doesn't answer my question. Are you willing to ban support and influence from ALL these sources or not? No more side stepping.

Well, I guess if it would stop big money donors from having an undue influence on our elections, I'd support a such a ban.

But what is this horseshit about "unfair advantage" again??

 

[taichiliberal]

A lot of people who voted for Obama in 2008 sat on their hands during the 2010 elections in protest of what they saw as Obama NOT living up to some of his key campaign speeches and promises.

And the result was you have several states now fighting neocon governors trying to destroy unions and push the failed reaganomics policy.

Well, unemployment and the budget will be the wrangler for the 2012 election....but I dare say that the actions of the Party of No during the last two years, plus Obama's new found backbone regarding the birther's and nailing Bin Laden will give new ears to ALL the information in that debate. Time will tell.

 

[jillian]

ever wonder what Obama's approval rating would be if you took the poll without california,new york,illinois,oregon and connecticut? I don't think it will be anywhere near the 57% that CBS gives him!

you mean without this country's major population centers?

retard.

 

[Chris]

George W. Bush inherited a strong economy, a budget surplus, and a nation at peace.

Eight years later he left Obama with a shattered economy, a trillion dollar deficit, and two useless wars.

Obama saved the country from a Great Depression, all the TARP money was paid back, GM was rebuilt and is making a profit, healthcare was reformed, Wall Street was reformed, the economy is recovering, we have had 13 straight months of job growth, and Bin Laden is dead.

It helps to have a smart president, my friends.

 

[Big Fitz]

George W. Bush inherited a strong economy, a budget surplus, and a nation at peace.

Eight years later he left Obama with a shattered economy, a trillion dollar deficit, and two useless wars.

Obama saved the country from a Great Depression, all the TARP money was paid back, GM was rebuilt and is making a profit, healthcare was reformed, Wall Street was reformed, the economy is recovering, we have had 13 straight months of job growth, and Bin Laden is dead.

It helps to have a smart president, my friends.

Still trying to sell that used beater of a car, are we?