If Mueller would have 'had the goods' on Trump he would have indicted him.

This is Mueller saying it right here..
You claim that Mueller denied saying what he just said here?

He said precisely the opposite in front of witnesses three fucking times, shit for brains.

I showed you a video of Mueller saying that if he had confidence the president hadnt committed a crime, he would have said so.
You claim he said the opposite, but you have nothing to back it up. Play the tapes.
halccrv6vo031.jpg

Mueller Takes a Parting Shot at the President, Reinvigorating Dems’ Impeachment Efforts | Conservative Angle

Mueller’s comments regarding his team’s conclusion on obstruction seemed to contradict Attorney General William Barr’s assertion last month that Mueller told him that he “was not saying that but for the OLC opinion, he would have found a crime.”

During a press conference on April 18, Barr noted that there were two other Justice Department officials with him when Mueller “made it clear” that that was not his position.

I would leave it to his description in the report, the special counsel’s own articulation of why he did not want to make a determination as to whether or not there was an obstruction offense.

But I will say that when we met with him, Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein and I met with him, along with Ed o’Callaghan, who is the principal associate deputy, on March 5th. We specifically asked him about the OLC opinion and whether or not he was taking a position that he would have found a crime but for the existence of the OLC opinion. And he made it very clear several times that that was not his position. He was not saying that but for the OLC opinion, he would have found a crime. He made it clear that he had not made the determination that there was a crime.

The discrepancy between Mueller’s remarks Wednesday, and what Barr says he and two other top DOJ officials heard in April, is glaring, to say the least.

You're relying on Barr's account of what Mueller said.
But, since Barr lied to congress, can anything Barr says be trusted?

We can only trust what Mueller actually said.

When did Barr lie to Congress?

Approx month ago when he misrepresented Mueller report to congress.
 
He said precisely the opposite in front of witnesses three fucking times, shit for brains.
I showed you a video of Mueller saying that if he had confidence the president hadnt committed a crime, he would have said so.
You claim he said the opposite, but you have nothing to back it up. Play the tapes.
halccrv6vo031.jpg
Mueller Takes a Parting Shot at the President, Reinvigorating Dems’ Impeachment Efforts | Conservative Angle

Mueller’s comments regarding his team’s conclusion on obstruction seemed to contradict Attorney General William Barr’s assertion last month that Mueller told him that he “was not saying that but for the OLC opinion, he would have found a crime.”

During a press conference on April 18, Barr noted that there were two other Justice Department officials with him when Mueller “made it clear” that that was not his position.

I would leave it to his description in the report, the special counsel’s own articulation of why he did not want to make a determination as to whether or not there was an obstruction offense.

But I will say that when we met with him, Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein and I met with him, along with Ed o’Callaghan, who is the principal associate deputy, on March 5th. We specifically asked him about the OLC opinion and whether or not he was taking a position that he would have found a crime but for the existence of the OLC opinion. And he made it very clear several times that that was not his position. He was not saying that but for the OLC opinion, he would have found a crime. He made it clear that he had not made the determination that there was a crime.

The discrepancy between Mueller’s remarks Wednesday, and what Barr says he and two other top DOJ officials heard in April, is glaring, to say the least.
You're relying on Barr's account of what Mueller said.
But, since Barr lied to congress, can anything Barr says be trusted?

We can only trust what Mueller actually said.
When did Barr lie to Congress?
Approx month ago when he misrepresented Mueller report to congress.
He didn't, dumbass.
 
Actually, Mueller said that because he couldn't prove Trump's intent or motive, he wasn't able to bring charges against him, but he also said that the report does not exonerate him either.
So he's guilty until proven innocent? Trump haters are fundamentally unamerican. They reject fundamental American values, like the principles of justice.
comey-mueller.jpg

Typical Progressive idea of Justice.....
 
How long are you Trump hating morons going to peddle this lie? It's already been debunked 10,000 times.
jwh765sg2c131.jpg

Mueller did in fact follow the OLC decision on indicting sitting president.
He himself denied that was the reason for his decision in front of witnesses three fucking times.

You imbeciles are totally fucking shameless when it comes to lying.
This is Mueller saying it right here..
You claim that Mueller denied saying what he just said here?

He said precisely the opposite in front of witnesses three fucking times, shit for brains.

I showed you a video of Mueller saying that if he had confidence the president hadnt committed a crime, he would have said so.
You claim he said the opposite, but you have nothing to back it up. Play the tapes.
halccrv6vo031.jpg


Now show us the video of "confident that he did not commit a crime" being any part of the American standard of justice.

Mueller knows perfectly well that he's torturing the language in order to gull illiterate simps like you, and he knows perfectly well that you're all too ignorant and too rabid to either know or care what the requirements of his job actually are.
 
He himself denied that was the reason for his decision in front of witnesses three fucking times.

You imbeciles are totally fucking shameless when it comes to lying.
This is Mueller saying it right here..
You claim that Mueller denied saying what he just said here?

He said precisely the opposite in front of witnesses three fucking times, shit for brains.

I showed you a video of Mueller saying that if he had confidence the president hadnt committed a crime, he would have said so.
You claim he said the opposite, but you have nothing to back it up. Play the tapes.
halccrv6vo031.jpg

The issue under discussion, shit for brains, is his claim that he didn't make a determination solely because DOJ policy prevented him from doing so. That was clearly a lie since he told Barr in front of multiple witnesses that it wasn't the case.

Please quit lying. You're only making a fool of yourself.


It's a lie, anyway. DOJ policy might prevent him from indicting Trump (had he found sufficient evidence). There's no policy against making a determination that an indictment would have been appropriate. Otherwise, what was the fucking point of the investigation?
 
He did NOT.

NO EVIDENCE
NO CRIME
NO RUSSIAN COLLUSION
NO OBSTRUCTION...

THUS...

NO INDICTMENTS FOR COLLUSION
NO CONVICTIONS FOR COLLUSION
NO INDICTMENTS FOR OBSTRUCTION
NO CONVICTIONS FOR OBSTRUCTION.

'Nuff time wasted.

'Nuff said.

NEXT!
A central reason for the Mueller team’s failure to make that judgment, despite the overwhelming evidence of obstruction they have reported, is two opinions rendered by the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) — one from 1973 and another from 2000 — which say that the indictment of an incumbent President is “impermissible.” Mueller concluded that as an operative of the Department of Justice (DOJ), he was bound to follow that guideline, and he lateralled the decision to Congress.

There is disagreement on this issue of whether a sitting president can be indicted. But it was Mueller's prerogative to use the OLC opinion to decline indictment. Lack of evidence doesnt even enter into the equation. There is boatloads of it.
How long are you Trump hating morons going to peddle this lie? It's already been debunked 10,000 times.
jwh765sg2c131.jpg

Mueller did in fact follow the OLC decision on indicting sitting president.
He himself denied that was the reason for his decision in front of witnesses three fucking times.

You imbeciles are totally fucking shameless when it comes to lying.
This is Mueller saying it right here..
You claim that Mueller denied saying what he just said here?

He said otherwise in front of multiple witnesses three times, shit for brains. Mueller is a two-faced lying piece of shit. No wonder you admire him.
 
He himself denied that was the reason for his decision in front of witnesses three fucking times.

You imbeciles are totally fucking shameless when it comes to lying.
This is Mueller saying it right here..
You claim that Mueller denied saying what he just said here?

He said precisely the opposite in front of witnesses three fucking times, shit for brains.

I showed you a video of Mueller saying that if he had confidence the president hadnt committed a crime, he would have said so.
You claim he said the opposite, but you have nothing to back it up. Play the tapes.
halccrv6vo031.jpg


Now show us the video of "confident that he did not commit a crime" being any part of the American standard of justice.

Mueller knows perfectly well that he's torturing the language in order to gull illiterate simps like you, and he knows perfectly well that you're all too ignorant and too rabid to either know or care what the requirements of his job actually are.

Mueller violated DOJ guidelines.
 

Forum List

Back
Top