If Mueller would have 'had the goods' on Trump he would have indicted him.

easyt65

Diamond Member
Aug 4, 2015
90,307
61,076
2,645
He did NOT.

NO EVIDENCE
NO CRIME
NO RUSSIAN COLLUSION
NO OBSTRUCTION...

THUS...

NO INDICTMENTS FOR COLLUSION
NO CONVICTIONS FOR COLLUSION
NO INDICTMENTS FOR OBSTRUCTION
NO CONVICTIONS FOR OBSTRUCTION.

'Nuff time wasted.

'Nuff said.

NEXT!
 
Actually, Mueller said that because he couldn't prove Trump's intent or motive, he wasn't able to bring charges against him, but he also said that the report does not exonerate him either.
 
yes--I don't know why that's so hard for the lefties to understand??
--o yeah--they just HATE Trump so bad, they are obsessed with getting rid of him even if they have to lie/cheat/steal
 
Actually, Mueller said that because he couldn't prove Trump's intent or motive...

Thank you for REPEATING what I 1st posted...

If Mueller 'had the goods' on the President he would have indicted him.

He did NOT.

NO EVIDENCE
NO CRIME
NO RUSSIAN COLLUSION
NO OBSTRUCTION...

THUS...

NO INDICTMENTS FOR COLLUSION
NO CONVICTIONS FOR COLLUSION
NO INDICTMENTS FOR OBSTRUCTION
NO CONVICTIONS FOR OBSTRUCTION.
 
Actually, Mueller said that because he couldn't prove Trump's intent or motive, he wasn't able to bring charges against him, but he also said that the report does not exonerate him either.
So he's guilty until proven innocent? Trump haters are fundamentally unamerican. They reject fundamental American values, like the principles of justice.
 
He did NOT.

NO EVIDENCE
NO CRIME
NO RUSSIAN COLLUSION
NO OBSTRUCTION...

THUS...

NO INDICTMENTS FOR COLLUSION
NO CONVICTIONS FOR COLLUSION
NO INDICTMENTS FOR OBSTRUCTION
NO CONVICTIONS FOR OBSTRUCTION.

'Nuff time wasted.

'Nuff said.

NEXT!

Read the report troll. The only reason Mueller didn’t charge Trump is because the DOJ can’t indict a sitting President. The decision to charge Trump lies with Congress, not the DOJ.

Barr doesn’t have the authority to clear Trump.
 
Actually, Mueller said that because he couldn't prove Trump's intent or motive, he wasn't able to bring charges against him, but he also said that the report does not exonerate him either.
So he's guilty until proven innocent? Trump haters are fundamentally unamerican. They reject fundamental American values, like the principles of justice.

Trump supporters fundamentally hate the Constitution and the rule of law. You show that every day you post you hate and bike against the left.
 
Actually, Mueller said that because he couldn't prove Trump's intent or motive, he wasn't able to bring charges against him, but he also said that the report does not exonerate him either.
So he's guilty until proven innocent? Trump haters are fundamentally unamerican. They reject fundamental American values, like the principles of justice.

Trump supporters fundamentally hate the Constitution and the rule of law. You show that every day you post you hate and bike against the left.

Huh.....what do you know about our Constitution?
 
Actually, Mueller said that because he couldn't prove Trump's intent or motive, he wasn't able to bring charges against him, but he also said that the report does not exonerate him either.
So he's guilty until proven innocent? Trump haters are fundamentally unamerican. They reject fundamental American values, like the principles of justice.

Trump supporters fundamentally hate the Constitution and the rule of law. You show that every day you post you hate and bike against the left.
So do you accept the principle of "innocent until proven guilty?"
 
He did NOT.

NO EVIDENCE
NO CRIME
NO RUSSIAN COLLUSION
NO OBSTRUCTION...

THUS...

NO INDICTMENTS FOR COLLUSION
NO CONVICTIONS FOR COLLUSION
NO INDICTMENTS FOR OBSTRUCTION
NO CONVICTIONS FOR OBSTRUCTION.

'Nuff time wasted.

'Nuff said.

NEXT!

Read the report troll. The only reason Mueller didn’t charge Trump is because the DOJ can’t indict a sitting President. The decision to charge Trump lies with Congress, not the DOJ.

Barr doesn’t have the authority to clear Trump.
If Mueller would have 'the goods' on the President he would have indicted him.

HE DID NOT.

NO EVIDENCE
NO CRIME
NO RUSSIAN COLLUSION
NO OBSTRUCTION...

THUS...

NO INDICTMENTS FOR COLLUSION
NO CONVICTIONS FOR COLLUSION
NO INDICTMENTS FOR OBSTRUCTION
NO CONVICTIONS FOR OBSTRUCTION.
 
He did NOT.

NO EVIDENCE
NO CRIME
NO RUSSIAN COLLUSION
NO OBSTRUCTION...

THUS...

NO INDICTMENTS FOR COLLUSION
NO CONVICTIONS FOR COLLUSION
NO INDICTMENTS FOR OBSTRUCTION
NO CONVICTIONS FOR OBSTRUCTION.

'Nuff time wasted.

'Nuff said.

NEXT!
There's no legal term for collusion. It's called conspiracy. Trumps goon squad like Barr today keep using that term so they can blow more smoke up your ass. So grab your ankles, assclown. A sitting Prez can't be indicted which is the only reason your boy isn't wearing an ankle bracelet right now.
 
He did NOT.

NO EVIDENCE
NO CRIME
NO RUSSIAN COLLUSION
NO OBSTRUCTION...

THUS...

NO INDICTMENTS FOR COLLUSION
NO CONVICTIONS FOR COLLUSION
NO INDICTMENTS FOR OBSTRUCTION
NO CONVICTIONS FOR OBSTRUCTION.

'Nuff time wasted.

'Nuff said.

NEXT!
There's no legal term for collusion. It's called conspiracy. Trumps goon squad like Barr today keep using that term so they can blow more smoke up your ass. So grab your ankles, assclown.
So what crime did the Trump campaign "conspire" on?
 
Actually, Mueller said that because he couldn't prove Trump's intent or motive, he wasn't able to bring charges against him, but he also said that the report does not exonerate him either.
So he's guilty until proven innocent? Trump haters are fundamentally unamerican. They reject fundamental American values, like the principles of justice.
just like Kavanaugh/Covington/cops/etc
 
He did NOT.

NO EVIDENCE
NO CRIME
NO RUSSIAN COLLUSION
NO OBSTRUCTION...

THUS...

NO INDICTMENTS FOR COLLUSION
NO CONVICTIONS FOR COLLUSION
NO INDICTMENTS FOR OBSTRUCTION
NO CONVICTIONS FOR OBSTRUCTION.

'Nuff time wasted.

'Nuff said.

NEXT!

Read the report troll. The only reason Mueller didn’t charge Trump is because the DOJ can’t indict a sitting President. The decision to charge Trump lies with Congress, not the DOJ.

Barr doesn’t have the authority to clear Trump.
Nonsense. Everyone including you knows there wasn't anything in all those 400 pages that was indictable. Also if it were really a non-partisan investigation into Russian interference, there would have been a few pages at least on Clinton's obvious involvement with the Russians. Were there any? I haven't read it but all I've heard is that the investigation completely ignored Democrats.
 
Actually, Mueller said that because he couldn't prove Trump's intent or motive, he wasn't able to bring charges against him, but he also said that the report does not exonerate him either.

You're both talking out of your ass. Mueller's report explicitly points to standing DOJ policy against indicting a sitting President. But who cares? Partisans on both sides will run their mouths however they want, neither side paying attention to the facts.
 
Mueller is working under the AG policy of not being able to indict a sitting prez .
 
He did NOT.

NO EVIDENCE
NO CRIME
NO RUSSIAN COLLUSION
NO OBSTRUCTION...

THUS...

NO INDICTMENTS FOR COLLUSION
NO CONVICTIONS FOR COLLUSION
NO INDICTMENTS FOR OBSTRUCTION
NO CONVICTIONS FOR OBSTRUCTION.

'Nuff time wasted.

'Nuff said.

NEXT!
There's no legal term for collusion. It's called conspiracy. Trumps goon squad like Barr today keep using that term so they can blow more smoke up your ass. So grab your ankles, assclown. A sitting Prez can't be indicted which is the only reason your boy isn't wearing an ankle bracelet right now.

There's no legal term for collusion. It's called conspiracy.

Did Mueller find evidence of conspiracy?
 

Forum List

Back
Top