Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I think its less about womanizing and more about the rape allegations. It will be tough to overlook the rape stuff if it turns out to be true. We will know in 8 years when the tapes are unsealed.All over the country statues of historical figures are being attacked as details about their personal lives become known.
Columbus day is in the process of losing its name because it has become known that Christopher Columbus was something of a slave trader and a racist.
Bostonians want the name of Faneuil Hall changed because Faneuil at one point in his life owned slaves.
Martin Luther King's sexual exploits aren't exactly a secret. You do have to be careful about believing urban legend. However it seems there is some foundation for believing that he was a real sexual predator. The question that we're asking here is whether or not that should make a difference to his place in history?
If that turns out to be true should the name of the holiday be changed? If he did indeed victimize dozens of women as rumor has it...should his statue still be standing down in DC? Or should the me-too movement speak up until it is removed?
Jo
Great claims require great evidence. If you told me you ate eggs for breakfast, i wouldnt need proof, but if you said you ate dragon eggs for breakfast, im going to need more than just your word before i believe it.I think its less about womanizing and more about the rape allegations. It will be tough to overlook the rape stuff if it turns out to be true. We will know in 8 years when the tapes are unsealed.All over the country statues of historical figures are being attacked as details about their personal lives become known.
Columbus day is in the process of losing its name because it has become known that Christopher Columbus was something of a slave trader and a racist.
Bostonians want the name of Faneuil Hall changed because Faneuil at one point in his life owned slaves.
Martin Luther King's sexual exploits aren't exactly a secret. You do have to be careful about believing urban legend. However it seems there is some foundation for believing that he was a real sexual predator. The question that we're asking here is whether or not that should make a difference to his place in history?
If that turns out to be true should the name of the holiday be changed? If he did indeed victimize dozens of women as rumor has it...should his statue still be standing down in DC? Or should the me-too movement speak up until it is removed?
Jo
Why wait 8 years? There are people who have seen and heard the tapes out there already.
If MLK isn't as upstanding as people thought, let's change the 3rd Monday of January to H. Rap Brown's Birthday and we can have a new black icon.
Great claims require great evidence. If you told me you ate eggs for breakfast, i wouldnt need proof, but if you said you ate dragon eggs for breakfast, im going to need more than just your word before i believe it.I think its less about womanizing and more about the rape allegations. It will be tough to overlook the rape stuff if it turns out to be true. We will know in 8 years when the tapes are unsealed.All over the country statues of historical figures are being attacked as details about their personal lives become known.
Columbus day is in the process of losing its name because it has become known that Christopher Columbus was something of a slave trader and a racist.
Bostonians want the name of Faneuil Hall changed because Faneuil at one point in his life owned slaves.
Martin Luther King's sexual exploits aren't exactly a secret. You do have to be careful about believing urban legend. However it seems there is some foundation for believing that he was a real sexual predator. The question that we're asking here is whether or not that should make a difference to his place in history?
If that turns out to be true should the name of the holiday be changed? If he did indeed victimize dozens of women as rumor has it...should his statue still be standing down in DC? Or should the me-too movement speak up until it is removed?
Jo
Why wait 8 years? There are people who have seen and heard the tapes out there already.
If MLK isn't as upstanding as people thought, let's change the 3rd Monday of January to H. Rap Brown's Birthday and we can have a new black icon.
All over the country statues of historical figures are being attacked as details about their personal lives become known.
Columbus day is in the process of losing its name because it has become known that Christopher Columbus was something of a slave trader and a racist.
Bostonians want the name of Faneuil Hall changed because Faneuil at one point in his life owned slaves.
Martin Luther King's sexual exploits aren't exactly a secret. You do have to be careful about believing urban legend. However it seems there is some foundation for believing that he was a real sexual predator. The question that we're asking here is whether or not that should make a difference to his place in history?
If that turns out to be true should the name of the holiday be changed? If he did indeed victimize dozens of women as rumor has it...should his statue still be standing down in DC? Or should the me-too movement speak up until it is removed?
Jo
"I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character." MLK
If he was a womanizer, then clearly he had some character issues. He himself dreamed of, and asked to be judged by the content of his character.
Columbus has been dead for hundreds of years..... But still we're punishing him.
Jo
Yeah, and Alexander Fleming didn't discover penicillin. It was already there.He didn't "discover" America. The people who lived here already knew it was here. What he did do was open the Americas to genocide and exploitation by Europe, resulting in the deaths of tens of millions of people and racism that haunts us to this very day.
Dr. King had consensual sex with some white women... at a time when that was more dangerous for him than them.
Dr. King had consensual sex with some white women... at a time when that was more dangerous for him than them.
If he did have sex with a woman who was the wife or goomah of a well connected individual, it would certainly be dangerous as hell for anyone regardless of their ethnicity.
It could also give a clue as to the motive for Mr. Ray to whack him in Memphis. I don't think the prevailing theory that Mr. Ray shot MLK because he didn't like blacks holds any water.
Ray could have taken out a whole slew of blacks standing on the motel balcony if it was racial hatred but he did not.
If Ray was executing the contract of someone who was offended because King was fucking his old lady, that would explain a lot
If he did have sex with a woman who was the wife or goomah of a well connected individual, it would certainly be dangerous as hell for anyone regardless of their ethnicity.
It could also give a clue as to the motive for Mr. Ray to whack him in Memphis. I don't think the prevailing theory that Mr. Ray shot MLK because he didn't like blacks holds any water.
Ray could have taken out a whole slew of blacks standing on the motel balcony if it was racial hatred but he did not.
If Ray was executing the contract of someone who was offended because King was fucking his old lady, that would explain a lot
Not sure what a goomah is, but this is a lot of conspiracy theory stuff.
It's just as likely that Ray was working for the FBI because J. Edgar Hoover thought he was a communist.
Still not seeing how any of this makes MLK a bad person.
I didn't say it made MLK a "bad person", just that if King were fucking someone's wife or girlfriend, it would provide a reason why someone would want to whack him- and leave his African American friends standing on the balcony alive.
If Director Hoover ordered the whacking of MLK, Hoover's direct superior was Ramsey Clark at the time and Mr. Clark is still alive and would presumably know what his staff was up to.
Or he was a racist who wanted to get the guy who was upsetting the white supremacist order.
.
That was the problem... Hoover acted as a law onto himself... which is why it was a scandal when we found out how much he had been spying on the rest of us.
Or he was a racist who wanted to get the guy who was upsetting the white supremacist order.
.
I guess that would be a possibility, but not a very likely one. Mr. Ray always denied the crime and had good relations with the King Family.
Releasing the tapes would help clear the matter, instead of just having people speculate as to the reason MLK had his ass capped.
All over the country statues of historical figures are being attacked as details about their personal lives become known.
Columbus day is in the process of losing its name because it has become known that Christopher Columbus was something of a slave trader and a racist.
Bostonians want the name of Faneuil Hall changed because Faneuil at one point in his life owned slaves.
Martin Luther King's sexual exploits aren't exactly a secret. You do have to be careful about believing urban legend. However it seems there is some foundation for believing that he was a real sexual predator. The question that we're asking here is whether or not that should make a difference to his place in history?
If that turns out to be true should the name of the holiday be changed? If he did indeed victimize dozens of women as rumor has it...should his statue still be standing down in DC? Or should the me-too movement speak up until it is removed?
Jo
Being a lady's man is not the same as being a slave owner.
No one cares about his womanizing. Its the rape stuff that is problematic."I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character." MLK
If he was a womanizer, then clearly he had some character issues. He himself dreamed of, and asked to be judged by the content of his character.
No one cares about his womanizing. Its the rape stuff that is problematic."I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character." MLK
If he was a womanizer, then clearly he had some character issues. He himself dreamed of, and asked to be judged by the content of his character.
The lack of curiosity about WHY MLK was whacked among leftards isn't surprising.
