If Jeb Bush and Hillary Clinton are the 2 choices for president what would you do?

No more Bushs No more Clintons, Seriously I will not vote for anyone with those names even if it for dog catcher.
I would find an alternative third party candidate.
 
After seeing Jeb Bush's and Hillary Clinton's policies they're both horrible and would destroy the country. I'd vote for neither. I'd vote for Putin over either of them, I'll probably move to Russia if Bush or Clinton become president.

At least Putin is for his countries interests, strong military, Anti-illegal immigrant, Anti- Islamic terrorist, and Anti-Communist.
Justbeing sarcatic about the Putin. But stil I hope this isn't the election result.

If the vote is between two different dynasties, I think that's a sign this country has lost all mooring with its roots. I voted 3rd party in 2008 and I'll be glad to do so again before voting for Hildabeast or Bush-take-three.
 
After seeing Jeb Bush's and Hillary Clinton's policies they're both horrible and would destroy the country. I'd vote for neither. I'd vote for Putin over either of them, I'll probably move to Russia if Bush or Clinton become president.

At least Putin is for his countries interests, strong military, Anti-illegal immigrant, Anti- Islamic terrorist, and Anti-Communist.
Justbeing sarcatic about the Putin. But stil I hope this isn't the election result.

If the vote is between two different dynasties, I think that's a sign this country has lost all mooring with its roots. I voted 3rd party in 2008 and I'll be glad to do so again before voting for Hildabeast or Bush-take-three.


thats great, but remember------------the Perot vote elected bubba clinton. 3rd parties always help the dems.
 
After seeing Jeb Bush's and Hillary Clinton's policies they're both horrible and would destroy the country. I'd vote for neither. I'd vote for Putin over either of them, I'll probably move to Russia if Bush or Clinton become president.

At least Putin is for his countries interests, strong military, Anti-illegal immigrant, Anti- Islamic terrorist, and Anti-Communist.
Justbeing sarcatic about the Putin. But stil I hope this isn't the election result.



Lets see here. The first bush took our nation and economy to the brink of collapse. The only reason it was stopped and reversed is because the first bush lost his second election and Clinton became president.

The bush boy actually did take the nation, our economy and the world over that edge and collapsed the economy. The bush boy then bailed out the very people who collapsed our economy with his TARP legislation.

If I have to choose between Hillary and another bush boy, I will do everything in my power to make sure another bush isn't given another chance to destroy our economy and nation.

Hillary would get my vote.
 
After seeing Jeb Bush's and Hillary Clinton's policies they're both horrible and would destroy the country. I'd vote for neither. I'd vote for Putin over either of them, I'll probably move to Russia if Bush or Clinton become president.

At least Putin is for his countries interests, strong military, Anti-illegal immigrant, Anti- Islamic terrorist, and Anti-Communist.
Justbeing sarcatic about the Putin. But stil I hope this isn't the election result.

If the vote is between two different dynasties, I think that's a sign this country has lost all mooring with its roots. I voted 3rd party in 2008 and I'll be glad to do so again before voting for Hildabeast or Bush-take-three.


thats great, but remember------------the Perot vote elected bubba clinton. 3rd parties always help the dems.

Weigh that against voting for somebody who I don't believe truly earned it. Also I don't think it's wise to second guess history. The election of Bill Clinton caused a Republican sweep of Congress in 1994 and resulted in a very fast paced series of conservative reforms. Clinton to his credit didn't stand in the way, but signed welfare reform and the balanced budget. All in all, I don't want to hazard to guess where we would be if Bush was re-elected.
 
After seeing Jeb Bush's and Hillary Clinton's policies they're both horrible and would destroy the country. I'd vote for neither. I'd vote for Putin over either of them, I'll probably move to Russia if Bush or Clinton become president.

At least Putin is for his countries interests, strong military, Anti-illegal immigrant, Anti- Islamic terrorist, and Anti-Communist.
Justbeing sarcatic about the Putin. But stil I hope this isn't the election result.

Fill out the ballot on local and state issues then write myself in for Dictator.

As low as the odds are that I'd be elected as dictator are... they're vastly better than the US Surviving either one of those clowns, in the wake of The Brown Clown.
 
After seeing Jeb Bush's and Hillary Clinton's policies they're both horrible and would destroy the country. I'd vote for neither. I'd vote for Putin over either of them, I'll probably move to Russia if Bush or Clinton become president.

At least Putin is for his countries interests, strong military, Anti-illegal immigrant, Anti- Islamic terrorist, and Anti-Communist.
Justbeing sarcatic about the Putin. But stil I hope this isn't the election result.

Fill out the ballot on local and state issues then write myself in for Dictator.

As low as the odds are that I'd be elected as dictator are... they're vastly better than the US Surviving either one of those clowns, in the wake of The Brown Clown.


America has had enough of Democrats playing between the bushes. Scott Walker has his head in the game and he's going to win hearts and minds like Bush III never could.
 
There's certain things both parties should agree on and work to approve.
-Infrastructure
-Our science programs
-Good investment into tech.

Some policies that have to do with trade and economics. We shouldn't fight on demanding that everyone pays their taxes...

Why should everything be a big fucking fight? I am sorry, but cut, slash and burn is just plain dumb.

What about jobs and wage disparity? If you want a healthy economy you MUST have a healthy middle class.
 
Jeb Bush did a good job with the Florida state budget while he was governor. He balanced the budget while providing substantial tax cuts. So on that basis alone, I would take him over Hillary.

My number one concern is electing a candidate who will impose some fiscal sanity on the federal government and begin to move us toward a balanced budget. I would not even mind a temporary tax hike to help balance the budget as long as it were accompanied by substantial spending cuts and some targeted tax relief for our businesses (such as lowering our insane corporate income tax rate and repatriated income tax rate).

Didn't Florida's budget grow by 27% during Bush?
 
Laugh like hell and vote for an interesting third party candidate or write in "None of The Above".

A vote no more wasted than casting one for either of those proposed.

At least a protest vote because:

1. Voting for the lesser of evils is still voting for evil.
2. Not voting demonstrates disinterest and negate a person's right to bitch.


that is so wrong. staying home or voting 3rd party always helps the worst of the primary party candidates. Want HRC to be president? vote 3rd party or stay home.

while you are at it, look up the word 'lessor', as in lessor of two evils.

In theory, but that all depends on what you define as "the worst".

For example, I doubt in all honesty, that Mitt Romney would have been all that much better.

The difference is, at least without me voting for him, I can safely and proudly say, that the insanity that's going on for the last 5 years, isn't my fault, because I didn't vote for him.

IF he'd been elected, he would have done all the same things, and everyone would be saying "you voted for him!", and they'd be right.

You give me a real alternative, and I'll really vote for him.

You give me 'left-wing nut job" and "left-wing nut job jr.", and no... sorry. I'm not going to vote for your left-wing nut job, over the other left-wing nut job, just because you think yours is the 'jr. nut job".

I'll vote for the constitutionalist party, just like I did last time. The wasted vote, is the vote for someone you know you already disagree with. That's why we've had such crappy choices for the last two elections.


conservatives and moderates who stayed home gave us the second 4 years of obama. Romney would have been a very good president. He understands what makes the economy work and has a deep love and respect for this country. He is also a good man who loves his family and his God.

Obama is the worst president in our history, he is destroying our culture, our fiscal sanity, our strength, and our international reputation. He is dividing us by race, sex, religion, income, and location. He is ignoring our constitution, enforcing the laws he likes and ignoring the ones he doesn't, and making up new ones without congressional involvement.

The dems, libs, and conservatives who sat out the elections are responsible.

Do you know what Romney Care is? Massachusetts has Romney Care, which had nearly bankrupted the state, caused hospitals to run some of the worst wait times in the entire country, nearly caused all the pharmaceutical companies to boycott the state, and yet have the highest health insurance costs of the the entire country.

The Obama Care system we've been complaining about for the last 5 years, and rightfully so, was created based on Romney Care.

That is one of several different policies that Romney was, and is, exactly like Obama on.

Would he have been better? I doubt it. He most certainly would have pushed through Romney Care for the country, and the Liberals would be screaming about it, and I'd be here going "well yeah I voted for him but.........."

And you all know it. At least this way, it was Obama's fault, and not mine for voting for him.
 
There's certain things both parties should agree on and work to approve.
-Infrastructure
-Our science programs
-Good investment into tech.

Some policies that have to do with trade and economics. We shouldn't fight on demanding that everyone pays their taxes...

Why should everything be a big fucking fight? I am sorry, but cut, slash and burn is just plain dumb.

What about jobs and wage disparity? If you want a healthy economy you MUST have a healthy middle class.

No problem. We'll tax middle class to pay for free health care for the middle class.... they'll be health then. That's the socialist way.
 
Jeb Bush did a good job with the Florida state budget while he was governor. He balanced the budget while providing substantial tax cuts. So on that basis alone, I would take him over Hillary.

My number one concern is electing a candidate who will impose some fiscal sanity on the federal government and begin to move us toward a balanced budget. I would not even mind a temporary tax hike to help balance the budget as long as it were accompanied by substantial spending cuts and some targeted tax relief for our businesses (such as lowering our insane corporate income tax rate and repatriated income tax rate).

Didn't Florida's budget grow by 27% during Bush?

I have no idea what Florida's budget is, or is not. But just as an FYI, I don't care about the size of the budget. What concerns me is, do we have the money to do it.

If we had $500 Billion surplus at the Federal level, with zero national debt, I'd have no problem increasing the budget, and setting up some programs for whatever.

The problem comes when we have a $500 Billion deficit, and $18 Trillion in debt. Then I want the budget to shrink. So telling me the budget in Florida increased 27%... doesn't tell me anything.

Was there a deficit? Did he cut the deficit drastically? Did he pay off the debts?

Those are the questions I want to know. I wager he likely didn't. That's my guess without looking it up. I'm not a Jeb fan.... yet. We'll see.
 

Forum List

Back
Top