If It's Bad.....Jews Did It

[eots]

NIST methodology was completly flawed dr Q was correct... there was no evidence of temperatures required in forensic testing to initiate failure... and again he is correct.. drQ made no direct statement on pre-planted explosives theory to be CTBS that was an editoral comment by the writer and not in quote however... Quintiere did say...Dr. Quintiere, one of the world’s leading fire science researchers and safety engineers, also encouraged his audience of fellow researchers and engineers to scientifically re-examine the WTC collapses. “I hope to convince you to perhaps become 'Conspiracy Theorists', but in a proper way,”
and also said...
“In my opinion, the WTC investigation by NIST falls short of expectations by not definitively finding cause, by not sufficiently linking recommendations of specificity to cause, by not fully invoking all of their authority to seek facts in the investigation, and by the guidance of government lawyers to deter rather than develop fact finding.
And also said...
Dr. Quintiere said he originally “had high hopes” that NIST would do a good job with the investigation.“They’re the central government lab for fire. There are good people there and they can do a good job.But what I also thought they would do is to enlist the service of the ATF [Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives], which has an investigation force and a laboratory of their own for fire.And I thought they would put people out on the street and get gumshoe-type information.What prevented all of this?I think it’s the legal structure that cloaks the Commerce Department and therefore NIST.And so, instead of lawyers as if they were acting on a civil case trying to get depositions and information subpoenaed, those lawyers did the opposite and blocked everything.”
Article Former Chief of NIST s Fire Science Division Calls for Independent Review of World Trade Center Investigation OpEdNews

And any metallurgist will tell you that the aviation fuel would generate sufficient heat to cause the valence bonds to fail. A simple experiment that every welder and car mechanic knows about, weld two sheets together and then flex the joint. The steel will give either side of the weld because the valence bonds are weakened by the heat of welding, the simple task of heating the steel slowly will stop this from happening as the valence bonds don't migrate away from the heat source.

babble...fuel burned off at impact .. how did it collapse with symmetry,,how did it collapse in secs..what happened to the central core

Already explained it was the fault of the designers sticking to code and allowing no leeway for a sudden impact. The fuel might have burnt of but the high temperatures and latent heat are enough to cause the valence bonds to fail. It was the central core that went as that is where the heat was directed by the updraught ( Bunsen burner remember ). Once one central support gave way the remaining ones were over their maximum loading and the steel being under compression heated through work until they gave. Once that happened the full weight of the floors above plus their kinetic energy plus the angular motion ( Newtons laws ) created a shock loading of many trillions of tons over and above the design parameters. With this being the central core the building collapsed in on itself ( fill a plastic bottle or metal can with steam, seal it and drop it in cold water for an example ). As each floor gave way the speed and inertia increased along with the mass and kinetic energy until more than one floor gave under the increasing weight

Just as the WTC did as each floor collapsed, the building stayed still for a split second before collapsing again, and again and again and again each pause getting shorter as the inertia overcame the stress loading. The two cars analogy is wrong in this instance as they are close in mass and inertia. More relevant would be an extremely heavy and fast train hitting a car, and taking 1 mile to stop.

Here it is happening



Notice the flames from the inferno inside at 9 minutes after the impact then again 15 minutes after.




Now the only possible explosive that could have caused the collapse would have nitro glycerine based, and the shock of the plane hitting the building would have triggered an explosion. NO EXPLOSION.

lol ..there is nothing but dust above the collapse line..its being crushed by dust

 

[eots]

NIST methodology was completly flawed dr Q was correct... there was no evidence of temperatures required in forensic testing to initiate failure... and again he is correct.. drQ made no direct statement on pre-planted explosives theory to be CTBS that was an editoral comment by the writer and not in quote however... Quintiere did say...Dr. Quintiere, one of the world’s leading fire science researchers and safety engineers, also encouraged his audience of fellow researchers and engineers to scientifically re-examine the WTC collapses. “I hope to convince you to perhaps become 'Conspiracy Theorists', but in a proper way,”
and also said...
“In my opinion, the WTC investigation by NIST falls short of expectations by not definitively finding cause, by not sufficiently linking recommendations of specificity to cause, by not fully invoking all of their authority to seek facts in the investigation, and by the guidance of government lawyers to deter rather than develop fact finding.
And also said...
Dr. Quintiere said he originally “had high hopes” that NIST would do a good job with the investigation.“They’re the central government lab for fire. There are good people there and they can do a good job.But what I also thought they would do is to enlist the service of the ATF [Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives], which has an investigation force and a laboratory of their own for fire.And I thought they would put people out on the street and get gumshoe-type information.What prevented all of this?I think it’s the legal structure that cloaks the Commerce Department and therefore NIST.And so, instead of lawyers as if they were acting on a civil case trying to get depositions and information subpoenaed, those lawyers did the opposite and blocked everything.”
Article Former Chief of NIST s Fire Science Division Calls for Independent Review of World Trade Center Investigation OpEdNews

And any metallurgist will tell you that the aviation fuel would generate sufficient heat to cause the valence bonds to fail. A simple experiment that every welder and car mechanic knows about, weld two sheets together and then flex the joint. The steel will give either side of the weld because the valence bonds are weakened by the heat of welding, the simple task of heating the steel slowly will stop this from happening as the valence bonds don't migrate away from the heat source.

babble...fuel burned off at impact .. how did it collapse with symmetry,,how did it collapse in secs..what happened to the central core

Already explained it was the fault of the designers sticking to code and allowing no leeway for a sudden impact. The fuel might have burnt of but the high temperatures and latent heat are enough to cause the valence bonds to fail. It was the central core that went as that is where the heat was directed by the updraught ( Bunsen burner remember ). Once one central support gave way the remaining ones were over their maximum loading and the steel being under compression heated through work until they gave. Once that happened the full weight of the floors above plus their kinetic energy plus the angular motion ( Newtons laws ) created a shock loading of many trillions of tons over and above the design parameters. With this being the central core the building collapsed in on itself ( fill a plastic bottle or metal can with steam, seal it and drop it in cold water for an example ). As each floor gave way the speed and inertia increased along with the mass and kinetic energy until more than one floor gave under the increasing weight

Just as the WTC did as each floor collapsed, the building stayed still for a split second before collapsing again, and again and again and again each pause getting shorter as the inertia overcame the stress loading. The two cars analogy is wrong in this instance as they are close in mass and inertia. More relevant would be an extremely heavy and fast train hitting a car, and taking 1 mile to stop.

Here it is happening



Notice the flames from the inferno inside at 9 minutes after the impact then again 15 minutes after.




Now the only possible explosive that could have caused the collapse would have nitro glycerine based, and the shock of the plane hitting the building would have triggered an explosion. NO EXPLOSION.

baseless assumption

 

[ChrisL]

Key findings include:

• Floor sagging and exposure to high temperatures caused the perimeter columns to bow inward and buckle—a process that spread across the faces of the buildings.
• Even though the jet fuel on the planes burned off in the first few minutes after impact, there was enough office furniture to sustain intense fires for at least an hour.
• The original builders of the twin towers and those who later renovated the structures did not have a clear technical standard for deciding on how much insulation to use around the structural beams, many of which gave way in the intense heat.

the case of the Twin Towers NIST only gives a theory of collapse initiation and never even attempts to explain the proceeding rapid collapse

Because they were bought of by the Building Contractors. The steel failed catastrophically because its load bearing was exceeded by an enormous factor. Watch the videos and you will see the steel shattering under the force of the increasing weight suddenly dropping on it. Much as a rope will hold your weight while a steady force is applied, but snatch load it and it snaps.

Electrical design has nothing to do with structural design, in fat many electrical designers have had to redo their designs when they breached code to shave the costs. Silly things like notching a load bearing beam to run electrical conduits in many places, rather that run around the load bearing beam.

He knows nothing about the stress loading of steel beams. So now you are clutching at straws

Told you so! It's not worth your time to argue with these kinds of people.

 

[Phoenall]

And any metallurgist will tell you that the aviation fuel would generate sufficient heat to cause the valence bonds to fail. A simple experiment that every welder and car mechanic knows about, weld two sheets together and then flex the joint. The steel will give either side of the weld because the valence bonds are weakened by the heat of welding, the simple task of heating the steel slowly will stop this from happening as the valence bonds don't migrate away from the heat source.

babble...fuel burned off at impact .. how did it collapse with symmetry,,how did it collapse in secs..what happened to the central core

Already explained it was the fault of the designers sticking to code and allowing no leeway for a sudden impact. The fuel might have burnt of but the high temperatures and latent heat are enough to cause the valence bonds to fail. It was the central core that went as that is where the heat was directed by the updraught ( Bunsen burner remember ). Once one central support gave way the remaining ones were over their maximum loading and the steel being under compression heated through work until they gave. Once that happened the full weight of the floors above plus their kinetic energy plus the angular motion ( Newtons laws ) created a shock loading of many trillions of tons over and above the design parameters. With this being the central core the building collapsed in on itself ( fill a plastic bottle or metal can with steam, seal it and drop it in cold water for an example ). As each floor gave way the speed and inertia increased along with the mass and kinetic energy until more than one floor gave under the increasing weight

Just as the WTC did as each floor collapsed, the building stayed still for a split second before collapsing again, and again and again and again each pause getting shorter as the inertia overcame the stress loading. The two cars analogy is wrong in this instance as they are close in mass and inertia. More relevant would be an extremely heavy and fast train hitting a car, and taking 1 mile to stop.

Here it is happening



Notice the flames from the inferno inside at 9 minutes after the impact then again 15 minutes after.




Now the only possible explosive that could have caused the collapse would have nitro glycerine based, and the shock of the plane hitting the building would have triggered an explosion. NO EXPLOSION.

lol ..there is nothing but dust above the collapse line..its being crushed by dust

That is the pulverised concrete and ashes being ejected by the collapse. You need to change your optician

 

[Phoenall]

And any metallurgist will tell you that the aviation fuel would generate sufficient heat to cause the valence bonds to fail. A simple experiment that every welder and car mechanic knows about, weld two sheets together and then flex the joint. The steel will give either side of the weld because the valence bonds are weakened by the heat of welding, the simple task of heating the steel slowly will stop this from happening as the valence bonds don't migrate away from the heat source.

babble...fuel burned off at impact .. how did it collapse with symmetry,,how did it collapse in secs..what happened to the central core

Already explained it was the fault of the designers sticking to code and allowing no leeway for a sudden impact. The fuel might have burnt of but the high temperatures and latent heat are enough to cause the valence bonds to fail. It was the central core that went as that is where the heat was directed by the updraught ( Bunsen burner remember ). Once one central support gave way the remaining ones were over their maximum loading and the steel being under compression heated through work until they gave. Once that happened the full weight of the floors above plus their kinetic energy plus the angular motion ( Newtons laws ) created a shock loading of many trillions of tons over and above the design parameters. With this being the central core the building collapsed in on itself ( fill a plastic bottle or metal can with steam, seal it and drop it in cold water for an example ). As each floor gave way the speed and inertia increased along with the mass and kinetic energy until more than one floor gave under the increasing weight

Just as the WTC did as each floor collapsed, the building stayed still for a split second before collapsing again, and again and again and again each pause getting shorter as the inertia overcame the stress loading. The two cars analogy is wrong in this instance as they are close in mass and inertia. More relevant would be an extremely heavy and fast train hitting a car, and taking 1 mile to stop.

Here it is happening



Notice the flames from the inferno inside at 9 minutes after the impact then again 15 minutes after.




Now the only possible explosive that could have caused the collapse would have nitro glycerine based, and the shock of the plane hitting the building would have triggered an explosion. NO EXPLOSION.

baseless assumption

No cold hard facts that can be found on the internet. Now about these flames seen a 9 minutes and 15 minutes after impact. How could this be when you said they did not exist ?

 

[eots]

Key findings include:

• Floor sagging and exposure to high temperatures caused the perimeter columns to bow inward and buckle—a process that spread across the faces of the buildings.
• Even though the jet fuel on the planes burned off in the first few minutes after impact, there was enough office furniture to sustain intense fires for at least an hour.
• The original builders of the twin towers and those who later renovated the structures did not have a clear technical standard for deciding on how much insulation to use around the structural beams, many of which gave way in the intense heat.

the case of the Twin Towers NIST only gives a theory of collapse initiation and never even attempts to explain the proceeding rapid collapse

Because they were bought of by the Building Contractors. The steel failed catastrophically because its load bearing was exceeded by an enormous factor. Watch the videos and you will see the steel shattering under the force of the increasing weight suddenly dropping on it. Much as a rope will hold your weight while a steady force is applied, but snatch load it and it snaps.

Electrical design has nothing to do with structural design, in fat many electrical designers have had to redo their designs when they breached code to shave the costs. Silly things like notching a load bearing beam to run electrical conduits in many places, rather that run around the load bearing beam.

He knows nothing about the stress loading of steel beams. So now you are clutching at straws

Told you so! It's not worth your time to argue with these kinds of people.

what a twit..you realize you just agreed with someone who thinks unions and NIST were bribed by mafia to not admit design flaws that caused the collapse and wtc 7 was taken down by the government for safety reasons..lol

 

[Phoenall]

Key findings include:

• Floor sagging and exposure to high temperatures caused the perimeter columns to bow inward and buckle—a process that spread across the faces of the buildings.
• Even though the jet fuel on the planes burned off in the first few minutes after impact, there was enough office furniture to sustain intense fires for at least an hour.
• The original builders of the twin towers and those who later renovated the structures did not have a clear technical standard for deciding on how much insulation to use around the structural beams, many of which gave way in the intense heat.

the case of the Twin Towers NIST only gives a theory of collapse initiation and never even attempts to explain the proceeding rapid collapse

Because they were bought of by the Building Contractors. The steel failed catastrophically because its load bearing was exceeded by an enormous factor. Watch the videos and you will see the steel shattering under the force of the increasing weight suddenly dropping on it. Much as a rope will hold your weight while a steady force is applied, but snatch load it and it snaps.

Electrical design has nothing to do with structural design, in fat many electrical designers have had to redo their designs when they breached code to shave the costs. Silly things like notching a load bearing beam to run electrical conduits in many places, rather that run around the load bearing beam.

He knows nothing about the stress loading of steel beams. So now you are clutching at straws

Told you so! It's not worth your time to argue with these kinds of people.

It is as they get ridiculed by everyone, and eventually their boss hears about them and they are the first to be let go. They can even be sacked for gross misconduct if they bring the company into disrepute.

 

[eots]

babble...fuel burned off at impact .. how did it collapse with symmetry,,how did it collapse in secs..what happened to the central core

Already explained it was the fault of the designers sticking to code and allowing no leeway for a sudden impact. The fuel might have burnt of but the high temperatures and latent heat are enough to cause the valence bonds to fail. It was the central core that went as that is where the heat was directed by the updraught ( Bunsen burner remember ). Once one central support gave way the remaining ones were over their maximum loading and the steel being under compression heated through work until they gave. Once that happened the full weight of the floors above plus their kinetic energy plus the angular motion ( Newtons laws ) created a shock loading of many trillions of tons over and above the design parameters. With this being the central core the building collapsed in on itself ( fill a plastic bottle or metal can with steam, seal it and drop it in cold water for an example ). As each floor gave way the speed and inertia increased along with the mass and kinetic energy until more than one floor gave under the increasing weight

Just as the WTC did as each floor collapsed, the building stayed still for a split second before collapsing again, and again and again and again each pause getting shorter as the inertia overcame the stress loading. The two cars analogy is wrong in this instance as they are close in mass and inertia. More relevant would be an extremely heavy and fast train hitting a car, and taking 1 mile to stop.

Here it is happening



Notice the flames from the inferno inside at 9 minutes after the impact then again 15 minutes after.




Now the only possible explosive that could have caused the collapse would have nitro glycerine based, and the shock of the plane hitting the building would have triggered an explosion. NO EXPLOSION.

baseless assumption

No cold hard facts that can be found on the internet. Now about these flames seen a 9 minutes and 15 minutes after impact. How could this be when you said they did not exist ?

15 mins of flame is not enough to do anything

 

[ChrisL]

the case of the Twin Towers NIST only gives a theory of collapse initiation and never even attempts to explain the proceeding rapid collapse

Because they were bought of by the Building Contractors. The steel failed catastrophically because its load bearing was exceeded by an enormous factor. Watch the videos and you will see the steel shattering under the force of the increasing weight suddenly dropping on it. Much as a rope will hold your weight while a steady force is applied, but snatch load it and it snaps.

Electrical design has nothing to do with structural design, in fat many electrical designers have had to redo their designs when they breached code to shave the costs. Silly things like notching a load bearing beam to run electrical conduits in many places, rather that run around the load bearing beam.

He knows nothing about the stress loading of steel beams. So now you are clutching at straws

Told you so! It's not worth your time to argue with these kinds of people.

It is as they get ridiculed by everyone, and eventually their boss hears about them and they are the first to be let go. They can even be sacked for gross misconduct if they bring the company into disrepute.

A lot of these CTs probably don't even HAVE jobs. That's why they have so much time to think up their ridiculous paranoid theories and argue about them ALL day long.

 

[eots]

the case of the Twin Towers NIST only gives a theory of collapse initiation and never even attempts to explain the proceeding rapid collapse

Because they were bought of by the Building Contractors. The steel failed catastrophically because its load bearing was exceeded by an enormous factor. Watch the videos and you will see the steel shattering under the force of the increasing weight suddenly dropping on it. Much as a rope will hold your weight while a steady force is applied, but snatch load it and it snaps.

Electrical design has nothing to do with structural design, in fat many electrical designers have had to redo their designs when they breached code to shave the costs. Silly things like notching a load bearing beam to run electrical conduits in many places, rather that run around the load bearing beam.

He knows nothing about the stress loading of steel beams. So now you are clutching at straws

Told you so! It's not worth your time to argue with these kinds of people.

It is as they get ridiculed by everyone, and eventually their boss hears about them and they are the first to be let go. They can even be sacked for gross misconduct if they bring the company into disrepute.

more of your fantasies backed by no one

 

[Phoenall]

the case of the Twin Towers NIST only gives a theory of collapse initiation and never even attempts to explain the proceeding rapid collapse

Because they were bought of by the Building Contractors. The steel failed catastrophically because its load bearing was exceeded by an enormous factor. Watch the videos and you will see the steel shattering under the force of the increasing weight suddenly dropping on it. Much as a rope will hold your weight while a steady force is applied, but snatch load it and it snaps.

Electrical design has nothing to do with structural design, in fat many electrical designers have had to redo their designs when they breached code to shave the costs. Silly things like notching a load bearing beam to run electrical conduits in many places, rather that run around the load bearing beam.

He knows nothing about the stress loading of steel beams. So now you are clutching at straws

Told you so! It's not worth your time to argue with these kinds of people.

what a twit..you realize you just agreed with someone who thinks unions and NIST were bribed by mafia to not admit design flaws that caused the collapse and wtc 7 was taken down by the government for safety reasons..lol

Official report says that WTC 7 was damaged by debris from the collapse of 1 and 2 leading to it being dangerous. So it was planned to be demolished on Government orders.

 

[eots]

Because they were bought of by the Building Contractors. The steel failed catastrophically because its load bearing was exceeded by an enormous factor. Watch the videos and you will see the steel shattering under the force of the increasing weight suddenly dropping on it. Much as a rope will hold your weight while a steady force is applied, but snatch load it and it snaps.

Electrical design has nothing to do with structural design, in fat many electrical designers have had to redo their designs when they breached code to shave the costs. Silly things like notching a load bearing beam to run electrical conduits in many places, rather that run around the load bearing beam.

He knows nothing about the stress loading of steel beams. So now you are clutching at straws

Told you so! It's not worth your time to argue with these kinds of people.

It is as they get ridiculed by everyone, and eventually their boss hears about them and they are the first to be let go. They can even be sacked for gross misconduct if they bring the company into disrepute.

A lot of these CTs probably don't even HAVE jobs. That's why they have so much time to think up their ridiculous paranoid theories and argue about them ALL day long.

so you agree with your little friend ?

 

[Phoenall]

Because they were bought of by the Building Contractors. The steel failed catastrophically because its load bearing was exceeded by an enormous factor. Watch the videos and you will see the steel shattering under the force of the increasing weight suddenly dropping on it. Much as a rope will hold your weight while a steady force is applied, but snatch load it and it snaps.

Electrical design has nothing to do with structural design, in fat many electrical designers have had to redo their designs when they breached code to shave the costs. Silly things like notching a load bearing beam to run electrical conduits in many places, rather that run around the load bearing beam.

He knows nothing about the stress loading of steel beams. So now you are clutching at straws

Told you so! It's not worth your time to argue with these kinds of people.

It is as they get ridiculed by everyone, and eventually their boss hears about them and they are the first to be let go. They can even be sacked for gross misconduct if they bring the company into disrepute.

more of your fantasies backed by no one

You wish read your contract of employment

 

[eots]

Because they were bought of by the Building Contractors. The steel failed catastrophically because its load bearing was exceeded by an enormous factor. Watch the videos and you will see the steel shattering under the force of the increasing weight suddenly dropping on it. Much as a rope will hold your weight while a steady force is applied, but snatch load it and it snaps.

Electrical design has nothing to do with structural design, in fat many electrical designers have had to redo their designs when they breached code to shave the costs. Silly things like notching a load bearing beam to run electrical conduits in many places, rather that run around the load bearing beam.

He knows nothing about the stress loading of steel beams. So now you are clutching at straws

Told you so! It's not worth your time to argue with these kinds of people.

what a twit..you realize you just agreed with someone who thinks unions and NIST were bribed by mafia to not admit design flaws that caused the collapse and wtc 7 was taken down by the government for safety reasons..lol

Official report says that WTC 7 was damaged by debris from the collapse of 1 and 2 leading to it being dangerous. So it was planned to be demolished on Government orders.

No sorry it does not. you are delusional...what to provide a link ..lol...no of course dont

 

[eots]

Electrical design has nothing to do with structural design, in fat many electrical designers have had to redo their designs when they breached code to shave the costs. Silly things like notching a load bearing beam to run electrical conduits in many places, rather that run around the load bearing beam.

He knows nothing about the stress loading of steel beams. So now you are clutching at straws

Told you so! It's not worth your time to argue with these kinds of people.

It is as they get ridiculed by everyone, and eventually their boss hears about them and they are the first to be let go. They can even be sacked for gross misconduct if they bring the company into disrepute.

more of your fantasies backed by no one

You wish read your contract of employment

ok ..talking to dumb people is one thing but you are clearly having some other kind of problem with your little Imaginings

 

[Phoenall]

Electrical design has nothing to do with structural design, in fat many electrical designers have had to redo their designs when they breached code to shave the costs. Silly things like notching a load bearing beam to run electrical conduits in many places, rather that run around the load bearing beam.

He knows nothing about the stress loading of steel beams. So now you are clutching at straws

Told you so! It's not worth your time to argue with these kinds of people.

what a twit..you realize you just agreed with someone who thinks unions and NIST were bribed by mafia to not admit design flaws that caused the collapse and wtc 7 was taken down by the government for safety reasons..lol

Official report says that WTC 7 was damaged by debris from the collapse of 1 and 2 leading to it being dangerous. So it was planned to be demolished on Government orders.

No sorry it does not. you are delusional...what to provide a link ..lol...no of course dont

How about a LINK then from a non partisan source ?

 

[Phoenall]

Electrical design has nothing to do with structural design, in fat many electrical designers have had to redo their designs when they breached code to shave the costs. Silly things like notching a load bearing beam to run electrical conduits in many places, rather that run around the load bearing beam.

He knows nothing about the stress loading of steel beams. So now you are clutching at straws

Told you so! It's not worth your time to argue with these kinds of people.

It is as they get ridiculed by everyone, and eventually their boss hears about them and they are the first to be let go. They can even be sacked for gross misconduct if they bring the company into disrepute.

more of your fantasies backed by no one

You wish read your contract of employment

ok ..talking to dumb people is one thing but you are clearly having some other kind of problem with your little Imaginings

Wrong as I could hire and fire when I was in work, and the favourite clause was gross misconduct. This usually happened when a person was caught drink driving or arrested for a misdemeanour, they were called to the office and their contract of employment was produced that stated instant dismissal for such offences.

 

[eots]

Told you so! It's not worth your time to argue with these kinds of people.

It is as they get ridiculed by everyone, and eventually their boss hears about them and they are the first to be let go. They can even be sacked for gross misconduct if they bring the company into disrepute.

more of your fantasies backed by no one

You wish read your contract of employment

ok ..talking to dumb people is one thing but you are clearly having some other kind of problem with your little Imaginings

Wrong as I could hire and fire when I was in work, and the favourite clause was gross misconduct. This usually happened when a person was caught drink driving or arrested for a misdemeanour, they were called to the office and their contract of employment was produced that stated instant dismissal for such offences.

your funny... remind me of this old cartoon

 

[Phoenall]

It is as they get ridiculed by everyone, and eventually their boss hears about them and they are the first to be let go. They can even be sacked for gross misconduct if they bring the company into disrepute.

more of your fantasies backed by no one

You wish read your contract of employment

ok ..talking to dumb people is one thing but you are clearly having some other kind of problem with your little Imaginings

Wrong as I could hire and fire when I was in work, and the favourite clause was gross misconduct. This usually happened when a person was caught drink driving or arrested for a misdemeanour, they were called to the office and their contract of employment was produced that stated instant dismissal for such offences.

your funny... remind me of this old cartoon

I see your back is to the wall so you start acting childishly, sorry nice try wont fly.

 

[Roudy]

Why are you guys feeding this troll? There is absolutely no doubt that Al Queda committed 9-11 and the towers came down as a result of two jet airliners smashing into them. It's not even debatable. Eots is a mentally ill moron.