If Iraq was not a failure, why would Bush co. only be able to visit unnanounced?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by pvsi., May 25, 2012.

  1. pvsi.
    Offline

    pvsi. Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2011
    Messages:
    754
    Thanks Received:
    41
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Ratings:
    +41
    If Iraq war was not a failure, why would Bush and co. only be able to visit that nation many years after the war started only unnanounced and in a fortified Baghdad green zone? why would anyone try to claim still that Iraq was not a failure? if things get better there eventually because the people will manage to pull themselves together after being looted, how can Americans claim credit for it? the mere thought that a nation trillions in debt somehow made Iraq better is mind boggling, it's no different then claiming that a crack whore who owes money for her drugs did not actually try to kidnap a baby that was not hers, but actually tried to save it from abusive parents - YOU JUST DO NOT TRUST WHORES IN DEBT
     
  2. jack113
    Offline

    jack113 Jack

    Joined:
    May 18, 2012
    Messages:
    311
    Thanks Received:
    46
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    New England
    Ratings:
    +46
    LOL this is funny. Bush cannot even visit our neighbor Canada because they will haul him off to Geneva for war crimes.
     
  3. pvsi.
    Offline

    pvsi. Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2011
    Messages:
    754
    Thanks Received:
    41
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Ratings:
    +41
    He can at least do talk shows on the media like Bill Clinton.
     

Share This Page