NYcarbineer
Diamond Member
How successful would I have to make it until I'm one of those evil businesses?
More successful than you're capable of, assuming that smarts are necessary, and based on the lack of same you've displayed here.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
How successful would I have to make it until I'm one of those evil businesses?
Avatar
How poor does one have to be to be considered the scum of the earth by the right wing is a better question imho....
Sad talking point and I am surpirsed it came from you.
The arrogantly see all those that make less than them as the scum of the earth.....not just the poor.
Most of the sucessful are not arrogant.
Avatar
How poor does one have to be to be considered the scum of the earth by the right wing is a better question imho....
Sad talking point and I am surpirsed it came from you.
The arrogantly see all those that make less than them as the scum of the earth.....not just the poor.
Most of the sucessful are not arrogant.
What? the rightwing doesn't bitch and moan and call names like lazy bastards, the poor?
ohhhh, the right wing adores the poor as much as global corporations....well, that's news to me.
My question was EQUAL to the question that Avatar made in his op.
both ridiculous....
that was my point.
Care4all said:What? the rightwing doesn't bitch and moan and call names like lazy bastards, the poor?
ohhhh, the right wing adores the poor as much as global corporations....well, that's news to me.
My question was EQUAL to the question that Avatar made in his op.
both ridiculous....
that was my point.
How successful would I have to make it until I'm one of those evil businesses?
How successful would I have to make it until I'm one of those evil businesses?
I love hypberbole.
How successful would a government employee have to be to become an evil greedy selfish cause for our nation's economic collapse?
Evil is not measured in terms of economic success Avatar. I might believe someone so full of pride as yourself, willing to suggest so often knowledge of what God thinks, would know that.
Evil is not measured in terms of how one follows or ignores the Ten Commandments, for bearing false witness is epidemic on this board and in the world at large; I'm sure you and your fellow 'conservatives' don't feel evil.
Let's simply call what you are doing on this thead mean. I don't believe you're evil, simply wrong. Scapegoating may not be a mortal sin, but in the mind of this agnostic, it is divisive and offers nothing postive to the conversation.
How successful would I have to make it until I'm one of those evil businesses?
How successful would I have to make it until I'm one of those evil businesses?
Avatar
How poor does one have to be to be considered the scum of the earth by the right wing is a better question imho....
Sad talking point and I am surpirsed it came from you.
The arrogantly see all those that make less than them as the scum of the earth.....not just the poor.
Most of the sucessful are not arrogant.
Starting a business is the best way for a person to pull themselves up in the world, help their fellow man, and enjoy a higher living standard in the process. The only thing that stops the majority of potential entrepreneurs in this country is FEAR. Children are taught to "get an education and a good job". They should be taught "learn a skill and start a company".
The socialist scum that vilify capitalism should all be forced to move to Cuba. The socialist "'workers paradise" that is only 90 miles away and 90 years behind the free world......
Care4all said:What? the rightwing doesn't bitch and moan and call names like lazy bastards, the poor?
ohhhh, the right wing adores the poor as much as global corporations....well, that's news to me.
My question was EQUAL to the question that Avatar made in his op.
both ridiculous....
that was my point.
Conservatives have no issue with helping the truly needy, but for every truly needy person or family there are 10 low lives that are gaming the system. You know it, I know it, everyone knows it.
Starting a business is the best way for a person to pull themselves up in the world, help their fellow man, and enjoy a higher living standard in the process. The only thing that stops the majority of potential entrepreneurs in this country is FEAR. Children are taught to "get an education and a good job". They should be taught "learn a skill and start a company".
The socialist scum that vilify capitalism should all be forced to move to Cuba. The socialist "'workers paradise" that is only 90 miles away and 90 years behind the free world......
Care4all said:What? the rightwing doesn't bitch and moan and call names like lazy bastards, the poor?
ohhhh, the right wing adores the poor as much as global corporations....well, that's news to me.
My question was EQUAL to the question that Avatar made in his op.
both ridiculous....
that was my point.
Conservatives have no issue with helping the truly needy, but for every truly needy person or family there are 10 low lives that are gaming the system. You know it, I know it, everyone knows it.
Starting a business is the best way for a person to pull themselves up in the world, help their fellow man, and enjoy a higher living standard in the process. The only thing that stops the majority of potential entrepreneurs in this country is FEAR. Children are taught to "get an education and a good job". They should be taught "learn a skill and start a company".
The socialist scum that vilify capitalism should all be forced to move to Cuba. The socialist "'workers paradise" that is only 90 miles away and 90 years behind the free world......
Care4all said:What? the rightwing doesn't bitch and moan and call names like lazy bastards, the poor?
ohhhh, the right wing adores the poor as much as global corporations....well, that's news to me.
My question was EQUAL to the question that Avatar made in his op.
both ridiculous....
that was my point.
Conservatives have no issue with helping the truly needy, but for every truly needy person or family there are 10 low lives that are gaming the system. You know it, I know it, everyone knows it.
no, I don't know that Zander.... MOST THAT ARE POOR, are truly poor and are not gaming the system....where you get that 90% of the poor are not poor is beyond me. (the reciprocal of the 10 to 1 ratio of low lifes you speak of above)
90% of the 50% that you all bitch about ad nausea that do not pay any federal income taxes are not lazy ass scumbags.....
generalizations such as that, is where you lose me....
no different than condemning all corporations instead of the few that are gaming the system...
Starting a business is the best way for a person to pull themselves up in the world, help their fellow man, and enjoy a higher living standard in the process. The only thing that stops the majority of potential entrepreneurs in this country is FEAR. Children are taught to "get an education and a good job". They should be taught "learn a skill and start a company".
The socialist scum that vilify capitalism should all be forced to move to Cuba. The socialist "'workers paradise" that is only 90 miles away and 90 years behind the free world......
Care4all said:What? the rightwing doesn't bitch and moan and call names like lazy bastards, the poor?
ohhhh, the right wing adores the poor as much as global corporations....well, that's news to me.
My question was EQUAL to the question that Avatar made in his op.
both ridiculous....
that was my point.
Conservatives have no issue with helping the truly needy, but for every truly needy person or family there are 10 low lives that are gaming the system. You know it, I know it, everyone knows it.
no, I don't know that Zander.... MOST THAT ARE POOR, are truly poor and are not gaming the system....where you get that 90% of the poor are not poor is beyond me. (the reciprocal of the 10 to 1 ratio of low lifes you speak of above)
90% of the 50% that you all bitch about ad nausea that do not pay any federal income taxes are not lazy ass scumbags.....
generalizations such as that, is where you lose me....
no different than condemning all corporations instead of the few that are gaming the system...
Starting a business is the best way for a person to pull themselves up in the world, help their fellow man, and enjoy a higher living standard in the process. The only thing that stops the majority of potential entrepreneurs in this country is FEAR. Children are taught to "get an education and a good job". They should be taught "learn a skill and start a company".
The socialist scum that vilify capitalism should all be forced to move to Cuba. The socialist "'workers paradise" that is only 90 miles away and 90 years behind the free world......
Conservatives have no issue with helping the truly needy, but for every truly needy person or family there are 10 low lives that are gaming the system. You know it, I know it, everyone knows it.
no, I don't know that Zander.... MOST THAT ARE POOR, are truly poor and are not gaming the system....where you get that 90% of the poor are not poor is beyond me. (the reciprocal of the 10 to 1 ratio of low lifes you speak of above)
90% of the 50% that you all bitch about ad nausea that do not pay any federal income taxes are not lazy ass scumbags.....
generalizations such as that, is where you lose me....
no different than condemning all corporations instead of the few that are gaming the system...
Let's make it simple - who are the truly needy in your eyes?
Starting a business is the best way for a person to pull themselves up in the world, help their fellow man, and enjoy a higher living standard in the process. The only thing that stops the majority of potential entrepreneurs in this country is FEAR. Children are taught to "get an education and a good job". They should be taught "learn a skill and start a company".
The socialist scum that vilify capitalism should all be forced to move to Cuba. The socialist "'workers paradise" that is only 90 miles away and 90 years behind the free world......
Care4all said:What? the rightwing doesn't bitch and moan and call names like lazy bastards, the poor?
ohhhh, the right wing adores the poor as much as global corporations....well, that's news to me.
My question was EQUAL to the question that Avatar made in his op.
both ridiculous....
that was my point.
Conservatives have no issue with helping the truly needy, but for every truly needy person or family there are 10 low lives that are gaming the system. You know it, I know it, everyone knows it.
Starting a business is the best way for a person to pull themselves up in the world, help their fellow man, and enjoy a higher living standard in the process. The only thing that stops the majority of potential entrepreneurs in this country is FEAR. Children are taught to "get an education and a good job". They should be taught "learn a skill and start a company".
The socialist scum that vilify capitalism should all be forced to move to Cuba. The socialist "'workers paradise" that is only 90 miles away and 90 years behind the free world......
Conservatives have no issue with helping the truly needy, but for every truly needy person or family there are 10 low lives that are gaming the system. You know it, I know it, everyone knows it.
no, I don't know that Zander.... MOST THAT ARE POOR, are truly poor and are not gaming the system....where you get that 90% of the poor are not poor is beyond me. (the reciprocal of the 10 to 1 ratio of low lifes you speak of above)
90% of the 50% that you all bitch about ad nausea that do not pay any federal income taxes are not lazy ass scumbags.....
generalizations such as that, is where you lose me....
no different than condemning all corporations instead of the few that are gaming the system...
Forty-three percent of all poor households actually own their own homes; the average home owned by persons classified as poor by the Census Bureau is a three-bedroom house with one-and-a-half baths, a garage and a porch or patio.
Eighty percent of poor households have air conditioning; by contrast, in 1970, only 36 percent of the entire U.S. population enjoyed air conditioning.
Only 6 percent of poor households are overcrowded; two-thirds have more than two rooms per person.
The typical poor American has more living space than the average individual living in Paris, London, Vienna, Athens and other cities throughout Europe (these comparisons are to the average citizens in foreign countries, not to those classified as poor).
Also:
Nearly three-quarters of poor households own a car; 31 percent own two or more cars.
Ninety-seven percent of poor households have a color television; over half own two or more color televisions.
Seventy-eight percent have a VCR or DVD player; 62 percent have cable or satellite TV reception.
Eighty-nine percent own microwave ovens, more than half have a stereo, and a more than a third have an automatic dishwasher.
Material poverty can be measured relatively or absolutely. An absolute measure would consist of some minimum quantity of goods and services deemed adequate for a baseline level of survival. Achieving that level means that poverty has been eliminated. However, if poverty is defined as, say, the lowest one-fifth of the income distribution, it is impossible to eliminate poverty. Everyone's income could double, triple and quadruple, but there will always be the lowest one-fifth, explains Williams.
Source: Walter Williams, "Where Best To Be Poor," Jewish World Review, June 30, 2010.
Starting a business is the best way for a person to pull themselves up in the world, help their fellow man, and enjoy a higher living standard in the process. The only thing that stops the majority of potential entrepreneurs in this country is FEAR. Children are taught to "get an education and a good job". They should be taught "learn a skill and start a company".
The socialist scum that vilify capitalism should all be forced to move to Cuba. The socialist "'workers paradise" that is only 90 miles away and 90 years behind the free world......
Conservatives have no issue with helping the truly needy, but for every truly needy person or family there are 10 low lives that are gaming the system. You know it, I know it, everyone knows it.
no, I don't know that Zander.... MOST THAT ARE POOR, are truly poor and are not gaming the system....where you get that 90% of the poor are not poor is beyond me. (the reciprocal of the 10 to 1 ratio of low lifes you speak of above)
90% of the 50% that you all bitch about ad nausea that do not pay any federal income taxes are not lazy ass scumbags.....
generalizations such as that, is where you lose me....
no different than condemning all corporations instead of the few that are gaming the system...
Forty-three percent of all poor households actually own their own homes; the average home owned by persons classified as poor by the Census Bureau is a three-bedroom house with one-and-a-half baths, a garage and a porch or patio.
Eighty percent of poor households have air conditioning; by contrast, in 1970, only 36 percent of the entire U.S. population enjoyed air conditioning.
Only 6 percent of poor households are overcrowded; two-thirds have more than two rooms per person.
The typical poor American has more living space than the average individual living in Paris, London, Vienna, Athens and other cities throughout Europe (these comparisons are to the average citizens in foreign countries, not to those classified as poor).
Also:
Nearly three-quarters of poor households own a car; 31 percent own two or more cars.
Ninety-seven percent of poor households have a color television; over half own two or more color televisions.
Seventy-eight percent have a VCR or DVD player; 62 percent have cable or satellite TV reception.
Eighty-nine percent own microwave ovens, more than half have a stereo, and a more than a third have an automatic dishwasher.
Material poverty can be measured relatively or absolutely. An absolute measure would consist of some minimum quantity of goods and services deemed adequate for a baseline level of survival. Achieving that level means that poverty has been eliminated. However, if poverty is defined as, say, the lowest one-fifth of the income distribution, it is impossible to eliminate poverty. Everyone's income could double, triple and quadruple, but there will always be the lowest one-fifth, explains Williams.
Source: Walter Williams, "Where Best To Be Poor," Jewish World Review, June 30, 2010.
no, I don't know that Zander.... MOST THAT ARE POOR, are truly poor and are not gaming the system....where you get that 90% of the poor are not poor is beyond me. (the reciprocal of the 10 to 1 ratio of low lifes you speak of above)
90% of the 50% that you all bitch about ad nausea that do not pay any federal income taxes are not lazy ass scumbags.....
generalizations such as that, is where you lose me....
no different than condemning all corporations instead of the few that are gaming the system...
Forty-three percent of all poor households actually own their own homes; the average home owned by persons classified as poor by the Census Bureau is a three-bedroom house with one-and-a-half baths, a garage and a porch or patio.
Eighty percent of poor households have air conditioning; by contrast, in 1970, only 36 percent of the entire U.S. population enjoyed air conditioning.
Only 6 percent of poor households are overcrowded; two-thirds have more than two rooms per person.
The typical poor American has more living space than the average individual living in Paris, London, Vienna, Athens and other cities throughout Europe (these comparisons are to the average citizens in foreign countries, not to those classified as poor).
Also:
Nearly three-quarters of poor households own a car; 31 percent own two or more cars.
Ninety-seven percent of poor households have a color television; over half own two or more color televisions.
Seventy-eight percent have a VCR or DVD player; 62 percent have cable or satellite TV reception.
Eighty-nine percent own microwave ovens, more than half have a stereo, and a more than a third have an automatic dishwasher.
Material poverty can be measured relatively or absolutely. An absolute measure would consist of some minimum quantity of goods and services deemed adequate for a baseline level of survival. Achieving that level means that poverty has been eliminated. However, if poverty is defined as, say, the lowest one-fifth of the income distribution, it is impossible to eliminate poverty. Everyone's income could double, triple and quadruple, but there will always be the lowest one-fifth, explains Williams.
Source: Walter Williams, "Where Best To Be Poor," Jewish World Review, June 30, 2010.
SO WHAT if they own their own home? My inlaws were below dirt poor, with 4 children of their own and they took in another poor kid in Matt's class that lost his home to fire when his step dad told him to fend for himself....
THEY OWNED THEIR HOME.....they bought if for $7000 dollars in the 1960's....
Poor people CAN own their own homes and pay LESS THAN RENT for them....
the homes they buy are just cheaper homes in poorer neighborhoods PC.
The criteria is the same for businesses as individuals. If you cheat, lie, and steal to reach your goals, you qualify.How successful would I have to make it until I'm one of those evil businesses?