“if” bush had heeded 911 warnings .

[CaféAuLait]

“IF” BUSH HAD HEEDED 911 WARNINGS….

We would not have had 911-2001 leading up to Afghanistan and Iraq war that killed a million Americans. 3,000 on 911, 5,000 in Iraq and over 2000 in Afghanistan leading to an unstable Middle East. Not the mention the deaths of our allies and Muslims civilians. Even the attack in Libya by terrorists commemorating 911and across the world. Where the **** was the “Issa’s rage” then against Bush, Cheney and Runsfeld that he is now unleashing on Obama because “4” Americans died in an attack on the Consulate in Libya? When are we going to stop blaming Bush? Never. This blunder costing us billions will go down in history books. Because if we forget, we are bound to repeat.
Want to talk about a “cover-up.” Information Obama is getting, he is giving to us in a timely fashion. But FOXNEWS claim to have had information it was a terrorist attack before Obama had it. How about the lies and cover-up about Saddam having WMDs and being a threat? The only threat as we now know, was Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld. And will continue with Israel and Romney/Ryan bomb, bomb and bombing Iran.

“There are lie, and then there are damn lies.”Mark Twain.

PS.
Romney is due to be on the View and Woopie will open that can of “whoop ***” that Obama did not.

A million dead Americans? Would you mind telling me how you got to that number? I stopped reading after that statement.

 

[daveman]

No matter what Obama is the cic no way around it , so yes it is on Obama the embassy was attacked. To be fair ,it would have takin a year to get the investigation going , not a month . The right have been politicizing this issue from the get go.

Why would it have taken a year? That's ludicrous.

My point was any administration would take longer then a month to investigate something of this nature . It's always the case with the government .

But this Administration didn't start the investigation immediately. They didn't even seal the scene, letting people come in and take documents and destroying evidence with their mere presence.

How can you excuse that?

 

[Lovebears65]

“IF” BUSH HAD HEEDED 911 WARNINGS….

We would not have had 911-2001 leading up to Afghanistan and Iraq war that killed a million Americans. 3,000 on 911, 5,000 in Iraq and over 2000 in Afghanistan leading to an unstable Middle East. Not the mention the deaths of our allies and Muslims civilians. Even the attack in Libya by terrorists commemorating 911and across the world. Where the **** was the “Issa’s rage” then against Bush, Cheney and Runsfeld that he is now unleashing on Obama because “4” Americans died in an attack on the Consulate in Libya? When are we going to stop blaming Bush? Never. This blunder costing us billions will go down in history books. Because if we forget, we are bound to repeat.
Want to talk about a “cover-up.” Information Obama is getting, he is giving to us in a timely fashion. But FOXNEWS claim to have had information it was a terrorist attack before Obama had it. How about the lies and cover-up about Saddam having WMDs and being a threat? The only threat as we now know, was Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld. And will continue with Israel and Romney/Ryan bomb, bomb and bombing Iran.

“There are lie, and then there are damn lies.”Mark Twain.

PS.
Romney is due to be on the View and Woopie will open that can of “whoop ***” that Obama did not.

If Clinton got him in the 90s , when he had a chance to a few times

 

[Mustang]

“IF” BUSH HAD HEEDED 911 WARNINGS….

We would not have had 911-2001 leading up to Afghanistan and Iraq war that killed a million Americans. 3,000 on 911, 5,000 in Iraq and over 2000 in Afghanistan leading to an unstable Middle East. Not the mention the deaths of our allies and Muslims civilians. Even the attack in Libya by terrorists commemorating 911and across the world. Where the **** was the “Issa’s rage” then against Bush, Cheney and Runsfeld that he is now unleashing on Obama because “4” Americans died in an attack on the Consulate in Libya? When are we going to stop blaming Bush? Never. This blunder costing us billions will go down in history books. Because if we forget, we are bound to repeat.
Want to talk about a “cover-up.” Information Obama is getting, he is giving to us in a timely fashion. But FOXNEWS claim to have had information it was a terrorist attack before Obama had it. How about the lies and cover-up about Saddam having WMDs and being a threat? The only threat as we now know, was Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld. And will continue with Israel and Romney/Ryan bomb, bomb and bombing Iran.

“There are lie, and then there are damn lies.”Mark Twain.

PS.
Romney is due to be on the View and Woopie will open that can of “whoop ***” that Obama did not.

If Clinton got him in the 90s , when he had a chance to a few times

Odd. Conservatives keep bemoaning the fact that Clinton didn't get bin Laden BEFORE 9-11, but Bush came right out and said he was even all that interested in bin Laden AFTER 9-11.

In Bush's OWN words:

"Who knows if he’s hiding in some cave or not. We haven’t heard from him in a long time. The idea of focusing on one person really indicates to me people don’t understand the scope of the mission. Terror is bigger than one person. He’s just a person who’s been marginalized. … I don’t know where he is. I really just don’t spend that much time on him, to be honest with you."
​

 

[daveman]

“IF” BUSH HAD HEEDED 911 WARNINGS….

We would not have had 911-2001 leading up to Afghanistan and Iraq war that killed a million Americans. 3,000 on 911, 5,000 in Iraq and over 2000 in Afghanistan leading to an unstable Middle East. Not the mention the deaths of our allies and Muslims civilians. Even the attack in Libya by terrorists commemorating 911and across the world. Where the **** was the “Issa’s rage” then against Bush, Cheney and Runsfeld that he is now unleashing on Obama because “4” Americans died in an attack on the Consulate in Libya? When are we going to stop blaming Bush? Never. This blunder costing us billions will go down in history books. Because if we forget, we are bound to repeat.
Want to talk about a “cover-up.” Information Obama is getting, he is giving to us in a timely fashion. But FOXNEWS claim to have had information it was a terrorist attack before Obama had it. How about the lies and cover-up about Saddam having WMDs and being a threat? The only threat as we now know, was Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld. And will continue with Israel and Romney/Ryan bomb, bomb and bombing Iran.

“There are lie, and then there are damn lies.”Mark Twain.

PS.
Romney is due to be on the View and Woopie will open that can of “whoop ***” that Obama did not.

If Clinton got him in the 90s , when he had a chance to a few times

Odd. Conservatives keep bemoaning the fact that Clinton didn't get bin Laden BEFORE 9-11, but Bush came right out and said he was even all that interested in bin Laden AFTER 9-11.

In Bush's OWN words:

"Who knows if he’s hiding in some cave or not. We haven’t heard from him in a long time. The idea of focusing on one person really indicates to me people don’t understand the scope of the mission. Terror is bigger than one person. He’s just a person who’s been marginalized. … I don’t know where he is. I really just don’t spend that much time on him, to be honest with you."
​

Yeah. It's great how terrorism stopped after SEAL Team 6 killed OBL, isn't it?


Oh, wait...

 

[Freewill]

These people don't CARE that this administration LIED to us......

.....But, what.....it was different......

....when Lil' Dumbya lied???

​

No, you're right it is EXACTLY the same. Now I know being a fair minded person you know dislike Obama as much as you disliked Bush. Or are you really the hypocrite?