Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
How could he have beaten the charge? They executed people who were part of the plot, why not the actual shooter? I don't think your reasoning makes much sense.
You brainless jackass. Lee was just a general in charge of the Army of Northern Virginia. He was in no way head of state. Just one general among many the south had.Lee's surrender did end the war. There is no legal concept in the world that would have justified Booth's atrocity.
The U.S. Constitution places the military under civilian control. Any jury would be quickly reminded of that.The commander in chief is not a soldier.
.
You keep saying that but have no argument for it. Any reasonable juror would think L was indeed a soldier.
Was Booth a member of the Far Right?Booth acted as an assassin not as an uniformed soldier in combat. He would have been found guilty.
Sure, a member of the Southern Democratic libertarian wing of the 1860s, that wanted to keep their free shit, like slaves.Was Booth a member of the Far Right?Booth acted as an assassin not as an uniformed soldier in combat. He would have been found guilty.
Okay good...you have finally named one person you consider part of the Far Right....though he died about 150 years ago. Can you name someone living?Sure, a member of the Southern Democratic libertarian wing of the 1860s, that wanted to keep their free shit, like slaves.Was Booth a member of the Far Right?Booth acted as an assassin not as an uniformed soldier in combat. He would have been found guilty.
No, I did not. Is a libertarian a far right reactionary? You better tell us your definitions, because you need to get 'right' before you get 'left.'Okay good...you have finally named one person you consider part of the Far Right....though he died about 150 years ago. Can you name someone living?Sure, a member of the Southern Democratic libertarian wing of the 1860s, that wanted to keep their free shit, like slaves.Was Booth a member of the Far Right?Booth acted as an assassin not as an uniformed soldier in combat. He would have been found guilty.
You should get into politics because you are a very good liar.No, I did not. Is a libertarian a far right reactionary? You better tell us your definitions, because you need to get 'right' before you get 'left.'Okay good...you have finally named one person you consider part of the Far Right....though he died about 150 years ago. Can you name someone living?Sure, a member of the Southern Democratic libertarian wing of the 1860s, that wanted to keep their free shit, like slaves.Was Booth a member of the Far Right?Booth acted as an assassin not as an uniformed soldier in combat. He would have been found guilty.
you can run, but you can't hide.gipper, of course I can but such is not germane to this discussion. You are not in charge of anything and offer little. Are you a libertarian. Booth would have been changed for murder, tried, convicted, and executed if he had survived arrest.
Booth acted as an assassin not as an uniformed soldier in combat. He would have been found guilty.
Easy to say that is one of the worst fallacy examples of a derivative analogy we have seen ever on the board. He was hiding in a barn hoping not to die at the hands of the soldiers. He was not a soldier.Hard to say where to draw the line between assassin and soldier. The uniform is not enough. If you are sleeping in a military camp and the enemy raids your camp and you jump out of bed and shoot an enemy soldier, are you an assassin just because you don't have a uniform on? THINKBooth acted as an assassin not as an uniformed soldier in combat. He would have been found guilty.
How could he have beaten the charge? They executed people who were part of the plot, why not the actual shooter? I don't think your reasoning makes much sense.
Booth was different - a handsome literary man. A celebrity of his day.
