If Anders Breivik had walked into a mosque in Oslo during Friday prayer and began shooting worshippers, do you think his actions would've attracted as much condemnation from ordinary, indigenous Europeans as they did following his slaying of mostly white children/teenagers?
I'm in no way, shape or form condoning what he did, but as things stand on the street with indigenous hostility towards muslims, I'm inclined to believe that if Breivik had targeted a mosque instead of the AUF and Labour Party's youth camp on Utøya, his actions would've drawn less negativity from the indigenous majority.
What are your thoughts/criticism on this hypothesis?
I'm in no way, shape or form condoning what he did, but as things stand on the street with indigenous hostility towards muslims, I'm inclined to believe that if Breivik had targeted a mosque instead of the AUF and Labour Party's youth camp on Utøya, his actions would've drawn less negativity from the indigenous majority.
What are your thoughts/criticism on this hypothesis?
Last edited:
