Yurt
Gold Member
If 90% of whites vote against Obama, are whites or those whites racist?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If 90% of whites vote against Obama, are whites or those whites racist?
Not if they vote against him because they don't like his politics. If they vote against him simply because he is black, yes.
Of course, we already know which way that's going to get played. We got the sneak preview in the Dem Primary.
I wonder how many intimidation votes Obama gets for laying that bullshit, racist guilt trip on chickenshits more afraid of what may said of them than they are putting the wrong PERSON in the White House.
If 90% of whites vote against Obama, are whites or those whites racist?
Tons of em----like a bunch of catholics dashing to the confession booth to be absolved.
I wonder how many intimidation votes Obama gets for laying that bullshit, racist guilt trip on chickenshits more afraid of what may said of them than they are putting the wrong PERSON in the White House.
Not if we vote against him to retain power for ourselves.
Totally different motivation than just plain spite.
I don't recall Obama ever saying that votes cast against him are cast in racism.
Intimidation votes? Are you serious? Since caucuses usually involve rather ardent supporters, I would guess few. Since in the primaries, votes are cast anonymously, I would also guess there were rather few.
Not if they vote against him because they don't like his politics. If they vote against him simply because he is black, yes.
Actually he has said that. He said, paraphrased: "...people will not vote for me because of my skin/race(I forget which one he said), but those people would not be voting democrat anyway"
He's a bit of a bigot, it seems. The leftist media lets him slide on all his crap, though, as always.
First, you should probably provide a link.
Second, that is not the same as saying that votes cast against him are necessarily cast in racism. That is simply acknowledging the simple fact that some people will not vote for him because he is black, which is pretty clearly the case.
Pretty difficult to find one given, like I said, the media gives him a pass on everything. But, quite frankly, I don't give a shit if you believe me or not. That is what he said.
How now brown cow? Would you mind sharing your definition of racism/racist? You seem to believe it something far removed from the current american vernacular.
Media specializes in hiding and/or distorting the truth. Where you been the last 500 years of western history?
"All people who don't for me are racist." This may or may not be true, and if not true, is at least a false generalization, if not racist.
"Some people who don't vote for me choose not to vote for me because I am black." This also may or may not be true (although in this case it is true). However, it is not a generalization at all, as it clearly distinguishes between similarly situated groups of people. If it is not based on a generalization, it also isn't racist, as racism is based on generalizations about groups of people based on race. All that beside the point of course, because it is clearly true.
Can't see the difference?
Luckily, we have you here to see past their vicious lies and enlighten us to the truth.
By the way, that was sarcasm (don't know how bright you are yet, so I wanted to make sure you got the memo).
What I see is you failed to define your personal variation of "racism/racist".
Thanks for the hint. I think it was Twain who said something akin to "Believe nothing you read/hear, and only half of what you see."
....
Oh, he wasn't being sarcastic.
Tons of em----like a bunch of catholics dashing to the confession booth to be absolved.
Thanks for the hint. I think it was Twain who said something akin to "Believe nothing you read/hear, and only half of what you see."
....
Oh, he wasn't being sarcastic.
Actually, the quote is "Believe nothing you hear, and only half of what you see."
Aphorism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
He was a writer after all.
You can feel free to read again. If you have problems, I can probably look up some remedial programs if you let me know what city you live in.
Heh. You should try. Twain didn't even say that. He was quoting someone else, some woman if I recall right.
One wonders how you would have any idea of the context of the quote then, hmm? Though of what consequence? You don't even understand the basic definitions of words in your own time, how could any reasonable person expect you to parse the logic of a genius in a different time. It's a good thing I don't.