Iceland's recovery continues has been deemed impressive

Dissent

Rookie
Aug 5, 2012
3,131
213
0
FEMA region 4
Iceland

Lord forbid the idiots in charge in the US take notice of this...matter of fact the main stream media has ignored it...don't want the sheeple getting any ideas of actually fixing the problem.
 
Iceland

Lord forbid the idiots in charge in the US take notice of this...matter of fact the main stream media has ignored it...don't want the sheeple getting any ideas of actually fixing the problem.


Some of the keys to Iceland's success;
*hold the banks and their executives liable
*no taxpayer bailout for banks
*higher taxes on the rich
*retain social programs for the lower income brackets


Austerity lovers should get a clue.





The Financial Times outlined a number of important points for countries in the eurozone to consider in an article published on Monday. These include Iceland’s tactic of pursing “politics of social and economic inclusion”. This includes heavier taxes on the higher brackets while cutting welfare schemes less than other areas of the budget to retain the purchasing power of lower income groups
 
I posted the below message to this message board on June 24th. Iceland's success story still-----still isn't getting much traction via the Corporate Media.


Iceland shows proof that arresting the bankers that caused the bailout is beneficial - US Message Board - Political Discussion




"We’ve heard in this country for the past several years of housing crisis that principal forgiveness rewards bad actors and causes moral hazard, and that we can’t do that to the poor, put-upon banks. Well guess what? Debt write-downs work. They generate a wealth effect among the population, and they help to end balance-sheet recessions and bring about economic growth. What’s more, Icelandic home values came back, just 3% off their September 2008 pre-crisis level. You can take the example of Iceland or you can take the example of the rest of Europe. It’s your choice. But the facts reveal that austerity is counter-productive, while debt forgiveness is extremely productive."


Interesting how Iceland's story is barely getting a mention in the corporate media? I wonder why?



Cenk Uygur Asks If the US Should be Following Iceland's Model in Dealing With the Financial Crisis | Video Cafe


June 12, 2012 07:55 PM


For all the fearmongering we hear out of our politicians on the right about how heaven forbid we're going to turn into Greece, the one country you never hear them talk about any more is Iceland. The reason they don't is, as Cenk Uygur explained on his show this Tuesday, they took a different path than the United States after their financial crisis and nationalized the banks, threw some the people responsible for the crash in jail and bailed out the homeowners instead of worrying about only bailing out the banks. And now they're coming back and their economy is growing again.

FDL's Dave Dayden has been writing about the financial crisis in depth for some time and he visited the set of The Young Turks to discuss whether the United States should be looking to Iceland as a model to emulate as he wrote about here: Iceland Provides Blueprint for How to Deal With the Financial Crisis:
I love this story. It’s one of those that calls to mind the old Margaret Mead dictum, “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it’s the only thing that ever has.”
Icelanders who pelted parliament with rocks in 2009 demanding their leaders and bankers answer for the country’s economic and financial collapse are reaping the benefits of their anger.
Since the end of 2008, the island’s banks have forgiven loans equivalent to 13 percent of gross domestic product, easing the debt burdens of more than a quarter of the population, according to a report published this month by the Icelandic Financial Services Association.
So does the story end there? Did the people revolt and the banks give in, leading to a lower standard of living or some financial disaster or something? No. Debt deleveraging successfully brought back the Icelandic economy.
The island’s steps to resurrect itself since 2008, when its banks defaulted on $85 billion, are proving effective. Iceland’s economy will this year outgrow the euro area and the developed world on average, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development estimates. It costs about the same to insure against an Icelandic default as it does to guard against a credit event in Belgium. Most polls now show Icelanders don’t want to join the European Union, where the debt crisis is in its third year.
The island’s households were helped by an agreement between the government and the banks, which are still partly controlled by the state, to forgive debt exceeding 110 percent of home values. On top of that, a Supreme Court ruling in June 2010 found loans indexed to foreign currencies were illegal, meaning households no longer need to cover krona losses.
We’ve heard in this country for the past several years of housing crisis that principal forgiveness rewards bad actors and causes moral hazard, and that we can’t do that to the poor, put-upon banks. Well guess what? Debt write-downs work. They generate a wealth effect among the population, and they help to end balance-sheet recessions and bring about economic growth. What’s more, Icelandic home values came back, just 3% off their September 2008 pre-crisis level. You can take the example of Iceland or you can take the example of the rest of Europe. It’s your choice. But the facts reveal that austerity is counter-productive, while debt forgiveness is extremely productive.
More there so go read the rest. Dave's interview with Cenk below the fold.
 
Iceland's experience really can't be duplicated here. For one thing, Iceland has a lot of oil, which they exploit and sell. They don't need it really since Iceland floats on a volcano. They merely tap into their geothermal resources and get basically free energy.

Iceland the First Country to Try Abandoning Gasoline - ABC News

They are ideally situated but that situation can't be duplicated.
 
Iceland's experience really can't be duplicated here. For one thing, Iceland has a lot of oil, which they exploit and sell. They don't need it really since Iceland floats on a volcano. They merely tap into their geothermal resources and get basically free energy.

Iceland the First Country to Try Abandoning Gasoline - ABC News

They are ideally situated but that situation can't be duplicated.

Iceland was doing swell before they bought in the 'invisible hand' of the 'free market' nonsense. Deregulation pushed that nation over the cliff. You focus on the energy thing alone. why?

because you're a fucking nitwit wingnut, that's why.
 
We're just like Iceland. If it works there with the people they have it will work here just as well.

Says the nitwit halfwit.
 

Forum List

Back
Top