I voted against Obama because...

I voted against Obama because...

...partly because of his inexperience. Now that he has experience, he most likely has my vote. After watching Romney turn into a do-and-say anything for a vote guy, Obama gets my support. Better the devil I know than the dooshbagh I don't.

I'm with you on this. I supported Romney in 08, then voted for McCain. This time around, Obama has my vote. Romney has decided that attracting the lowest common denominator of his party is more important than sticking to principal. He will say anything to anybody if he thinks it will get him a vote. He has zero backbone. I don't want that in the person who will lead this country.
 
really? Obama never said just anything to get elected. He rode an idiotic populist wave into 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. After he was elected he faced reality, or worse he snookered many on the left with high hopes. Either way your analysis is as flawed as it gets.
And you claim you'll vote for him again, so where's your logic... in the toilet?

I rarely if ever voted for a President based on campaign promises.

sorry, I'm really into elective politics and am more of a realist when it comes to governing styles.

I am not of the left, or a populist nitwit, so any promises Obama may have made, I have zero interest in.

:eusa_whistle:
lesson over

Well thanks but no thanks for the lesson in lying.

You've been a leftist since you got to this board and everyone here knows it. You are an obama love child.

There isn't ONE SINGLE GOOD THING ABOUT obama that's reason to reelect him, let alone electing him in the first place. Anyone that isn't a socialist, commie, racist or retarded can see that.
 
Last edited:
So Dante negged me because I said the MSM elected Obama, he doesn't believe me.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Just curious if you would have said that Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity elected McCain if he had won? Or would you have attributed a McCain election to thoughtful processing of information from the highly educated right?
 
I voted against Obama because...

...partly because of his inexperience. Now that he has experience, he most likely has my vote. After watching Romney turn into a do-and-say anything for a vote guy, Obama gets my support. Better the devil I know than the dooshbagh I don't.

I'm with you on this. I supported Romney in 08, then voted for McCain. This time around, Obama has my vote. Romney has decided that attracting the lowest common denominator of his party is more important than sticking to principal. He will say anything to anybody if he thinks it will get him a vote. He has zero backbone. I don't want that in the person who will lead this country.

Yeah. Thing is Obama's promises fit the man. Poor Romney, whom I disagreed with but admired as Governor of my home state, has become a man in an ill fitting suit. The promises he is making are pathetic, and running away from his main major accomplishment -- Romney Care ... :confused:
 
I voted against Obama because...

...partly because of his inexperience. Now that he has experience, he most likely has my vote. After watching Romney turn into a do-and-say anything for a vote guy, Obama gets my support. Better the devil I know than the dooshbagh I don't.

I'm with you on this. I supported Romney in 08, then voted for McCain. This time around, Obama has my vote. Romney has decided that attracting the lowest common denominator of his party is more important than sticking to principal. He will say anything to anybody if he thinks it will get him a vote. He has zero backbone. I don't want that in the person who will lead this country.

Yeah. Thing is Obama's promises fit the man. Poor Romney, whom I disagreed with but admired as Governor of my home state, has become a man in an ill fitting suit. The promises he is making are pathetic, and running away from his main major accomplishment -- Romney Care ... :confused:

Yup... like we all know... you're an obama love child and a devote leftist. Stupid too, if you're voting for odumbo AGAIN.
 
And you claim you'll vote for him again, so where's your logic... in the toilet?

I rarely if ever voted for a President based on campaign promises.

sorry, I'm really into elective politics and am more of a realist when it comes to governing styles.

I am not of the left, or a populist nitwit, so any promises Obama may have made, I have zero interest in.

:eusa_whistle:
lesson over

Well thanks but no thanks for the lesson in lying.

You've been a leftist since you got to this board and everyone here knows it. You are an obama love child.

There isn't ONE SINGLE GOOD THING ABOUT obama that's reason to reelect him, let alone electing him in the first place. Anyone that isn't a socialist, commie, racist or retarded can see that.

Anybody that believes that Obama is a socialist, commie, or racist is retarded.
 
I rarely if ever voted for a President based on campaign promises.

sorry, I'm really into elective politics and am more of a realist when it comes to governing styles.

I am not of the left, or a populist nitwit, so any promises Obama may have made, I have zero interest in.

:eusa_whistle:
lesson over

Well thanks but no thanks for the lesson in lying.

You've been a leftist since you got to this board and everyone here knows it. You are an obama love child.

There isn't ONE SINGLE GOOD THING ABOUT obama that's reason to reelect him, let alone electing him in the first place. Anyone that isn't a socialist, commie, racist or retarded can see that.

Anybody that believes that Obama is a socialist, commie, or racist is retarded.

I am sure retards worldwide will come after you for putting them in that company, and I can't say I blame them.

:eusa_whistle:
 
really? Obama never said just anything to get elected. He rode an idiotic populist wave into 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. After he was elected he faced reality, or worse he snookered many on the left with high hopes. Either way your analysis is as flawed as it gets.

Specifically how is it flawed? (I won't hold my breath)
You obviously didn't pay attention in 2008, and don't appear to be in 2012 either - so you are in no position to judge anyone's analysis since yours is based on a whimsical thought.

pay attention. I will stoop to condescend to you this one time, as my time here is valuable. :eusa_clap:

have you ever wondered why you did so poorly in school?

:lol::lol:
If only you knew.
Whatever kid [flip] - here's a nickel - I'm sure you'll find something to entertain yourself with.
 
Yeah... right... sounds good in theory, and I might even agree you should to be for someone. But that won't change the truth, and the truth of the matter is we the electorate are left with picking the lesser of two evils more times than not. That's just the way it is, and is done the majority of time... i.e. Romney vs obama.

The thing is, if we are talking "the lesser of two evils", then you usually end up going with the "Devil you know".

What we are seeing is the more people see of Mitt Romney, the less they like him.
 
People like you are a prime example of why democracy is an ignorant and coercive political philosophy upon to others.

Why should I be subjected to your sophomoric and myopic views?

do you plan on puking up the entire text of roget's or just selected chunks?


asshat

:lol:

^^Still sore from my assbeating the other night on a simple vocabulary lesson.

Temporary means:

a. You are still sore
b. I like Pie
c. Nazi
d. Provisional

People like you are a prime example of why democracy is an ignorant and coercive political philosophy upon to others.

Why should I be subjected to your sophomoric and myopic views?

I want to clear a few things up to be sure I understand your statement.
You believe that our current form of government, a democracy, doesn't not truly serve the people. am I correct? What type of government would better serve our nation?
 
Yeah... right... sounds good in theory, and I might even agree you should to be for someone. But that won't change the truth, and the truth of the matter is we the electorate are left with picking the lesser of two evils more times than not. That's just the way it is, and is done the majority of time... i.e. Romney vs obama.

The thing is, if we are talking "the lesser of two evils", then you usually end up going with the "Devil you know".

What we are seeing is the more people see of Mitt Romney, the less they like him.

That is certainly true.
Romney does nothing for me.
Unfortunately you get weaker opponents when a sitting President is seeking election. I mean...look at the idiots the Dems put up against Bush Jr.
Same here. A serious candidate will usually wait until a sitting President reaches the term limit before running.
 

Forum List

Back
Top