I think I get libertarian economics now

Socialism is designed to make people into permanent working stiffs; other than the leaches that is.

REALLY, ME BOY. Have a source?? Latest prosperity ratings have Norway as number 1, and all the Scandinavian nations rated ahead of us.
THE PROSPERITY INDEX
TOP 25

1 - Norway
2 - Denmark
3 - Sweden
4 - Australia
5 - New Zealand
6 - Canada
7 - Finland
8 - Netherlands
9 - Switzerland
10 - Ireland
11 - Luxembourg
12 - U.S.
13 - UK
14 - Germany
15 - Iceland
16 - Austria
17 - Belgium
18 - Hong Kong
19 - Singapore
20 - Taiwan
21 - France
22 - Japan
23 - Spain
24 - Slovenia
25 - Malta

Norway, Denmark and Sweden are ranked first, second and third place respectively.

In Europe, overall prosperity has risen, with the Netherlands, Ireland and Germany climbing the rankings into eighth, tenth and 14th position.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2227334/Scandinavian-countries-list-worlds-prosperous-nations--U-S-drops-time.html#ixzz44czMizxD
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Homogenous cultures do better with socialism. In America it's about selling victimhood to leaches.
And Bripat, the self proclaimed Libertarian, looks at the country prosperity rankings, and sees that none of the highly rated countries are capitalist, much less libertarian. Then, he peruses the nut case crazy conservative web sites. And does what any con tool would do, and blames the British organization doing the rating. Bripart is so predictable and amusing.
So, me boy, you must have an impartial rating showing at least a MOSTLY libertarian nation doing well!!!
But no. No mostly libertarian nations exist. Poor Bripart. Stuck trying to find some country, new or old, that could be called successful, but there are none. No country seems to be interested in saying they are libertarian, or even mostly libertarian. Perhaps, me boy, they do not understand themselves. Or MAYBE you, me boy, are a lying libertarian apologist.
Really, me boy, being a libertarian without a nation is tough. We all feel so sorry for you, me poor con tool boy.

You just can't figure out how that quote thingy works, can you, douche bag? Despite your obvious technical inabilities, you believe people are supposed to accept you as some kind of serious scholar. How beautifully liberal!

I don't know why anyone shouldn't "blame" a propaganda whore for putting out obvious propaganda. The source itself admits that its "ratings" are based on metrics like "citizens’ sense of wellbeing – from how safe they feel, to their perceived personal freedom." In other words, the "rating" is based on totally subjective nebulous bullshit, just as all leftist propaganda claiming socialism is superior does. If you look at objective measurements, such as GDP per capita in terms of PPP, the data shows that the less the government interferes in the economy, the wealthier the inhabitants are.
 
Socialism is designed to make people into permanent working stiffs; other than the leaches that is.

REALLY, ME BOY. Have a source?? Latest prosperity ratings have Norway as number 1, and all the Scandinavian nations rated ahead of us.
THE PROSPERITY INDEX
TOP 25

1 - Norway
2 - Denmark
3 - Sweden
4 - Australia
5 - New Zealand
6 - Canada
7 - Finland
8 - Netherlands
9 - Switzerland
10 - Ireland
11 - Luxembourg
12 - U.S.
13 - UK
14 - Germany
15 - Iceland
16 - Austria
17 - Belgium
18 - Hong Kong
19 - Singapore
20 - Taiwan
21 - France
22 - Japan
23 - Spain
24 - Slovenia
25 - Malta

Norway, Denmark and Sweden are ranked first, second and third place respectively.

In Europe, overall prosperity has risen, with the Netherlands, Ireland and Germany climbing the rankings into eighth, tenth and 14th position.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2227334/Scandinavian-countries-list-worlds-prosperous-nations--U-S-drops-time.html#ixzz44czMizxD
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Homogenous cultures do better with socialism. In America it's about selling victimhood to leaches.

Nobody does better with socialism. Most of the countries douche bag listed as "socialist" are really more capitalists than the ones he claims are capitalist.
 
While there are self proclaimed Libertarians, there are no (as in zero) libertarian societies. With over 200 nations and over hundreds of years, there has NEVER been a libertarian nation. If libertarianism was so great, WHAT HAPPENED, WHY ARE THERE NO SUCCESSFUL LIBERTARIAN NATIONS? Why, because the people always revolt to stop the libertarian bosses from continuing to ruin their, and their families life's.
So, these self professed libertarians are simply delusional clowns that are too stupid to see the obvious. Reading Atlas Shrugged and pounding on their chest. Just delusional knuckle draggers.


Probably the closes nation on earth would be one that has very little government and allows anything. Example maybe somalia some areas.

It isn't pretty.

Government is necessary.

The United States prior to 1914.

Somalia has plenty of government.

The US prior to 1914 had lots of gov, and was far from Libertarian. Stupid statement. That was just 14 years prior to the Great Republican Depression of 1929.

And Somalia, me boy, has had no central government since 1991. Nice try, but another swing and a miss, dipshit.

Don't be absurd. Here are just a few government agencies that didn't exist in 1914:

EPA
Dept of Education The original Department of Education was created in 1867
Dept of Transportation Was in most states prior to then, consolidated as a cede, agency later. SO?
Dept of Energy
HEW. FORMED UNDE REPUBLICAN PRES EISENHOWER IN 1953
Dept of Labor The law creating a U.S. Department of Labor, signed by President William H. Taft on March 4, 1913. OOOOOPS.
FBI The bureau was established in 1908 as the Bureau of Investigation (BOI). Its name was changed to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in 1935.
CIA
NSA
Dept of Agriculture On May 15, 1862, Abraham Lincoln established the independent Department of Agriculture
USDA usda, me boy, is an acronym for THE US DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. You have it listed TWICE.
Food and Drug Administration Though FDA can trace its origins back to the creation of the Agricultural Division in the Patent Office in 1848, its origins as a federal consumer protection agency began with the passage of the 1906 Pure Food and Drugs Act.
NASA. UH, ME BOY, THERE WAS NO AERONAUTICS OR SOACE TRAVEL PRIOR TO 1914.
BATF
AMTRAK. UH, THERE WAS NO AMTRAC IN 1914.
Army Corp of Engineers The history of United States Army Corps of Engineers can be traced back to 16 June 1775, when the Continental Congress organized an army with a chief engineer and two assistants.[7] Colonel Richard Gridley became General George Washington's first chief engineer; however, it was not until 1779 that Congress created a separate Corps of Engineers.
Bureau of Land Management The history of United States Army Corps of Engineers can be traced back to 16 June 1775, when the Continental Congress organized an army with a chief engineer and two assistants.[7] Colonel Richard Gridley became General George Washington's first chief engineer; however, it was not until 1779 that Congress created a separate Corps of Engineers.
CDC
Civil Rights Commission
CBO The CBO is not a department, me boy.
Council of Economic Advisors AH, NOT AN AVENCY, ME BOY. THE WORD COUNCIL SHOULD GIVE YOU A CLUE.
Yada
Yada
Yada
. . .​

There are literally thousands more. None of these agencies existed before 1914.

All these agencies are making regulations and spending the taxpayer's money. The claim that the USA had "lots of government" before 1914 doesn't pass the stupid test. By what standard? Is 1000 times less government still "lots of government?"

Somalia has no central government, but then neither did Europe a couple of decades ago. Does that mean Europe had no government before the EU? It has plenty of government, and so does Somalia. The latter has a particularly brutal and oppressive kind of government.

ME BOY, THE EU IS A UNION. NOT A NATION. NOW, LET ME EDUCATE YOU AGAIN. UNIONS DO NOT AND CAN NOT HAVE ANY ECONOMY.
The countries in the EU have had economies, some for decades. Sorry you missed that.
Another swing and a miss, me boy.
Really, me boy, you are a simple liar.

The politicians of the EU would disagree with you. The undeniable fact is that the EU is a government. I used the EU as an analogy to show that having not having a monolithic government covering the territory withing a specified border does not mean there is no government within that border. Since you have to admit that fact is a fact, you wail and bleat as if the analogy was intended to prove some other point. But that's what leftist douche bags like you do. If you can't address the point being discussed, you address some other point - always deflecting, lying and dissembling.
 
Socialism is designed to make people into permanent working stiffs; other than the leaches that is.

REALLY, ME BOY. Have a source?? Latest prosperity ratings have Norway as number 1, and all the Scandinavian nations rated ahead of us.
THE PROSPERITY INDEX
TOP 25

1 - Norway
2 - Denmark
3 - Sweden
4 - Australia
5 - New Zealand
6 - Canada
7 - Finland
8 - Netherlands
9 - Switzerland
10 - Ireland
11 - Luxembourg
12 - U.S.
13 - UK
14 - Germany
15 - Iceland
16 - Austria
17 - Belgium
18 - Hong Kong
19 - Singapore
20 - Taiwan
21 - France
22 - Japan
23 - Spain
24 - Slovenia
25 - Malta

Norway, Denmark and Sweden are ranked first, second and third place respectively.

In Europe, overall prosperity has risen, with the Netherlands, Ireland and Germany climbing the rankings into eighth, tenth and 14th position.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2227334/Scandinavian-countries-list-worlds-prosperous-nations--U-S-drops-time.html#ixzz44czMizxD
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Homogenous cultures do better with socialism. In America it's about selling victimhood to leaches.
And Bripat, the self proclaimed Libertarian, looks at the country prosperity rankings, and sees that none of the highly rated countries are capitalist, much less libertarian. Then, he peruses the nut case crazy conservative web sites. And does what any con tool would do, and blames the British organization doing the rating. Bripart is so predictable and amusing.
So, me boy, you must have an impartial rating showing at least a MOSTLY libertarian nation doing well!!!
But no. No mostly libertarian nations exist. Poor Bripart. Stuck trying to find some country, new or old, that could be called successful, but there are none. No country seems to be interested in saying they are libertarian, or even mostly libertarian. Perhaps, me boy, they do not understand themselves. Or MAYBE you, me boy, are a lying libertarian apologist.
Really, me boy, being a libertarian without a nation is tough. We all feel so sorry for you, me poor con tool boy.

You just can't figure out how that quote thingy works, can you, douche bag? Despite your obvious technical inabilities, you believe people are supposed to accept you as some kind of serious scholar. How beautifully liberal!

I don't know why anyone shouldn't "blame" a propaganda whore for putting out obvious propaganda. The source itself admits that its "ratings" are based on metrics like "citizens’ sense of wellbeing – from how safe they feel, to their perceived personal freedom." In other words, the "rating" is based on totally subjective nebulous bullshit, just as all leftist propaganda claiming socialism is superior does. If you look at objective measurements, such as GDP per capita in terms of PPP, the data shows that the less the government interferes in the economy, the wealthier the inhabitants are.
As hard as you try, the more you prove you are a simple tool. Do you make enough to post your drivel?
Stop complaining about a impartial survey that is economies doing well. accepted and respected worldwide, and lets see if you can show highly libertarian economies doing well, or, since there are none, highly capitalist economies doing better than Norway.
But you will not, because you can not, Really, you are such a tool, dipshit.
 
Probably the closes nation on earth would be one that has very little government and allows anything. Example maybe somalia some areas.

It isn't pretty.

Government is necessary.

The United States prior to 1914.

Somalia has plenty of government.

The US prior to 1914 had lots of gov, and was far from Libertarian. Stupid statement. That was just 14 years prior to the Great Republican Depression of 1929.

And Somalia, me boy, has had no central government since 1991. Nice try, but another swing and a miss, dipshit.

Don't be absurd. Here are just a few government agencies that didn't exist in 1914:

EPA
Dept of Education The original Department of Education was created in 1867
Dept of Transportation Was in most states prior to then, consolidated as a cede, agency later. SO?
Dept of Energy
HEW. FORMED UNDE REPUBLICAN PRES EISENHOWER IN 1953
Dept of Labor The law creating a U.S. Department of Labor, signed by President William H. Taft on March 4, 1913. OOOOOPS.
FBI The bureau was established in 1908 as the Bureau of Investigation (BOI). Its name was changed to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in 1935.
CIA
NSA
Dept of Agriculture On May 15, 1862, Abraham Lincoln established the independent Department of Agriculture
USDA usda, me boy, is an acronym for THE US DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. You have it listed TWICE.
Food and Drug Administration Though FDA can trace its origins back to the creation of the Agricultural Division in the Patent Office in 1848, its origins as a federal consumer protection agency began with the passage of the 1906 Pure Food and Drugs Act.
NASA. UH, ME BOY, THERE WAS NO AERONAUTICS OR SOACE TRAVEL PRIOR TO 1914.
BATF
AMTRAK. UH, THERE WAS NO AMTRAC IN 1914.
Army Corp of Engineers The history of United States Army Corps of Engineers can be traced back to 16 June 1775, when the Continental Congress organized an army with a chief engineer and two assistants.[7] Colonel Richard Gridley became General George Washington's first chief engineer; however, it was not until 1779 that Congress created a separate Corps of Engineers.
Bureau of Land Management The history of United States Army Corps of Engineers can be traced back to 16 June 1775, when the Continental Congress organized an army with a chief engineer and two assistants.[7] Colonel Richard Gridley became General George Washington's first chief engineer; however, it was not until 1779 that Congress created a separate Corps of Engineers.
CDC
Civil Rights Commission
CBO The CBO is not a department, me boy.
Council of Economic Advisors AH, NOT AN AVENCY, ME BOY. THE WORD COUNCIL SHOULD GIVE YOU A CLUE.
Yada
Yada
Yada
. . .​

There are literally thousands more. None of these agencies existed before 1914.

All these agencies are making regulations and spending the taxpayer's money. The claim that the USA had "lots of government" before 1914 doesn't pass the stupid test. By what standard? Is 1000 times less government still "lots of government?"

Somalia has no central government, but then neither did Europe a couple of decades ago. Does that mean Europe had no government before the EU? It has plenty of government, and so does Somalia. The latter has a particularly brutal and oppressive kind of government.

ME BOY, THE EU IS A UNION. NOT A NATION. NOW, LET ME EDUCATE YOU AGAIN. UNIONS DO NOT AND CAN NOT HAVE ANY ECONOMY.
The countries in the EU have had economies, some for decades. Sorry you missed that.
Another swing and a miss, me boy.
Really, me boy, you are a simple liar.

The politicians of the EU would disagree with you. The undeniable fact is that the EU is a government. I used the EU as an analogy to show that having not having a monolithic government covering the territory withing a specified border does not mean there is no government within that border. Since you have to admit that fact is a fact, you wail and bleat as if the analogy was intended to prove some other point. But that's what leftist douche bags like you do. If you can't address the point being discussed, you address some other point - always deflecting, lying and dissembling.

Nice try, but simply stupid. The EU, dipshit, has no economy. And no, me lying tool, the EU would NEVER agree with you, because you are simply making stupid statements to support your agenda.
 
Socialism is designed to make people into permanent working stiffs; other than the leaches that is.

REALLY, ME BOY. Have a source?? Latest prosperity ratings have Norway as number 1, and all the Scandinavian nations rated ahead of us.
THE PROSPERITY INDEX
TOP 25

1 - Norway
2 - Denmark
3 - Sweden
4 - Australia
5 - New Zealand
6 - Canada
7 - Finland
8 - Netherlands
9 - Switzerland
10 - Ireland
11 - Luxembourg
12 - U.S.
13 - UK
14 - Germany
15 - Iceland
16 - Austria
17 - Belgium
18 - Hong Kong
19 - Singapore
20 - Taiwan
21 - France
22 - Japan
23 - Spain
24 - Slovenia
25 - Malta

Norway, Denmark and Sweden are ranked first, second and third place respectively.

In Europe, overall prosperity has risen, with the Netherlands, Ireland and Germany climbing the rankings into eighth, tenth and 14th position.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2227334/Scandinavian-countries-list-worlds-prosperous-nations--U-S-drops-time.html#ixzz44czMizxD
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Homogenous cultures do better with socialism. In America it's about selling victimhood to leaches.

Nobody does better with socialism. Most of the countries douche bag listed as "socialist" are really more capitalists than the ones he claims are capitalist.

You seem to think it is a list put out by a single person. It is a British think tank, known for being impartial. Dipshits like you making unfounded accusations will not change that.
 
Socialism is designed to make people into permanent working stiffs; other than the leaches that is.

REALLY, ME BOY. Have a source?? Latest prosperity ratings have Norway as number 1, and all the Scandinavian nations rated ahead of us.
THE PROSPERITY INDEX
TOP 25

1 - Norway
2 - Denmark
3 - Sweden
4 - Australia
5 - New Zealand
6 - Canada
7 - Finland
8 - Netherlands
9 - Switzerland
10 - Ireland
11 - Luxembourg
12 - U.S.
13 - UK
14 - Germany
15 - Iceland
16 - Austria
17 - Belgium
18 - Hong Kong
19 - Singapore
20 - Taiwan
21 - France
22 - Japan
23 - Spain
24 - Slovenia
25 - Malta

Norway, Denmark and Sweden are ranked first, second and third place respectively.

In Europe, overall prosperity has risen, with the Netherlands, Ireland and Germany climbing the rankings into eighth, tenth and 14th position.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2227334/Scandinavian-countries-list-worlds-prosperous-nations--U-S-drops-time.html#ixzz44czMizxD
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Homogenous cultures do better with socialism. In America it's about selling victimhood to leaches.
And Bripat, the self proclaimed Libertarian, looks at the country prosperity rankings, and sees that none of the highly rated countries are capitalist, much less libertarian. Then, he peruses the nut case crazy conservative web sites. And does what any con tool would do, and blames the British organization doing the rating. Bripart is so predictable and amusing.
So, me boy, you must have an impartial rating showing at least a MOSTLY libertarian nation doing well!!!
But no. No mostly libertarian nations exist. Poor Bripart. Stuck trying to find some country, new or old, that could be called successful, but there are none. No country seems to be interested in saying they are libertarian, or even mostly libertarian. Perhaps, me boy, they do not understand themselves. Or MAYBE you, me boy, are a lying libertarian apologist.
Really, me boy, being a libertarian without a nation is tough. We all feel so sorry for you, me poor con tool boy.

You just can't figure out how that quote thingy works, can you, douche bag? Despite your obvious technical inabilities, you believe people are supposed to accept you as some kind of serious scholar. How beautifully liberal!

I don't know why anyone shouldn't "blame" a propaganda whore for putting out obvious propaganda. The source itself admits that its "ratings" are based on metrics like "citizens’ sense of wellbeing – from how safe they feel, to their perceived personal freedom." In other words, the "rating" is based on totally subjective nebulous bullshit, just as all leftist propaganda claiming socialism is superior does. If you look at objective measurements, such as GDP per capita in terms of PPP, the data shows that the less the government interferes in the economy, the wealthier the inhabitants are.
And the tool goes blah, blah, blah..............
Still waiting to see that successful libertarian economy, dipshit.
Or maybe more lists of fed agencies and associated lies. Dipshit.
Why do they pay a stiff like you to post. Nothing better, I suppose. Dipshit.
So why do I call you dipshit? Because you post drivel and lies, and are a lightweight. Dipshit.
 
Socialism is designed to make people into permanent working stiffs; other than the leaches that is.

REALLY, ME BOY. Have a source?? Latest prosperity ratings have Norway as number 1, and all the Scandinavian nations rated ahead of us.
THE PROSPERITY INDEX
TOP 25

1 - Norway
2 - Denmark
3 - Sweden
4 - Australia
5 - New Zealand
6 - Canada
7 - Finland
8 - Netherlands
9 - Switzerland
10 - Ireland
11 - Luxembourg
12 - U.S.
13 - UK
14 - Germany
15 - Iceland
16 - Austria
17 - Belgium
18 - Hong Kong
19 - Singapore
20 - Taiwan
21 - France
22 - Japan
23 - Spain
24 - Slovenia
25 - Malta

Norway, Denmark and Sweden are ranked first, second and third place respectively.

In Europe, overall prosperity has risen, with the Netherlands, Ireland and Germany climbing the rankings into eighth, tenth and 14th position.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2227334/Scandinavian-countries-list-worlds-prosperous-nations--U-S-drops-time.html#ixzz44czMizxD
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Homogenous cultures do better with socialism. In America it's about selling victimhood to leaches.

Nobody does better with socialism. Most of the countries douche bag listed as "socialist" are really more capitalists than the ones he claims are capitalist.

You seem to think it is a list put out by a single person. It is a British think tank, known for being impartial. Dipshits like you making unfounded accusations will not change that.

It's "known for being impartial?" Says who? What does the word "impartial" even mean in this context? Does it mean that it's not a leftwing propaganda organ pumping out obvious bullshit? No, it certainly doesn't mean that. One thing is certain: there's nothing objective about quantities like "citizens’ sense of wellbeing, how safe they feel and their perceived personal freedom." Those are obviously subjective. Using the term "perceived" is an admission that they are subjective. Whether this think tank is impartial hasn't been established, but whether it is objective has, and it clearly isn't objective.
 
Socialism is designed to make people into permanent working stiffs; other than the leaches that is.

REALLY, ME BOY. Have a source?? Latest prosperity ratings have Norway as number 1, and all the Scandinavian nations rated ahead of us.
THE PROSPERITY INDEX
TOP 25

1 - Norway
2 - Denmark
3 - Sweden
4 - Australia
5 - New Zealand
6 - Canada
7 - Finland
8 - Netherlands
9 - Switzerland
10 - Ireland
11 - Luxembourg
12 - U.S.
13 - UK
14 - Germany
15 - Iceland
16 - Austria
17 - Belgium
18 - Hong Kong
19 - Singapore
20 - Taiwan
21 - France
22 - Japan
23 - Spain
24 - Slovenia
25 - Malta

Norway, Denmark and Sweden are ranked first, second and third place respectively.

In Europe, overall prosperity has risen, with the Netherlands, Ireland and Germany climbing the rankings into eighth, tenth and 14th position.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2227334/Scandinavian-countries-list-worlds-prosperous-nations--U-S-drops-time.html#ixzz44czMizxD
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Homogenous cultures do better with socialism. In America it's about selling victimhood to leaches.
And Bripat, the self proclaimed Libertarian, looks at the country prosperity rankings, and sees that none of the highly rated countries are capitalist, much less libertarian. Then, he peruses the nut case crazy conservative web sites. And does what any con tool would do, and blames the British organization doing the rating. Bripart is so predictable and amusing.
So, me boy, you must have an impartial rating showing at least a MOSTLY libertarian nation doing well!!!
But no. No mostly libertarian nations exist. Poor Bripart. Stuck trying to find some country, new or old, that could be called successful, but there are none. No country seems to be interested in saying they are libertarian, or even mostly libertarian. Perhaps, me boy, they do not understand themselves. Or MAYBE you, me boy, are a lying libertarian apologist.
Really, me boy, being a libertarian without a nation is tough. We all feel so sorry for you, me poor con tool boy.

You just can't figure out how that quote thingy works, can you, douche bag? Despite your obvious technical inabilities, you believe people are supposed to accept you as some kind of serious scholar. How beautifully liberal!

I don't know why anyone shouldn't "blame" a propaganda whore for putting out obvious propaganda. The source itself admits that its "ratings" are based on metrics like "citizens’ sense of wellbeing – from how safe they feel, to their perceived personal freedom." In other words, the "rating" is based on totally subjective nebulous bullshit, just as all leftist propaganda claiming socialism is superior does. If you look at objective measurements, such as GDP per capita in terms of PPP, the data shows that the less the government interferes in the economy, the wealthier the inhabitants are.
And the tool goes blah, blah, blah..............
Still waiting to see that successful libertarian economy, dipshit.
Or maybe more lists of fed agencies and associated lies. Dipshit.
Why do they pay a stiff like you to post. Nothing better, I suppose. Dipshit.
So why do I call you dipshit? Because you post drivel and lies, and are a lightweight. Dipshit.

When you show me a successful socialist economy, then perhaps I'll waste some of my time educating you about the success of libertarian economics.
 
REALLY, ME BOY. Have a source?? Latest prosperity ratings have Norway as number 1, and all the Scandinavian nations rated ahead of us.
THE PROSPERITY INDEX
TOP 25

1 - Norway
2 - Denmark
3 - Sweden
4 - Australia
5 - New Zealand
6 - Canada
7 - Finland
8 - Netherlands
9 - Switzerland
10 - Ireland
11 - Luxembourg
12 - U.S.
13 - UK
14 - Germany
15 - Iceland
16 - Austria
17 - Belgium
18 - Hong Kong
19 - Singapore
20 - Taiwan
21 - France
22 - Japan
23 - Spain
24 - Slovenia
25 - Malta

Norway, Denmark and Sweden are ranked first, second and third place respectively.

In Europe, overall prosperity has risen, with the Netherlands, Ireland and Germany climbing the rankings into eighth, tenth and 14th position.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2227334/Scandinavian-countries-list-worlds-prosperous-nations--U-S-drops-time.html#ixzz44czMizxD
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Homogenous cultures do better with socialism. In America it's about selling victimhood to leaches.
And Bripat, the self proclaimed Libertarian, looks at the country prosperity rankings, and sees that none of the highly rated countries are capitalist, much less libertarian. Then, he peruses the nut case crazy conservative web sites. And does what any con tool would do, and blames the British organization doing the rating. Bripart is so predictable and amusing.
So, me boy, you must have an impartial rating showing at least a MOSTLY libertarian nation doing well!!!
But no. No mostly libertarian nations exist. Poor Bripart. Stuck trying to find some country, new or old, that could be called successful, but there are none. No country seems to be interested in saying they are libertarian, or even mostly libertarian. Perhaps, me boy, they do not understand themselves. Or MAYBE you, me boy, are a lying libertarian apologist.
Really, me boy, being a libertarian without a nation is tough. We all feel so sorry for you, me poor con tool boy.

You just can't figure out how that quote thingy works, can you, douche bag? Despite your obvious technical inabilities, you believe people are supposed to accept you as some kind of serious scholar. How beautifully liberal!

I don't know why anyone shouldn't "blame" a propaganda whore for putting out obvious propaganda. The source itself admits that its "ratings" are based on metrics like "citizens’ sense of wellbeing – from how safe they feel, to their perceived personal freedom." In other words, the "rating" is based on totally subjective nebulous bullshit, just as all leftist propaganda claiming socialism is superior does. If you look at objective measurements, such as GDP per capita in terms of PPP, the data shows that the less the government interferes in the economy, the wealthier the inhabitants are.
And the tool goes blah, blah, blah..............
Still waiting to see that successful libertarian economy, dipshit.
Or maybe more lists of fed agencies and associated lies. Dipshit.
Why do they pay a stiff like you to post. Nothing better, I suppose. Dipshit.
So why do I call you dipshit? Because you post drivel and lies, and are a lightweight. Dipshit.

When you show me a successful socialist economy, then perhaps I'll waste some of my time educating you about the success of libertarian economics.

You can not, of course. You have seen many highly successful economies. Norway, Sweden, and many others. What you are having problems with, me poor ignorant con tool, is that the people who pay you to post can not help you. Because of course, there ARE no economies that claim to be Libertarian. So you are out of luck. Just another stupid self proclaimed libertarian without a libertarian country to point to.
Jesus, me boy, even communist countries existed for years and decades, but with over 200 nations in this world, non are libertarian. Even a paid tool can not find one.
But you can point to the man made islands that rich but brainless libertarians are paying millions to create.
God you are stupid.
Socialism is designed to make people into permanent working stiffs; other than the leaches that is.

REALLY, ME BOY. Have a source?? Latest prosperity ratings have Norway as number 1, and all the Scandinavian nations rated ahead of us.
THE PROSPERITY INDEX
TOP 25

1 - Norway
2 - Denmark
3 - Sweden
4 - Australia
5 - New Zealand
6 - Canada
7 - Finland
8 - Netherlands
9 - Switzerland
10 - Ireland
11 - Luxembourg
12 - U.S.
13 - UK
14 - Germany
15 - Iceland
16 - Austria
17 - Belgium
18 - Hong Kong
19 - Singapore
20 - Taiwan
21 - France
22 - Japan
23 - Spain
24 - Slovenia
25 - Malta

Norway, Denmark and Sweden are ranked first, second and third place respectively.

In Europe, overall prosperity has risen, with the Netherlands, Ireland and Germany climbing the rankings into eighth, tenth and 14th position.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2227334/Scandinavian-countries-list-worlds-prosperous-nations--U-S-drops-time.html#ixzz44czMizxD
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Homogenous cultures do better with socialism. In America it's about selling victimhood to leaches.

Nobody does better with socialism. Most of the countries douche bag listed as "socialist" are really more capitalists than the ones he claims are capitalist.

You seem to think it is a list put out by a single person. It is a British think tank, known for being impartial. Dipshits like you making unfounded accusations will not change that.

It's "known for being impartial?" Says who? What does the word "impartial" even mean in this context? Does it mean that it's not a leftwing propaganda organ pumping out obvious bullshit? No, it certainly doesn't mean that. One thing is certain: there's nothing objective about quantities like "citizens’ sense of wellbeing, how safe they feel and their perceived personal freedom." Those are obviously subjective. Using the term "perceived" is an admission that they are subjective. Whether this think tank is impartial hasn't been established, but whether it is objective has, and it clearly isn't objective.
There are no paid left wing propaganda organs. That is the preview of the cons. But only you, and no one of any notoriety is suggesting they are partial, me boy.
This is far from the only organization who has studied the subject with the same findings.
Now, we all understand that you do not like largely socialist countries like those of Scandinavia coming out ahead of even the US. But you trying to besmirch the study that many countries and nations take very seriously is stupid of you, but no surprise.

You loose again, dipshit.
 
Now, we all understand that you do not like largely socialist countries like those of Scandinaviat.
its not clear that they are socialist. We have a higher corporate tax and our top 1% pay more than theirs!
It is, of course, quite clear to thinking people that Scandinavian countries are mostly socialist in nature. High us taxes is a myth. We have the highest tax RATES, but not the highest effective rates. And since corporations do not pay stated rates, but do pay effective rates, the statement that we have the highest rate is completely meaningless.
Many companies have effective rates between 0% and 13%. And, overall, saying us corporations pay the highest rates is a lie.
 
Okay, so I've figured out that the ideal libertarian society is made up of two classes: the rich, or the capitalists, and the poor, or proletariat. The capitalists own the state and all property, including the means of production. Their chief goals are to keep their position in society and to expand their personal wealth. They do this by intelligently deploying their human and material capital, cutting their costs to the bare minimum required for maximum efficiency, and investing in the proletariat to the minimum level for them to be useful employees. The proletariat are the workforce of society and use the property of the capitalists throughout their lives in exchange for their wages. Their chief goal is to earn those wages by using the capitalists' means of production to create and sell goods as cheaply as possible. They are also the primary consumers of those goods.

Tldr: The rich own the nation and everything in it. They acquire their wealth by the labor and taxation of the poor. The poor earn wages by working to help the rich become richer and spend those wages on the taxes that the state owned by the rich needs to perform its various functions and the goods and services they produce and need for their daily survival.

Almost... almost... Marx would be proud.
 
Now, we all understand that you do not like largely socialist countries like those of Scandinaviat.
its not clear that they are socialist. We have a higher corporate tax and our top 1% pay more than theirs!
It is, of course, quite clear to thinking people that Scandinavian countries are mostly socialist in nature. High us taxes is a myth. We have the highest tax RATES, but not the highest effective rates. And since corporations do not pay stated rates, but do pay effective rates, the statement that we have the highest rate is completely meaningless.
Many companies have effective rates between 0% and 13%. And, overall, saying us corporations pay the highest rates is a lie.

The Scandinavian countries are only slightly more socialist than the U.S. So your post is obvious horseshit.
 
Now, we all understand that you do not like largely socialist countries like those of Scandinaviat.
its not clear that they are socialist. We have a higher corporate tax and our top 1% pay more than theirs!
It is, of course, quite clear to thinking people that Scandinavian countries are mostly socialist in nature. High us taxes is a myth. We have the highest tax RATES, but not the highest effective rates. And since corporations do not pay stated rates, but do pay effective rates, the statement that we have the highest rate is completely meaningless.
Many companies have effective rates between 0% and 13%. And, overall, saying us corporations pay the highest rates is a lie.

The Scandinavian countries are only slightly more socialist than the U.S. So your post is obvious horseshit.
:

Slightly more socialist is a relative statement. It is not a statement that people who actually think would buy, me boy. An organization with people capable of thought would include the Scandinavian countries, and not the United States Sorry, me boy, but it is really hard to find truth in those bat shit crazy con web sites you peruse.
Here is a list of the ten most socialist Scandinavian countries, me boy.
Top 10 Most Socialist Countries in the World
By Peerform · On December 6, 2012
The term socialist has been thrown around quite a bit in the past few years. Not since the cold war has the term garnered so much attention in the press and from politicians. But when you look at countries who actually have a socialist economic structure, you can see some similarities to the United States – but there are some really stark differences.

Below, you will see some of the most socialistic nations in the world today:

  • China
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • Netherlands
  • Canada
  • Sweden
  • Norway
  • Ireland
  • New Zealand
  • Belgium
Top 10 Most Socialist Countries in the World - Peerform Blog

Notice that the United States is not included?
No nation, me boy, is 100% socialist, or 100% capitalist. The above are primarily Socialist nations. But the US will always be in the primarily Capitalist list, except if the list is being made by a Conservative Tool for reasons true to their agenda. But there are NO primarily Libertarian nations. Only Libertarians without a nation.
 

Forum List

Back
Top