creativedreams
Weaver
- Nov 15, 2009
- 1,165
- 28
- 71
- Thread starter
- #21
Ignoramus...there ARE countless professors NOT remaining silent...what is remaining silent is the corporate controlled media which is connected at the hip with the United States corporate controlled government...
Here are a couple well documented examples of professors out of countless many...
A. K. Dewdney, PhD – Professor, University of Western Ontario
Quote: "The debris found outside the Pentagon is inconsistent with the impact of a Boeing 757 or any aircraft of comparable dimensions. In particular, in the absence of some agency (possibly unknown to physical science) that removed the wings, there is no way to avoid the conclusion that the wings, and therefore the aircraft were never present in the first place. In this case, no Boeing 757 struck the Pentagon building on the morning of September 11, 2001."
David L. Griscom, PhD – Research physicist, Naval Research Laboratory in Washington, DC with 33 years service. Fellow of the American Physical Society. Fulbright-García Robles Fellow at Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México in Mexico City. Visiting professorships of research at the Universities of Paris and Saint-Etienne, France, and Tokyo Institute of Technology. Professor of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Arizona.
Winner of the N. F. Mott Award sponsored by the Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, the Otto Schott Award offered by the Carl-Zeiss-Stiftung (Germany), an Outstanding Graduate School Alumnus Award at Brown University, and the Sigma Xi Pure Science Award at NRL.
Quote: "The issue of knowing who was really behind the 9/11 attacks is of paramount importance to the future of our country, because the "official" assumption that it was the work of 19 Arab amateurs does not match the available facts and has led directly to the deplorable Patriot Act, the illegal Iraq war, NSA spying on ordinary Americans, repudiation of the Geneva Conventions, and the repeal of habeas corpus a fundamental point of law that has been with us since the signing of the Magna Carta in 1215.
Surely these Orwellian consequences of public ignorance constitute more than sufficient motivation for any patriotic American physicist or engineer to join the search for 9/11 Truth."
Joel S. Hirschhorn, BS Metallurgical Engineering, MS Metallurgical Engineering, PhD Materials Engineering – Professor of Metallurgical Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison. Senior Staff Member, Congressional Office of Technology Assessment. Testified more than 50 times before Congress on technology and science issues. National Governors Association. Consultant to industrial and chemical companies, DOE laboratories, state governments, and public interest organizations.
Quote: "Many technical analyses cast doubt on the official explanation of the collapse of three World Trade Center buildings. More difficult than discovering the truth, however, is convincing most of the public to accept the bitter truth."
"When it comes to 9/11, we face the strong belief that only al-Qaeda caused 9/11. But analyses by many experts reveal the collapse of the three WTC buildings was not caused by the two airplanes exploding into the twin towers."
"The immediate reaction is like a cosmic big bang. It would have taken considerable effort by a number of people with expertise and access to the buildings to rig them so that they could be intentionally collapsed when the two jets hit the towers. Tough questions flood in: Who could have engineered all this? Could foreign agents accomplish such complex actions - and if they did, why not take credit for it? If Americans did it, why would they intentionally inflict inevitable mass death and devastation? Worse, they seemingly knew about the plan to fly the jets into the towers."
"Groups of Architects and Engineers want a new, honest and comprehensive study that considers all the evidence for controlled demolition. As a former engineering professor with growing skepticism about the official WTC story I share their concerns. First, let the technical truth emerge. Then, if necessary, cope with the inevitable political, conspiracy and other questions. But let us not allow a possible painful truth block the primary task of determining once and for all what caused the collapse of the WTC towers and building no. 7."
"If those that believe the official 9/11 story - especially elected officials - trust their views, then let them support a serious effort to test the validity of the controlled demolition hypothesis. If they fear and reject doing so, then let us see that as suspicious and unacceptable."
"Horrific possible answers can cause us to shun a question. But clearing our minds of the fear of painful truths is essential to clearing our nation of destructive lies. Otherwise, we stay stuck in a delusional democracy."
[/QUOTE]
Last edited:
The fucking idiot who likes to pretend he has a high IQ can't even spell the plural of ignoramus right. It is either ignoramuses or ignorami, not both! 
