I put this in the wrong thread.

[Mindful]

Should be here:

Milk Round success is tragic culpable failure Practical Ethics

 

[I.P.Freely]

Anyone can sympathize with the sufferings of a friend, but it requires a very fine nature to sympathize with a friend's success.”
oscar wilde

 

[Mindful]

Anyone can sympathize with the sufferings of a friend, but it requires a very fine nature to sympathize with a friend's success.”
oscar wilde

Suits and briefcases constitute success?

Depends how one defines success.

 

[I.P.Freely]

Finding the correct location for a post is a success for some.

 

[Mindful]

Finding the correct location for a post is a success for some.

You must be having trouble then.

 

[Mr. H.]

A thread is comprised of posts. The thread placement is in a particular forum.

 

[Mindful]

A thread is comprised of posts. The thread placement is in a particular forum.

I meant it for the philosophy section, I couldn't find it, put it in an encompassing thread.Then later I managed to locate the one I wanted. I was in a rush, so wasn't paying attention.

Is that okay?

 

[Mr. H.]

A thread is comprised of posts. The thread placement is in a particular forum.

I meant it for the philosophy section, I couldn't find it, put it in an encompassing thread.Then later I managed to locate the one I wanted. I was in a rush, so wasn't paying attention.

Is that okay?

Of course it's okay.

But just for good measure... here's a good ol' bitch slap.

 

[Vikrant]

It is OK to put it in a wrong thread. Just don't put it in a wrong ****.

 

[emilynghiem]

What?
Wouldn't the conflicts in their philosophy writings show in their biases?
I don't think you have to exclude people by judging by their profession
to do that.

What I find is if there is some bias or conflict skewing their judgment,
it will show in their writing that will contradict itself.

You can actually use their own profession to point this out in some cases.
So their profession could help make the arguments and further the discussion.

What is wrong with using that as part of the discourse?
To take the whole person in context, and discuss conflicts WITHIN their views.
Not judge their views from the outside but from the content and context included?

 

[emilynghiem]

A thread is comprised of posts. The thread placement is in a particular forum.

I meant it for the philosophy section, I couldn't find it, put it in an encompassing thread.Then later I managed to locate the one I wanted. I was in a rush, so wasn't paying attention.

Is that okay?

Well Mindful. If your blog post was about "judging people for their profession"
instead of the content of their material, then why are you surprised when people
poke at you for external things that have naught to do with the content of your posts?

 

[Mindful]

A thread is comprised of posts. The thread placement is in a particular forum.

I meant it for the philosophy section, I couldn't find it, put it in an encompassing thread.Then later I managed to locate the one I wanted. I was in a rush, so wasn't paying attention.

Is that okay?

Well Mindful. If your blog post was about "judging people for their profession"
instead of the content of their material, then why are you surprised when people
poke at you for external things that have naught to do with the content of your posts?

I don't know.

 

[emilynghiem]

A thread is comprised of posts. The thread placement is in a particular forum.

I meant it for the philosophy section, I couldn't find it, put it in an encompassing thread.Then later I managed to locate the one I wanted. I was in a rush, so wasn't paying attention.

Is that okay?

Well Mindful. If your blog post was about "judging people for their profession"
instead of the content of their material, then why are you surprised when people
poke at you for external things that have naught to do with the content of your posts?

I don't know.

Wow, you are honest. Yours is the most honest post I have read on this forum.
Someone admitting they don't know. You will serve very well here, we need more people and influence like you!