Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The change in policy by the AG speaks for itself, which is contrary to the law. The credible source is you. You linked it right? Lol!The attorney Generals quote tells us he does not know the law. Nor is there a law stating such. That is a policy contrary to the "asylum" law. The AG adopted a policy that skirts the law.
He's the US Attorney General moron. Feel free to cite a credible source.
Like I said, there's enough there to pretend you don't get it.You're right, I don't. With your incoherent, grammatically incorrect, run on sentence structure, I'm convinced I saw you in the crowd as well. Go back to school and learn basic grammar. Because, no one is ever going to know what you are talking about if you don't.
That is a different topic of conversation boss. Try and keep it in the road. Let's don't start drifting here. Stay with the topic.Again, you are falling down on the job. Asylum seekers are not illegal. And, your definition of asylum seekers explains clearly, through "persecution" and "social class" that law clearly applies to asylum seekers who again, are not illegal.I did. And you want it both ways. You got caught linking something absolute, only to change it for your convenience. The truth is, these asylum seekers are interviewed on a case by case basis. Not all apply, that is for sure. But if the asylum clause you linked applies to those truly affected, then the "persecution" and or "social status" will give them asylum.
No you didn't liar. I proved gangs and cartels are not grounds for asylum, that is what the vast majority of these illegals are claiming.There is no precedence to admit defeat for anything. The law for asylum seekers is clear . As you and I pointed out. An AG's policy change is invalid. He know's that, you know that, and so does law enforcement. Social class and persecution apply via the law. The AG can play games with the law all he wants. But, at the end of the day, the law still applies. You are the one who has been defeated here. And you did it with your own link.You incorrectly tried to use social status to grant asylum for those situations. You need a proven source or admit defeat.
Just because you call them asylum seekers does not make it true.
Jeff Sessions didn't change the law. Jeff Sessions just adopted an illegal policy, and he ended up getting butt hurt because of it.They are applying for that status based on fleeing from gangs or cartels. That is not a basis for getting asylum according to Jeff Sessions.
Sure I have. An illegal policy change contrary to the law, is by itself proof.You have not proven Sessions to be in error other than stating and restating it.
Lol! Lose what? The accurate reading of the law versus an unauthorized policy change? The only thing lost here is your inability to decipher law from illegal policy. The only loser here is you, because it is impossible to physically fix that problem, unless the law itself is changed. But it wasn't was it? That's right, it wasn't.If you could have done that, we would not be at this point in the discussion, you lose.
Jeff Sessions didn't change the law. Jeff Sessions just adopted an illegal policy, and he ended up getting butt hurt because of it..
No, you have, remember?The change in policy by the AG speaks for itself, which is contrary to the law. The credible source is you. You linked it right? Lol!The attorney Generals quote tells us he does not know the law. Nor is there a law stating such. That is a policy contrary to the "asylum" law. The AG adopted a policy that skirts the law.
He's the US Attorney General moron. Feel free to cite a credible source.
So show us the law that requires those fleeing gangs and cartels to be granted asylum. Should be easy you have mentioned it several times. It needs to say gangs and cartels....
I cited it. And it is contrary to the quotes of the AG. The AG basically just made it up.Jeff Sessions didn't change the law. Jeff Sessions just adopted an illegal policy, and he ended up getting butt hurt because of it..
Cite a credible source that says it is an illegal policy change. So far we have you as a confirmed liar attesting to it, but we need more.
You still haven't referenced the law.
I cited it. And it is contrary to the quotes of the AG. The AG basically just made it up.
Those failed governments are a direct result of decades of U.S. intervention. Which is exactly why we are dealing with this now. CIA in South America | Geopolitical MonitorThe really absurd part is many of these liberals point to socialist countries as some great model for the US. Yet here they are arguing for them to be let in because of gangs and cartels and failed government protections in their own countries.
And they're all Trump supporters.
They don't even know what "seeking asylum" means. They think it is some sort of illegal act.
The Republican leadership has done a fantastic job of keeping their base so misinformed, that they could easily tell them to follow Trump off a cliff, and they would certainly do it.
I was in total shock when I watched that video. The alarming gross stupidity was off the chain.
Folks, this country is in trouble.
Post # 86!I cited it. And it is contrary to the quotes of the AG. The AG basically just made it up.
Where? It should be easy to repost it here. vvv
Those failed governments are a direct result of decades of U.S. intervention. Which is exactly why we are dealing with this now. CIA in South America | Geopolitical MonitorThe really absurd part is many of these liberals point to socialist countries as some great model for the US. Yet here they are arguing for them to be let in because of gangs and cartels and failed government protections in their own countries.
No, you have, remember?
A person who owing to a well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion, is outside the country of his nationality and is unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country; or who, not having a nationality and being outside the country of his former habitual residence as a result of such events, is unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to return to it."[6]
Refugee law - Wikipedia
Correct.But Trump didn't do that. He instead arrested people who had done nothing illegal, then kidnapped their children.Turn them away at the border. Problem solved.
And they're all Trump supporters.
They don't even know what "seeking asylum" means. They think it is some sort of illegal act.
The Republican leadership has done a fantastic job of keeping their base so misinformed, that they could easily tell them to follow Trump off a cliff, and they would certainly do it.
I was in total shock when I watched that video. The alarming gross stupidity was off the chain.
Folks, this country is in trouble.
Ignorance and stupidity are typical of most on the right; indeed, being ignorant and stupid is a prerequisite for being a conservative.
And add to that, of course, fear and hate – most conservatives are willfully ignorant of immigration law because of their unwarranted fear and hatred toward immigrants.
Thanks! See how easy that was? And yet, others on here are too blind, deaf, and dumb to see what is staring them straight in the face.Correct.But Trump didn't do that. He instead arrested people who had done nothing illegal, then kidnapped their children.Turn them away at the border. Problem solved.
That an immigrant is undocumented doesn’t mean he’s ‘illegal.’
All persons in the United States are entitled to due process of the law, including those undocumented.
An undocumented immigrant has the right to apply for asylum and refugee status, and is not illegal until such time as he has been found guilty in a court of law of entering the country absent authorization, having failed to justify refugee status.
what a jerk he isBut Trump didn't do that. He instead arrested people who had done nothing illegal, then kidnapped their children.Turn them away at the border. Problem solved.
