I Don't Understand NUDISM...

[007]

I can remember being on my third date with my boyfriend. He was fully clothed, but every so often, he would move his arm, and I'd catch a glimpse of this golden hair along a firm, tanned wrist. I remember staring at that wrist for at least 5 hours (we talked, and talked, and talked, and ate oysters and watched basketball), and wondering what the rest of his body looked like, and what it would feel like to have his big strong hands on me. We held hands, and looked into each other's eyes, and damn...

It was SWOONY. Still one of the best dates I've ever had.

I'm a huge fan of delayed gratification. it's ever so much more gratifying when you finally get there.

I hear ya.... are we old fashioned or what?

 

[catzmeow]

I hear ya.... are we old fashioned or what?

Maybe just old, dammit. But, those who don't believe in mystery and delayed gratification have no ideas of the infinite pleasures they are missing out on.

 

[random3434]

Maybe just old, dammit. But, those who don't believe in mystery and delayed gratification have no ideas of the infinite pleasures they are missing out on.

THIS is what it's all about:



[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NWrCf7rAytc]YouTube - Young Frankenstein[/ame]

 

[catzmeow]

THIS is what it's all about:



YouTube - Young Frankenstein

Doing it fully clothed while singing?

Well, everybody got their something.

 

[KittenKoder]

I wouldn't classify them perverts either. I think they believe that what they're doing is legitimate. My only point is that I think when people are walking around naked 24/7, it takes away from the sexual aspect of finding the opposite sex stimulating when naked. I mean people are visual, whether some here will admit it or not, and nakedness is a turn on. Put a man in a room and have a fully clothed woman walk in and there's no sexual stimulus. Put a man in a room and have a naked woman walk in and instantly there's a sexual stimulus. That being said, if the man was a nudist and around naked women all day and all night, the naked woman wouldn't have a fraction of the effect it would on a man that wasn't a nudist. That ruins it for me. I think women are beautiful, and I don't ever want the sight of one naked to be just some mundane, everyday occurrence to me.

Actually, I think of all humans as perverts, well, those who think about sex. In reality by the definition of pervert humanity is perverted, we are pulling ourselves further from nature and thus perverted life forms. However in this context I see breeders as the most perverted, anyone that thinks about sex that much so that they can't even ignore a little nipple or curve without thinking about fucking it is extremely perverted. Nudists don't think about sex nearly as much as even the 'normal' people (ie clothed) and that makes them the least perverted of all breeders (humans who have sex).

Oh, and as for your example, most men are turned on by clothing just as much as nudity.

 

[007]

Actually, I think of all humans as perverts, well, those who think about sex. In reality by the definition of pervert humanity is perverted, we are pulling ourselves further from nature and thus perverted life forms. However in this context I see breeders as the most perverted, anyone that thinks about sex that much so that they can't even ignore a little nipple or curve without thinking about fucking it is extremely perverted. Nudists don't think about sex nearly as much as even the 'normal' people (ie clothed) and that makes them the least perverted of all breeders (humans who have sex).

Hmmm... ok... I just find all that rather.... weird...

Oh, and as for your example, most men are turned on by clothing just as much as nudity.

I totally disagree. If so, men would be flocking to the womens clothing department in Sears and JC Penny more than they do to nudie bars. Nope, you're just wrong on this one.

 

[KittenKoder]

Hmmm... ok... I just find all that rather.... weird...


I totally disagree. If so, men would be flocking to the womens clothing department in Sears and JC Penny more than they do to nudie bars. Nope, you're just wrong on this one.

Have you gone shopping in the womens departments? Also, not as many go to the strip joints as you would think. Walk into a porn store to, not many there either. The online porn industry makes more money from the 'strange' sexual fetishes than from pure nudity. Your argument isn't very well informed. Nudism is good in that when one makes nudity less sexual then the men and women are more interested in if they will get along with a partner instead of whether they look just like a super model. Clothing hides the flaws in a person, allowing someone to look as good as they can dress. I have seen many who look almost perfect in clothing but once they undress no one would touch them, for example. So no, your argument is completely flawed in this matter.

Try talking to more than just your 'buds' sometime, you will find there is more out there than a narrow minded view of the world. Also if you were correct at all then the fetishists wouldn't be the biggest seller for the porn industry, there are more men turned on by feet in high heels than breasts even now (it's about 25% of the porn industry at this point).

 

[007]

Have you gone shopping in the womens departments? Also, not as many go to the strip joints as you would think. Walk into a porn store to, not many there either. The online porn industry makes more money from the 'strange' sexual fetishes than from pure nudity. Your argument isn't very well informed. Nudism is good in that when one makes nudity less sexual then the men and women are more interested in if they will get along with a partner instead of whether they look just like a super model. Clothing hides the flaws in a person, allowing someone to look as good as they can dress. I have seen many who look almost perfect in clothing but once they undress no one would touch them, for example. So no, your argument is completely flawed in this matter.

Well, you just don't know what you're talking about. First off, you have nothing to back up your assertions. Second, my wife was a stripper when I met her, so I do know what I'm talking about. She danced in a topless bar in Tampa, Florida called the Seven Seas. The place was packed any night of the week, but weekends she'd bring home $1,000+ in tips IN ONE NIGHT. Now tell me again how men like women in clothes better than naked. Bull shit. Period. You don't know what you're talking about. If men liked women fully clothed even remotely as much as you'd have us believe, there would be bars where chicks would dance with all their clothes on, but you know as well as I do, there ain't such a place. Starting to get the picture?

I do agree that some people look better in clothes than naked. Many in fact.

Try talking to more than just your 'buds' sometime, you will find there is more out there than a narrow minded view of the world. Also if you were correct at all then the fetishists wouldn't be the biggest seller for the porn industry, there are more men turned on by feet in high heels than breasts even now (it's about 25% of the porn industry at this point).

You have no idea what so ever who I talk to, and just because I don't buy into your wild assertions with nothing to back them up does not mean I'm narrow minded. It means you can't prove shit so you insult me. Are you a liberal? That IS one of the liberals favorite tactics. So if you want to stay credible here, post some links to back up all this percentage talk you're spewing about men loving feet more than breasts. Until then, you're just kind of out in left field without a leg to stand on.

 

[KittenKoder]

Why not go move to the Middle East if you can only think about sex when seeing a nude person, since they all agree with you.