I dont give a shit!

Nobody here thinks kids should be able to borrow money for college and not have to pay it back. The President's program makes it easier for kids to pay off their loans.

Cons don't seem to be able to get that.


Not all cons think alike, any more than libs do. Lumping people together is a bit lazy I think.

I don't think the federal gov't should be involved at all with student loans. Actually, I don't think any level of gov't should be involved with student loans, it should be done privately with the schools, the banks, and the student and the family.

The president's program originally allowed unpaid student loans to be forgiven after 25 years, as part of the ObamaCare bill. Which I think was dishonest, the dems tried to use interest paid from the loans to help pay the costs of the new healthcare bill. Now he wants to change it to 20 years, which to me is a blatent attempt to buy votes at the expense of taxpayers. It stinks.

I completely agree with you. Not all cons think alike. Just the ones who post on this forum.

It depends on what your criteria is for cons. Honestly based on most of what I've seen you post, anyone not 60 degrees left of center could be considered a con. :dunno:
 
Not all cons think alike, any more than libs do. Lumping people together is a bit lazy I think.

I don't think the federal gov't should be involved at all with student loans. Actually, I don't think any level of gov't should be involved with student loans, it should be done privately with the schools, the banks, and the student and the family.

The president's program originally allowed unpaid student loans to be forgiven after 25 years, as part of the ObamaCare bill. Which I think was dishonest, the dems tried to use interest paid from the loans to help pay the costs of the new healthcare bill. Now he wants to change it to 20 years, which to me is a blatent attempt to buy votes at the expense of taxpayers. It stinks.

I completely agree with you. Not all cons think alike. Just the ones who post on this forum.

It depends on what your criteria is for cons. Honestly based on most of what I've seen you post, anyone not 60 degrees left of center could be considered a con. :dunno:

True. I'm the most leftist poster at USMB. That's why I'm so popular.
 
I completely agree with you. Not all cons think alike. Just the ones who post on this forum.

It depends on what your criteria is for cons. Honestly based on most of what I've seen you post, anyone not 60 degrees left of center could be considered a con. :dunno:

True. I'm the most leftist poster at USMB. That's why I'm so popular.
Trust me, you're not the most leftist one on this board unless you actively embrace pure socialism as an answer to all our political and social ills, real and perceived.
 
Quote: Originally Posted by geauxtohell
Not really. The upside of my earnability is fixed. I will have to do something outside of medicine to make over $300K. You, on the other hand, can expand your business and make millions. I have less risk, but less reward. The only thing that stops a small business owner from take a stab at a massive income is their own hesitency. More risk, more reward.

That's not entirely true either. If you go into private practice and build your own, bringing other Docs aboard, NPs, PAs etc.
 
It depends on what your criteria is for cons. Honestly based on most of what I've seen you post, anyone not 60 degrees left of center could be considered a con. :dunno:

True. I'm the most leftist poster at USMB. That's why I'm so popular.
Trust me, you're not the most leftist one on this board unless you actively embrace pure socialism as an answer to all our political and social ills, real and perceived.

I am the most left wing, non-socialist, who posts here. This board is ULTRA right wing.
 
Today on The Five, Dana Perino (my girl crush), got heated up about this issue as well.

dana_perino.jpg


perino.jpg
 

Forum List

Back
Top