Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Mann has been proven correct by more than a dozen indepentdent studies. The idiocy for the 'Conservatives' is just that. Next, you will be stating that the farmers in the Mid-West deserve no support because the drought is a figment of their imagination. Oh, wait, your leadership has already stated that.
Mann has been proven correct by more than a dozen indepentdent studies. The idiocy for the 'Conservatives' is just that. Next, you will be stating that the farmers in the Mid-West deserve no support because the drought is a figment of their imagination. Oh, wait, your leadership has already stated that.
The drought is real, Mann's hockey stick is the figment.
Mann has been proven correct by more than a dozen indepentdent studies. The idiocy for the 'Conservatives' is just that. Next, you will be stating that the farmers in the Mid-West deserve no support because the drought is a figment of their imagination. Oh, wait, your leadership has already stated that.
The drought is real, Mann's hockey stick is the figment.
Your proof of which is?
Selective perception is a wonderful thing, isn't it? It lets you pretend all those inconvenient truths simply don't exist.Discovery would KILL Mann (professionally speaking that is).
Now that you've traced the silliness at the focus of your faux protest back to your ilk, you are back to repeating unsupported assertions without standing or merit. Please feel free to explain and support the absurdity you repeat. How would discovery "KILL Mann"? there is nothing that that I'm aware of in his very public life and works indicative of anything that would damage him personally or professionally. Note that blog rumors and distortions are not compelling references or evidences.
Ah, well, when you put it like that the content and reliability of what you have to offer is just so much easier to understand and properly characterize, thank-you for your assistance!
ROFLOL
Your fraudulent pretense of sophistication is duly noted and summarily rejected.
You make lots of demands for verification, etc. But you offer none.
In case you thought nobody noticed what a poseur you are, you were wrong about that, too.
Meanwhile, why do you support Mann the fraud? Is it that you frauds like to stick together?
LOL. You demonstrate the assinine nature of your argument, I thank you for demonstrating the nature of you arguments so clearly for me, and you think I'm patting you on the back, what a maroon!
Your fraudulent pretense of sophistication is duly noted and summarily rejected.
You make lots of demands for verification, etc. But you offer none.
In case you thought nobody noticed what a poseur you are, you were wrong about that, too.
Meanwhile, why do you support Mann the fraud? Is it that you frauds like to stick together?
LOL. You demonstrate the assinine nature of your argument, I thank you for demonstrating the nature of you arguments so clearly for me, and you think I'm patting you on the back, what a maroon!
And despite what you feel, "being a liberal" is NOT an achievement.
Your fraudulent pretense of sophistication is duly noted and summarily rejected.
You make lots of demands for verification, etc. But you offer none.
In case you thought nobody noticed what a poseur you are, you were wrong about that, too.
Meanwhile, why do you support Mann the fraud? Is it that you frauds like to stick together?
LOL. You demonstrate the assinine nature of your argument, I thank you for demonstrating the nature of you arguments so clearly for me, and you think I'm patting you on the back, what a maroon!
And despite what you feel, "being a liberal" is NOT an achievement.
You don't know the half of it.So damned hard to deal with cretins.
Yeah. I've never seen you espouse anything but liberal -- and far left liberal, at that -- ideas.LOL. You demonstrate the assinine nature of your argument, I thank you for demonstrating the nature of you arguments so clearly for me, and you think I'm patting you on the back, what a maroon!
And despite what you feel, "being a liberal" is NOT an achievement.
Still lost lala land I see, I despise liberals at least as much as I do conservatives, do try to keep up your are making yourself look slow and in the crew you are hanging with that takes some doing.
Looks like Roxy is feeling his toes stepped on.LOL. You demonstrate the assinine nature of your argument, I thank you for demonstrating the nature of you arguments so clearly for me, and you think I'm patting you on the back, what a maroon!
And despite what you feel, "being a liberal" is NOT an achievement.
So damned hard to deal with cretins.
Mann has been proven correct by more than a dozen indepentdent studies. The idiocy for the 'Conservatives' is just that. Next, you will be stating that the farmers in the Mid-West deserve no support because the drought is a figment of their imagination. Oh, wait, your leadership has already stated that.
The drought is real, Mann's hockey stick is the figment.
Your proof of which is?
He magically made the MWP disappear.
World wide the MWP amounted to an average increase of about 0.2, compared to the 0.7 that we have already seen. It was mainly a north european phenomonem.
Surface Temperature Reconstructions for the Last 2,000 Years
LOL. You demonstrate the assinine nature of your argument, I thank you for demonstrating the nature of you arguments so clearly for me, and you think I'm patting you on the back, what a maroon!
And despite what you feel, "being a liberal" is NOT an achievement.
So damned hard to deal with cretins.
A very informative blog type piece with lots of useful hyperlinks in it.
hyperpartisan political rhetoric in support of hyperpartisan political rhetoric, linking to yet more hyperpartisan political rhetoric, imagine that.
A very informative blog type piece with lots of useful hyperlinks in it:
New SLAAPstick Courtroom Capers as Michael Mann Falls Foul Again | johnosullivan
EXCERPT:
-- id.* * * *
So Steyn should take with a pinch of salt the warning shot from Manns lawyer claiming that a slew of official investigations cleared Mann of any wrongdoing in the 2009 Climategate scandal. Such claims are not what they seem.
Andrew Montford (read his Caspar and Jesus paper) is one such expert who deftly explains that those (non-judicial) Climategate inquiries fell well short of robust exoneration. This is because they all skirted around the unscientific behavior concerning Manns key hidden data. Unfortunately, for Mann he has made himself the plaintiff in this Canadian libel suit and cannot now duck the issue.
In the B.C. Supreme Court Balls attorney, Michael Scherr, has a clear run to perfectly demonstrate how climate scientists have been (and still are) withholding data that would help to resolve the climate controversy; we may say unscientific behavior, because hiding data makes it difficult or impossible for independent scientists/statisticians to replicate the claimed results.
As we know, Manns dirty laundry is the withheld r-squared correlation coefficient numbers for the hockey stick graph which McIntyre, Wegman, Cuccinelli and others have been desperate to see publicly examined but which Mann (and his university employers) have always kept under wraps. Its not just the key evidence, but also Manns days that are numbered. This is because, as plaintiff in the action, Mann picked the worst possible jurisdiction to do legal battle over his hockey stick graph. This is for two key reasons:
* * * *
A very informative blog type piece with lots of useful hyperlinks in it:
New SLAAPstick Courtroom Capers as Michael Mann Falls Foul Again | johnosullivan
EXCERPT:
-- id.* * * *
So Steyn should take with a pinch of salt the “warning shot” from Mann’s lawyer claiming that a slew of official investigations “cleared” Mann of any wrongdoing in the 2009 Climategate scandal. Such claims are not what they seem.
Andrew Montford (read his ‘Caspar and Jesus’ paper) is one such expert who deftly explains that those (non-judicial) “Climategate” inquiries fell well short of robust exoneration. This is because they all skirted around the unscientific behavior concerning Mann’s key hidden data. Unfortunately, for Mann he has made himself the plaintiff in this Canadian libel suit and cannot now duck the issue.
In the B.C. Supreme Court Ball’s attorney, Michael Scherr, has a clear run to perfectly demonstrate how climate “scientists” have been (and still are) withholding data that would help to resolve the climate controversy; we may say unscientific behavior, because hiding data makes it difficult or impossible for independent scientists/statisticians to replicate the claimed results.
As we know, Mann’s “dirty laundry” is the withheld r-squared correlation coefficient numbers for the “hockey stick” graph which McIntyre, Wegman, Cuccinelli and others have been desperate to see publicly examined but which Mann (and his university employers) have always kept under wraps. It’s not just the key evidence, but also Mann’s days that are numbered. This is because, as plaintiff in the action, Mann picked the worst possible jurisdiction to do legal battle over his “hockey stick” graph. This is for two key reasons:
* * * *
"As we know, Mann’s “dirty laundry” is the withheld r-squared correlation coefficient numbers for the “hockey stick” graph which McIntyre, Wegman, Cuccinelli and others have been desperate to see publicly examined but which Mann (and his university employers) have always kept under wraps. It’s not just the key evidence, but also Mann’s days that are numbered..."
Remember when Einstein first release his famous e = mc (fill in the blank cause I ain't telling) equation?
I live for the day when all these fakes are booted off campus by real scientists for the academic frauds they are.
Why are people still referring to Mann as a "Scientist"?
Because he is a world class scientist, greatly honored by his peers in the scientific community.
You, on the other hand, are a brainwashed retard, clueless, uneducated in science, and filled with a big steaming pile of BS, misinformation, smears, propaganda and outright lies that you swallowed unquestioningly because your ideological puppet-masters told you to.
