Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
the backstory is jarhead comes to my city, and we've almost met up once or twice. it's not a "call out"
True.
I misinterpreted it.
My error.
Truth is....
I do not feel a condemnation was appropriate.
Nor do I feel a Presidential condemnation of ANY freedom of speech action of a US citizen is appropriate.
Strange,
I don't see anyone being killed over "piss christ".. But, you never know what will happen with wacky Christians!
the backstory is jarhead comes to my city, and we've almost met up once or twice. it's not a "call out"
Nor do I feel a Presidential condemnation of ANY freedom of speech action of a US citizen is appropriate.
when it could save lives, who cares. His condemnation of the video doesn't mean he can't have his free speech.
who asked him to condemn the film?
Oh.
who knows about the film.
start there.
versus who knows about pee jar.
and..............whats the typical cry baby muslim outcry when mohammad is dissed?
versus.....
christians know how to behave in reaction to a slur, and don't need to be told.
these things are just common sense.
so we are appeasing them becuase they act irrational (in our eyes)....
That is something I do not agree with.
You may see it differently....but that does not mean that my thinking is wrong and deserves the ridicule that is spalttered all over this thread.
the backstory is jarhead comes to my city, and we've almost met up once or twice. it's not a "call out"
Nor do I feel a Presidential condemnation of ANY freedom of speech action of a US citizen is appropriate.
when it could save lives, who cares. His condemnation of the video doesn't mean he can't have his free speech.
the backstory is jarhead comes to my city, and we've almost met up once or twice. it's not a "call out"
True.
I misinterpreted it.
My error.
Truth is....
I do not feel a condemnation was appropriate.
Nor do I feel a Presidential condemnation of ANY freedom of speech action of a US citizen is appropriate.
Why is it not Presedential to condemn hate speech? It's perfectly Presidential, especially with the hundreds of posters amongst the burning middle east stating their anger @ the slur.
It's not Presidential to BAN hate speech, but to condemn it?
That's reaching.
Strange,
I don't see anyone being killed over "piss christ".. But, you never know what will happen with wacky Christians!
And it appears no one was killed due to the film either.
who knows about the film.
start there.
versus who knows about pee jar.
and..............whats the typical cry baby muslim outcry when mohammad is dissed?
versus.....
christians know how to behave in reaction to a slur, and don't need to be told.
these things are just common sense.
so we are appeasing them becuase they act irrational (in our eyes)....
That is something I do not agree with.
You may see it differently....but that does not mean that my thinking is wrong and deserves the ridicule that is spalttered all over this thread.
Sorry but,
Killing more terrorists than were killed under Bush is not "appeasement," calling Obama's policy "appeasement" is rhetoric. His policy all along is to try to bridge the gap while also responding to any threat with force. And that can't be denied with any sort of rhetoric. It's well documented.
It's also rhetoric and dishonesty to call what Obama did an "apology."
He's just reminding the immature children who can't take a joke, that it isn't like the joke is the United States' official policy, so RELAX cave people with cell phones.
It's also rhetoric and dishonesty to call what Obama did an "apology."
He's just reminding the immature children who can't take a joke, that it isn't like the joke is the United States' official policy, so RELAX cave people with cell phones.
so we are appeasing them becuase they act irrational (in our eyes)....
That is something I do not agree with.
You may see it differently....but that does not mean that my thinking is wrong and deserves the ridicule that is spalttered all over this thread.
Sorry but,
Killing more terrorists than were killed under Bush is not "appeasement," calling Obama's policy "appeasement" is rhetoric. His policy all along is to try to bridge the gap while also responding to any threat with force. And that can't be denied with any sort of rhetoric. It's well documented.
Do not forget to mention that more soldiers have been killed under Hussein's watch than under Dubya
Strange,
I don't see anyone being killed over "piss christ".. But, you never know what will happen with wacky Christians!
And it appears no one was killed due to the film either.
True, but almost everyone seemed to think it was at first, until the intel started to come in.
However, this is still an issue over hurt feelings, not anything with any merit.. I don't see Christians rioting and burning everything in sight, like they were doing in ME.
Sorry but,
Killing more terrorists than were killed under Bush is not "appeasement," calling Obama's policy "appeasement" is rhetoric. His policy all along is to try to bridge the gap while also responding to any threat with force. And that can't be denied with any sort of rhetoric. It's well documented.
Do not forget to mention that more soldiers have been killed under Hussein's watch than under Dubya
That's what happens with non appeasement. When you escalate a War, deaths on both sides typically go up.
But if he was appeasing these guys, as commander in Chief I don't know why he'd escalate the War against them at the same time. Quite the acrobatic reach of logic you have to have in order to call him an appeaser, but I do understand Partisanship.
It's also rhetoric and dishonesty to call what Obama did an "apology."
He's just reminding the immature children who can't take a joke, that it isn't like the joke is the United States' official policy, so RELAX cave people with cell phones.
I never once said it was an apology. It was by no means an apology. It was a condemnation.
However....someone who wants to stir up troubloe with Muslims can say..
"he condemend this action becuase he is concerned we will all act like children and hold our breath til we are blue....."
It is important to be consistant when in the public eye.
Condemning this hate speech and not other hate speech isolates Muslims as "special"...be it good or bad.
It's also rhetoric and dishonesty to call what Obama did an "apology."
He's just reminding the immature children who can't take a joke, that it isn't like the joke is the United States' official policy, so RELAX cave people with cell phones.
I never once said it was an apology. It was by no means an apology. It was a condemnation.
However....someone who wants to stir up troubloe with Muslims can say..
"he condemend this action becuase he is concerned we will all act like children and hold our breath til we are blue....."
It is important to be consistant when in the public eye.
Condemning this hate speech and not other hate speech isolates Muslims as "special"...be it good or bad.
Oh gosh.
Here's what happened:
A big event happened in the world.
The Pres was drawn to having to speak on it.
In said speech, he reaffirmed we don't agree with ANY hate speech - againsy ANY Religions, and said so EXPLICITLY.
Now a small, tiny little thing in NYC he doesn't even know about happens, and his condemnation of anti-religious bumblejargain just a week before isn't good enough.....now - because he addressed something that was MAJOR world news with continuing deaths........he now must address ALL Religious degradation or else be a hypocrite.
And in adult speak, that frame of mind is called being a busy body. It's small ball, and deserves to be laughed at because of how childish it is, in and of itself.
