teapartysamurai
Gold Member
- Mar 27, 2010
- 20,056
- 2,562
- 290
You notice that liberals are always talking about helping the poor, BUT if the poor actually rise above poverty, then they start tearing them down?
And notice when tearing down the rich, they conveniently leave out all those RICH limosine liberals like (the late) Ted Kennedy, Michael Moore, Noam Chomsky, the Clintons, etc etc etc. All of whom, make hand over fist, while decrying the "greed" of the rich.
So, here are all these libs in here, decrying Romney's Wealth. But turning a blind eye to how much Michelle Obama pays for clothes and shoes and how many golf vacations Obama takes.
What gives libs? Are you telling us you don't want people to have an "unfair" advantage unless they tow the liberal line?
If you don't, you want them in poverty?
Seems like that's the message from the "99%" and Obama.
Vote liberal or live hand to mouth.
I see some really big, transparent hypocrites!
And notice when tearing down the rich, they conveniently leave out all those RICH limosine liberals like (the late) Ted Kennedy, Michael Moore, Noam Chomsky, the Clintons, etc etc etc. All of whom, make hand over fist, while decrying the "greed" of the rich.
So, here are all these libs in here, decrying Romney's Wealth. But turning a blind eye to how much Michelle Obama pays for clothes and shoes and how many golf vacations Obama takes.
What gives libs? Are you telling us you don't want people to have an "unfair" advantage unless they tow the liberal line?
If you don't, you want them in poverty?
Seems like that's the message from the "99%" and Obama.
Vote liberal or live hand to mouth.
I see some really big, transparent hypocrites!
