Humorous video destroys Global Whiners

And you'll never admit that all their models were WRONG! Much less admit that the data has been manipulated to fit the conclusion instead of drawing a conclusion form that data as actual scientist would do.

What models? What data? What conclusions?

Time to stop strawmanning others positions.

Let this "corporate bitch" explain this to you. GW theory is not just about whether the planet is warming a bit or if mankind has a contribution to that. The CORE theories of AGW are built on SPECULATION about accelerations and positive feedbacks which will result in runaway warming and irreversible doom.

It's those parts of AGW theory that most folks who have studied the topic --- are "skeptical" about.

In the past 30 years ALL projected forecasts for warming have been revised drastically downward. Partly because of new REAL science about how the climate ACTUALLY works --- and partly because most ALL of the predictive models using these accelerations and positive feedbacks HAVE FAILED in less then 20 years since they were run. So the SCIENCE is maturing and moderating --- but the RHETORIC and the FEAR are the ONLY things accelerating in the GW movement.

YOU --- must believe that this planet will commit suicide if a "trigger temp" of even 2 degrees were to happen. VERY FEW scientists will stick their necks out anymore to PICK a trigger temp or even make temperature predictions 50 or 100 years into the future. That early APOCALYPTIC version of GW is dead. But the movement struggles on..

It's actually over and the skeptics have prevailed and better science is being done. YOU just don't know that because you never really followed the story.. The science was never settled. And STILL is not settled.

If you took the time to watch the OP vid --- you'd know a few reasons why that is true. But you're apparently lazy and want to call me a "corporate bitch" instead of investing time to understand what YOUR theory actually says and what the REAL questions are...

most people who actually study climate are not "skeptical" about climate change.

and why would anyone "take the time" to watch a video by a science denying comedian who has absolutely no knowledge about the subject?

just saying/

Well remain ignorant then. Had you bothered to watch the video you would know he has a his sources listed on his web site.
 
The GOP and GOP dupes are the only peoplle in the world denying this...This year it's gotten totally out of hand. Every month is the hottest ever....

So party first the GOP is now cheering Russian hacking of election. Unbelievable.
 
Oddly, in reading the scientific papers concerning AGW, I have not seen the doomsday predictions you proclaim that most of the climate scientists are supposed to be making. What I have seen is often conservative predictions of the climate scientists happening sooner than expected. What is being said in most of the predictions is that we are giving our children a world that is less than we should be giving them. Even a foot more of sea level rise by 2100 is going to cost us. Should that end up as 3 feet, then the cost will be astronomical. We pretty much know that we will reach the one foot level, and 3 feet is possible.

In 1981, Dr. Hansen made some bold predictions for that time. All have come to pass, and sooner than expected.

And in the 70's they were warning about the coming ice age. Does that sound like consensus to you?
 
Oddly, in reading the scientific papers concerning AGW, I have not seen the doomsday predictions you proclaim that most of the climate scientists are supposed to be making. What I have seen is often conservative predictions of the climate scientists happening sooner than expected. What is being said in most of the predictions is that we are giving our children a world that is less than we should be giving them. Even a foot more of sea level rise by 2100 is going to cost us. Should that end up as 3 feet, then the cost will be astronomical. We pretty much know that we will reach the one foot level, and 3 feet is possible.

In 1981, Dr. Hansen made some bold predictions for that time. All have come to pass, and sooner than expected.

And in the 70's they were warning about the coming ice age. Does that sound like consensus to you?
No, dumb fuck, they were not. The majority of the scientists publishing in peer reviewed journals at that time were predicting warming rather than cooling.

And you have had this pointed out to you before. That you repeat this lie is an indictation of your lack of character.


What were climate scientists predicting in the 1970s?

Peer-Reviewed Literature
However, these are media articles, not scientific studies. A survey of peer reviewed scientific papers from 1965 to 1979 show that few papers predicted global cooling (7 in total). Significantly more papers (42 in total) predicted global warming (Peterson 2008). The large majority of climate research in the 1970s predicted the Earth would warm as a consequence of CO2. Rather than 1970s scientists predicting cooling, the opposite is the case.

1970s_papers.gif

Figure 1: Number of papers classified as predicting global cooling (blue) or warming (red). In no year were there more cooling papers than warming papers (Peterson 2008).

Scientific Consensus
In the 1970s, the most comprehensive study on climate change (and the closest thing to a scientific consensus at the time) was the 1975 US National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council Report. Their basic conclusion was "…we do not have a good quantitative understanding of our climate machine and what determines its course. Without the fundamental understanding, it does not seem possible to predict climate…"

This is in strong contrast with the current position of the US National Academy of Sciences: "...there is now strong evidence that significant global warming is occurring... It is likely that most of the warming in recent decades can be attributed to human activities... The scientific understanding of climate change is now sufficiently clear to justify nations taking prompt action." This is in a joint statement with the Academies of Science from Brazil, France, Canada, China, Germany, India, Italy, Japan, Russia and the United Kingdom.

In contrast to the 1970s, there are now a number of scientific bodies that have released statements affirming man-made global warming. More on scientific consensus...
 
Yep, all the predictions flopped, but you don't dare say so, you'll be labeled anti science, when it was the so called science that failed in the first place.


It's one of my favorite moonbat lines, "the science is settled" when they cannot refute the data that proves beyond a doubt the science is not actually on their side. Their predictions didn't come true. There are more polar bears now than since they've been counted, there's more ice than ever and the promoters of the hoax are richer than ever.

One thing that wasn't brought up in the video is the fact that 1000 years ago it was WARMER than it is now. There were viking settlements on Greenland and in Newfoundland. Last I looked no one was refining crude oil into gasoline, lighting up entire continents with coal fired generators or running their AC's on full blast.

The moonbats aren't even content with a debate any longer because they've lost any credibility (assuming they had any to begin with) so now they want to start using law enforcement to stifle dissent.

BS, dupe.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct...ooming&usg=AFQjCNFwhkj67eX1EU1ba79_pf-weVmzfg
 
The GOP and GOP dupes are the only peoplle in the world denying this...This year it's gotten totally out of hand. Every month is the hottest ever....

So party first the GOP is now cheering Russian hacking of election. Unbelievable.

You're a fucking liar, British courts have declared it a farce.

British Court Rules Al Gore Film Exaggerated Climate Claims | Fox News
U.K. Judge Rules Gore's Climate Film Has 9 Errors

High Court Judge Michael Burton, deciding a lawsuit that questioned the film's suitability for showing in British classrooms, said Wednesday that the movie builds a "powerful" case that global warming is caused by humans and that urgent means are needed to counter it.

But he also said Gore makes nine statements in the film that are not supported by current mainstream scientific consensus. Teachers, Burton concluded, could show the film but must alert students to what the judge called errors.

The film continues to be shown in British schools. And the nine errors are to be pointed out, none of which have anything to do with the premise that AGW is real and a clear and present danger.
 
The GOP and GOP dupes are the only peoplle in the world denying this...This year it's gotten totally out of hand. Every month is the hottest ever....

So party first the GOP is now cheering Russian hacking of election. Unbelievable.

You're a fucking liar, British courts have declared it a farce.

British Court Rules Al Gore Film Exaggerated Climate Claims | Fox News
LOL. The GOP is the only party that denies, despite its stupid propaganda.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct...ooming&usg=AFQjCNFwhkj67eX1EU1ba79_pf-weVmzfg
 
Answered by Dr. Steven C. Amstrup, chief scientist with Polar Bears International and USGS polar bear project leader for 30 years.

Q: Why all the fuss about polar bears? Aren't their populations increasing: in fact, booming?

A: One of the most frequent myths we hear about polar bears is that their numbers are increasing and have, in fact, more than doubled over the past thirty years. Tales about how many polar bears there used to be (with claims as low as 5,000 in the 1960s) are undocumented, but cited over and over again. Yet no one I know can come up with a legitimate source for these numbers.*

One Russian extrapolation presented in 1956 suggested a number of 5,000 to 8,000, but that figure was never accepted by scientists. The fact is that in the 1960s we had no idea how many polar bears there were. Even now, about half of our population estimates are only educated guesses. Back then, the best we had over most of the polar bear's range were uneducated guesses. Polar bear science has come a long way since then.

We do know (and I have published papers on this) that some polar bear populations grew after quotas were imposed in Canada, aerial hunting ceased in Alaska, and trapping and hunting were banned in Svalbard. All of these events occurred in the late 60s or early 70s, and we know some populations responded—as you would expect. Some populations were not being hunted back then (or were hunted very little) and those were probably unaffected by these three actions.

Back then, the sea ice was solid and not noticeably in retreat. With stable habitat, polar bears were a renewable resource that could be harvested on a sustainable basis.

But the most important point is that whatever happened in the past is really irrelevant. Polar bear habitat is disappearing due to global warming. Even the most careful on-the-ground management doesn't matter if polar bears don't have the required habitat.

Polar bears depend on the sea ice surface to efficiently catch their seal prey. A shorter duration of ice cover over their productive hunting areas means less opportunity to hunt. A reduction in sea ice has been statistically linked to reduced stature and weight in polar bears and to lower survival rates of cubs. So, it doesn't really matter that hunting is now largely under control or that we know a lot about other impacts people might have on bears. Without habitat, polar bears will disappear no matter what else we do. If a farmer has 100 cows out in a pasture, and every year he goes out and paves over some of his pasture, pretty soon he won't have enough habitat to support 100 cows. And, each time he paves over a little more land, his remaining land will hold fewer cattle. There may be some short-term enhancements of the remaining habitat that will forestall the inevitable. But, when his whole pasture is paved there will be no cows! Declining habitat now and the assurance it will decline in the future is why polar bears were listed as a threatened species. Discussions about how many bears may have lived in the past before and after hunting quotas have no bearing on this new situation.

Planetary physics require the world to warm as greenhouse gas concentrations rise, so without greenhouse gas mitigation, the ice will continue to melt. For an animal dependent on sea ice to survive, the prospects are not good. As the ice decline continues, the plight of the polar bear only can worsen.

* For a fascinating look at where this widely repeated myth comes from, read"Magic Number: A sketchy 'fact' about polar bears keeps going … and going .. and going" by Peter Dykstra, published in the Society of Environmental Journalists' SEJournal.
 
Oddly, in reading the scientific papers concerning AGW, I have not seen the doomsday predictions you proclaim that most of the climate scientists are supposed to be making. What I have seen is often conservative predictions of the climate scientists happening sooner than expected. What is being said in most of the predictions is that we are giving our children a world that is less than we should be giving them. Even a foot more of sea level rise by 2100 is going to cost us. Should that end up as 3 feet, then the cost will be astronomical. We pretty much know that we will reach the one foot level, and 3 feet is possible.

In 1981, Dr. Hansen made some bold predictions for that time. All have come to pass, and sooner than expected.

And in the 70's they were warning about the coming ice age. Does that sound like consensus to you?
No, dumb fuck, they were not. The majority of the scientists publishing in peer reviewed journals at that time were predicting warming rather than cooling.

And you have had this pointed out to you before. That you repeat this lie is an indictation of your lack of character.


What were climate scientists predicting in the 1970s?

Peer-Reviewed Literature
However, these are media articles, not scientific studies. A survey of peer reviewed scientific papers from 1965 to 1979 show that few papers predicted global cooling (7 in total). Significantly more papers (42 in total) predicted global warming (Peterson 2008). The large majority of climate research in the 1970s predicted the Earth would warm as a consequence of CO2. Rather than 1970s scientists predicting cooling, the opposite is the case.

1970s_papers.gif

Figure 1: Number of papers classified as predicting global cooling (blue) or warming (red). In no year were there more cooling papers than warming papers (Peterson 2008).

Scientific Consensus
In the 1970s, the most comprehensive study on climate change (and the closest thing to a scientific consensus at the time) was the 1975 US National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council Report. Their basic conclusion was "…we do not have a good quantitative understanding of our climate machine and what determines its course. Without the fundamental understanding, it does not seem possible to predict climate…"

This is in strong contrast with the current position of the US National Academy of Sciences: "...there is now strong evidence that significant global warming is occurring... It is likely that most of the warming in recent decades can be attributed to human activities... The scientific understanding of climate change is now sufficiently clear to justify nations taking prompt action." This is in a joint statement with the Academies of Science from Brazil, France, Canada, China, Germany, India, Italy, Japan, Russia and the United Kingdom.

In contrast to the 1970s, there are now a number of scientific bodies that have released statements affirming man-made global warming. More on scientific consensus...

Yet Time published this in Apr 1977
time-magazine-april-1977.jpg
 
Dupes don't know the diff between sea ice and crap ice, what half their bs is based on..
The GOP and GOP dupes are the only peoplle in the world denying this...This year it's gotten totally out of hand. Every month is the hottest ever....

So party first the GOP is now cheering Russian hacking of election. Unbelievable.

You're a fucking liar, British courts have declared it a farce.

British Court Rules Al Gore Film Exaggerated Climate Claims | Fox News
And you're an ignorant brainwashed functional moron who can't learn a gd thing...
 
Oddly, in reading the scientific papers concerning AGW, I have not seen the doomsday predictions you proclaim that most of the climate scientists are supposed to be making. What I have seen is often conservative predictions of the climate scientists happening sooner than expected. What is being said in most of the predictions is that we are giving our children a world that is less than we should be giving them. Even a foot more of sea level rise by 2100 is going to cost us. Should that end up as 3 feet, then the cost will be astronomical. We pretty much know that we will reach the one foot level, and 3 feet is possible.

In 1981, Dr. Hansen made some bold predictions for that time. All have come to pass, and sooner than expected.

And in the 70's they were warning about the coming ice age. Does that sound like consensus to you?
No, dumb fuck, they were not. The majority of the scientists publishing in peer reviewed journals at that time were predicting warming rather than cooling.

And you have had this pointed out to you before. That you repeat this lie is an indictation of your lack of character.


What were climate scientists predicting in the 1970s?

Peer-Reviewed Literature
However, these are media articles, not scientific studies. A survey of peer reviewed scientific papers from 1965 to 1979 show that few papers predicted global cooling (7 in total). Significantly more papers (42 in total) predicted global warming (Peterson 2008). The large majority of climate research in the 1970s predicted the Earth would warm as a consequence of CO2. Rather than 1970s scientists predicting cooling, the opposite is the case.

1970s_papers.gif

Figure 1: Number of papers classified as predicting global cooling (blue) or warming (red). In no year were there more cooling papers than warming papers (Peterson 2008).

Scientific Consensus
In the 1970s, the most comprehensive study on climate change (and the closest thing to a scientific consensus at the time) was the 1975 US National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council Report. Their basic conclusion was "…we do not have a good quantitative understanding of our climate machine and what determines its course. Without the fundamental understanding, it does not seem possible to predict climate…"

This is in strong contrast with the current position of the US National Academy of Sciences: "...there is now strong evidence that significant global warming is occurring... It is likely that most of the warming in recent decades can be attributed to human activities... The scientific understanding of climate change is now sufficiently clear to justify nations taking prompt action." This is in a joint statement with the Academies of Science from Brazil, France, Canada, China, Germany, India, Italy, Japan, Russia and the United Kingdom.

In contrast to the 1970s, there are now a number of scientific bodies that have released statements affirming man-made global warming. More on scientific consensus...

Yet Time published this in Apr 1977View attachment 87679
That was a stupid fad that only TIME took seriously, nothing like this, dumbass. And now you've parrotted ALL the usual GOP bs...
 
The GOP and GOP dupes are the only peoplle in the world denying this...This year it's gotten totally out of hand. Every month is the hottest ever....

So party first the GOP is now cheering Russian hacking of election. Unbelievable.

You're a fucking liar, British courts have declared it a farce.

British Court Rules Al Gore Film Exaggerated Climate Claims | Fox News
U.K. Judge Rules Gore's Climate Film Has 9 Errors

High Court Judge Michael Burton, deciding a lawsuit that questioned the film's suitability for showing in British classrooms, said Wednesday that the movie builds a "powerful" case that global warming is caused by humans and that urgent means are needed to counter it.

But he also said Gore makes nine statements in the film that are not supported by current mainstream scientific consensus. Teachers, Burton concluded, could show the film but must alert students to what the judge called errors.

The film continues to be shown in British schools. And the nine errors are to be pointed out, none of which have anything to do with the premise that AGW is real and a clear and present danger.

So we just ignore the fact that temps flattened out for 15 years?
 
The GOP and GOP dupes are the only peoplle in the world denying this...This year it's gotten totally out of hand. Every month is the hottest ever....

So party first the GOP is now cheering Russian hacking of election. Unbelievable.

You're a fucking liar, British courts have declared it a farce.

British Court Rules Al Gore Film Exaggerated Climate Claims | Fox News
U.K. Judge Rules Gore's Climate Film Has 9 Errors

High Court Judge Michael Burton, deciding a lawsuit that questioned the film's suitability for showing in British classrooms, said Wednesday that the movie builds a "powerful" case that global warming is caused by humans and that urgent means are needed to counter it.

But he also said Gore makes nine statements in the film that are not supported by current mainstream scientific consensus. Teachers, Burton concluded, could show the film but must alert students to what the judge called errors.

The film continues to be shown in British schools. And the nine errors are to be pointed out, none of which have anything to do with the premise that AGW is real and a clear and present danger.

So we just ignore the fact that temps flattened out for 15 years?
Not true, as always. Sea temps went up when air temps didn't. Read something.
 
The GOP and GOP dupes are the only peoplle in the world denying this...This year it's gotten totally out of hand. Every month is the hottest ever....

So party first the GOP is now cheering Russian hacking of election. Unbelievable.

You're a fucking liar, British courts have declared it a farce.

British Court Rules Al Gore Film Exaggerated Climate Claims | Fox News
U.K. Judge Rules Gore's Climate Film Has 9 Errors

High Court Judge Michael Burton, deciding a lawsuit that questioned the film's suitability for showing in British classrooms, said Wednesday that the movie builds a "powerful" case that global warming is caused by humans and that urgent means are needed to counter it.

But he also said Gore makes nine statements in the film that are not supported by current mainstream scientific consensus. Teachers, Burton concluded, could show the film but must alert students to what the judge called errors.

The film continues to be shown in British schools. And the nine errors are to be pointed out, none of which have anything to do with the premise that AGW is real and a clear and present danger.

So we just ignore the fact that temps flattened out for 15 years?
Not true, as always. Sea temps went up when air temps didn't. Read something.

And now they say the seas are cooling.

Cooler Pacific Ocean Temperatures Might Explain Global Warming ‘Hiatus’

Cooler Pacific Ocean Temperatures Might Explain Global Warming 'Hiatus'

You were saying?
 
The GOP and GOP dupes are the only peoplle in the world denying this...This year it's gotten totally out of hand. Every month is the hottest ever....

So party first the GOP is now cheering Russian hacking of election. Unbelievable.

You're a fucking liar, British courts have declared it a farce.

British Court Rules Al Gore Film Exaggerated Climate Claims | Fox News
U.K. Judge Rules Gore's Climate Film Has 9 Errors

High Court Judge Michael Burton, deciding a lawsuit that questioned the film's suitability for showing in British classrooms, said Wednesday that the movie builds a "powerful" case that global warming is caused by humans and that urgent means are needed to counter it.

But he also said Gore makes nine statements in the film that are not supported by current mainstream scientific consensus. Teachers, Burton concluded, could show the film but must alert students to what the judge called errors.

The film continues to be shown in British schools. And the nine errors are to be pointed out, none of which have anything to do with the premise that AGW is real and a clear and present danger.

So we just ignore the fact that temps flattened out for 15 years?
Not true, as always. Sea temps went up when air temps didn't. Read something.

And now they say the seas are cooling.

Cooler Pacific Ocean Temperatures Might Explain Global Warming ‘Hiatus’

Cooler Pacific Ocean Temperatures Might Explain Global Warming 'Hiatus'

You were saying?
The GOP and GOP dupes are the only peoplle in the world denying this...This year it's gotten totally out of hand. Every month is the hottest ever....

So party first the GOP is now cheering Russian hacking of election. Unbelievable.

You're a fucking liar, British courts have declared it a farce.

British Court Rules Al Gore Film Exaggerated Climate Claims | Fox News
U.K. Judge Rules Gore's Climate Film Has 9 Errors

High Court Judge Michael Burton, deciding a lawsuit that questioned the film's suitability for showing in British classrooms, said Wednesday that the movie builds a "powerful" case that global warming is caused by humans and that urgent means are needed to counter it.

But he also said Gore makes nine statements in the film that are not supported by current mainstream scientific consensus. Teachers, Burton concluded, could show the film but must alert students to what the judge called errors.

The film continues to be shown in British schools. And the nine errors are to be pointed out, none of which have anything to do with the premise that AGW is real and a clear and present danger.

So we just ignore the fact that temps flattened out for 15 years?
Not true, as always. Sea temps went up when air temps didn't. Read something.

And now they say the seas are cooling.

Cooler Pacific Ocean Temperatures Might Explain Global Warming ‘Hiatus’

Cooler Pacific Ocean Temperatures Might Explain Global Warming 'Hiatus'

You were saying?
This chart of rising ocean temperatures is terrifying | Grist
grist.org/climate-energy/this-chart-of-rising-ocean-temperatures-is-terrifying/
Grist
Jan 22, 2015 - Warmer oceans matter because “global warming” doesn't just mean above average airtemperatures over the course of a year — it actually ...
Warming of oceans due to climate change is unstoppable, say US ...
www.theguardian.com › Environment › Climate change
The Guardian
Jul 16, 2015 - The warming of the oceans due to climate change is now unstoppable after recordtemperatures last year, bringing additional sea-level rise, ...
The oceans are warming so fast, they keep breaking scientists' charts ...
www.theguardian.com › Environment › Climate change
The Guardian
Jan 22, 2015 - This ocean warming data is the clearest nail in that coffin. ... as much as 240% if sea-surface temperatures rise 2C, say Australian researchers.
Ocean Warming: Probing a Blue Abyss | Climate Central
www.climatecentral.org/news/2014-in-review-ocean-warming-18417
Climate Central
Dec 30, 2014 - The effects of ocean warming might be imperceptible to most of us, but they ... During 2014, as rising ocean heat fueled planetary temperature ...
 
You're a fucking liar, British courts have declared it a farce.

British Court Rules Al Gore Film Exaggerated Climate Claims | Fox News
U.K. Judge Rules Gore's Climate Film Has 9 Errors

High Court Judge Michael Burton, deciding a lawsuit that questioned the film's suitability for showing in British classrooms, said Wednesday that the movie builds a "powerful" case that global warming is caused by humans and that urgent means are needed to counter it.

But he also said Gore makes nine statements in the film that are not supported by current mainstream scientific consensus. Teachers, Burton concluded, could show the film but must alert students to what the judge called errors.

The film continues to be shown in British schools. And the nine errors are to be pointed out, none of which have anything to do with the premise that AGW is real and a clear and present danger.

So we just ignore the fact that temps flattened out for 15 years?
Not true, as always. Sea temps went up when air temps didn't. Read something.

And now they say the seas are cooling.

Cooler Pacific Ocean Temperatures Might Explain Global Warming ‘Hiatus’

Cooler Pacific Ocean Temperatures Might Explain Global Warming 'Hiatus'

You were saying?
You're a fucking liar, British courts have declared it a farce.

British Court Rules Al Gore Film Exaggerated Climate Claims | Fox News
U.K. Judge Rules Gore's Climate Film Has 9 Errors

High Court Judge Michael Burton, deciding a lawsuit that questioned the film's suitability for showing in British classrooms, said Wednesday that the movie builds a "powerful" case that global warming is caused by humans and that urgent means are needed to counter it.

But he also said Gore makes nine statements in the film that are not supported by current mainstream scientific consensus. Teachers, Burton concluded, could show the film but must alert students to what the judge called errors.

The film continues to be shown in British schools. And the nine errors are to be pointed out, none of which have anything to do with the premise that AGW is real and a clear and present danger.

So we just ignore the fact that temps flattened out for 15 years?
Not true, as always. Sea temps went up when air temps didn't. Read something.

And now they say the seas are cooling.

Cooler Pacific Ocean Temperatures Might Explain Global Warming ‘Hiatus’

Cooler Pacific Ocean Temperatures Might Explain Global Warming 'Hiatus'

You were saying?
This chart of rising ocean temperatures is terrifying | Grist
grist.org/climate-energy/this-chart-of-rising-ocean-temperatures-is-terrifying/
Grist
Jan 22, 2015 - Warmer oceans matter because “global warming” doesn't just mean above average airtemperatures over the course of a year — it actually ...
Warming of oceans due to climate change is unstoppable, say US ...
www.theguardian.com › Environment › Climate change
The Guardian
Jul 16, 2015 - The warming of the oceans due to climate change is now unstoppable after recordtemperatures last year, bringing additional sea-level rise, ...
The oceans are warming so fast, they keep breaking scientists' charts ...
www.theguardian.com › Environment › Climate change
The Guardian
Jan 22, 2015 - This ocean warming data is the clearest nail in that coffin. ... as much as 240% if sea-surface temperatures rise 2C, say Australian researchers.
Ocean Warming: Probing a Blue Abyss | Climate Central
www.climatecentral.org/news/2014-in-review-ocean-warming-18417
Climate Central
Dec 30, 2014 - The effects of ocean warming might be imperceptible to most of us, but they ... During 2014, as rising ocean heat fueled planetary temperature ...

Didn't you just say air temps weren't rising?
 
U.K. Judge Rules Gore's Climate Film Has 9 Errors

High Court Judge Michael Burton, deciding a lawsuit that questioned the film's suitability for showing in British classrooms, said Wednesday that the movie builds a "powerful" case that global warming is caused by humans and that urgent means are needed to counter it.

But he also said Gore makes nine statements in the film that are not supported by current mainstream scientific consensus. Teachers, Burton concluded, could show the film but must alert students to what the judge called errors.

The film continues to be shown in British schools. And the nine errors are to be pointed out, none of which have anything to do with the premise that AGW is real and a clear and present danger.

So we just ignore the fact that temps flattened out for 15 years?
Not true, as always. Sea temps went up when air temps didn't. Read something.

And now they say the seas are cooling.

Cooler Pacific Ocean Temperatures Might Explain Global Warming ‘Hiatus’

Cooler Pacific Ocean Temperatures Might Explain Global Warming 'Hiatus'

You were saying?
U.K. Judge Rules Gore's Climate Film Has 9 Errors

High Court Judge Michael Burton, deciding a lawsuit that questioned the film's suitability for showing in British classrooms, said Wednesday that the movie builds a "powerful" case that global warming is caused by humans and that urgent means are needed to counter it.

But he also said Gore makes nine statements in the film that are not supported by current mainstream scientific consensus. Teachers, Burton concluded, could show the film but must alert students to what the judge called errors.

The film continues to be shown in British schools. And the nine errors are to be pointed out, none of which have anything to do with the premise that AGW is real and a clear and present danger.

So we just ignore the fact that temps flattened out for 15 years?
Not true, as always. Sea temps went up when air temps didn't. Read something.

And now they say the seas are cooling.

Cooler Pacific Ocean Temperatures Might Explain Global Warming ‘Hiatus’

Cooler Pacific Ocean Temperatures Might Explain Global Warming 'Hiatus'

You were saying?
This chart of rising ocean temperatures is terrifying | Grist
grist.org/climate-energy/this-chart-of-rising-ocean-temperatures-is-terrifying/
Grist
Jan 22, 2015 - Warmer oceans matter because “global warming” doesn't just mean above average airtemperatures over the course of a year — it actually ...
Warming of oceans due to climate change is unstoppable, say US ...
www.theguardian.com › Environment › Climate change
The Guardian
Jul 16, 2015 - The warming of the oceans due to climate change is now unstoppable after recordtemperatures last year, bringing additional sea-level rise, ...
The oceans are warming so fast, they keep breaking scientists' charts ...
www.theguardian.com › Environment › Climate change
The Guardian
Jan 22, 2015 - This ocean warming data is the clearest nail in that coffin. ... as much as 240% if sea-surface temperatures rise 2C, say Australian researchers.
Ocean Warming: Probing a Blue Abyss | Climate Central
www.climatecentral.org/news/2014-in-review-ocean-warming-18417
Climate Central
Dec 30, 2014 - The effects of ocean warming might be imperceptible to most of us, but they ... During 2014, as rising ocean heat fueled planetary temperature ...

Didn't you just say air temps weren't rising?
No, I said they didn't for a while, and during that time it was the seas that were...They have 3000 buoys now EVERYWHERE so they know...
 
Oddly, in reading the scientific papers concerning AGW, I have not seen the doomsday predictions you proclaim that most of the climate scientists are supposed to be making. What I have seen is often conservative predictions of the climate scientists happening sooner than expected. What is being said in most of the predictions is that we are giving our children a world that is less than we should be giving them. Even a foot more of sea level rise by 2100 is going to cost us. Should that end up as 3 feet, then the cost will be astronomical. We pretty much know that we will reach the one foot level, and 3 feet is possible.

In 1981, Dr. Hansen made some bold predictions for that time. All have come to pass, and sooner than expected.

And in the 70's they were warning about the coming ice age. Does that sound like consensus to you?
No, dumb fuck, they were not. The majority of the scientists publishing in peer reviewed journals at that time were predicting warming rather than cooling.

And you have had this pointed out to you before. That you repeat this lie is an indictation of your lack of character.


What were climate scientists predicting in the 1970s?

Peer-Reviewed Literature
However, these are media articles, not scientific studies. A survey of peer reviewed scientific papers from 1965 to 1979 show that few papers predicted global cooling (7 in total). Significantly more papers (42 in total) predicted global warming (Peterson 2008). The large majority of climate research in the 1970s predicted the Earth would warm as a consequence of CO2. Rather than 1970s scientists predicting cooling, the opposite is the case.

1970s_papers.gif

Figure 1: Number of papers classified as predicting global cooling (blue) or warming (red). In no year were there more cooling papers than warming papers (Peterson 2008).

Scientific Consensus
In the 1970s, the most comprehensive study on climate change (and the closest thing to a scientific consensus at the time) was the 1975 US National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council Report. Their basic conclusion was "…we do not have a good quantitative understanding of our climate machine and what determines its course. Without the fundamental understanding, it does not seem possible to predict climate…"

This is in strong contrast with the current position of the US National Academy of Sciences: "...there is now strong evidence that significant global warming is occurring... It is likely that most of the warming in recent decades can be attributed to human activities... The scientific understanding of climate change is now sufficiently clear to justify nations taking prompt action." This is in a joint statement with the Academies of Science from Brazil, France, Canada, China, Germany, India, Italy, Japan, Russia and the United Kingdom.

In contrast to the 1970s, there are now a number of scientific bodies that have released statements affirming man-made global warming. More on scientific consensus...

Yet Time published this in Apr 1977View attachment 87679

Yet you continue to be a sucker that does not check sources. LOL

Sorry, a TIME Magazine Cover Did Not Predict a Coming Ice Age | TIME.com

Ads, jokes and protests are one thing, though — hoax covers are something else entirely. And that’s the problem with a faked TIME cover about global warming that’s been floating around the Internet for some time. (Hat tip to the science blogger David Kirtley, who posted on this a couple of days ago.) You can see it here:



The cover on the right is real. (I should know — I wrote the story about China and India that’s mentioned in the subhead.) The one on the left is very much not. It’s a doctored version of this cover, from 2007:

1101070409_400.jpg



(MORE: The (Virtually) Tornado-Proof Hospital: What Moore Can Learn From Joplin)

Apparently the hoax cover has been floating around the Internet for at least a few years. I’m not sure who created it, and it doesn’t seem to have gotten a whole lot of traction, even among climate-science deniers. Though kudos to whoever initially put the fake cover together. That’s some pretty good photoshopping.
 
The GOP and GOP dupes are the only peoplle in the world denying this...This year it's gotten totally out of hand. Every month is the hottest ever....

So party first the GOP is now cheering Russian hacking of election. Unbelievable.

You're a fucking liar, British courts have declared it a farce.

British Court Rules Al Gore Film Exaggerated Climate Claims | Fox News
LOL. The GOP is the only party that denies, despite its stupid propaganda.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwidn4qd4urOAhWB7iYKHZpVBsgQFggeMAA&url=http://www.polarbearsinternational.org/about-polar-bears/what-scientists-say/are-polar-bear-populations-booming&usg=AFQjCNFwhkj67eX1EU1ba79_pf-weVmzfg
LOL. The Democrats are the only party that believes, despite its stupid propaganda.
 

Forum List

Back
Top