How will Republicans be able to escape the charge of complicity with Russia and Putin?

Apparently, denial isn't just a river in Egypt.
 
As Trump Struggles With Helsinki’s Fallout, Congress Faces a New Charge: Complicity

WASHINGTON — In the nearly two years since Russia attacked the American democratic process, congressional Republicans have played conflicting roles in the drama: Some have pressed to impose sanctions on Russia and quietly pursue investigations, but they have been outshouted by Republicans who have obfuscated and undercut efforts to uncover the Kremlin’s plot.

And when the House Intelligence Committee closed its Russia investigation, declaring no evidence of collusion, it raised doubts about the intelligence agencies’ conclusion that Mr. Trump had wanted Mr. Putin to win, before backtracking. (In Helsinki last week, Mr. Putin confirmed that he had indeed wanted Mr. Trump to win. “Yes, I did. Yes, I did,” he told reporters.)

“No prior president has ever abased himself more abjectly before a tyrant,” Mr. McCain said in the wake of the summit meeting.

But a day later, at a regular forum hosted by the Freedom Caucus, lawmakers close to Mr. Trump declared the meeting a success, pinning blame not on his performance but on the reporters who had the audacity to ask the two leaders about the attacks.

--------------------------

If Russia can have something on Trump, isn't it possible they have something on other Republicans? There has to be a reason for this sudden embrace of Russia.



lock-hillary-up-ben-garrison_1_orig.jpg
 
As Trump Struggles With Helsinki’s Fallout, Congress Faces a New Charge: Complicity

WASHINGTON — In the nearly two years since Russia attacked the American democratic process, congressional Republicans have played conflicting roles in the drama: Some have pressed to impose sanctions on Russia and quietly pursue investigations, but they have been outshouted by Republicans who have obfuscated and undercut efforts to uncover the Kremlin’s plot.

And when the House Intelligence Committee closed its Russia investigation, declaring no evidence of collusion, it raised doubts about the intelligence agencies’ conclusion that Mr. Trump had wanted Mr. Putin to win, before backtracking. (In Helsinki last week, Mr. Putin confirmed that he had indeed wanted Mr. Trump to win. “Yes, I did. Yes, I did,” he told reporters.)

“No prior president has ever abased himself more abjectly before a tyrant,” Mr. McCain said in the wake of the summit meeting.

But a day later, at a regular forum hosted by the Freedom Caucus, lawmakers close to Mr. Trump declared the meeting a success, pinning blame not on his performance but on the reporters who had the audacity to ask the two leaders about the attacks.

--------------------------

If Russia can have something on Trump, isn't it possible they have something on other Republicans? There has to be a reason for this sudden embrace of Russia.
'There has to be a reason for this sudden embrace of Russia.'

In 2014 Obama gave Putin 20% of the US supply of uranium, Crimea, TOP SECRRT CLASSIFIED info, & a free hand to hack and interfere.

Obama laughed at Romney calling Russia a threat, and Hillar gave the Russians a plastic reset prop that was supposed to make us bestest buddies....

Hillary took over $100 MILLION from the KGB Bank, Bill took $500k from them...

John Podesta took thousands of unreported Russian stock....

Hillary paid foreign spies and Russians for an unverified document she used illegally in a US election...

And you want to post some butt-hurt rant, accusing others of doing what Democrats do and of being who Democras are...
 
If Russia can have something on Trump, isn't it possible they have something on other Republicans?

WTF, so much for relying on anything resembling facts.

If, possible, something gee we are up to our eyeballs in hard facts here. :lol:
Hard facts.

191 criminal charges
35 indictments
5 guilty pleas
2 in jail.

You can't get facts any harder than those, right? Well? Right?
And not one of those have anything to do with Trump and illegal collusion with Russians...

Going on 3 years now you still have NO evidence of any crime.

Your only hope lies in a porn star and the violation of attorney-client privilege by a desperate criminal Special Counsel...

LOL
 
If Russia can have something on Trump, isn't it possible they have something on other Republicans?

WTF, so much for relying on anything resembling facts.

Facts??

They don't need facts. All they need are a bunch of unproven, unsubstantiated ideas that some one came up with. Mostly lefty idiots.

You can't cure tree stump dumb.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top