How Will Obama, His Thugs & Liberal Commentators Spin Upcoming Stagnant Economy ?

Mar 16, 2012
1,720
110
0
Sarasota & Naples, Florida

:argue::eusa_snooty::blahblah:
As we enter the six months prior to the election, we all know the stock market is likely to remain stagnant as investors are anxiously waiting and assuming Romney will win.
It will be the equivalent of the anticipation of Ronald Reagan in November of 1980.
Didnt the stock market gradually shoot up after he won?
We have already seen the forcast for the summer, NOT GOOD !!
Now all of those butthead liberals are going to have to explain to Hannity and O'Reilly why the economy has all of a sudden declined.
And keep in mind, they have been trying to convince us that the economy has been roaring back for quite some time.:blahblah::cow:
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #2
and did any of you catch that pow-wow about a week/10 days ago on some Fox News program when the dumbass liberal was fighting with a conservative, and he claimed "all indicators are showing a vigorous recovery on the way",,,well something like that, then the conservative told the twirp off !!! like,,,yah right, unemployment 8.3....15 Trillion, 1.3 Trillion defecit,,,etc,,,etc,,,,
and if the economy is recovering so well,,then how come Yobama still needs to borrow a trillion a year?
 
Obama proposed a program and it was blocked by the Republicans in the House. This is the issue.

Of course Obama's program was mere window dressing. He knew it had no chance. And even if it did get passed it was merely a re-do of his failed stimulus, the worst economic policy move since Smoot-Hawley.
 
Obama proposed a program and it was blocked by the Republicans in the House. This is the issue.

Of course Obama's program was mere window dressing. He knew it had no chance. And even if it did get passed it was merely a re-do of his failed stimulus, the worst economic policy move since Smoot-Hawley.

hasn't both of his proposed budgets gone down in flames,,, what? did one person vote for obama's budget?




:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #6
as we go into the summer months with a more realistic 9% unemployment, with the monthly figures far off the recent 200,000 jobs per month, its going to be interesting to see Wasserman explain it away.
 
There was a headline earlier today on yahoo. An AP article claimed that the economy was greatly improved and the unemployment was down in all the swing states, which would help Obama. The article disappeared. What a huge pile of shit to try and put that out there. Only koolaid drinkers would even believe it.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #9
These next 4 weeks are going to determine the economy for the summer, and I dont see any sign of any improvement, I follow the stock market all the time,,,its been soooo stagnant,,,hovering around 13,000 for the longest time! I guess Obama isnt God after all. More Like Barney the Dinosor.
 
The UE rate is down largely because people are dropping out of the workforce, not because they are working. Job creation has barely kept up with increasing available workers.
 
as we go into the summer months with a more realistic 9% unemployment, with the monthly figures far off the recent 200,000 jobs per month, its going to be interesting to see Wasserman explain it away.


She will just follow the playbook.

Bush screwed everything up.
It was worse then we all thought.
Obama could have fixed it all.
But the Republicans everyone of them pretty much racist
refused to work with the President.

And Chris Mathews and all the rest of the employed by the WH staff
will agree with her completely and we go from there.
 
Thugs my azz, ya brainwashed tool if the greedy rich.

Dems will resort to the truth, including Pub plans to cut taxes on the bloated rich and destroy Medicare and WAY overdue health reform, which the US doesn't understand. Pub misinformation is rampant.
 
Obama has added 4.1 million jobs since 2009.

Here’s what Bush left us with.....

Aug 2008 - 334,000 net JOBS LOST
Sep 2008 - 458,000 net JOBS LOST
Oct 2008 - 554,000 net JOBS LOST
Nov 2008 - 728,000 net JOBS LOST
Dec 2008 - 673,000 net JOBS LOST
Jan 2009 - 779,000 net JOBS LOST
 
The Dow just reached a 4 year high. The Nasdaq just reached an 11 year high.

Obama is the Democrats Reagan.
 
.

Pretty simple, really.

The Democrat line will be "Obama inherited an economy that was so damaged that there was no way he could turn it around in 4 years."

The Republican line will be "4 years should have been enough time to turn it around, and his policies have clearly delayed full recovery."

The reality is, as always, probably somewhere in the middle. But regardless of the spin, the unemployment rate and its trajectory will make all of the standard rhetorical noise irrelevant. Which is good, I suppose, because the standard rhetorical noise SHOULD be irrelevant.

.
 
and remember how the lefty commentators often said :"well at this time during the Reagan years"? as if by the third year the economy will be roaring back? has it? especially alan colmes, once when bill backed him into a corner spewing all the bad news on the economy, he decided to use the Reagan At This Time Excuse,,,,,,yup,,,,things sure are better now,,,i cant keep up with all the pre-approved visa offers.
 
Reagan had nothing like this economy- , and didn't have a do nothing, block everything Pub congress, and banks for that matter, or a fear mongering opposition propaganda machine- all of whom want to go back to the policies that produced this mess- total ideological bs madness.

I know, let's cut taxes on the bloated rich, destroy Medicare, and lower the deficit- in 2036...
 
Last edited:

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top