How to legally have sex with children.

I had no idea children that young could be married in this country :(

I did!

Wrote about it a few times on other sites. What the OP left out is some states also need a judge to sign off on the marriage beside the Consenting Parent or guardian.

I believe Marriage laws should be changed to the age of 21 and with court permission because of pregnancy then 18.

( Most people before 25 have no clue what love is and live with lust instead... )

The problem is biology is still biology and humans can have children when they are children themselves.

So basically kids can get pregnant, but we then are saying if they want to legalize their relationship they cannot.
That is part of the problem, our biological maturity precedes by many years our brain maturity.

I am ok with 18 as the age, with 16 and 17 with a judge and parental permission.

But 10? 12? 14? No.

Well then we better start figuring out a way to stop the downward trend of sexual maturity we are seeing in girls and the ability of boys to father kids with them, or we basically create a situation where we are saying "it's OK, knock a girl up and we can't even try to make you do the right thing"

Biology seems to be going one direction with the decreasing in age of sexual maturing, and we now take much longer to mature intellectually, emotionally, and more importantly, legally.
Do you really think it is "doing the right thing" to have 10 and 13 year olds marry? What does that say about marriage? Talk about a travesty.
It doesn't mean the children shouldn't be held responsible, but not by a marriage contract.
 
I had no idea children that young could be married in this country :(

I did!

Wrote about it a few times on other sites. What the OP left out is some states also need a judge to sign off on the marriage beside the Consenting Parent or guardian.

I believe Marriage laws should be changed to the age of 21 and with court permission because of pregnancy then 18.

( Most people before 25 have no clue what love is and live with lust instead... )

The problem is biology is still biology and humans can have children when they are children themselves.

So basically kids can get pregnant, but we then are saying if they want to legalize their relationship they cannot.
That is part of the problem, our biological maturity precedes by many years our brain maturity.

I am ok with 18 as the age, with 16 and 17 with a judge and parental permission.

But 10? 12? 14? No.

Well then we better start figuring out a way to stop the downward trend of sexual maturity we are seeing in girls and the ability of boys to father kids with them, or we basically create a situation where we are saying "it's OK, knock a girl up and we can't even try to make you do the right thing"

Biology seems to be going one direction with the decreasing in age of sexual maturing, and we now take much longer to mature intellectually, emotionally, and more importantly, legally.
Do you really think it is "doing the right thing" to have 10 and 13 year olds marry? What does that say about marriage? Talk about a travesty.
It doesn't mean the children shouldn't be held responsible, but not by a marriage contract.

How else to hold them responsible? It's not like getting a divorce is such a big deal these days.

People after puberty having sex can result in children. Children group up better in a stable environment. Marriage usually creates the most stable environment.
 
I did!

Wrote about it a few times on other sites. What the OP left out is some states also need a judge to sign off on the marriage beside the Consenting Parent or guardian.

I believe Marriage laws should be changed to the age of 21 and with court permission because of pregnancy then 18.

( Most people before 25 have no clue what love is and live with lust instead... )

The problem is biology is still biology and humans can have children when they are children themselves.

So basically kids can get pregnant, but we then are saying if they want to legalize their relationship they cannot.
That is part of the problem, our biological maturity precedes by many years our brain maturity.

I am ok with 18 as the age, with 16 and 17 with a judge and parental permission.

But 10? 12? 14? No.

Well then we better start figuring out a way to stop the downward trend of sexual maturity we are seeing in girls and the ability of boys to father kids with them, or we basically create a situation where we are saying "it's OK, knock a girl up and we can't even try to make you do the right thing"

Biology seems to be going one direction with the decreasing in age of sexual maturing, and we now take much longer to mature intellectually, emotionally, and more importantly, legally.
Do you really think it is "doing the right thing" to have 10 and 13 year olds marry? What does that say about marriage? Talk about a travesty.
It doesn't mean the children shouldn't be held responsible, but not by a marriage contract.

How else to hold them responsible? It's not like getting a divorce is such a big deal these days.

People after puberty having sex can result in children. Children group up better in a stable environment. Marriage usually creates the most stable environment.

How do you hold your 10 and 13 year olds responsible? Same way.

They are way too young to rear children; they are nothing but children themselves.
The very idea of talking about this is the best advertisement for matter of fact sex education EARLY and availability of good birth control. Kids will experiment. They might as well be prepared as pregnant at 12.
 
Marry them.

In most states, there is no legal age for getting married. You only need the parents consent.

13,000 children a year are married in America

Three 10-year-old girls and an 11-year-old boy were among the youngest to wed, under legal loopholes which allow minors to marry in certain circumstances.

The minimum age for marriage across most of the US is 18, but every state has exemptions – such as parental consent or pregnancy – which allow younger children to tie the knot.

The youngest wedded were three 10-year-old girls in Tennessee who married men aged 24, 25 and 31 in 2001.

-------------------------------

Republicans complain that Muslims marry children. How many of these children in the US getting married are to Republican Conservatives?

Me personally, I feel that no one younger than 17 should be able to get married. And that with parents consent, just like going into the military.

In most states, there is no legal age for getting married. You only need the parents consent.
Bullshit.
Alabama The age of consent is eighteen. With parental consent, a person can marry at sixteen; however, parental consent is not required if the minor was previously married.
Alaska The age of consent is eighteen. With parental consent, a person can marry at sixteen. EXCEPTION: parties under the age of eighteen who are members of the U.S. armed forces are not required to provide parental consent (while on active duty). Also, marriage under the age of sixteen is possible if there's a court order.
Arizona The age of consent is eighteen. With parental consent, a person can marry at sixteen, as long as one party isn't more than three years older than the minor.
Arkansas The age of consent is eighteen. With parental consent, a male can marry at seventeen, and a female can marry at sixteen.
California The age of consent is eighteen. With parental consent, there are no age limits regarding the minimum age for a couple to marry.
Colorado The age of consent is eighteen. With parental consent, a person can marry at sixteen. If under sixteen, a person can marry with parental consent and judicial approval.
Connecticut The age of consent is eighteen. With parental consent, a person can marry at sixteen.
Delaware The age of consent is eighteen.
Florida The age of consent is eighteen. With parental consent, a person can marry at seventeen as long as one party isn't more than two years older than the minor.
Georgia The age of consent is eighteen. With parental consent, a person can marry at sixteen.
Hawaii The age of consent is eighteen. With parental consent, a person can marry at sixteen. A person who is fifteen can marry with parental consent and judicial approval.
Idaho The age of consent is eighteen. With parental consent, a person can marry at sixteen. If under sixteen, a person can marry with parental consent and judicial approval.
Illinois The age of consent is eighteen. With parental consent, a person can marry at sixteen.
Indiana The age of consent is eighteen. With parental consent, a person can marry at seventeen. A person who is fifteen or sixteen can marry with parental consent and judicial approval, which is given if the couple is expecting a child or the parents of a child.
Iowa The age of consent is eighteen. With parental consent, a person can marry at sixteen.
Kansas The age of consent is eighteen. With parental consent, a person can marry at sixteen. With judicial approval, a person can marry at age fifteen.
Kentucky The age of consent is eighteen. With judicial approval, a person can marry at seventeen.
Louisiana The age of consent is eighteen. With parental consent, a person can marry at sixteen. A person who is under sixteen can marry with parental consent and judicial approval.
Maine The age of consent is eighteen. With parental consent, a person can marry at sixteen. A person who is under sixteen can marry with parental consent and judicial approval.
Maryland The age of consent is eighteen. With parental consent or proof of pregnancy/birth of a child, parties can marry at sixteen. A person can marry at fifteen with parental consent and there's proof the female is pregnant or has given birth to a child.
Massachusetts The age of consent is eighteen. With parental consent and judicial approval, a person can marry under the age of eighteen.
Michigan The age of consent is eighteen. With parental consent, a person can marry at sixteen.
Minnesota The age of consent is eighteen. With parental consent, a person can marry at sixteen.
Mississippi The age of consent is twenty-one. With parental consent, males can marry at seventeen and females can marry at fifteen.
Missouri The age of consent is eighteen. With parental consent, a person can marry at fifteen. A person under fifteen may get married if good cause is shown and such unusual circumstances conditions that make the marriage advisable.
Montana The age of consent is eighteen. With parental consent and after at least two separate counseling sessions, a person can marry at sixteen.
Nebraska The age of consent is nineteen. With parental consent, a person can marry at seventeen.
Nevada The age of consent is eighteen. With parental consent, a person can marry at sixteen. A person under sixteen can marry with parental consent and judicial approval.
New Hampshire The age of consent is eighteen. With parental consent and the consent of the judge, a person can marry at sixteen.
New Jersey The age of consent is eighteen.
New Mexico The age of consent is eighteen. With parental consent, a person can marry at sixteen. A person under sixteen can marry by order of a children's or family division of district court.
New York The age of consent is eighteen. With parental and judicial consent, a person can marry at seventeen.
North Carolina The age of consent is eighteen. With parental consent, a person can marry at sixteen. A person can marry at fourteen with judicial consent, which is given if the person is pregnant or has given birth to a child.
North Dakota The age of consent is eighteen. With parental consent, a person can marry at sixteen.
Ohio The age of consent is eighteen. With parental consent, females can marry at sixteen.
Oklahoma The age of consent is eighteen. With parental consent, a person can marry at sixteen. A person under sixteen may marry if authorized by the court.
Oregon The age of consent is eighteen. With parental consent, a person can marry at seventeen.
Pennsylvania The age of consent is eighteen. With parental consent, a person can marry at sixteen. A person under sixteen can marry with court approval, which is given if it's in the best interest of the person.
Rhode Island The age of consent is eighteen. With parental consent, a person can marry at sixteen. A person can marry under the age of sixteen if approved by the family court.
South Carolina The age of consent is eighteen. With parental consent, a person can marry at sixteen. NOTE: If the couple is expecting a baby or have had a child together, they can marry under eighteen with the approval of one of the female's parents.
South Dakota The age of consent is eighteen. With parental consent, a person can marry at sixteen.
Tennessee The age of consent is eighteen. With parental consent, a person can marry at seventeen; however, one party cannot be more than four years older than the minor.
Texas The age of consent is eighteen. With a court order, a person can marry under the age of eighteen.
Utah The age of consent is eighteen. With parental consent, a person can marry at sixteen. A person can marry at age fifteen with parental consent and judicial approval or court commissioner.
Vermont The age of consent is eighteen. With parental consent, a person can marry at sixteen.
Virginia The age of consent is eighteen.
Washington The age of consent is eighteen. With judicial approval, a person can marry at seventeen.
West Virginia The age of consent is eighteen. With parental consent, a person can marry at sixteen. A person under sixteen can marry with parental consent and judicial approval.
Wisconsin The age of consent is eighteen. With parental consent, a person can marry at age sixteen.
Wyoming The age of consent is eighteen. With parental consent, a person can marry at sixteen. A person under the age of sixteen can marry with judicial approval.
District of Columbia The age of consent is eighteen. With parental consent, a person can marry at sixteen; however, parental consent is not required if the minor has previously been married.
Puerto Rico The age of consent is twenty-one. With parental approval (and under specific circumstances), females can marry at fourteen and males can marry at sixteen. NOTE: a person who is eighteen does not need parental or judicial authorization if the female has proven that she has been raped, seduced, or is pregnant.
I did not bother to read the rest of the post because you are profoundly ignorant.

State-by-State Marriage "Age of Consent" Laws - FindLaw
 
it is so nice that young girls are allowed to marry their rapist
Allowed to? If you follow the Bible they’re forced to.

Deuteronomy 22:29 the man who raped her must pay the young woman's father fifty shekels of silver, and she must become his wife because he has violated her. He must not divorce her as long as he lives.

Worse, if we follow the Bible his victim is forced to marry her rapist and they can never divorce.

The link is like every translation of deuteronomy 22 through 29.
 
Marry them.

In most states, there is no legal age for getting married. You only need the parents consent.

13,000 children a year are married in America

Three 10-year-old girls and an 11-year-old boy were among the youngest to wed, under legal loopholes which allow minors to marry in certain circumstances.

The minimum age for marriage across most of the US is 18, but every state has exemptions – such as parental consent or pregnancy – which allow younger children to tie the knot.

The youngest wedded were three 10-year-old girls in Tennessee who married men aged 24, 25 and 31 in 2001.

-------------------------------

Republicans complain that Muslims marry children. How many of these children in the US getting married are to Republican Conservatives?

Me personally, I feel that no one younger than 17 should be able to get married. And that with parents consent, just like going into the military.

Seriously, stop posting your fantasies online.

They're meant to be private and we can't unread them.
 
it is so nice that young girls are allowed to marry their rapist
Allowed to? If you follow the Bible they’re forced to.

Deuteronomy 22:29 the man who raped her must pay the young woman's father fifty shekels of silver, and she must become his wife because he has violated her. He must not divorce her as long as he lives.

Worse, if we follow the Bible his victim is forced to marry her rapist and they can never divorce.

The link is like every translation of deuteronomy 22 through 29.
That is why Joe Biden is okay by you. Beau...Beau...Beau;;;...let me rip into your azz!
 
Marry them.

In most states, there is no legal age for getting married. You only need the parents consent.

13,000 children a year are married in America

Three 10-year-old girls and an 11-year-old boy were among the youngest to wed, under legal loopholes which allow minors to marry in certain circumstances.

The minimum age for marriage across most of the US is 18, but every state has exemptions – such as parental consent or pregnancy – which allow younger children to tie the knot.

The youngest wedded were three 10-year-old girls in Tennessee who married men aged 24, 25 and 31 in 2001.

-------------------------------

Republicans complain that Muslims marry children. How many of these children in the US getting married are to Republican Conservatives?

Me personally, I feel that no one younger than 17 should be able to get married. And that with parents consent, just like going into the military.

Here's a rocket launcher. Now go kill those dune coonz ! " Sir, may I have a beer first, sir." No asshole you have to be 21 to drink. Now go kill those assholes and I'll put another stripe on your jacket to help with that 40 year mortgage.
 
The problem is biology is still biology and humans can have children when they are children themselves.

So basically kids can get pregnant, but we then are saying if they want to legalize their relationship they cannot.
That is part of the problem, our biological maturity precedes by many years our brain maturity.

I am ok with 18 as the age, with 16 and 17 with a judge and parental permission.

But 10? 12? 14? No.

Well then we better start figuring out a way to stop the downward trend of sexual maturity we are seeing in girls and the ability of boys to father kids with them, or we basically create a situation where we are saying "it's OK, knock a girl up and we can't even try to make you do the right thing"

Biology seems to be going one direction with the decreasing in age of sexual maturing, and we now take much longer to mature intellectually, emotionally, and more importantly, legally.
Do you really think it is "doing the right thing" to have 10 and 13 year olds marry? What does that say about marriage? Talk about a travesty.
It doesn't mean the children shouldn't be held responsible, but not by a marriage contract.

How else to hold them responsible? It's not like getting a divorce is such a big deal these days.

People after puberty having sex can result in children. Children group up better in a stable environment. Marriage usually creates the most stable environment.

How do you hold your 10 and 13 year olds responsible? Same way.

They are way too young to rear children; they are nothing but children themselves.
The very idea of talking about this is the best advertisement for matter of fact sex education EARLY and availability of good birth control. Kids will experiment. They might as well be prepared as pregnant at 12.

The problem is progs like you stretch basic sex ed into social conditioning, taking on questions of morality and only giving the progressive side of said arguments.

"If you stick it in, this may happen" has morphed into official viewpoints on things like the morality of premarital sex, homosexuality, and transexuality.

And most of the time the pregnancies are in the 15-17 year old range, the lower ages are outliers.

Why deny two 17 year olds the right to marry if the sex they have between them isn't illegal?
 
That is part of the problem, our biological maturity precedes by many years our brain maturity.

I am ok with 18 as the age, with 16 and 17 with a judge and parental permission.

But 10? 12? 14? No.

Well then we better start figuring out a way to stop the downward trend of sexual maturity we are seeing in girls and the ability of boys to father kids with them, or we basically create a situation where we are saying "it's OK, knock a girl up and we can't even try to make you do the right thing"

Biology seems to be going one direction with the decreasing in age of sexual maturing, and we now take much longer to mature intellectually, emotionally, and more importantly, legally.
Do you really think it is "doing the right thing" to have 10 and 13 year olds marry? What does that say about marriage? Talk about a travesty.
It doesn't mean the children shouldn't be held responsible, but not by a marriage contract.

How else to hold them responsible? It's not like getting a divorce is such a big deal these days.

People after puberty having sex can result in children. Children group up better in a stable environment. Marriage usually creates the most stable environment.

How do you hold your 10 and 13 year olds responsible? Same way.

They are way too young to rear children; they are nothing but children themselves.
The very idea of talking about this is the best advertisement for matter of fact sex education EARLY and availability of good birth control. Kids will experiment. They might as well be prepared as pregnant at 12.

The problem is progs like you stretch basic sex ed into social conditioning, taking on questions of morality and only giving the progressive side of said arguments.

"If you stick it in, this may happen" has morphed into official viewpoints on things like the morality of premarital sex, homosexuality, and transexuality.

And most of the time the pregnancies are in the 15-17 year old range, the lower ages are outliers.

Why deny two 17 year olds the right to marry if the sex they have between them isn't illegal?
Denying two 17 year olds the right to marry has nothing to do with this argument. Focus.
As soon as a boy has a wet dream it's time to explain what's in that fluid and what can happen if that gets into a girl's womb. Girls need to know BEFORE their period starts how a baby starts and grows. Both boys and girls need to know practical ways to stop the sperm from reaching the egg.
Obviously, as parents, you will also talk about the fact that this activity is meant for adults, not children, and the reasons why.
 
Well then we better start figuring out a way to stop the downward trend of sexual maturity we are seeing in girls and the ability of boys to father kids with them, or we basically create a situation where we are saying "it's OK, knock a girl up and we can't even try to make you do the right thing"

Biology seems to be going one direction with the decreasing in age of sexual maturing, and we now take much longer to mature intellectually, emotionally, and more importantly, legally.
Do you really think it is "doing the right thing" to have 10 and 13 year olds marry? What does that say about marriage? Talk about a travesty.
It doesn't mean the children shouldn't be held responsible, but not by a marriage contract.

How else to hold them responsible? It's not like getting a divorce is such a big deal these days.

People after puberty having sex can result in children. Children group up better in a stable environment. Marriage usually creates the most stable environment.

How do you hold your 10 and 13 year olds responsible? Same way.

They are way too young to rear children; they are nothing but children themselves.
The very idea of talking about this is the best advertisement for matter of fact sex education EARLY and availability of good birth control. Kids will experiment. They might as well be prepared as pregnant at 12.

The problem is progs like you stretch basic sex ed into social conditioning, taking on questions of morality and only giving the progressive side of said arguments.

"If you stick it in, this may happen" has morphed into official viewpoints on things like the morality of premarital sex, homosexuality, and transexuality.

And most of the time the pregnancies are in the 15-17 year old range, the lower ages are outliers.

Why deny two 17 year olds the right to marry if the sex they have between them isn't illegal?
Denying two 17 year olds the right to marry has nothing to do with this argument. Focus.
As soon as a boy has a wet dream it's time to explain what's in that fluid and what can happen if that gets into a girl's womb. Girls need to know BEFORE their period starts how a baby starts and grows. Both boys and girls need to know practical ways to stop the sperm from reaching the egg.
Obviously, as parents, you will also talk about the fact that this activity is meant for adults, not children, and the reasons why.
Obviously, as parents, you will also talk about the fact that this activity is meant for adults, not children, and the reasons why

Parents have to compete with the schools. The schools more or less say that you can safely fuck whomever you wish. Sex anytime, anywhere as long as it is protected. Which sounds better to children?
 
Well then we better start figuring out a way to stop the downward trend of sexual maturity we are seeing in girls and the ability of boys to father kids with them, or we basically create a situation where we are saying "it's OK, knock a girl up and we can't even try to make you do the right thing"

Biology seems to be going one direction with the decreasing in age of sexual maturing, and we now take much longer to mature intellectually, emotionally, and more importantly, legally.
Do you really think it is "doing the right thing" to have 10 and 13 year olds marry? What does that say about marriage? Talk about a travesty.
It doesn't mean the children shouldn't be held responsible, but not by a marriage contract.

How else to hold them responsible? It's not like getting a divorce is such a big deal these days.

People after puberty having sex can result in children. Children group up better in a stable environment. Marriage usually creates the most stable environment.

How do you hold your 10 and 13 year olds responsible? Same way.

They are way too young to rear children; they are nothing but children themselves.
The very idea of talking about this is the best advertisement for matter of fact sex education EARLY and availability of good birth control. Kids will experiment. They might as well be prepared as pregnant at 12.

The problem is progs like you stretch basic sex ed into social conditioning, taking on questions of morality and only giving the progressive side of said arguments.

"If you stick it in, this may happen" has morphed into official viewpoints on things like the morality of premarital sex, homosexuality, and transexuality.

And most of the time the pregnancies are in the 15-17 year old range, the lower ages are outliers.

Why deny two 17 year olds the right to marry if the sex they have between them isn't illegal?
Denying two 17 year olds the right to marry has nothing to do with this argument. Focus.
As soon as a boy has a wet dream it's time to explain what's in that fluid and what can happen if that gets into a girl's womb. Girls need to know BEFORE their period starts how a baby starts and grows. Both boys and girls need to know practical ways to stop the sperm from reaching the egg.
Obviously, as parents, you will also talk about the fact that this activity is meant for adults, not children, and the reasons why.

The more we take responsibility away from parents the more we are surprised when we end up with parents who don't take responsibility.

I'm all for sex ed, but this strange need for progressives to bring it down to the 8 or 9 year old level is quite frankly, creepy.

The schools can handle the basics, leave the morality to the parents.
 
Just convert to Islam and deeply disturbed schizophrenic leftists like Deanrd will give you "carte blanche" to fuck as many children as you please. Islam was founded by a mass-murdering PEDO who married a 6-year-old when he was in his fifties. Islam doctrine also commands muslims to make sex-slaves out of non-believer women and children - hence, all the rape/pedophilia. I know that Deanrd lacks the mental/moral capacity to understand this, I'm just saying this for everyone else's benefit.
 

Forum List

Back
Top