How The Democrats Created Red China

[CrusaderFrank]

But do you notice how the Left never has a bad word to say about Mao or Stalin?

 

[Ravi]

But do you notice how the Left never has a bad word to say about Mao or Stalin?

No.

 

[del]

But do you notice how the Left never has a bad word to say about Mao or Stalin?

No.

me either

let's ask another leftist, shall we?

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VKB-w179PIQ]The Beatles - Revolution (1968) - YouTube[/ame]


nope

 

[Ravi]

Don't be silly Del. Don't you know that history has been rewritten and John Lennon is a rightwingloon?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

But do you notice how the Left never has a bad word to say about Mao or Stalin?

No.

me either

let's ask another leftist, shall we?

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VKB-w179PIQ]The Beatles - Revolution (1968) - YouTube[/ame]


nope

"do you deny that chiang's regime was not only corrupt but cowardly as well?

that they refused to engage the enemy and raped and pillaged the peasants?" -- Del

Your search for bad words about Mao or Stalin returned 0 hits

 

[PoliticalChic]

I'm surprised that PC is a fan of chiang kai shek. Really surprised.

I'm a fan of Sun Yat Sen.
The first President of the Republic of China....Nationalist China.


...now...you're really gonna like this:
"There is, however, some evidence to suggest that he was actually born at Ewa in Honolulu, Hawaii.[9][10][11] These claims that he was born in Hawaii have been disputed by some.[12] What seems to be beyond dispute is that, while still quite young, he was already living a comfortable life, of modest wealth, in Hawaii."
Sun Yat-sen - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Does that ring a bell?

(Rumor has it he was born in Kenya....)


But I like surprising you.

 

[PoliticalChic]

But do you notice how the Left never has a bad word to say about Mao or Stalin?

Absolutely, Frank!!!

Prager explores that idea:

From Marx on, the Left has fought against religion for the above reason, and because they understood how difficult it is to get religious people to engage in revolution for the purpose of bettering their material lives. Such folks often relegate the material world to lower priority than the spiritual, moral and intellectual world.

a. While the Judeo-Christian society labels actions as ‘good’ or ‘evil,’ due to morality and/or self-control, the Left sees the results as due to material inequality, i.e., violent crime due to poverty.

b. The Left has been far more interested in fighting material inequality than tyranny, which is why Lenin, Mao, Pol Pot, Ho Chi Minh, Castro, etc., tend to have the support of Leftists around the world.

c. The Left is less interested in creating wealth than in distributing it.
Prager, "Still The Best Hope."

 

[PoliticalChic]

Don't be silly Del. Don't you know that history has been rewritten and John Lennon is a rightwingloon?

"(CBS) John Lennon: Musician, advocate...closet Republican?

The singer's former assistant claims in a new documentary that Lennon was a Ronald Reagan fan and a conservative at the time of his death.

Pictures: John Lennon
Pictures: Beatles through the years

The Toronto Sun reports that Fred Seaman, Lennon's assistant from 1979 until his death in 1980, made the revelations in the documentary "Beatles Stories."

"John, basically, made it very clear that if he were an American he would vote for Reagan because he was really sour on Jimmy Carter," Seaman reportedly told filmmaker Seth Swirsky.

"He'd met Reagan back, I think, in the '70s at some sporting event... Reagan was the guy who had ordered the National Guard, I believe, to go after the young (peace) demonstrators in Berkeley, so I think that John maybe forgot about that... He did express support for Reagan, which shocked me," he continued.

According to the Toronto Sun, Seaman added that Lennon was embarrassed by his earlier radicalism."
John Lennon was a secret Republican, former assistant says - Celebrity Circuit - CBS News



"Say it ain't so!!!" huh?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Interesting facts......

Tomorrow....October 10th, is important for the following reasons...

October 10th, 1911 Chinese revolutionary Dr. Sun Yat-sen overthrew the Manchu Dynasty, and became first president of the Republic of China. He turned his revolutionary organization into a mainstream political party, the Kuomintang, which won power in 1913 in the first-ever national elections.

October 10th, 1943 Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek was sworn in as President of (Nationalist) China

 

[del]

No.

me either

let's ask another leftist, shall we?

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VKB-w179PIQ]The Beatles - Revolution (1968) - YouTube[/ame]


nope

"do you deny that chiang's regime was not only corrupt but cowardly as well?

that they refused to engage the enemy and raped and pillaged the peasants?" -- Del

Your search for bad words about Mao or Stalin returned 0 hits

lay off the stupid pills, frank

 

[Sallow]

Pay attention....

Lattimore was found to be a “conscious, articulate instrument of the Soviet conspiracy” by a unanimous Senate committee (William F. Buckley and Brent Bozell, McCarty and His Enemies, p. 274, quoting the Congressional Record)

Pay attention. NOTHING stood up in court.

Right....

....and Bill Clinton isn't a rapist.

No Clinton isn't a rapist..and no Democrats in the US did not "create" the Communist Chinese.

 

[Sallow]

But do you notice how the Left never has a bad word to say about Mao or Stalin?

Absolutely, Frank!!!

Prager explores that idea:

From Marx on, the Left has fought against religion for the above reason, and because they understood how difficult it is to get religious people to engage in revolution for the purpose of bettering their material lives. Such folks often relegate the material world to lower priority than the spiritual, moral and intellectual world.

a. While the Judeo-Christian society labels actions as ‘good’ or ‘evil,’ due to morality and/or self-control, the Left sees the results as due to material inequality, i.e., violent crime due to poverty.

b. The Left has been far more interested in fighting material inequality than tyranny, which is why Lenin, Mao, Pol Pot, Ho Chi Minh, Castro, etc., tend to have the support of Leftists around the world.

c. The Left is less interested in creating wealth than in distributing it.Prager, "Still The Best Hope."

Most "wealth" or the "pooling of assets" is "created" by leeching off the labor, innovations and ideas of others. If full audits were done of every wealthy person in the world..there'd be ALOT less wealthy people in the world.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Pay attention. NOTHING stood up in court.

Right....

....and Bill Clinton isn't a rapist.

No Clinton isn't a rapist..and no Democrats in the US did not "create" the Communist Chinese.

So sorry....

....you got both parts wrong.



Try again?

 

[PoliticalChic]

But do you notice how the Left never has a bad word to say about Mao or Stalin?

Absolutely, Frank!!!

Prager explores that idea:

From Marx on, the Left has fought against religion for the above reason, and because they understood how difficult it is to get religious people to engage in revolution for the purpose of bettering their material lives. Such folks often relegate the material world to lower priority than the spiritual, moral and intellectual world.

a. While the Judeo-Christian society labels actions as ‘good’ or ‘evil,’ due to morality and/or self-control, the Left sees the results as due to material inequality, i.e., violent crime due to poverty.

b. The Left has been far more interested in fighting material inequality than tyranny, which is why Lenin, Mao, Pol Pot, Ho Chi Minh, Castro, etc., tend to have the support of Leftists around the world.

c. The Left is less interested in creating wealth than in distributing it.Prager, "Still The Best Hope."

Most "wealth" or the "pooling of assets" is "created" by leeching off the labor, innovations and ideas of others. If full audits were done of every wealthy person in the world..there'd be ALOT less wealthy people in the world.

You really don't understand capitalism....do you.....


Well....in the words of Mighty Mouse.....'here I come, to save the day!'

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Ttbj6LAu0A&feature=player_embedded#

 

[Sallow]

Right....

....and Bill Clinton isn't a rapist.

No Clinton isn't a rapist..and no Democrats in the US did not "create" the Communist Chinese.

So sorry....

....you got both parts wrong.



Try again?

Sure.

You're wrong.

Easy enough.

 

[Sallow]

Absolutely, Frank!!!

Prager explores that idea:

From Marx on, the Left has fought against religion for the above reason, and because they understood how difficult it is to get religious people to engage in revolution for the purpose of bettering their material lives. Such folks often relegate the material world to lower priority than the spiritual, moral and intellectual world.

a. While the Judeo-Christian society labels actions as ‘good’ or ‘evil,’ due to morality and/or self-control, the Left sees the results as due to material inequality, i.e., violent crime due to poverty.

b. The Left has been far more interested in fighting material inequality than tyranny, which is why Lenin, Mao, Pol Pot, Ho Chi Minh, Castro, etc., tend to have the support of Leftists around the world.

c. The Left is less interested in creating wealth than in distributing it.Prager, "Still The Best Hope."

Most "wealth" or the "pooling of assets" is "created" by leeching off the labor, innovations and ideas of others. If full audits were done of every wealthy person in the world..there'd be ALOT less wealthy people in the world.

You really don't understand capitalism....do you.....


Well....in the words of Mighty Mouse.....'here I come, to save the day!'

Does Capitalism Exploit Workers? - YouTube

I understand it fine.

And actually..back in the thick of it again.

 

[rdean]

Since China entered the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 2001, the United States has lost 5.5 million manufacturing jobs and more than 26,000 (net) manufacturing plants. Between 2001 and 2008 alone, growing trade deficits with China displaced 2.4 million U.S. jobs, and 60% of those jobs were lost in the manufacturing sector (Scott 2010).

http://www.epi.org/page/-/pdf/ib283.pdf

Report: U.S. has lost 2.4M jobs to China from 2001 to 2008 - The Hill

Here's the surprise: since 2001 we have lost more tech jobs than manufacturing jobs! -- We lost 628,000 tech jobs -26 percent of all jobs displaced by trade- between 2001 and 2008.

Find Out How MANY Jobs Have Been Lost To China Where YOU Live

Remember, Republicans, working with the Chamber and Commerce and China helped move millions of jobs to China from 2001 to 2008. It's all documented. Easy to find out.

Republicans think Democrats helped turn China RED, but WE KNOW Republicans helped turn China "GREEN" with American money and jobs. And under Romney they will continue what they started under Bush. They want to "finish the job".

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vwcSROff--I]Mitt Romney Talks About Chinese slave labor at Factory His Bain Capital Bought In China - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Jroc]

Pay attention. NOTHING stood up in court.

Right....

....and Bill Clinton isn't a rapist.

No Clinton isn't a rapist..and no Democrats in the US did not "create" the Communist Chinese.

Clinton loved the Chinese. Thank you Bill Clinton..

Clinton Overrules Secretary of State

The alleged improper export by Hughes of satellite technology was cited as a key reason when Clinton's secretary of state, Warren Christopher, rejected a plan to give the Commerce Department full authority to control satellite exports.

According to a Sept. 22, 1995, memorandum, Christopher rejected plans to give Commerce the authority to approve satellite exports after an interagency study noted that "significant" military and intelligence capabilities could be lost.

The memorandum stated the Pentagon and U.S. intelligence agencies strongly opposed the policy change because Hughes exported two satellites with sensitive cryptographic technology without first getting a State Department munitions license. Cryptographic technology is used to scramble communications sent to satellites to prevent unauthorized access.

President Clinton, who transferred the power to regulate sensitive satellites to Commerce, under Commerce Secretary Ron Brown, ultimately overruled Christopher.

Clinton's transfer allowed the Chinese army to acquire advanced U.S. technology for military purposes. Hughes satellites currently provide the Chinese army with secure communications that are invulnerable to earth combat and highly accurate all-weather navigation for strike bombers and missiles.

Hughes satellites purchased by Shen also provide direct TV and cable TV broadcasts to most of Asia. Thus, cable and pay-per-view services help pay for the Chinese army satellite communications. The brilliant planning and logistics mean that Chinese military communications pay for themselves.

Clinton Legacy – A New Arms Race

The satellite and missile technology obtained from Hughes by the Chinese army is critical for the design and manufacture of missile nose cones and electronic missile control systems. The technology clearly helped the Chinese army field a new generation of ICBMS, including the Dong Feng 31 missile, which can drop three nuclear warheads on any city in the U.S.

The success of Shen is a story of missiles, politics and greed. Gen. Shen succeeded in using Hughes and President Clinton as valuable tools to obtain weapons that are now pointed at the United States.

China won and the U.S. lost what may very well be the first round of World War III. Gen. Shen led that victory and he did it with a checkbook. The Clinton legacy for the 21st century is a new arms race.

Clinton and Chinese Missiles

 

[Jroc]

More from Clinton...He loved Chinese money..Thats for sure

Clinton Gave China Chips for Nuclear War

Newly declassified documents show that President Bill Clinton personally approved the transfer to China of advanced space technology that can be used for nuclear combat.

The documents show that in 1996 Clinton approved the export of radiation hardened chip sets to China. The specialized chips are necessary for fighting a nuclear war.

"Waivers may be granted upon a national interest determination," states a Commerce Department document titled "U.S. Sanctions on China."

"The President has approved a series of satellite related waivers in recent months, most recently in November, 1996 for export of radiation hardened chip sets for a Chinese meteorological satellite," noted the Commerce Department documents.

These special computer chips are designed to function while being bombarded by intense radiation. Radiation hardened chips are considered critical for atomic warfare and are required by advanced nuclear tipped missiles.

Clinton Gave China Chips for Nuclear War

 

[PoliticalChic]

No Clinton isn't a rapist..and no Democrats in the US did not "create" the Communist Chinese.

So sorry....

....you got both parts wrong.



Try again?

Sure.

You're wrong.

Easy enough.

Could you extend your efforts just a wee bit more....and show which parts of the OP are in error.....


...'cause without same, they seem to lead to an overwhelming conclusion....

Don't you agree?