How the brexiteers echo the Nazis

[Phoenall]

Actually they dont, and you dont know what my real position is either.

Of course, it would help if you weren't a liar to begin with.

AH! yes when all else fails call the opponent a LIAR, but dont point out what Lies have been told or your proof. Rule 19 from the book of disinformation

So now I am calling you out. What lies and were is your proof they are Lies ?

 

[anotherlife]

I didn't know that a website called Justice4Poland existed, but Poland does need justice. I don't want to make this about the Jews because the problem is now much bigger than that.

Here is the bottom line of justice in Europe. And this is not just for Poland but all the countries that Western Europe and the soviets pillaged.

The bottom line is country borders. So this is in the domain of philosophies of brexit.

Until the pre ww1 country borders are restored, both for Poland and Hungary, and for Italy, and for Finland, ... and so on, including all the occupied states within the old Russian empire, there is not going to be justice in Europe. And if there is no justice in Europe, then we just keep issuing licenses to communist's and nationalists, to keep population shifting any people they don't like, in other words we sponsor genocide.

This is the legacy, still ongoing, that the brexiters have signed up to with their votes.

So, do you want to talk about justice? Then let's begin with the injustice, that started it all, right with the peace dictates of ww1. This is the exact conversation that no European power wants to happen, especially nationalists and socialists don't want it to happen, because then they have to admit, that they caused the birth of like ~ 50 million people on Earth to this day, for no other purpose than to prop their 90 year long crime.

So, how do we provide justice with such a number disadvantage? With a genocide?

The best demonstration of this is the Crimea war with its western coverage.

If I was a brexiter, I would study both the ww1 and ww2 peace dictates very carefully, because that is what brexit signs up to.

More crap from the hate sites that try and sell the idea it was all the fault of the Jewish bankers who carved up Europe to suit their families. Then you come out with the canard " I dont want to make this about the Jews" when you obviously do and cant find a way to slip in the latest anti semitic hate mantra.

Forget pre WW1 unless you want to go back to the depths of pre history, unless you want to start putting right the wrongs against the Jews

The bottom line is control of our existing current borders, so why do you neo marxists want to say it isnt, will this give you better chances of demonising the Jews in your eyes.

Why the pre WW1 borders, why not the pre Goth borders or the Paleolithic borders. Does your cut of date give you an advantage you dont have now ? Is this your plan for the future ? Does what the people living there not count or are you prepared to eliminate them to achieve your end ?

BULLSHIT this is the legacy YOU have left us to sort out and now we are sorting it our way you dont like it. It leaves you disenfranchised and surrounded by enemies who will rise up against you and hammer you down.

Why is it this injustice and no other, didnt we have injustice before the end of WW1 when the victors negotiated terms with the losers that were meant to stop any further wars being started by you lot. Why not the injustice that saw you lot mass murdering innocents in the name of your new world order, and now trying to hide the evidence

Okay, obviously history was not your prime subject in school, but don't worry, I am not a social science student either. Only common sense. And by the way you are painting the Jews like they are the only losers. This is not important though, because like I said in my previous post, the problem is much bigger.

The ww1 point is important, because that was the 1st war in Europe, where civilians were considered combatant. Before that time, formal wars with formal peace treaties were negotiated between armies, and little did anyone care which serf had assets where or in what language. So it is ww1 that is the turning point.

Also, genocide before ww1 wasn't a crime and wasn't declared a war crime. It was just business as usual. It was ww1 that suddenly created laws about genocide. For what purpose? For the purpose of legalizing genocide if the entente does it, and make it a crime if others do it. This is an additional reason why ww1 is the point in question.

And do you really think you can isolate your country from the adverse effects of what you yourself perpetrated on the entire world, e.g. on Poland, by brexiting them out into oblivion? Historic question: what is the result on you when you do divide and conquer?

It might not have been my prime subject but it does not mean that I did not get told the facts. You are trying to re-write history and re-draw the borders to suit your nationalist tendencies and forgetting that those you are trying to steal from will oppose you all the way. Why do you stop at pre WW1 for your cut off date why not pre islamic invasion or pre Roman empire. Is it because they would give you nothing as your country did not exist back then, or is it that you wont get the cream of the land to steal.

All wars in Europe had the civilians as combatants, it is how wars were fought right up until WW1 when it stopped and clear lines were drawn. Well I want the paleolithic as the turning point because it give me an advantage over you. Dont like it then get a life.

It still wasnt a crime in reality as the law was never ratified, leaving you with STUPID engraved in your forehead. And it was post WW2 that saw any attempts at formalising war and genocide as a war crime, Again showing that you are far from being educated in the reality.

I have perpetrated nothing on anyone, it was those who came before me and I am not guilty of their crimes. So dig them up, resurrect them and tell them your woes. But how will the UK leaving the neo marxist ran EU cause any problems for anyone that is prepared to work at making it better. Why should I be denied health care that I have paid for yet scroungers and criminals from Poland get it on demand and they have not paid a penny. When you understand this then you will see that Brexit is right and proper for the UK. And sod the rest of Europe that will lose the UK welfare that kept them afloat, start going after your leaders for the money they have secreted into swiss bank accounts for when the bubble bursts.

Therer will be no result as there is no divide and conquer, we are not as devious as you are we just want control back where it belongs. IN OUR HANDS

Apart from that I have already answered your points here in my previous post, I can only say that you make a liar out of yourself by repeating the lies that the nationalists of the entente have been drilling into your head for the latest 100 years.

When you take other people's money (or land), they will come for it. No matter how many lies you convince yourself of, to keep your loot.

I suggest you read about your prime minister Chamberlain, the one you and your fellow goons love to hate.

And have you shown these lies to be that, or have you just shouted down anyone that disagrees with you. No evidence of them being lies makes you the LIAR

Sounds very much like the islamonazi mantra that the Jews have stolen the arab lands when the reality is the arab's never owned the land in the first place

What is there to read about him, he made a statement that was shown later to be false. Just like Blair did, and Brown after him. All politicians get caught out at some time or other, but it seems that left wing ones get caught out more often

Haha, this is funny, the con men are asking the others to prove the con. Hehehe.

Chamberlain has shown by taking down Czechoslovakia, that you can give back what you steal.

But the Palestine situation is different. Even there though, the enemies became real enemies only after the entente created borders there.

 

[Phoenall]

More crap from the hate sites that try and sell the idea it was all the fault of the Jewish bankers who carved up Europe to suit their families. Then you come out with the canard " I dont want to make this about the Jews" when you obviously do and cant find a way to slip in the latest anti semitic hate mantra.

Forget pre WW1 unless you want to go back to the depths of pre history, unless you want to start putting right the wrongs against the Jews

The bottom line is control of our existing current borders, so why do you neo marxists want to say it isnt, will this give you better chances of demonising the Jews in your eyes.

Why the pre WW1 borders, why not the pre Goth borders or the Paleolithic borders. Does your cut of date give you an advantage you dont have now ? Is this your plan for the future ? Does what the people living there not count or are you prepared to eliminate them to achieve your end ?

BULLSHIT this is the legacy YOU have left us to sort out and now we are sorting it our way you dont like it. It leaves you disenfranchised and surrounded by enemies who will rise up against you and hammer you down.

Why is it this injustice and no other, didnt we have injustice before the end of WW1 when the victors negotiated terms with the losers that were meant to stop any further wars being started by you lot. Why not the injustice that saw you lot mass murdering innocents in the name of your new world order, and now trying to hide the evidence

Okay, obviously history was not your prime subject in school, but don't worry, I am not a social science student either. Only common sense. And by the way you are painting the Jews like they are the only losers. This is not important though, because like I said in my previous post, the problem is much bigger.

The ww1 point is important, because that was the 1st war in Europe, where civilians were considered combatant. Before that time, formal wars with formal peace treaties were negotiated between armies, and little did anyone care which serf had assets where or in what language. So it is ww1 that is the turning point.

Also, genocide before ww1 wasn't a crime and wasn't declared a war crime. It was just business as usual. It was ww1 that suddenly created laws about genocide. For what purpose? For the purpose of legalizing genocide if the entente does it, and make it a crime if others do it. This is an additional reason why ww1 is the point in question.

And do you really think you can isolate your country from the adverse effects of what you yourself perpetrated on the entire world, e.g. on Poland, by brexiting them out into oblivion? Historic question: what is the result on you when you do divide and conquer?

It might not have been my prime subject but it does not mean that I did not get told the facts. You are trying to re-write history and re-draw the borders to suit your nationalist tendencies and forgetting that those you are trying to steal from will oppose you all the way. Why do you stop at pre WW1 for your cut off date why not pre islamic invasion or pre Roman empire. Is it because they would give you nothing as your country did not exist back then, or is it that you wont get the cream of the land to steal.

All wars in Europe had the civilians as combatants, it is how wars were fought right up until WW1 when it stopped and clear lines were drawn. Well I want the paleolithic as the turning point because it give me an advantage over you. Dont like it then get a life.

It still wasnt a crime in reality as the law was never ratified, leaving you with STUPID engraved in your forehead. And it was post WW2 that saw any attempts at formalising war and genocide as a war crime, Again showing that you are far from being educated in the reality.

I have perpetrated nothing on anyone, it was those who came before me and I am not guilty of their crimes. So dig them up, resurrect them and tell them your woes. But how will the UK leaving the neo marxist ran EU cause any problems for anyone that is prepared to work at making it better. Why should I be denied health care that I have paid for yet scroungers and criminals from Poland get it on demand and they have not paid a penny. When you understand this then you will see that Brexit is right and proper for the UK. And sod the rest of Europe that will lose the UK welfare that kept them afloat, start going after your leaders for the money they have secreted into swiss bank accounts for when the bubble bursts.

Therer will be no result as there is no divide and conquer, we are not as devious as you are we just want control back where it belongs. IN OUR HANDS

Apart from that I have already answered your points here in my previous post, I can only say that you make a liar out of yourself by repeating the lies that the nationalists of the entente have been drilling into your head for the latest 100 years.

When you take other people's money (or land), they will come for it. No matter how many lies you convince yourself of, to keep your loot.

I suggest you read about your prime minister Chamberlain, the one you and your fellow goons love to hate.

And have you shown these lies to be that, or have you just shouted down anyone that disagrees with you. No evidence of them being lies makes you the LIAR

Sounds very much like the islamonazi mantra that the Jews have stolen the arab lands when the reality is the arab's never owned the land in the first place

What is there to read about him, he made a statement that was shown later to be false. Just like Blair did, and Brown after him. All politicians get caught out at some time or other, but it seems that left wing ones get caught out more often

Haha, this is funny, the con men are asking the others to prove the con. Hehehe.

Chamberlain has shown by taking down Czechoslovakia, that you can give back what you steal.

But the Palestine situation is different. Even there though, the enemies became real enemies only after the entente created borders there.

And it is obvious that you are the con man here

WRONG

No it is an invented people claiming an invented nation because their god told them to in 630 C.E. Under international law the Jews were granted 22% of palestine and the arab muslims 78%, that is fair in most peoples eyes so why do you and the islamonazi's object ?

 

[xyz]

Thread where Phoenall praises Polish nationalists:
75k Polish Nationalists march


Read the posts, in particular page 15 and 16 here, in both threads and click on the links.

 

[anotherlife]

Okay, obviously history was not your prime subject in school, but don't worry, I am not a social science student either. Only common sense. And by the way you are painting the Jews like they are the only losers. This is not important though, because like I said in my previous post, the problem is much bigger.

The ww1 point is important, because that was the 1st war in Europe, where civilians were considered combatant. Before that time, formal wars with formal peace treaties were negotiated between armies, and little did anyone care which serf had assets where or in what language. So it is ww1 that is the turning point.

Also, genocide before ww1 wasn't a crime and wasn't declared a war crime. It was just business as usual. It was ww1 that suddenly created laws about genocide. For what purpose? For the purpose of legalizing genocide if the entente does it, and make it a crime if others do it. This is an additional reason why ww1 is the point in question.

And do you really think you can isolate your country from the adverse effects of what you yourself perpetrated on the entire world, e.g. on Poland, by brexiting them out into oblivion? Historic question: what is the result on you when you do divide and conquer?

It might not have been my prime subject but it does not mean that I did not get told the facts. You are trying to re-write history and re-draw the borders to suit your nationalist tendencies and forgetting that those you are trying to steal from will oppose you all the way. Why do you stop at pre WW1 for your cut off date why not pre islamic invasion or pre Roman empire. Is it because they would give you nothing as your country did not exist back then, or is it that you wont get the cream of the land to steal.

All wars in Europe had the civilians as combatants, it is how wars were fought right up until WW1 when it stopped and clear lines were drawn. Well I want the paleolithic as the turning point because it give me an advantage over you. Dont like it then get a life.

It still wasnt a crime in reality as the law was never ratified, leaving you with STUPID engraved in your forehead. And it was post WW2 that saw any attempts at formalising war and genocide as a war crime, Again showing that you are far from being educated in the reality.

I have perpetrated nothing on anyone, it was those who came before me and I am not guilty of their crimes. So dig them up, resurrect them and tell them your woes. But how will the UK leaving the neo marxist ran EU cause any problems for anyone that is prepared to work at making it better. Why should I be denied health care that I have paid for yet scroungers and criminals from Poland get it on demand and they have not paid a penny. When you understand this then you will see that Brexit is right and proper for the UK. And sod the rest of Europe that will lose the UK welfare that kept them afloat, start going after your leaders for the money they have secreted into swiss bank accounts for when the bubble bursts.

Therer will be no result as there is no divide and conquer, we are not as devious as you are we just want control back where it belongs. IN OUR HANDS

Apart from that I have already answered your points here in my previous post, I can only say that you make a liar out of yourself by repeating the lies that the nationalists of the entente have been drilling into your head for the latest 100 years.

When you take other people's money (or land), they will come for it. No matter how many lies you convince yourself of, to keep your loot.

I suggest you read about your prime minister Chamberlain, the one you and your fellow goons love to hate.

And have you shown these lies to be that, or have you just shouted down anyone that disagrees with you. No evidence of them being lies makes you the LIAR

Sounds very much like the islamonazi mantra that the Jews have stolen the arab lands when the reality is the arab's never owned the land in the first place

What is there to read about him, he made a statement that was shown later to be false. Just like Blair did, and Brown after him. All politicians get caught out at some time or other, but it seems that left wing ones get caught out more often

Haha, this is funny, the con men are asking the others to prove the con. Hehehe.

Chamberlain has shown by taking down Czechoslovakia, that you can give back what you steal.

But the Palestine situation is different. Even there though, the enemies became real enemies only after the entente created borders there.

And it is obvious that you are the con man here

WRONG

No it is an invented people claiming an invented nation because their god told them to in 630 C.E. Under international law the Jews were granted 22% of palestine and the arab muslims 78%, that is fair in most peoples eyes so why do you and the islamonazi's object ?

I don't think I object to the land %'s. What I object to, and what every decent human too should object to, is the borders. This is why I agree with pres. Carter's one state solution, which you nationalist socialist Jew con masters will never accept. Moreover, also the other American presidents earlier, even Wilson, spoke up against new borders and called them absurd. The Judeo communist bullies, starting with ww1, invented new borders to help themselves to a huge loot, and now they want even more borders to keep their ill gotten loot, so their puppets, the brexiters are mobilized. But you are right, the pyramid of con engineering for borders may easily go much higher than the Jews, and to follow the money to such heights may easily kill the investigative journalist. One thing is obvious though, the Bible clearly states, that moving border stones is theft.

 

[Phoenall]

Thread where Phoenall praises Polish nationalists:
75k Polish Nationalists march


Read the posts, in particular page 15 and 16 here, in both threads and click on the links.

No posts by me in that link were I praise Polish nationalists, why do you LIE ?

 

[Phoenall]

It might not have been my prime subject but it does not mean that I did not get told the facts. You are trying to re-write history and re-draw the borders to suit your nationalist tendencies and forgetting that those you are trying to steal from will oppose you all the way. Why do you stop at pre WW1 for your cut off date why not pre islamic invasion or pre Roman empire. Is it because they would give you nothing as your country did not exist back then, or is it that you wont get the cream of the land to steal.

All wars in Europe had the civilians as combatants, it is how wars were fought right up until WW1 when it stopped and clear lines were drawn. Well I want the paleolithic as the turning point because it give me an advantage over you. Dont like it then get a life.

It still wasnt a crime in reality as the law was never ratified, leaving you with STUPID engraved in your forehead. And it was post WW2 that saw any attempts at formalising war and genocide as a war crime, Again showing that you are far from being educated in the reality.

I have perpetrated nothing on anyone, it was those who came before me and I am not guilty of their crimes. So dig them up, resurrect them and tell them your woes. But how will the UK leaving the neo marxist ran EU cause any problems for anyone that is prepared to work at making it better. Why should I be denied health care that I have paid for yet scroungers and criminals from Poland get it on demand and they have not paid a penny. When you understand this then you will see that Brexit is right and proper for the UK. And sod the rest of Europe that will lose the UK welfare that kept them afloat, start going after your leaders for the money they have secreted into swiss bank accounts for when the bubble bursts.

Therer will be no result as there is no divide and conquer, we are not as devious as you are we just want control back where it belongs. IN OUR HANDS

Apart from that I have already answered your points here in my previous post, I can only say that you make a liar out of yourself by repeating the lies that the nationalists of the entente have been drilling into your head for the latest 100 years.

When you take other people's money (or land), they will come for it. No matter how many lies you convince yourself of, to keep your loot.

I suggest you read about your prime minister Chamberlain, the one you and your fellow goons love to hate.

And have you shown these lies to be that, or have you just shouted down anyone that disagrees with you. No evidence of them being lies makes you the LIAR

Sounds very much like the islamonazi mantra that the Jews have stolen the arab lands when the reality is the arab's never owned the land in the first place

What is there to read about him, he made a statement that was shown later to be false. Just like Blair did, and Brown after him. All politicians get caught out at some time or other, but it seems that left wing ones get caught out more often

Haha, this is funny, the con men are asking the others to prove the con. Hehehe.

Chamberlain has shown by taking down Czechoslovakia, that you can give back what you steal.

But the Palestine situation is different. Even there though, the enemies became real enemies only after the entente created borders there.

And it is obvious that you are the con man here

WRONG

No it is an invented people claiming an invented nation because their god told them to in 630 C.E. Under international law the Jews were granted 22% of palestine and the arab muslims 78%, that is fair in most peoples eyes so why do you and the islamonazi's object ?

I don't think I object to the land %'s. What I object to, and what every decent human too should object to, is the borders. This is why I agree with pres. Carter's one state solution, which you nationalist socialist Jew con masters will never accept. Moreover, also the other American presidents earlier, even Wilson, spoke up against new borders and called them absurd. The Judeo communist bullies, starting with ww1, invented new borders to help themselves to a huge loot, and now they want even more borders to keep their ill gotten loot, so their puppets, the brexiters are mobilized. But you are right, the pyramid of con engineering for borders may easily go much higher than the Jews, and to follow the money to such heights may easily kill the investigative journalist. One thing is obvious though, the Bible clearly states, that moving border stones is theft.

You object to seeing the greener grass on the other mans plot, so rather than work hard on yours you would rather take his by force and destroy it. Who are these so called Judeo communists as the evidence shows the majority were white Russians from the middle classes and not a link to Judaism at all. You are wrong as we dont want more borders, just the right to enforce the ones already in place. It is the pro Euro's that want more borders so they can freeze out those that oppose them and then take their land when they engineer a war. And you want to remove the border stones so there are no borders at all.

 

[xyz]

Thread where Phoenall praises Polish nationalists:
75k Polish Nationalists march


Read the posts, in particular page 15 and 16 here, in both threads and click on the links.

No posts by me in that link were I praise Polish nationalists, why do you LIE ?

Not directly, but you criticize their opponents, the anti-Nazi counter-demonstrators, the ones in the link in the original post, for example.

 

[Phoenall]

Thread where Phoenall praises Polish nationalists:
75k Polish Nationalists march


Read the posts, in particular page 15 and 16 here, in both threads and click on the links.

No posts by me in that link were I praise Polish nationalists, why do you LIE ?

Not directly, but you criticize their opponents, the anti-Nazi counter-demonstrators, the ones in the link in the original post, for example.

Now you are changing your words because you knowyou are telling lies. I did not do that either, so WHY DO YOU LIE ?

 

[anotherlife]

Apart from that I have already answered your points here in my previous post, I can only say that you make a liar out of yourself by repeating the lies that the nationalists of the entente have been drilling into your head for the latest 100 years.

When you take other people's money (or land), they will come for it. No matter how many lies you convince yourself of, to keep your loot.

I suggest you read about your prime minister Chamberlain, the one you and your fellow goons love to hate.

And have you shown these lies to be that, or have you just shouted down anyone that disagrees with you. No evidence of them being lies makes you the LIAR

Sounds very much like the islamonazi mantra that the Jews have stolen the arab lands when the reality is the arab's never owned the land in the first place

What is there to read about him, he made a statement that was shown later to be false. Just like Blair did, and Brown after him. All politicians get caught out at some time or other, but it seems that left wing ones get caught out more often

Haha, this is funny, the con men are asking the others to prove the con. Hehehe.

Chamberlain has shown by taking down Czechoslovakia, that you can give back what you steal.

But the Palestine situation is different. Even there though, the enemies became real enemies only after the entente created borders there.

And it is obvious that you are the con man here

WRONG

No it is an invented people claiming an invented nation because their god told them to in 630 C.E. Under international law the Jews were granted 22% of palestine and the arab muslims 78%, that is fair in most peoples eyes so why do you and the islamonazi's object ?

I don't think I object to the land %'s. What I object to, and what every decent human too should object to, is the borders. This is why I agree with pres. Carter's one state solution, which you nationalist socialist Jew con masters will never accept. Moreover, also the other American presidents earlier, even Wilson, spoke up against new borders and called them absurd. The Judeo communist bullies, starting with ww1, invented new borders to help themselves to a huge loot, and now they want even more borders to keep their ill gotten loot, so their puppets, the brexiters are mobilized. But you are right, the pyramid of con engineering for borders may easily go much higher than the Jews, and to follow the money to such heights may easily kill the investigative journalist. One thing is obvious though, the Bible clearly states, that moving border stones is theft.

You object to seeing the greener grass on the other mans plot, so rather than work hard on yours you would rather take his by force and destroy it. Who are these so called Judeo communists as the evidence shows the majority were white Russians from the middle classes and not a link to Judaism at all. You are wrong as we dont want more borders, just the right to enforce the ones already in place. It is the pro Euro's that want more borders so they can freeze out those that oppose them and then take their land when they engineer a war. And you want to remove the border stones so there are no borders at all.

The nationalists and the communists and the socialists do these crimes. I am a critique of them. The borders currently in place are a result of the theft described earlier. So enforcing any one of them is a license for more theft in the future.

And why would the borders of the U.K. be any different? Or do you think the Irish won't want the northern part of their country back, as soon as the EU mandates border controls on them there?

 

[Phoenall]

And have you shown these lies to be that, or have you just shouted down anyone that disagrees with you. No evidence of them being lies makes you the LIAR

Sounds very much like the islamonazi mantra that the Jews have stolen the arab lands when the reality is the arab's never owned the land in the first place

What is there to read about him, he made a statement that was shown later to be false. Just like Blair did, and Brown after him. All politicians get caught out at some time or other, but it seems that left wing ones get caught out more often

Haha, this is funny, the con men are asking the others to prove the con. Hehehe.

Chamberlain has shown by taking down Czechoslovakia, that you can give back what you steal.

But the Palestine situation is different. Even there though, the enemies became real enemies only after the entente created borders there.

And it is obvious that you are the con man here

WRONG

No it is an invented people claiming an invented nation because their god told them to in 630 C.E. Under international law the Jews were granted 22% of palestine and the arab muslims 78%, that is fair in most peoples eyes so why do you and the islamonazi's object ?

I don't think I object to the land %'s. What I object to, and what every decent human too should object to, is the borders. This is why I agree with pres. Carter's one state solution, which you nationalist socialist Jew con masters will never accept. Moreover, also the other American presidents earlier, even Wilson, spoke up against new borders and called them absurd. The Judeo communist bullies, starting with ww1, invented new borders to help themselves to a huge loot, and now they want even more borders to keep their ill gotten loot, so their puppets, the brexiters are mobilized. But you are right, the pyramid of con engineering for borders may easily go much higher than the Jews, and to follow the money to such heights may easily kill the investigative journalist. One thing is obvious though, the Bible clearly states, that moving border stones is theft.

You object to seeing the greener grass on the other mans plot, so rather than work hard on yours you would rather take his by force and destroy it. Who are these so called Judeo communists as the evidence shows the majority were white Russians from the middle classes and not a link to Judaism at all. You are wrong as we dont want more borders, just the right to enforce the ones already in place. It is the pro Euro's that want more borders so they can freeze out those that oppose them and then take their land when they engineer a war. And you want to remove the border stones so there are no borders at all.

The nationalists and the communists and the socialists do these crimes. I am a critique of them. The borders currently in place are a result of the theft described earlier. So enforcing any one of them is a license for more theft in the future.

And why would the borders of the U.K. be any different? Or do you think the Irish won't want the northern part of their country back, as soon as the EU mandates border controls on them there?

They can have it as long as they realise they cant have all the infrastucture put in place by the UK. And then they have to abide by the wishes of the people whether they stay with the union or go with the failed socialist experiment in the south.
Most borders are over 500 years old and have stood the test of time, your plot to have fighting on the borders over such things as customs and taxes is a non runner from the start which is why nations want back controls of their borders

 

[anotherlife]

Haha, this is funny, the con men are asking the others to prove the con. Hehehe.

Chamberlain has shown by taking down Czechoslovakia, that you can give back what you steal.

But the Palestine situation is different. Even there though, the enemies became real enemies only after the entente created borders there.

And it is obvious that you are the con man here

WRONG

No it is an invented people claiming an invented nation because their god told them to in 630 C.E. Under international law the Jews were granted 22% of palestine and the arab muslims 78%, that is fair in most peoples eyes so why do you and the islamonazi's object ?

I don't think I object to the land %'s. What I object to, and what every decent human too should object to, is the borders. This is why I agree with pres. Carter's one state solution, which you nationalist socialist Jew con masters will never accept. Moreover, also the other American presidents earlier, even Wilson, spoke up against new borders and called them absurd. The Judeo communist bullies, starting with ww1, invented new borders to help themselves to a huge loot, and now they want even more borders to keep their ill gotten loot, so their puppets, the brexiters are mobilized. But you are right, the pyramid of con engineering for borders may easily go much higher than the Jews, and to follow the money to such heights may easily kill the investigative journalist. One thing is obvious though, the Bible clearly states, that moving border stones is theft.

You object to seeing the greener grass on the other mans plot, so rather than work hard on yours you would rather take his by force and destroy it. Who are these so called Judeo communists as the evidence shows the majority were white Russians from the middle classes and not a link to Judaism at all. You are wrong as we dont want more borders, just the right to enforce the ones already in place. It is the pro Euro's that want more borders so they can freeze out those that oppose them and then take their land when they engineer a war. And you want to remove the border stones so there are no borders at all.

The nationalists and the communists and the socialists do these crimes. I am a critique of them. The borders currently in place are a result of the theft described earlier. So enforcing any one of them is a license for more theft in the future.

And why would the borders of the U.K. be any different? Or do you think the Irish won't want the northern part of their country back, as soon as the EU mandates border controls on them there?

They can have it as long as they realise they cant have all the infrastucture put in place by the UK. And then they have to abide by the wishes of the people whether they stay with the union or go with the failed socialist experiment in the south.
Most borders are over 500 years old and have stood the test of time, your plot to have fighting on the borders over such things as customs and taxes is a non runner from the start which is why nations want back controls of their borders

Customs and taxes are annoying but indeed they are not a big issue compared to language laws, visa requirements, and institutional discrimination. A border can be around for 500 years but these are the things that begin enforcing it and turn it into a line of fire.

And you are contradicting yourself, because if you say the Irish can have the north back, then you can't say about the wishes of unionists, unless you want to deport them, like a communist or nationalist socialist. Hehe.

 

[Phoenall]

And it is obvious that you are the con man here

WRONG

No it is an invented people claiming an invented nation because their god told them to in 630 C.E. Under international law the Jews were granted 22% of palestine and the arab muslims 78%, that is fair in most peoples eyes so why do you and the islamonazi's object ?

I don't think I object to the land %'s. What I object to, and what every decent human too should object to, is the borders. This is why I agree with pres. Carter's one state solution, which you nationalist socialist Jew con masters will never accept. Moreover, also the other American presidents earlier, even Wilson, spoke up against new borders and called them absurd. The Judeo communist bullies, starting with ww1, invented new borders to help themselves to a huge loot, and now they want even more borders to keep their ill gotten loot, so their puppets, the brexiters are mobilized. But you are right, the pyramid of con engineering for borders may easily go much higher than the Jews, and to follow the money to such heights may easily kill the investigative journalist. One thing is obvious though, the Bible clearly states, that moving border stones is theft.

You object to seeing the greener grass on the other mans plot, so rather than work hard on yours you would rather take his by force and destroy it. Who are these so called Judeo communists as the evidence shows the majority were white Russians from the middle classes and not a link to Judaism at all. You are wrong as we dont want more borders, just the right to enforce the ones already in place. It is the pro Euro's that want more borders so they can freeze out those that oppose them and then take their land when they engineer a war. And you want to remove the border stones so there are no borders at all.

The nationalists and the communists and the socialists do these crimes. I am a critique of them. The borders currently in place are a result of the theft described earlier. So enforcing any one of them is a license for more theft in the future.

And why would the borders of the U.K. be any different? Or do you think the Irish won't want the northern part of their country back, as soon as the EU mandates border controls on them there?

They can have it as long as they realise they cant have all the infrastucture put in place by the UK. And then they have to abide by the wishes of the people whether they stay with the union or go with the failed socialist experiment in the south.
Most borders are over 500 years old and have stood the test of time, your plot to have fighting on the borders over such things as customs and taxes is a non runner from the start which is why nations want back controls of their borders

Customs and taxes are annoying but indeed they are not a big issue compared to language laws, visa requirements, and institutional discrimination. A border can be around for 500 years but these are the things that begin enforcing it and turn it into a line of fire.

And you are contradicting yourself, because if you say the Irish can have the north back, then you can't say about the wishes of unionists, unless you want to deport them, like a communist or nationalist socialist. Hehe.

Read what I wrote again, they cant have what is not theirs. So they would lose all the infrastructure put in place by the UK and have to start from scratch. And you will find that the majority in the north dont want to be part of the south and so the deal stops at the first fence. Those who want to live in the south can do so under current EU laws, so why wont they take the short walk to the border. Could it be the alarmingly high cost of living in the south with rented accommodation costing 3 to 4 times what it costs in the north.

 

[anotherlife]

I don't think I object to the land %'s. What I object to, and what every decent human too should object to, is the borders. This is why I agree with pres. Carter's one state solution, which you nationalist socialist Jew con masters will never accept. Moreover, also the other American presidents earlier, even Wilson, spoke up against new borders and called them absurd. The Judeo communist bullies, starting with ww1, invented new borders to help themselves to a huge loot, and now they want even more borders to keep their ill gotten loot, so their puppets, the brexiters are mobilized. But you are right, the pyramid of con engineering for borders may easily go much higher than the Jews, and to follow the money to such heights may easily kill the investigative journalist. One thing is obvious though, the Bible clearly states, that moving border stones is theft.

You object to seeing the greener grass on the other mans plot, so rather than work hard on yours you would rather take his by force and destroy it. Who are these so called Judeo communists as the evidence shows the majority were white Russians from the middle classes and not a link to Judaism at all. You are wrong as we dont want more borders, just the right to enforce the ones already in place. It is the pro Euro's that want more borders so they can freeze out those that oppose them and then take their land when they engineer a war. And you want to remove the border stones so there are no borders at all.

The nationalists and the communists and the socialists do these crimes. I am a critique of them. The borders currently in place are a result of the theft described earlier. So enforcing any one of them is a license for more theft in the future.

And why would the borders of the U.K. be any different? Or do you think the Irish won't want the northern part of their country back, as soon as the EU mandates border controls on them there?

They can have it as long as they realise they cant have all the infrastucture put in place by the UK. And then they have to abide by the wishes of the people whether they stay with the union or go with the failed socialist experiment in the south.
Most borders are over 500 years old and have stood the test of time, your plot to have fighting on the borders over such things as customs and taxes is a non runner from the start which is why nations want back controls of their borders

Customs and taxes are annoying but indeed they are not a big issue compared to language laws, visa requirements, and institutional discrimination. A border can be around for 500 years but these are the things that begin enforcing it and turn it into a line of fire.

And you are contradicting yourself, because if you say the Irish can have the north back, then you can't say about the wishes of unionists, unless you want to deport them, like a communist or nationalist socialist. Hehe.

Read what I wrote again, they cant have what is not theirs. So they would lose all the infrastructure put in place by the UK and have to start from scratch. And you will find that the majority in the north dont want to be part of the south and so the deal stops at the first fence. Those who want to live in the south can do so under current EU laws, so why wont they take the short walk to the border. Could it be the alarmingly high cost of living in the south with rented accommodation costing 3 to 4 times what it costs in the north.

This is a good study in war and peace, hehehe. What is not theirs? Is Pilsen, where your beer comes from, not the German's who built it? If it is theirs, then why do the Czechs have it now? It was a British (and French) deal to end up like this. But if the Czechs have the right to it now, then south Ireland should have the right to norther Ireland too then, including all that was built there by the uk, as per the same logic.

 

[Phoenall]

You object to seeing the greener grass on the other mans plot, so rather than work hard on yours you would rather take his by force and destroy it. Who are these so called Judeo communists as the evidence shows the majority were white Russians from the middle classes and not a link to Judaism at all. You are wrong as we dont want more borders, just the right to enforce the ones already in place. It is the pro Euro's that want more borders so they can freeze out those that oppose them and then take their land when they engineer a war. And you want to remove the border stones so there are no borders at all.

The nationalists and the communists and the socialists do these crimes. I am a critique of them. The borders currently in place are a result of the theft described earlier. So enforcing any one of them is a license for more theft in the future.

And why would the borders of the U.K. be any different? Or do you think the Irish won't want the northern part of their country back, as soon as the EU mandates border controls on them there?

They can have it as long as they realise they cant have all the infrastucture put in place by the UK. And then they have to abide by the wishes of the people whether they stay with the union or go with the failed socialist experiment in the south.
Most borders are over 500 years old and have stood the test of time, your plot to have fighting on the borders over such things as customs and taxes is a non runner from the start which is why nations want back controls of their borders

Customs and taxes are annoying but indeed they are not a big issue compared to language laws, visa requirements, and institutional discrimination. A border can be around for 500 years but these are the things that begin enforcing it and turn it into a line of fire.

And you are contradicting yourself, because if you say the Irish can have the north back, then you can't say about the wishes of unionists, unless you want to deport them, like a communist or nationalist socialist. Hehe.

Read what I wrote again, they cant have what is not theirs. So they would lose all the infrastructure put in place by the UK and have to start from scratch. And you will find that the majority in the north dont want to be part of the south and so the deal stops at the first fence. Those who want to live in the south can do so under current EU laws, so why wont they take the short walk to the border. Could it be the alarmingly high cost of living in the south with rented accommodation costing 3 to 4 times what it costs in the north.

This is a good study in war and peace, hehehe. What is not theirs? Is Pilsen, where your beer comes from, not the German's who built it? If it is theirs, then why do the Czechs have it now? It was a British (and French) deal to end up like this. But if the Czechs have the right to it now, then south Ireland should have the right to norther Ireland too then, including all that was built there by the uk, as per the same logic.

I dont drink lager, it is foul I only drink beer.

No as they agreed under treaty and international law to seperate part of Ireland to become British. Now that they are being forced to hand everything over to Brussells they want to tear up treaties and claim back the north, along with all that the UK has plowed into it. It is only the minority Catholics that want to join with the south and so they are defeated on number every time. The only way would be an invasion and armed attacks, and this would lead to Ireland being squashed like a bug

 

[anotherlife]

The nationalists and the communists and the socialists do these crimes. I am a critique of them. The borders currently in place are a result of the theft described earlier. So enforcing any one of them is a license for more theft in the future.

And why would the borders of the U.K. be any different? Or do you think the Irish won't want the northern part of their country back, as soon as the EU mandates border controls on them there?

They can have it as long as they realise they cant have all the infrastucture put in place by the UK. And then they have to abide by the wishes of the people whether they stay with the union or go with the failed socialist experiment in the south.
Most borders are over 500 years old and have stood the test of time, your plot to have fighting on the borders over such things as customs and taxes is a non runner from the start which is why nations want back controls of their borders

Customs and taxes are annoying but indeed they are not a big issue compared to language laws, visa requirements, and institutional discrimination. A border can be around for 500 years but these are the things that begin enforcing it and turn it into a line of fire.

And you are contradicting yourself, because if you say the Irish can have the north back, then you can't say about the wishes of unionists, unless you want to deport them, like a communist or nationalist socialist. Hehe.

Read what I wrote again, they cant have what is not theirs. So they would lose all the infrastructure put in place by the UK and have to start from scratch. And you will find that the majority in the north dont want to be part of the south and so the deal stops at the first fence. Those who want to live in the south can do so under current EU laws, so why wont they take the short walk to the border. Could it be the alarmingly high cost of living in the south with rented accommodation costing 3 to 4 times what it costs in the north.

This is a good study in war and peace, hehehe. What is not theirs? Is Pilsen, where your beer comes from, not the German's who built it? If it is theirs, then why do the Czechs have it now? It was a British (and French) deal to end up like this. But if the Czechs have the right to it now, then south Ireland should have the right to norther Ireland too then, including all that was built there by the uk, as per the same logic.

I dont drink lager, it is foul I only drink beer.

No as they agreed under treaty and international law to seperate part of Ireland to become British. Now that they are being forced to hand everything over to Brussells they want to tear up treaties and claim back the north, along with all that the UK has plowed into it. It is only the minority Catholics that want to join with the south and so they are defeated on number every time. The only way would be an invasion and armed attacks, and this would lead to Ireland being squashed like a bug

Okay then I understand. You advocate for war. Posing is an interesting concept. It causes the perpetrator to stick out his head. Maybe soon there is gonna be a bet open for Ireland. I will bet for Ireland, because the EU's 600 million strong headcount biomass will go against the tiny 80 million UK. I would risk a second bet too, that the Irish would get Liverpool as a special war trophy too, which will end Liverpool's Theacherean managed decline.

 

[Phoenall]

They can have it as long as they realise they cant have all the infrastucture put in place by the UK. And then they have to abide by the wishes of the people whether they stay with the union or go with the failed socialist experiment in the south.
Most borders are over 500 years old and have stood the test of time, your plot to have fighting on the borders over such things as customs and taxes is a non runner from the start which is why nations want back controls of their borders

Customs and taxes are annoying but indeed they are not a big issue compared to language laws, visa requirements, and institutional discrimination. A border can be around for 500 years but these are the things that begin enforcing it and turn it into a line of fire.

And you are contradicting yourself, because if you say the Irish can have the north back, then you can't say about the wishes of unionists, unless you want to deport them, like a communist or nationalist socialist. Hehe.

Read what I wrote again, they cant have what is not theirs. So they would lose all the infrastructure put in place by the UK and have to start from scratch. And you will find that the majority in the north dont want to be part of the south and so the deal stops at the first fence. Those who want to live in the south can do so under current EU laws, so why wont they take the short walk to the border. Could it be the alarmingly high cost of living in the south with rented accommodation costing 3 to 4 times what it costs in the north.

This is a good study in war and peace, hehehe. What is not theirs? Is Pilsen, where your beer comes from, not the German's who built it? If it is theirs, then why do the Czechs have it now? It was a British (and French) deal to end up like this. But if the Czechs have the right to it now, then south Ireland should have the right to norther Ireland too then, including all that was built there by the uk, as per the same logic.

I dont drink lager, it is foul I only drink beer.

No as they agreed under treaty and international law to seperate part of Ireland to become British. Now that they are being forced to hand everything over to Brussells they want to tear up treaties and claim back the north, along with all that the UK has plowed into it. It is only the minority Catholics that want to join with the south and so they are defeated on number every time. The only way would be an invasion and armed attacks, and this would lead to Ireland being squashed like a bug

Okay then I understand. You advocate for war. Posing is an interesting concept. It causes the perpetrator to stick out his head. Maybe soon there is gonna be a bet open for Ireland. I will bet for Ireland, because the EU's 600 million strong headcount biomass will go against the tiny 80 million UK. I would risk a second bet too, that the Irish would get Liverpool as a special war trophy too, which will end Liverpool's Theacherean managed decline.

Where did I say that, I said that the Irish would have to invade the north and face the consequences. The demographics are against the south ever getting their hands on the north. The EU would not dare interfere as the US and Russia would come down hard on them. They can have Liverpool and the scousers with our blessing