How should we approach North Korea, a menace to global society?

xomputer

Rookie
Dec 9, 2008
339
18
0

South Korea concluded that North Korea staged the alleged attack on the South Korean warship. Since the attack, the North had denied its involvement in the matter. However, after careful investigation, the joint investigation team found critical evidence that it was indeed the North's torpedo which attacked the warship. The US echoed Seoul's assertion that an international investigation had yielded proof of this issue and vowed to help South Korea engage diplomatically on the matter. North Korean nuclear arsenal is a big threat globally. It's hard to say that even the US is safe from harm.
How should we approach North Korea, a menace to global society?
Countries must engage in cooperating with the South as well as form some kind of aggressive sanctions against the North. Currently the US ruled out North Korea from the terrorist nations list, and I believe that we should start out by putting North back in the list.
Letting North, the axis of evil(many called it), be as it may would certainly bring threat to world peace.

Petition :http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/axisofevil
 
Last edited:
Dumbya invaded the wrong country. He should have asked the Chinese if he could go in. I'm sure they would have been happy for him to do that, then a real threat to world peace might have been put to bed.
 
Dumbya invaded the wrong country. He should have asked the Chinese if he could go in. I'm sure they would have been happy for him to do that, then a real threat to world peace might have been put to bed.

You are a FUCKING retard and a FOOL. You have whined ever since we invaded Iraq but have demanded we do shit like Invade North Korea or Iran. I tell you what you sheep fucking one leg longer then the other mountain boy, tend to YOUR Country and we will tend to OURS. In other words FUCK OFF.
 
Dumbya invaded the wrong country. He should have asked the Chinese if he could go in. I'm sure they would have been happy for him to do that, then a real threat to world peace might have been put to bed.

I doubt Chinese would ever agree with that. They helped North Koreans, so they can "clean the mess" whenever they wish.

I can imagine Chinese would retaliate in case of our invasion.

Oh, by the way ... North can't do anything if we don't count nukes. So I think it's empty threat.
 
First Impeach and throw out of office the fake president and put in office a real President who actually loves his country.
 
Force. A 2,000 pound on the defense building. That's all they will understand.
 
Dumbya invaded the wrong country. He should have asked the Chinese if he could go in. I'm sure they would have been happy for him to do that, then a real threat to world peace might have been put to bed.

So you approve of pre-emptive warfare...:lol:....are you a closet neo-con? :lol:

What is pre emptive about a country threatening war. When did Saddam say he was going to war with the US?
 
Dumbya invaded the wrong country. He should have asked the Chinese if he could go in. I'm sure they would have been happy for him to do that, then a real threat to world peace might have been put to bed.

You are a FUCKING retard and a FOOL. You have whined ever since we invaded Iraq but have demanded we do shit like Invade North Korea or Iran. I tell you what you sheep fucking one leg longer then the other mountain boy, tend to YOUR Country and we will tend to OURS. In other words FUCK OFF.

1) I have never stated that you should invade Iran...in fact I have stated the exact opposite Fatman
2) My argument is: if you are going to use the piss-weak "Saddam was a threat to world peace" argument, then I suggest you bone up true world threats and do something about it. Or was Dumbya just full of shit? (rhetorical question BTW)
3) I'd love you to tend to YOUR country....because you know NZ has military bases all over the world, unlike you, right? And we're always invading countries that have nothing to do with our security under false pretenses to fit a neocon agenda, right? :cuckoo:
 
Last edited:
Dumbya invaded the wrong country. He should have asked the Chinese if he could go in. I'm sure they would have been happy for him to do that, then a real threat to world peace might have been put to bed.

So you approve of pre-emptive warfare...:lol:....are you a closet neo-con? :lol:

What is pre emptive about a country threatening war. When did Saddam say he was going to war with the US?
When he tried to assassinate Pres. Bush senior.
 
Dumbya invaded the wrong country. He should have asked the Chinese if he could go in. I'm sure they would have been happy for him to do that, then a real threat to world peace might have been put to bed.

You are a FUCKING retard and a FOOL. You have whined ever since we invaded Iraq but have demanded we do shit like Invade North Korea or Iran. I tell you what you sheep fucking one leg longer then the other mountain boy, tend to YOUR Country and we will tend to OURS. In other words FUCK OFF.

1) I have never stated that you should invade Iran...in fact I have stated the exact opposite Fatman
2) My argument is: if you are going to use the piss-weak "Saddam was a threat to world peace" argument, then I suggest you bone up true world threats and do something about it. Or was Dumbya just full of shit? (rhetorical question BTW)
3) I'd love you to tend to YOUR country....because you know NZ has military bases all over the world, unlike you, right? And we're always invading countries that have nothing to do with our security under false pretenses to fit a neocon agenda, right? :cuckoo:

A little reminder.

What Democrats said about Weapons of Mass Destruction


"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
- President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
- President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"We must stop Saddam from ever again jeopardizing the stability and security of his neighbors with weapons of mass destruction."
- Madeline Albright, Feb 1, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
- Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton.
- (D) Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, others, Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
- Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
 

Forum List

Back
Top