How Republicans Plan To Rig The Next Presidential Election, In Six Pictures

Let me get this straight, how is it unfair that the tally of votes in congressional districts to determine electoral votes? It seems like it's the ultimate in fairness.
No it is NOT the ultimate in fairness at all. Here's why, in 1 word:

Gerrymandering

It's completely different than the individual popular vote, which can NOT be gerrymandered.
 
Any perceived move to adjust and decentralize the power of large metropolitan area's will be met with resistance by the beneficiaries that depend upon their firm grasp and control. The fact that the surrounding communities have no voice insures their continued support and dominance which was not the framers of the constitutions intent, however, a fact of reality in todays political environment. One can only trust that states will recognize and approve adjustments to restore the power of the vote and restore the voice of all citizens.

So we need to let Cleetus and Clem decide our elections because them big city folks with their edumacation and their culture might actually decide to do some good and they ain't right with Jay-a-zus!
 
If you and I are sitting around playing a game of risk, is it ok to switch the board to candyland mid game?

I found this whitehouse petition about redistricting oversight. http://wh.gov/VbMN

Pass it on
 
Oddball said:
Strange how the socialist kooks shitting themselves over this one have no problem with states moving to award their electoral votes based upon the national popular vote, though.

Anyone who is neither retard or liar -- which leaves out Oddball -- understands that the National Popular Vote Initiative is a completely different thing than rigging by district. The Democratic plan is designed so presidential elections are decided solely by total national popular vote, while the Republican plan is specifically designed to allow a minority to override the total popular vote through gerrymandering.

It's ALWAYS different when dishonest scheming socialist dickweeds like you try to rationalize rigging elections in your favor.

Nothing new under the sun there.
 
Any perceived move to adjust and decentralize the power of large metropolitan area's will be met with resistance by the beneficiaries that depend upon their firm grasp and control. The fact that the surrounding communities have no voice insures their continued support and dominance which was not the framers of the constitutions intent, however, a fact of reality in todays political environment. One can only trust that states will recognize and approve adjustments to restore the power of the vote and restore the voice of all citizens.

So we need to let Cleetus and Clem decide our elections because them big city folks with their edumacation and their culture might actually decide to do some good and they ain't right with Jay-a-zus!

I really love this post. It's indicative of the attitude urban lefties have of the people who feed and clothe them. Is it any wonder that people in rural areas want nothing to do with them?
 
Never did understand the winner take all aspect of this.
I always thought that the electoral vote should be awarded by percentage of the vote.
 
Last edited:
Any perceived move to adjust and decentralize the power of large metropolitan area's will be met with resistance by the beneficiaries that depend upon their firm grasp and control. The fact that the surrounding communities have no voice insures their continued support and dominance which was not the framers of the constitutions intent, however, a fact of reality in todays political environment. One can only trust that states will recognize and approve adjustments to restore the power of the vote and restore the voice of all citizens.

So we need to let Cleetus and Clem decide our elections because them big city folks with their edumacation and their culture might actually decide to do some good and they ain't right with Jay-a-zus!

I really love this post. It's indicative of the attitude urban lefties have of the people who feed and clothe them. Is it any wonder that people in rural areas want nothing to do with them?

The feeling is mutual. Frankly, my parents used to drag us down to visit her relatives down on the farm,and it was like a weekend in hell.

One person. One vote. If the urban areas have more votes, they should decide elections.
 
It is not Gerrymandering,when Dems did it to favor the large cities over the rural areas.
It is not fair or right that larger cities should rule over everyone.
If each county has an electoral vote based on the majorities votes from each county, it would make the minorities votes count for a change.
This would also make it easier for third parities to have a better chance of being elected.
The way both parties have things set up for just them, makes it impossible for third parties to have any sort of a chance.
 
Dems- still paranoid about Republicans "stealing elections" even after they lost the last two Presidential ones....


Carry on, dipshits.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top