How Rail Screws the Poor

[Amelia]

How Rail Screws the Poor
As Los Angeles spends billions on light rail, transit use declines.

The dirty secret of the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) is that it provides some of the finest public transit service in the country. With a network stretching over 1,513 square miles, the MTA runs a fleet of 2,723 buses every weekday, operates trains over 87 miles of track, and carries more than 1 million passengers a day.

The authority’s newest service, the long-aborning light-rail Expo Line from downtown L.A. to Culver City, rides like a dream along its eight-mile route. Shortly after the Expo Line opened in late April, my colleague Scott Shackford and I found Expo Line riders unanimously enthusiastic about the train.

Unfortunately, we also found very few riders. Based on our counts and calculations, we estimated total daily ridership could not exceed 13,000 people. A few days after we rode the rails, Los Angeles County Supervisor Zev Yaroslavsky came up with an even smaller figure of 9,000 daily riders.

Here you begin to see how the MTA is simultaneously increasing operating costs, reducing operating revenue, cutting service for working-class and poor customers, and dismantling a functioning mass transit system, all in the service of a fantasy that was pushed on an unwilling L.A. by wealthy liberals.

Since 2009 the MTA has added eight miles of train service, at a capital cost of about $2 billion. These new trains, the Expo Line and an extension of the east-county Gold Line, carry a total of about 39,000 people a day.

In the meantime, the cash-strapped authority radically reduced bus service twice: It cut bus lines by 4 percent in 2010 and 12 percent in 2011. These cuts were made even though buses move more than four times as many Angelenos as trains do. In 2009 MTA buses carried about 1.2 million riders a day. Multiplying that by 16 percent, we can estimate more than 180,000 people had their service canceled while fewer than 40,000 had service introduced.

read more: How Rail Screws the Poor - Reason.com

 

[Big Fitz]

When the Metropolitan Council who runs the Twin Cities bus and light rail system in MN faced budget cuts, they released a plan to do the following.

1. Rate hike by .50 to a dollar
2. Cut service times and weekend service for all but the most heavily travelled INNER CITY routes.
3. End park and ride express routes (that pay the most money) to the suburbs
4. Layoff every driver under 2 years seniority.

They would continue limited service to the light rail and the heaviest use local lines. Here's the fun part. The route and service cuts 99% of the time were the safest, highest paying and highest revenue lines in the system. They would keep the most dangerous and least paying lines (because people would not pay fares) in the worst neighborhoods. Oh and the rather empty light rail that they're currently expanding to St. Paul at the cost of a billion dollars down the busiest east west road in the city, halving it's capacity due to trains and construction.

Anyone else see a stupidity to this?