How much was the Biden Quid Pro Quo?

Considering Biden's son was never under investigation by the Ukrainians...


the company he worked for was so that means he was too,,,

Well, whether or not he was ever under investigation, at the very least his $50k per month paycheck was being threatened by the Bursima investigation.

Let's ignore the fact that all parties including the EU, the countries within the EU, IMF, ant-corruption activists in Ukraine and the United States all wanted that Ukrainian prosecutor fired due to his unwillingness to actually prosecute corruption.
Also, let us not forget that it was ONLY Joe Biden who offered the quid pro quo of $1billion dollars. Regardless of the motivation of Bursima in hiring Hunter (we all know it was going to be a pay to play scheme), the fact of the matter is that Biden is the one who threatened to withhold aid, not other parties in the EU, not the IMF.
 
Considering Biden's son was never under investigation by the Ukrainians...


the company he worked for was so that means he was too,,,

Well, whether or not he was ever under investigation, at the very least his $50k per month paycheck was being threatened by the Bursima investigation.

Let's ignore the fact that all parties including the EU, the countries within the EU, IMF, ant-corruption activists in Ukraine and the United States all wanted that Ukrainian prosecutor fired due to his unwillingness to actually prosecute corruption.
Also, let us not forget that it was ONLY Joe Biden who offered the quid pro quo of $1billion dollars. Regardless of the motivation of Bursima in hiring Hunter (we all know it was going to be a pay to play scheme), the fact of the matter is that Biden is the one who threatened to withhold aid, not other parties in the EU, not the IMF.

And Joe bragged about doing it. Now you see just how ridiculous the blatant double standard and hypocrisy is among Dem's.
 
Considering Biden's son was never under investigation by the Ukrainians...


the company he worked for was so that means he was too,,,

Well, whether or not he was ever under investigation, at the very least his $50k per month paycheck was being threatened by the Bursima investigation.

Let's ignore the fact that all parties including the EU, the countries within the EU, IMF, ant-corruption activists in Ukraine and the United States all wanted that Ukrainian prosecutor fired due to his unwillingness to actually prosecute corruption.
Also, let us not forget that it was ONLY Joe Biden who offered the quid pro quo of $1billion dollars. Regardless of the motivation of Bursima in hiring Hunter (we all know it was going to be a pay to play scheme), the fact of the matter is that Biden is the one who threatened to withhold aid, not other parties in the EU, not the IMF.

Biden according to him made that statement, nobody said there was no backing from the U.S. government. Let's also be clear, we were advocating for anti corruption advocates within the Ukraine who wanted this guy gone as well.

Now we're actually twisting the arm of a guy who ran on anti-corruption.
 
Considering Biden's son was never under investigation by the Ukrainians...


the company he worked for was so that means he was too,,,

Well, whether or not he was ever under investigation, at the very least his $50k per month paycheck was being threatened by the Bursima investigation.

Let's ignore the fact that all parties including the EU, the countries within the EU, IMF, ant-corruption activists in Ukraine and the United States all wanted that Ukrainian prosecutor fired due to his unwillingness to actually prosecute corruption.
Also, let us not forget that it was ONLY Joe Biden who offered the quid pro quo of $1billion dollars. Regardless of the motivation of Bursima in hiring Hunter (we all know it was going to be a pay to play scheme), the fact of the matter is that Biden is the one who threatened to withhold aid, not other parties in the EU, not the IMF.

And Joe bragged about doing it. Now you see just how ridiculous the blatant double standard and hypocrisy is among Dem's.

I don't see a double standard. There is literally no evidence that this helped Biden's son. Where as getting the president of Ukraine to announce an investigation into a political opponent stinks to high heaven.
 
the company he worked for was so that means he was too,,,

Well, whether or not he was ever under investigation, at the very least his $50k per month paycheck was being threatened by the Bursima investigation.

Let's ignore the fact that all parties including the EU, the countries within the EU, IMF, ant-corruption activists in Ukraine and the United States all wanted that Ukrainian prosecutor fired due to his unwillingness to actually prosecute corruption.
Also, let us not forget that it was ONLY Joe Biden who offered the quid pro quo of $1billion dollars. Regardless of the motivation of Bursima in hiring Hunter (we all know it was going to be a pay to play scheme), the fact of the matter is that Biden is the one who threatened to withhold aid, not other parties in the EU, not the IMF.

And Joe bragged about doing it. Now you see just how ridiculous the blatant double standard and hypocrisy is among Dem's.

I don't see a double standard. There is literally no evidence that this helped Biden's son. Where as getting the president of Ukraine to announce an investigation into a political opponent stinks to high heaven.
The first [Biden] was a direct misuse of his power for his own personal benefit.

Asking Ukraine to investigate possible corruption in their country benefits no one except Ukraine.
 
What was the actual amount of US aid meant for Ukraine that Biden withheld until his son Hunter was cleared of charges and the prosecutor fired? Was the full amount of aid released once Biden's corrupt personal demands were satisfied by the American taxpayers?
$0.00
 
Now we're actually twisting the arm of a guy who ran on anti-corruption.
and to get the new anti corruption president there ....

to involve himself and country in Trump and Giuliani political corruption... how sad... :(
 
Considering Biden's son was never under investigation by the Ukrainians...


the company he worked for was so that means he was too,,,

Well, whether or not he was ever under investigation, at the very least his $50k per month paycheck was being threatened by the Bursima investigation.

Let's ignore the fact that all parties including the EU, the countries within the EU, IMF, ant-corruption activists in Ukraine and the United States all wanted that Ukrainian prosecutor fired due to his unwillingness to actually prosecute corruption.
Also, let us not forget that it was ONLY Joe Biden who offered the quid pro quo of $1billion dollars. Regardless of the motivation of Bursima in hiring Hunter (we all know it was going to be a pay to play scheme), the fact of the matter is that Biden is the one who threatened to withhold aid, not other parties in the EU, not the IMF.

Biden according to him made that statement, nobody said there was no backing from the U.S. government. Let's also be clear, we were advocating for anti corruption advocates within the Ukraine who wanted this guy gone as well.

Now we're actually twisting the arm of a guy who ran on anti-corruption.
That is incorrect. Biden has actually admitted what he did. Take it as a confession if will. Biden said there was no backing from the US government. I was implicit in his threat that he was leaving inside of six hours and if he did not get what he wanted, the money was gone.
 
I don't see a double standard. There is literally no evidence that this helped Biden's son. Where as getting the president of Ukraine to announce an investigation into a political opponent stinks to high heaven.

LMAO ^^^

I know, you don't get extorting a foreign government to dig up dirt on your political opponent is in any way, shape or form normal.
 
Well we know the stupid cokehead got $70K a month job in a field he knew nothing about. That is a lot Quid for the Pro Quo that his Daddy was able to give.
 
the company he worked for was so that means he was too,,,

Well, whether or not he was ever under investigation, at the very least his $50k per month paycheck was being threatened by the Bursima investigation.

Let's ignore the fact that all parties including the EU, the countries within the EU, IMF, ant-corruption activists in Ukraine and the United States all wanted that Ukrainian prosecutor fired due to his unwillingness to actually prosecute corruption.
Also, let us not forget that it was ONLY Joe Biden who offered the quid pro quo of $1billion dollars. Regardless of the motivation of Bursima in hiring Hunter (we all know it was going to be a pay to play scheme), the fact of the matter is that Biden is the one who threatened to withhold aid, not other parties in the EU, not the IMF.

Biden according to him made that statement, nobody said there was no backing from the U.S. government. Let's also be clear, we were advocating for anti corruption advocates within the Ukraine who wanted this guy gone as well.

Now we're actually twisting the arm of a guy who ran on anti-corruption.
That is incorrect. Biden has actually admitted what he did. Take it as a confession if will. Biden said there was no backing from the US government. I was implicit in his threat that he was leaving inside of six hours and if he did not get what he wanted, the money was gone.

Uh, what exactly are you disagreeing with me on?
 
Now we're actually twisting the arm of a guy who ran on anti-corruption.
and to get the new anti corruption president there ....

to involve himself and country in Trump and Giuliani political corruption... how sad... :(

Yep, they are just trying to escape their shackles of corruption and Russian interference and look what we come along and do.
 
I know, you don't get extorting a foreign government to dig up dirt on your political opponent is in any way, shape or form normal.

According to you people no dirt exists so what's the problem? Ouch, that's going to leave a mark. :21:

Asking a foreign government to intervene in our elections by publicly opening up a criminal investigation is what we are talking about. It's illegal.
 
I know, you don't get extorting a foreign government to dig up dirt on your political opponent is in any way, shape or form normal.

According to you people no dirt exists so what's the problem? Ouch, that's going to leave a mark. :21:

Asking a foreign government to intervene in our elections by publicly opening up a criminal investigation is what we are talking about. It's illegal.

When did you decide it was illegal before or after Obama and Hillary did the same thing?
 

Forum List

Back
Top