How many minorities have Republicans alienated?

R

rdean

Guest
Republicans have recently targeted another 180,000 in their voter suppression scheme. Funny, someone noticed that more than 60% of those voters have Hispanic surnames.

Alienate Hispanic voters: Done

Alienate African American voters: Done

Alienate Gay voters: Done

Alienate feminists and many single women: Done

Rick Santorum says "smart people" not welcome in the GOP. So what's left don't consider themselves "smart"?

Since these laws have worked for many elections, why do Republicans feel they won't work now? If they have the best policies, do they need voter suppression?
 
Republicans have recently targeted another 180,000 in their voter suppression scheme. Funny, someone noticed that more than 60% of those voters have Hispanic surnames.

Alienate Hispanic voters: Done bullshit

Alienate African American voters: Done bulllshit

Alienate Gay voters: Done Dont care

Alienate feminists and many single women: Done Feminists....dont care

Rick Santorum says "smart people" not welcome in the GOP. So what's left don't consider themselves "smart"?

Since these laws have worked for many elections, why do Republicans feel they won't work now? If they have the best policies, do they need voter suppression?

The fact is we've been victim to the Goebbles like propaganda of the democrats and their media friends
 
Republicans have recently targeted another 180,000 in their voter suppression scheme. Funny, someone noticed that more than 60% of those voters have Hispanic surnames.

Alienate Hispanic voters: Done bullshit

Alienate African American voters: Done bulllshit

Alienate Gay voters: Done Dont care

Alienate feminists and many single women: Done Feminists....dont care

Rick Santorum says "smart people" not welcome in the GOP. So what's left don't consider themselves "smart"?

Since these laws have worked for many elections, why do Republicans feel they won't work now? If they have the best policies, do they need voter suppression?

The fact is we've been victim to the Goebbles like propaganda of the democrats and their media friends

What propaganda?

None is needed.

Just leave an open mike anywhere conservatives congregate.
 
Republicans have recently targeted another 180,000 in their voter suppression scheme. Funny, someone noticed that more than 60% of those voters have Hispanic surnames.

Alienate Hispanic voters: Done

Alienate African American voters: Done

Alienate Gay voters: Done

Alienate feminists and many single women: Done

Rick Santorum says "smart people" not welcome in the GOP. So what's left don't consider themselves "smart"?

Since these laws have worked for many elections, why do Republicans feel they won't work now? If they have the best policies, do they need voter suppression?
This is a fine example of the Democrats as written below right now today.... Obama is the guilty one currently.. Enough already is what I say to the sharade and unstableness going on. This nation can't be run by the sugared up nursery children any longer, we must have order in this nation once again.

What the democrats remind me of...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Along time ago, there was a situation in a workplace where a line construction company had what is known as a stern manager, who if a crew member asked for a tool, because he claimed that he had broken his, then that manager would ask that crewmen for the old tool before issuing the new one out to him (simple concept right), and if the crewmen couldnot produce the tool he was claiming he had broken, then the tool was issued even so, but a fine was charged for the tool that is now considered lost. The charge was pro-rated of course for example a come-along that would cost $100.00 dollars, would be charged in turn to the crew member for around symbolically $25.00 dollars, and this just to tighten up the ship and breed personal responsibility.. Now doesn't this make since when managing properly a company and it's assets, in order to keep a tight ship, and to make profits, as well as (very importantly) to save jobs because the company is making a profit and looking secure under such a manager ? Yes it does!

Ok, but the employee's didnot like this manager, infact they hated him or loathed him badly, because they wanted him to be more liberal and freerer with the companies assets and/or tools in this case, so they worked every angle that they could on this guy, in order to try and make him look bad, but it all failed or didn't work, because this guy was rock solid.

Soon because of this guy's credentials he had built up, and the stability that had surrounded him it paid off, as he was promoted on up the ladder because of, but he needed a replacement or was expected to pick a replacement in which he soon did. He then picked a replacement, and here is the difference that was found quickly between the two be it him and his replacement. His replacement was a stone cold liberal minded fellow, that was very likeable and was very easy to deal with quickly, infact he was very funny (joking all the time), and he also worked the way he acted, so the men drew a great sigh of relief when this guy showed up on the scene as the other guy's replacement.

The first day on the job, he opened up the tool shed, and said to the men (take what you need, because I know you have been deprived and held back of the things that you have needed), evil grin as he looked upon the men taking what they felt they needed just like kids turned lose in a candy store all of a sudden. He then won them over by opening up this tool shed and making people laugh and laugh it seemed, but his bottom line began to slip, and his profits began to fall, his crews began wanting more and more and more, even beyond what they needed, but they expected it anyway. He began golfing and drinking while on lunch break, and just having the time of his life, while his crews began slipping and losing production, running wild and etc. Soon it all came to an abrupt end, as the party that was started had to end, and order had to be restored, and the lock was put back on the tool shed door. He was soon fired bacause of it all, and the next guy had to come in and repair all the damage, restore order, and put the company and it's employee's back on track again.

This return of order protected the company, it's employee's, and it's long term contract and profits.

Did Bill Clinton take the lock off of the tool shed door, and are we paying for all of that right now or unto this very day ?

Did Obama take the lock off the tool shed door, and begin a reign of unstableness that cannot be sustained much longer, and if so should we be looking for a new manager of this nation again, otherwise if we do find that this has been the case with these democrats? I am for liking people and having fun, but there is the right time and the right place for these things in life to happen, and then there is the wrong time for being funny when we should be serious, so are we crossing lines in all of these things today in America, instead of managing affectively for stability ?
 
Last edited:
For the OP.
thumb-dumbass.jpg
 
Republicans have recently targeted another 180,000 in their voter suppression scheme. Funny, someone noticed that more than 60% of those voters have Hispanic surnames.

Alienate Hispanic voters: Done

Alienate African American voters: Done

Alienate Gay voters: Done

Alienate feminists and many single women: Done

Rick Santorum says "smart people" not welcome in the GOP. So what's left don't consider themselves "smart"?

Since these laws have worked for many elections, why do Republicans feel they won't work now? If they have the best policies, do they need voter suppression?
This is a fine example of the Democrats as written below right now today.... Obama is the guilty one currently.. Enough already is what I say to the sharade and unstableness going on. This nation can't be run by the sugared up nursery children any longer, we must have order in this nation once again.

What the democrats remind me of...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Along time ago, there was a situation in a workplace where a line construction company had what is known as a stern manager, who if a crew member asked for a tool, because he claimed that he had broken his, then that manager would ask that crewmen for the old tool before issuing the new one out to him (simple concept right), and if the crewmen couldnot produce the tool he was claiming he had broken, then the tool was issued even so, but a fine was charged for the tool that is now considered lost. The charge was pro-rated of course for example a come-along that would cost $100.00 dollars, would be charged in turn to the crew member for around symbolically $25.00 dollars, and this just to tighten up the ship and breed personal responsibility.. Now doesn't this make since when managing properly a company and it's assets, in order to keep a tight ship, and to make profits, as well as (very importantly) to save jobs because the company is making a profit and looking secure under such a manager ? Yes it does!

Ok, but the employee's didnot like this manager, infact they hated him or loathed him badly, because they wanted him to be more liberal and freerer with the companies assets and/or tools in this case, so they worked every angle that they could on this guy, in order to try and make him look bad, but it all failed or didn't work, because this guy was rock solid.

Soon because of this guy's credentials he had built up, and the stability that had surrounded him it paid off, as he was promoted on up the latter because of, but he needed a replacement or was expected to pick a replacement in which he soon did. He then picked a replacement, and here is the difference that was found quickly between the two be it him and his replacement. His replacement was a stone cold liberal minded fellow, that was very likeable and was very easy to deal with quickly, infact he was very funny (joking all the time), and he also worked the way he acted, so the men drew a great sigh of relief when this guy showed up on the scene as the other guy's replacement.

The first day on the job, he opened up the tool shed, and said to the men (take what you need, because I know you have been deprived and held back of the things that you have needed), evil grin as he looked upon the men taking what they felt they needed just like kids turned lose in a candy store all of a sudden. He then won them over by opening up this tool shed and making people laugh and laugh it seemed, but his bottom line began to slip, and his profits began to fall, his crews began wanting more and more and more, even beyond what they needed, but they expected it anyway. He began golfing and drinking while on lunch break, and just having the time of his life, while his crews began slipping and losing production, running wild and etc. Soon it all came to an abrupt end, as the party that was started had to end, and order had to be restored, and the lock was put back on the tool shed door. He was soon fired bacause of it all, and the next guy had to come in and repair all the damage, restore order, and put the company and it's employee's back on track again.

This return of order protected the company, it's employee's, and it's long term contract and profits.

Did Bill Clinton take the lock off of the tool shed door, and are we paying for all of that right now or unto this very day ?

Did Obama take the lock off the tool shed door, and begin a reign of unstableness that cannot be sustained much longer, and if so should we be looking for a new manager of this nation again, otherwise if we do find that this has been the case with these democrats? I am for liking people and having fun, but there is the right time and the right place for these things in life to happen, and then there is the wrong time for being funny when we should be serious, so are we crossing lines in all of these things today in America, instead of managing affectively for stability ?

None of the above. It was Bush(43)

U.S. Federal Deficits, Presidents, and Congress
 
The real question is how many times has Obama divided the country but by race , religion, wealth, sexual orientation, American against American like no other president in history!! ...
Republicans have recently targeted another 180,000 in their voter suppression scheme. Funny, someone noticed that more than 60% of those voters have Hispanic surnames.

Alienate Hispanic voters: Done

Alienate African American voters: Done

Alienate Gay voters: Done

Alienate feminists and many single women: Done

Rick Santorum says "smart people" not welcome in the GOP. So what's left don't consider themselves "smart"?

Since these laws have worked for many elections, why do Republicans feel they won't work now? If they have the best policies, do they need voter suppression?
 
Republicans have recently targeted another 180,000 in their voter suppression scheme. Funny, someone noticed that more than 60% of those voters have Hispanic surnames.

And what shecme would that be, got a link or something

Alienate Hispanic voters: Done

Exactly how have they done this?

Alienate African American voters: Done

They want to stay on the dem plantation, so be it, they can stay with no job and dependent, that their choice.

Alienate Gay voters: Done

Yep the dems want congress to redefine marriage but heaven forbid they redefine anything else.

Alienate feminists and many single women: Done

If they can't figure out they don't need the government to provide for them then who gives a shit.

Rick Santorum says "smart people" not welcome in the GOP. So what's left don't consider themselves "smart"?

Since these laws have worked for many elections, why do Republicans feel they won't work now? If they have the best policies, do they need voter suppression?

Of course the definition of merriage as a man and a woman has worked for centuries, but who all of a sudden thinks it isn't good enough anymore. Damn don't you need ID to get married? When you going to object to that?
 
Last edited:
Republicans have recently targeted another 180,000 in their voter suppression scheme. Funny, someone noticed that more than 60% of those voters have Hispanic surnames.

Alienate Hispanic voters: Done

Alienate African American voters: Done

Alienate Gay voters: Done

Alienate feminists and many single women: Done

Rick Santorum says "smart people" not welcome in the GOP. So what's left don't consider themselves "smart"?

Since these laws have worked for many elections, why do Republicans feel they won't work now? If they have the best policies, do they need voter suppression?

Please define "alienated." Is it like "offended?" People who describe themselves by either of these terms are morons.
 
Romney and Ryan have much bigger plans rdean... they are working on alienating majorities...
 

Forum List

Back
Top