How Many Dead Mexicans Equal One Dead Border Patrol Agent?

Regarding your third point:

From CBS not a conspiracy website.


December 7, 2011 1:44 PM

Documents: ATF used "Fast and Furious" to make the case for gun regulations

By Sharyl Attkisson


Guns recovered by ATF Agents (Credit: CBS)

Documents obtained by CBS News show that the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) discussed using their covert operation "Fast and Furious" to argue for controversial new rules about gun sales.


But wait there's more!


ATF officials didn't intend to publicly disclose their own role in letting Mexican cartels obtain the weapons, but emails show they discussed using the sales, including sales encouraged by ATF, to justify a new gun regulation called "Demand Letter 3". That would require some U.S. gun shops to report the sale of multiple rifles or "long guns." Demand Letter 3 was so named because it would be the third ATF program demanding gun dealers report tracing information.

You getting this? It's not bullshit. This is documented.

Further into the article:

On July 14, 2010 after ATF headquarters in Washington D.C. received an update on Fast and Furious, ATF Field Ops Assistant Director Mark Chait emailed Bill Newell, ATF's Phoenix Special Agent in Charge of Fast and Furious:

"Bill - can you see if these guns were all purchased from the same (licensed gun dealer) and at one time. We are looking at anecdotal cases to support a demand letter on long gun multiple sales. Thanks."


And kazinga! the nail in the coffin.:eusa_clap:

On Jan. 4, 2011, as ATF prepared a press conference to announce arrests in Fast and Furious, Newell saw it as "(A)nother time to address Multiple Sale on Long Guns issue." And a day after the press conference, Chait emailed Newell:

"Bill--well done yesterday... (I)n light of our request for Demand letter 3, this case could be a strong supporting factor if we can determine how many multiple sales of long guns occurred during the course of this case."


The whole article is at the link.

Documents: ATF used "Fast and Furious" to make the case for gun regulations - CBS News Investigates - CBS News

And the reporting of the sale of multiple "long guns" equates to an assault on the 2nd amendment how?

- understand that I guarantee I own more guns than you do, both hand and rifle combined. In fact, I would bet money I own more than every other poster in this thread...combined -

I've only maintained that F&F from what we know at this point in time is that the ATF was looking to provide anecdotal evidence (as in their own words) to enact new legislation re gun control.

The key here is "at this point in time". And most importantly the ATF basically mandated these "multiple sales" .

One more time, think of the bullshit of this.

"Bill--well done yesterday... (I)n light of our request for Demand letter 3, this case could be a strong supporting factor if we can determine how many multiple sales of long guns occurred during the course of this case."

It's devious and disgusting.


One must observe how something is done before being able to explain it to others. His statement can be easily explained as they can now demonstate how its done when theyre NOT looking by showing how its done when they are.

Im going to need more evidence than that of a vast conspiracy to attack the 2nd amendment...no matter what Uncle Teds sheep have to say on the subject.
 
Regarding your third point:

From CBS not a conspiracy website.


December 7, 2011 1:44 PM

Documents: ATF used "Fast and Furious" to make the case for gun regulations

By Sharyl Attkisson


Guns recovered by ATF Agents (Credit: CBS)

Documents obtained by CBS News show that the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) discussed using their covert operation "Fast and Furious" to argue for controversial new rules about gun sales.


But wait there's more!


ATF officials didn't intend to publicly disclose their own role in letting Mexican cartels obtain the weapons, but emails show they discussed using the sales, including sales encouraged by ATF, to justify a new gun regulation called "Demand Letter 3". That would require some U.S. gun shops to report the sale of multiple rifles or "long guns." Demand Letter 3 was so named because it would be the third ATF program demanding gun dealers report tracing information.

You getting this? It's not bullshit. This is documented.

Further into the article:

On July 14, 2010 after ATF headquarters in Washington D.C. received an update on Fast and Furious, ATF Field Ops Assistant Director Mark Chait emailed Bill Newell, ATF's Phoenix Special Agent in Charge of Fast and Furious:

"Bill - can you see if these guns were all purchased from the same (licensed gun dealer) and at one time. We are looking at anecdotal cases to support a demand letter on long gun multiple sales. Thanks."


And kazinga! the nail in the coffin.:eusa_clap:

On Jan. 4, 2011, as ATF prepared a press conference to announce arrests in Fast and Furious, Newell saw it as "(A)nother time to address Multiple Sale on Long Guns issue." And a day after the press conference, Chait emailed Newell:

"Bill--well done yesterday... (I)n light of our request for Demand letter 3, this case could be a strong supporting factor if we can determine how many multiple sales of long guns occurred during the course of this case."


The whole article is at the link.

Documents: ATF used "Fast and Furious" to make the case for gun regulations - CBS News Investigates - CBS News

And the reporting of the sale of multiple "long guns" equates to an assault on the 2nd amendment how?

- understand that I guarantee I own more guns than you do, both hand and rifle combined. In fact, I would bet money I own more than every other poster in this thread...combined -

I've only maintained that F&F from what we know at this point in time is that the ATF was looking to provide anecdotal evidence (as in their own words) to enact new legislation re gun control.

The key here is "at this point in time". And most importantly the ATF basically mandated these "multiple sales" .

One more time, think of the bullshit of this.

"Bill--well done yesterday... (I)n light of our request for Demand letter 3, this case could be a strong supporting factor if we can determine how many multiple sales of long guns occurred during the course of this case."

It's devious and disgusting.

Wow you are projecting and speculating on nothing..there is nothing in that quote that should lead anyone to think they are going after the 2nd amendment.god you are trash
 

Forum List

Back
Top